Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:05:27.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antonin Scalia, William Brennan, and the Politics of Expression: A Study of Legal Violence and Repression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Richard A. Brisbin Jr.
Richard A. Brisbin Jr.
Affiliation:
West Virginia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study of legal politics often attends to the description and explanation of the instrumental politics of legal change or to the mobilization of rights by individual citizens as an act of empowerment beneficial to their individual liberty. Drawing far less attention from the discipline is the privileged construction of a discourse or set of attitudes about rights by the judiciary. I present a case study of the First Amendment opinions of two members of the Supreme Court of the United States to criticize the range of their attitudes about rights and to illustrate how their opinions help construct and legitimate the disciplinary actions that provide order in the modern liberal regime. To preserve order, the justices are shown to use the language of rights as an instrument for the facilitation of violence, repression, and subjection against some litigants, rather than as an instrument for the enhancement of expressive liberties.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 87 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 912 - 927
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkansas Writers' Project v. Ragland. 1987. 107 S.Ct. 1722.Google Scholar
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce. 1990. 110 S.Ct. 1391.Google Scholar
Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc. 1991. 111 S.Ct. 2456.Google Scholar
Block v. Meese. 1986. 793 F.2d 1303 (D.C. Or.).Google Scholar
Board of Trustees of State University of New York v. Fox. 1989. 109 S.Ct. 3030.Google Scholar
Boos v. Barry. 1988. 108 S.Ct. 1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burson v. Freeman. 1992. 112 S.Ct. 1846.Google Scholar
Central Hudson Gas and Electric Company v. Public Service Commission. 1980. 447 U.S. 557.Google Scholar
Community for Creative Nonviolence v. Watt. 1983. 703 F.2d 556 (D.C. Or.).Google Scholar
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop v. Amos. 1987.107 S.Ct. 2862.Google Scholar
Craig v. Boren. 1976. 429 U.S. 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. 1990. 110 S.Ct. 2841.Google Scholar
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith. 1988. 108 S.Ct. 1444.Google Scholar
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 1990. 110 S.Ct. 1595.Google Scholar
Federal Election Commission v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life. 1986. 107 S.Ct. 616.Google Scholar
Freedman v. Maryland. 1965. 380 U.S. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisby v. Schultz. 1988. 108 S.Ct. 2495.Google Scholar
Frontiero v. Richardson. 1973. 411 U.S. 677.Google Scholar
FW/PBS v. City of Dallas. 1990. 110 S.Ct. 596.Google Scholar
Ginzburg v. United States. 1966. 383 U.S. 463.Google Scholar
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier. 1988. 108 S.Ct. 562.Google Scholar
Houston v. Hill. 1987. 107 S.Ct. 2502.Google Scholar
Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Company. 1988. 108 S.Ct. 2138.Google Scholar
Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association. 1988. 108 S.Ct. 1319.Google Scholar
Massachusetts v. Oakes. 1989. 109 S.Ct. 2633.Google Scholar
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Company. 1990. 110 S.Ct. 2695.Google Scholar
Miller v. California. 1973. 413 U.S. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times v. Sullivan. 1964. 376 U.S. 254.Google Scholar
Oilman v. Evans. 1984. 750 F.2d 970 (D.C. Cir.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz. 1987. 107 S.Ct. 2400.Google Scholar
Osborne v. Ohio. 1990. 110 S.Ct. 1691.Google Scholar
Plyler v. Doe. 1982. 457 U.S. 202.Google Scholar
Pope v. Illinois. 1987. 107 S.Ct. 1918.Google Scholar
Rankin v. McPherson. 1987. 107 S.Ct. 2891.Google Scholar
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul. 1992. 112 S.Ct. 2538.Google Scholar
Riley v. National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina. 1988. 108 S.Ct. 2667.Google Scholar
Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois. 1990. 110 S.Ct. 2729.Google Scholar
Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission. 1989. 109 S.Ct. 2829.Google Scholar
Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association. 1988. 108 S.Ct. 1916.Google Scholar
Shapiro v. Thompson. 1969. 394 U.S. 618.Google Scholar
Tashjian v. Republican Party of Connecticut. 1986. 107 S.Ct. 544.Google Scholar
Texas v. Johnson. 1989. 109 S.Ct. 2533.Google Scholar
United States v. Eichman. 1990. 110 S.Ct. 2404.Google Scholar
United States v. Kokinda. 1990. 110 S.Ct. 3115.Google Scholar
United States v. O'Brien. 1968. 391 U.S. 367.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1965. On Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1970. Crises of the Republic. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton S.. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56:947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baynes, Kenneth. 1991. “Violence and Communication: The Limits of Philosophical Explanations of Violence.” In Justice, Law, and Violence, ed. Brady, James B. and Garver, Newton. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1978. Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings, ed. Demetz, Peter. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice. 1987. “Michel Foucault as I Imagine Him.” In Foucault/Blanchot. trans. Melman, Jeffrey. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger. 1987. The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” Trans. Terdiman, Richard. Hastings Law Journal 38:805–53.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Trans. Nice, Richard. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Passeron, Jean-Claude. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. Trans. Nice, Richard. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Brigham, John. 1987. “Right, Rage, and Remedy: Forms of Law in Political Discourse.” Studies in American Political Development 2:303–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisbin, Richard A. Jr., 1990. “The Conservatism of Antonin Scalia.” Political Science Quarterly 105:1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisbin, Richard A. Jr., 1991. “Justice Antonin Scalia, Constitutional Discourse, and the Legalistic State.” Western Political Quarterly 44:1005–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, Robert A. 1991. “Precedent and Authority in Antonin Scalia's Jurisprudence.” Cardozo Law Review 12:1685–1716.Google Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary J. 1989. “Room for Manoeuver: Toward a Theory of Practice in Critical Legal Studies.” Law and Social Inquiry 14:69–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corwin, Edward S. 1948. Liberty against Government: The Rise, Flowering, and Decline of a Famous Juridical Concept. