Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:10:58.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Retroactivity of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Altmann v. Austria, 142 F.Supp.2d 1187, 1195 (CD. Cal. 2001).

2 28 U.S.C. §§1330, 1602–11 (2000). The expropriation exception appears at 28 U.S.C. §1605(a)(3).

3 In a 1952 letter sent from the U.S. Department of State to the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. executive branch announced its adoption of the “restrictive” theory of foreign sovereign immunity, meaning that a state should be granted immunity only for its sovereign or public acts. Letter from Tate, Jack B., Acting Legal Adviser, to Philip B. Perlman, Acting Attorney General (May 19, 1952), reprinted in 26 Dep’t St. Bull. 984 (1952)Google Scholar.

4 142 F.Supp.2d at 1201.

5 Landgraf v. USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244 (1994).

6 Id. at 262.

7 142 F.Supp.2d at 1201.

8 Republic of Austria v. Altmann, 317 F.3d 954, 962 (9th Cir. 2002).

9 Id. at 966.

10 Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, at 7–8, 18, Republic of Austria v. Altmann, 2004 WL 1238028 (U.S.June 7, 2004) (No. 03–13) (footnotes omitted).

11 Republic of Austria v. Altmann, 2004 WL 1238028, at *11–12 (U.S. June 7, 2004) (footnotes omitted).