Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:22:09.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Have Milk Fat Preferences Shifted? Structural Analysis of New York Milk Consumption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Takeshi Ueda  and
Darren L. Frechette
Takeshi Ueda
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
Darren L. Frechette
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consumption of lowfat and skim milk has increased substantially over the past decade. This study investigates whether the change is due to price and expenditure effects or to a more fundamental preference change in milk demand. Parametric and nonparametric analytical approaches provide a comprehensive analysis of structural change in milk consumption in New York State. A nonparametric approach first finds evidence of structural change. A parametric likelihood-ratio test then confirms the existence of structural change using a Kalman filter specification. The value of this technical analysis of milk preferences is its implication for labeling initiatives. Milk fat labels have allowed consumers to act on a new set of preferences, thereby improving consumer welfare.

Keywords

demand systemKalman filtermilk demandrevealed preferencestructural change
Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , April 2002 , pp. 71 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, J. M., and Chalfant, J. A. (1991, July). “Can We Take the Con Out of Meat Demand Studies?” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 16(1), 36–48.Google Scholar
Alston, J. M., and Chalfant, J. A. (1993). “The Silence of the Lambdas: A Test of the Almost Ideal and Rotterdam Models.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, 304–313.Google Scholar
Barten, A. P. (1993). “Consumer Allocation Models: Choice of Functional Form.” Empirical Economics 18, 129–158.Google Scholar
Chalfant, J. A., and Alston, J. M. (1988). “Accounting for Changes in Tastes.” Journal of Political Economy 96(2), 391–410.Google Scholar
Chavas, J.-P. (1983). “Structural Change in the Demand for Meat.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65, 148–153.Google Scholar
Choi, S., and Sosin, K. (1990). “Testing for Structural Change: The Demand for Meat.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornick, J., Cox, T. L., and Gould, B. W. (1994). “Fluid Milk Purchases: A Multivariate Tobit Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76, 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, J. S., and Unnevehr, L. J. (1988). “Demand for Beef and Chicken Products: Separability and Structural Change.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70, 521–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eales, J. S., and Unnevehr, L. J. (1993). “Simultaneity and Structural Change in U.S. Meat Demand.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, 259–268.Google Scholar
Frechette, D. L., and Jin, H. J. (2001). “Distinguishing Transitory Nonlinear Shocks from Permanent Structural Change.” Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. M., and Uzawa, H. (1964). “A Note on Separability in Demand Analysis.” Econometrica 32, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, B. W. (1996, July). “Factors Affecting U.S. Demand for Reduced-Fat Fluid Milk.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21(1), 68–81.Google Scholar
Gould, B. W., Cox, T. L., and Perali, F. (1990, July). “The Demand for Fluid Milk Products in the U.S.: A Demand Systems Approach.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 15(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Heien, D. M., and Wessells, C. R. (1988). “The Demand for Dairy Products: Structure, Prediction, and Decomposition.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70, 219–228.Google Scholar
Houthakker, H. S. (1950). “Revealed Preference and the Utility Function.” Economica 17, 159–174.Google Scholar
Huang, C. L., and Raunikar, R. (1983). “Household Fluid Milk Expenditure Patterns in the South and United States.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 15, 27–33.Google Scholar
Jensen, K. (1995). “Fluid Milk Purchase Patterns in the South: Effects of Use of Nutrition Information and Household Characteristics.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(2), 644–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, K., and Bevins, S. (1991, December). “The Demand for Butter, Margarine, and Oils: A Nonparametric Test for Evidence of Structural Change.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 23(2), 59–63.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D. W., and Lau, L. J. (1975). “The Structure of Consumer Preferences.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 4, 49–101.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. M., Forker, O. D., Lenz, J. E., and Sun, C. H. (1994). “Evaluating Generic Dairy Advertising Impacts on Retail, Wholesale, and Farm Milk Markets.” Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 44(4), 3–17.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. M., and Reberte, J. C. (1996). “Impact of Generic Advertising for Fluid Milk on Demand for Whole, Lowfat, and Skim Milks.” Journal of Dairy Science 79, 2281–2291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnucan, H. W. (1986). “Demographic versus Media Advertising Effects on Milk Demand: The Case of the New York City Market” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural Economics 15, 66–74.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, H. W., Xiao, H., Hsia, C.-J., and Jackson, J. D. (1997). “Effects of Health Information and Generic Advertising on U.S. Meat Demand.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.-Y., Brown, M. G., and Seale, J. L. Jr. (1994). “Model Choice in Consumer Analysis: Taiwan, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76, 504–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, J. E., Kaiser, H. M., and Chung, C. (1998). “Economic Analysis of Generic Milk Advertising Impacts on Markets in New York State.” Agribusiness: An International Journal 14, 73–83.Google Scholar
Meinhold, R. J., and Singpurwalla, N. D. (1983). “Understanding the Kalman Filter.” The American Statistician 37(2), 123–127.Google Scholar
New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets. (1991–1998). New York State Dairy Statistics, Annual Summary. Division of Dairy Industry Services and Producer Security, Albany, NY. Various issues.Google Scholar
Ott, L. (1988). An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis, 3rd edition. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Co. Google Scholar
Raunikar, R., and Huang, C.-L. (1984). “Characteristics of Fluid Milk Expenditure Patterns in the Northeast Region. “Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council 13, 54–59.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1938). “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumers’ Behaviour.” Economica 5, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tegene, A. (1990). “The Kalman Filter Approach for Testing Structural Change in the Demand for Alcoholic Beverages in the U.S.” Applied Economics 22, 1407–1416.Google Scholar
Thurman, W. N. (1987). “The Poultry Market: Demand Stability and Industry Structure.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69, 30–37.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (1970–1999). Food Consumption, Prices, and Expenditures. USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington, DC. various issues.Google Scholar
Vande Kamp, P. R., and Kaiser, H. M. (2000). “Optimal Temporal Policies in Fluid Milk Advertising.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(2), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1982). “The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis.” Econometrica 50(4), 940–973.Google Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1983). “Non-parametric Tests of Consumer Behavior.” Review of Economic Studies 50, 99–110.Google Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd edition. New York: W. W. Norton and Co. Google Scholar