No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2017
1 An admirable recent example is: Jan Hessbruegge, Human Rights and Individual Self-Defense in International Law (2017).
2 See, e.g., Amitai Etzioni, A Communitarian Critique of Human Rights, in Handbook on Human Rights (Thomas Cushman ed., 2012).
3 See Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas v. Austria, App. No. 40825/98, 48 Eur. H.R. Rep. 17 (2009), to which Fellmeth refers on pages 188–89.
4 See generally Henry Shue, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy (2d ed. 1996).
5 See generally Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights (2d ed. 2008).
6 This is often framed as the debate between the so-called “will” or “choice” theory, which insists on enforcement, and the “interest” or “benefit” theory, to whom enforcement is not an essential feature of rights. See, e.g., Matthew H. Kramer, N. E. Simmonds & Hillel Steiner, A Debate over Rights (2000).