Article contents
Diplomacy of the Quarter Deck
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2017
Extract
The building of the Panama Canal has not been a one man’s work by any means. In its inception the preparation of the field, the elimination of impossible routes, and in the actual construction work, it has drawn forth some of the best brains of the country.
Noted engineers from civil life have had an important influence in determining the locality best suited for the purpose, and also in the plans adopted for building the canal; and the names of these men will go down in history as a part of its constructive force. But as the principal object of building the canal was to augment means for the national defence, it was eminently proper that the Army and Navy of the United States should have paramount influence in its establishment. For nearly forty years naval men have been engaged in surveying different parts of Central America and the Isthmus of Panama to find a practical route which should offer the fewest obstacles in cutting a channel between the two oceans. Finally, by a process of elimination, which brought the problem to a choice between the Nicaragua and Panama routes, the construction of a canal was actually begun by an American company on the Nicaragua line, and the work of construction put in the charge of naval officers.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1914
References
1 Naval Correspondence, Report of the Secretary of the Navy.
2 Naval Correspondence, Report of the Secretary of the Navy.
3 Ibid.
4 Diplomatic Correspondence—Department of State—Enclosure in letter No. 199, Mr. Burton to Mr. Seward, November 5, 1865.
5 Diplomatic Correspondence, Department of State, 1865, Letter 134, Mr. Seward to Mr. Burton.
6 Diplomatic Correspondence, Department of State, 1866.
7 Naval Correspondence, Captains’ letters.
8 Ibid.
9 Naval Correspondence, Letter 4, Admiral Jouett to Sec. Navy, Apr. 17, 1885.
10 Naval Correspondence, Captains’ letters.
11 Naval Correspondence, Captains’ letters.
12 Naval Correspondence, Admirals’ letters
13 Naval Correspondence, Letter of Sec. State to Sec. Navy, Sept. 16,1902.
14 Naval Correspondence, Captains’ letters.
15 Diplomatic Correspondence, Department of State, Hay-Herran Treaty.
16 Diplomatic Correspondence, Department of State, 1903.
17 Naval Correspondence, Captains’ letters.
18 Diplomatic Correspondence, Department of State, Letter No. 277, Oct. 3, 1866, Exhibit F.
19 See ante.
20 Diplomatic Correspondence, Department of State, 1866.
- 1
- Cited by