Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:39:43.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Macro-fiber composite actuators for a swept wing unmanned aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

O. Bilgen ,
K. B. Kochersberger  and
D. J. Inman
O. Bilgen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, USA
K. B. Kochersberger
Affiliation:
[email protected]
D. J. Inman
Affiliation:
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of the research presented here is to exploit actuation via smart materials to perform shape control of an aerofoil on a small aircraft and to determine the feasibility and advantages of smooth control surface deformations. A type of piezoceramic composite actuator known as Macro-Fiber Composite (MFC) is used for changing the camber of the wings. The MFC actuators were implemented on a 30° swept wing, 0·76m wingspan aircraft. The experimental vehicle was flown using two MFC patches in an elevator/aileron (elevon) configuration. Preliminary flight and wind-tunnel testing has demonstrated the stability and control of the concept. Flight tests were performed to quantify roll control using the MFC actuators. Lift and drag coefficients along with pitch and roll moment coefficients were measured in a low-speed, open-section wind tunnel. A vortex-lattice analysis complemented the database of aerodynamic derivatives used to analyse control response. The research, for the first time, successfully demonstrated that piezoceramic devices requiring high voltages can be effectively employed in small air vehicles without compromising the weight of the overall system.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 113 , Issue 1144: Flight structures fundamental research in the United States of America: A Special Issue , June 2009 , pp. 385 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lazarus, K.B., Crawley, E.F. and Bohlmann, J.D., Static aeroelastic control using strain actuated adaptive structures, J Intelligent Materials, Systems and Structures, July 1991, 2, pp 386–410.Google Scholar
2. Roglin, R.L., Hanagud, S.V. and Kondor, S., Adaptive aerofoils for helicopters, 35th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, AIAA 1994.Google Scholar
3. Steadman, D.L., Griffin, S.L. and Hanagud, S.V., Structure-control interaction and the design of piezoceramic actuated adaptive aerofoils, AIAA-1994-1747.Google Scholar
4. Giurgiutiu, V., Chaudhry, Z. and Rogers, C.A., Engineering feasibility of induced-strain actuators for rotor blade active vibration control, Smart Structures and Materials ‘94, Orlando, Florida, USA, 13-18 February 1994, Paper # 2190-11, SPIE Volume 2190, pp 107–122.Google Scholar
5. Giurgiutiu, V., Review of smart-materials actuation solutions for aeroelastic and vibration control, J Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, July 2000, 11.Google Scholar
6. Jha, A.K. and Kudva, J.N., Morphing aircraft concepts, classifications and challenges, Proceedings of SPIE, 2004, 5388.Google Scholar
7. Bartley-Cho, J.D., Wang, D.P. and West, M.N., Development, control and test results of high-rate, hingeless trailing edge control surface for the smart wing phase 2 wind-tunnel model, smart structures and materials 2002: Industrial and commercial applications of smart structures technologies, Proceedings of SPIE, 2002, 4698.Google Scholar
8. Moses, R.W., Weisman, C.D., Bent, A.A. and Pizzochero, A.E., Evaluation of New Actuators in a Buffet Loads Environment, SPIE 8th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, 2001, Newport Beach, CA, USA.Google Scholar
9. Cadogan, D., Smith, T., Lee, R., Scarborough, S. and Graziosi, D., Inflatable and Rigidizable wing components for unmanned aerial vehicles, AIAA 2003-6630, 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, April, 2003, Norfolk, VA, USA.Google Scholar
10. Cadogan, D., Smith, T., Uhelsky, F. and Mackusick, M., Morphing inflatable wing development for compact package unmanned aerial Vehicles, AIAA-2004-1807, 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, April 2004, Palm Springs, CA, USA.Google Scholar
11. Murray, J., Pahle, J., Thornton, S., Frackowiak, T., Mello, J. and Norton, B., Ground and Flight Evaluation of a Small-Scale Inflatable-Winged Aircraft, AIAA 2002-0820, 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 14–17 January 2005.Google Scholar
12. Simpson, A. and Jacob, J., Aerodynamic control of an inflatable wing using wing warping, 35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, 6 – 9 June 2005, Toronto, Ontario Canada, AIAA 2005-5133Google Scholar
13. Lesieutre, G. and Davis, C., Can a coupling coefficient of a piezoelectric device be higher than those of Its active material? J Intelligent Materials Systems and Structures, 1997, 8, (10), pp 859–867.Google Scholar
14. Vos, R., Debreuker, R., Barrett, R. and Tiso, P., Morphing wing fight control via post-Buckled precompressed piezoelectric actuators, J Aircr, 44, (44), July-August 2007, pp 1060–1069.Google Scholar
15. Seigler, T.M., Neal, D.A., Bae, J.S. and Inman, D.J., Modeling and flight control of large-scale morphing aircraft, J Aircr, 44, (44), July–August 2007 Google Scholar