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, Robert M. 1986. “Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal 95:1601–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 2:210–15.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Foucault. Trans, and ed. Hand, Seán. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1992. “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’.” In Destruction and the Possibility of Justice, ed. Cornell, Drucilla, Rosenfield, Michel, and Carlson, David Gary. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Digeser, Peter. 1992. “The Fourth Face of Power.” Journal of Politics 52:977–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumm, Thomas L. 1987. Democracy and Punishment: Disciplinary Origins of the United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Dumm, Thomas L. 1990. “Fear of Law.” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 10:29–57.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Kobylka, Joseph F.. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard E. 1976. The Practice of Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard E. 1989. Toward a Liberalism. … Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980a. An Introduction. Vol. 1 of The History of Sexuality. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980b. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. Ed. Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1987. “Maurice Blanchot: The Thought from Outside.” In Foucault/Blanchot, trans. Massumi, Brian. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Questions of Method.” In The Foucault Effect, ed. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galloway, Russell W. 1988. “Means–Ends Scrutiny in American Constitutional Law.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 21:449–96.Google Scholar
Garver, Newton. 1968. “What Violence Is.” Nation 207:817–22.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F. 1983. The Modern Liberal Theory of Man. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1961. The Federalist. Ed. Cooke, Jacob E.. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, Edward V. 1987. “Justice Brennan and Freedom of Expression Doctrine in the Burger Court.” San Diego Law Review 24:1153–83.Google Scholar
Hirsch, H. N. 1992. A Theory of Liberty: The Constitution and Minorities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoy, David Couzens. 1986. “Power, Repression, and Progress: Foucault, Lukes, and the Frankfurt School.” In Foucault: A Critical Reader, ed. Hoy, David Couzens. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan. 1992. “Foucault's Expulsion of Law: Toward a Retrieval.” Law and Social Inquiry 17:1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irons, Peter. 1988. The Courage of Their Convictions: Sixteen Americans Who Fought Their Way to the Supreme Court. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kannar, George. 1990. “The Constitutional Catechism of Antonin Scalia.” Yale Law Journal 99:1297–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kannar, George. 1991. “Strenuous Virtues, Virtuous Lives: The Social Vision of Antonin Scalia.” Cardozo Law Review 12:1845–67.Google Scholar
Ladd, John. 1991. “The Idea of Collective Violence.” In Justice, Law, and Violence, ed. Brady, James B. and Garver, Newton. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1974. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. 1990. Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1990. Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1991. “Law, Boundaries, and the Bounded Self.” In Law and the Order of Culture, ed. Post, Robert. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, Karl. 1971. Law as Fact. 2d ed. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Timothy J. 1981. “The Language of Equality in a Constitutional Order.” American Political Science Review 75: 626–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B. 1984. “Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 26:126–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennock, J. Roland. 1979. Democratic Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas R.. 1991. “A Journey through Forgetting: Toward A Jurisprudence of Violence.” In The Fate of Law, ed. Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas R.. 1992. “Making Peace with Violence: Robert Cover on Law and Legal Theory,” In Law's Violence, ed. Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1987a. “A House with Many Mansions: Categories of Free Speech under the First Amendment.” In The Constitution, the Law, and Freedom of Expression, 1787–1987, ed. Stewart, James Breyer. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1987b. “The Limits of the Law.” New Jersey Law Journal 119(8):4–5, 22–23.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1989a. “Originalism: The Lesser Evil.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 57:849–65.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1989b. “The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules.” University of Chicago Law Review 56:1175–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1990. The Faces of Injustice. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 1992. “‘In Another Kind of Wood’: Michel Foucault and Sociolegal Studies.” Law and Social Inquiry 17:49–56.Google Scholar
Smart, Barry. 1983. Foucault, Marxism, and Critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol. 1989. Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1985. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, David A. 1991. “Tradition, Precedent, and Justice Scalia.” Cardozo Law Review 12:1699–1716.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. 1984. Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1945. Democracy in America. Trans. Bradley, Phillips. 2 vols. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H., and Dorf, Michael C.. 1991. On Reading the Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Michael A. 1972. “Coercion, Space, and the Modes of Human Domination.” In Coercion: Nomos XIV, ed. Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W.. Chicago: Aldine–Atherton.Google Scholar
William, Raymond. 1976. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 1960. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn. 1983. “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of Law in the Legal System.” American Political Science Review 77:690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.