Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:47:22.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Internationale Unternehmen im Deutschen Gesellschaftsrecht. By Hans-Georg Koppensteiner. Frankfurt a.M.: Athenäum Verlag, pp. 366. 1971. DM. 5.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Detlev F. Vagts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , July 1972 , pp. 683 - 685
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 E.g., Servan-Schreiber, The American Challenge (1968); Torem, and Craig, , “Developments in the Control of Foreign Investment in France,” 70 Mich. Law Re. 285, 313 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, note that American investment in Germany is in fact twice that in France.

2 See, e.g., Noyes, Intercorporate Relationships (1902).

3 Ripley v. International Railways of Central America, 8 N.Y. 2d 430, 171 N.E.2d 443, 209 N.Y.S.2d 289 (1960); Sinclair Oil Corp. v. Levien, 280 At.2d 717 (Del. Sup. Ct., 1971).

4 Hausman v. Buckley, 299 F.2d 696 (2d Cir., 1962), cert, denied, 369 U.S. 885 (1962).

5 For an American explanation of these rules, see Haskell, “New West German Law of ‘Related Business Units’,” 24 Business Lawyer 421 (1969).

6 Described in Craig, , “Application of the Trading with the Enemy Act to Foreign Corporations Owned by Americans: Reflections on Fruehauf v. Massardy,” 83 Harv. Law Re. 579 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.