Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:48:45.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taranis and beyond: inspiring aerodynamic capability

Part of: RAeS Lanchester Lecture Papers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

C. Lee
C. Lee*
Affiliation:
BAE Systems, Warton, UK
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his 1916 book, Aircraft in Warfare, the Dawn of the Fourth Arm, F.W. Lanchester wrote:

“The supremacy of British aircraft can only be maintained by the adoption of a thoroughly progressive constructional policy, guided constantly by the most recent scientific discovery and research, and by utilising to the full information and experience gained in the Services.”

The recent successful flight trials of the Taranis low-observable unmanned demonstrator aircraft provide the latest evidence of the UK’s continued capacity for the entire design, development, manufacture, and flight testing of world-leading combat aircraft, particularly with regard to Aerodynamics. Taranis is both the culmination of many years’ research and development in the UK and a starting-point for the next generation of UK combat air systems.

In this lecture, Taranis is reviewed, in such detail as current sensitivities will allow, in the wider context of UK combat aircraft aerodynamic capability, exemplified by the leading roles taken by the UK in the Tornado and Typhoon programmes and the important contribution made to the development of the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter.

The immediate technical challenges associated with the aerodynamic design and qualification of a low-observable air vehicle are considerable. In this instance they have been compounded by the balanced view taken within the project of trade-offs against many parameters. However, the UK aerodynamics community faces equally stringent challenges in terms of the identification and delivery of the most appropriate future systems; increasingly complex and demanding operational and functional requirements; and, perhaps most of all, maintaining an affordable and cost-effective capability in the face of strict budgetary pressures and austere economic conditions.

Nevertheless, those challenges are accompanied by a wide range of opportunities, namely for national and international partnership; radically innovative engineering solutions and approaches; new thinking; and the engagement of the best minds and ideas in the UK academic community.

Taranis represented a big integration task, requiring a particular set of skills to pull together the total package, resting on a bedrock of mastery of the technical issues. It has been an inspirational experience for those of us who have worked on it. It has demonstrated that the UK is capable of achieving the most demanding current and anticipated military aerodynamic requirements and has signposted the way to an exciting and nationally important future.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 118 , Issue 1206 , August 2014 , pp. 845 - 859
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lanchester, F.W. Aircraft in Warfare, the Dawn of the Fourth Arm, originally published Constable and Co, London, 1916; published Forgotten Books, 2012. Section 112, p 172.Google Scholar
2. Shaw, D.E. and Lee, C.S. EAP: Leading a New Generation of Fighters, published in proceedings of Symposium on Aerodynamic Design for Supersonic Flight, Royal Aeronautical Society, London, 19 April 1988.Google Scholar
3 Probert, B. Aspects of Aerodynamic Optimisation for Military Aircraft Design, paper presented at the NATO RTO AVT Symposium on Aerodynamic Design and Optimisation of Flight Vehicles in a Concurrent Multi-Disciplinary Environment, Ottawa, Canada, 18-21 October 1999 Google Scholar
4. McKay, K. Eurofighter: Aerodynamics within a Multi-Disciplinary Design Environment, paper presented at the NATO RTO AVT Symposium on Aerodynamic Design and Optimisation of Flight Vehicles in a Concurrent Multi-Disciplinary Environment, Ottawa, Canada, 18-21 October 1999 and published in RTO MP-35.Google Scholar
5. Liddell, P.W. Supersonic ASTOVL Synopsis, published in proceedings of Symposium on Aerodynamic Design for Supersonic Flight, Royal Aeronautical Society, London, 19 April 1988.Google Scholar
6. Currie, N.C. (Ed), Radar Reflectivity Measurement: Techniques and Applications, Artech House, Norwood MA, 1989, p 30.Google Scholar
7. McMichael, T. and others, Aerodynamic Technology – the role of aerodynamic technology in the design and development of modern combat aircraft, Aeronaut J, December 1996, 100, (1000), pp 411–424.Google Scholar
8. Flux, P. Some Stability and Control Aspects of UCAV Configurations, paper presented at CEAS Aerospace Aerodynamics Research Conference, 10-13 June 2003.Google Scholar
9. Lanchester, F.W. ibid, Section 110, p 167.Google Scholar
10. Anderson, J.D. Jr Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 3rd ed, McGraw Hill, 2001, Section 4.13, pp 340–345.Google Scholar