16. Glezer, A., Amitay, M. and Honohan, A., Aspects of low- and high-frequency actuation for aerodynamic flow control, J AIAA, 43, (43), 2005, pp 1501 – 1511.Google Scholar
17. Pern, N.J., Jacob, J. and Lebeau, R., Characterization of zero mass flux flow control for separation control of an adaptive aerofoil, AIAA Paper 2006-3032, 36th Fluid Dynamics Conference, June 2006.Google Scholar
18. Ramakumar, K., and Jacob, J., Flow control and lift enhancement using plasma actuators, AIAA Paper 2005-4635, 35th Fluid dynamics Conference, June 2005.Google Scholar
19. Rogers, E., Schwartz, A. and Abramson, J., Applied aerodynamics of circulation control aerofoils and rotors, annual forum proceedings of the American Helicopter Society, 1985, 2, (41), pp 479 – 490.Google Scholar
20. Acharya, M., Emo, S., Bugajski, D. and Williams, D., Smart vanes for UCAV engine applications, 2nd AIAA Flow Control Conference, 28 June – 1 July 2004, Portland, Oregon, USA, AIAA 2004-2516.Google Scholar
21. Santhanakrishnan, A., Pern, N.J., Ramakumar, K., Simpson, A. and Jacob, J.D., Enabling Flow Control Technology for Low Speed UAVs, Infotech@Aerospace 26 – 29 September 2005, Arlington, Virginia, USA, AIAA 2005-6960.Google Scholar
22. Gomes, L.D., Crowther, W.J. and Wood, N.J., Towards a practical piezoceramic diaphragm based synthetic jet actuator For high subsonic applications – effect of chamber and orifice depth on actuator peak Velocity, 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, 5–8 June 2006, San Francisco, California, USA, AIAA 2006-2859.Google Scholar
23. Patel, M.P., Ng, T.T., Vasudevan, S., Corke, T.C. and He, C., Plasma actuators for hingeless aerodynamic control of an unmanned air vehicle, J Aircr, 44, (44), July–August 2007Google Scholar
24. Ifju, P.G., Jenkins, D.A., Ettinger, S., Lian, Y., Shyy, W. and Waszak, M.R., flexible-wing-based micro air vehicles, AIAA Annual Conference, AIAA 2002~0705. January 2002.Google Scholar
25. Waszak, M.R., Jenkins, L.N. and Ifju, P.G., Stability and control properties of an aeroelastic fixed wing micro aerial vehicle, AIAA 2001~4005.Google Scholar
26. Albertani, R., Stanford, B., Hubner, J.P., Lind, R. and Ifju, P., Experimental Analysis of deformation for flexible-wing micro air vehicles, 2005 AIAA SDM Conference, Austin, TX, USA, May 2005.Google Scholar
27. Torres, G.E., Aerodynamics of Low Aspect Ratio Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers with Applications to Micro Air Vehicle Design, Ph.D. Dissertation, Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Dept., University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA, April 2002.Google Scholar
28. Garcia, H.M., Abdulrahim, M. and Lind, R., Roll control for a micro air vehicle using active wing morphing, AIAA 2003~5347.Google Scholar
29. Kim, D.K. and Han, J.H., Smart flapping wing using macro-fiber composite actuators, proceedings of SPIE Vol. 6173 61730F, 2006, pp 1–9.Google Scholar
30. Wilkie, W.K., Bryant, G.R. and High, J.W., Low-cost piezocomposite actuator for structural control applications, SPIE 7th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, 2000, Newport Beach, CA, USA.Google Scholar
31. High, J.W. and Wilkie, W.K., Method of fabricating NASA-standard macro-fiber composite piezoelectric actuators, NASA/TM-2003-212427, ARL-TR-2833.Google Scholar
32. Hagood, N.W., Kindel, R., Ghandi, K. and Gaudenzi, P., Improving transverse actuation using interdigitated surface electrodes, SPIE Paper No. 1917-25, 1993 North American Conference on Smart Structures and Materials, Albuquerque, NM, USA, pp 341–352.Google Scholar
33. Williams, R.B., Nonlinear Mechanical and Actuation Characterization of Piezoceramic Fiber Composites, PhD. Dissertation, Mechanical Engineering Dept., Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 22 March 2004.Google Scholar
34. Bilgen, O., Kochersberger, K. and Inman, D.J., An experimental and analytical study of a flow vectoring aerofoil via macro-fiber-composite actuators, Proc. of SPIE, 6930, SPIE Smart Structures and NDE 2008, San Diego, California, USA, 9-13 March 2008.Google Scholar
35. Bilgen, O., Kochersberger, K. and Inman, D.J., A novel aerodynamic vectoring control aerofoil via macro-fiber-composite actuators, AIAA-2008-1700, 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Schaumburg, Illinois, USA, 7-10 April 2008.Google Scholar
36. Bilgen, O., Kochersberger, K., Diggs, E.C., Kurdila, A.J. and Inman, D.J., Morphing Wing Micro-Air-Vehicles via Macro-Fiber-Composite Actuators, AIAA-2007-1785, 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 23-26 April 2007.Google Scholar
37. Drela, M., AVL 3.26 User Primer, [http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/avl/avl_doc.txt.]Google Scholar
38. Bilgen, O., Kochersberger, K., Diggs, E.C., Kurdila, A.J. and Inman, D.J., Morphing wing aerodynamic control via macro-fiber-composite actuators in an unmanned aircraft, AIAA-2007-2741, AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace Conference, Rohnert Park, California, USA, 7-10 May 2007.Google Scholar
39. AIAA Standard on assessment of experimental uncertainty with application to wind-tunnel testing, S-071A-1995, AIAA, New York, USA, 1995.Google Scholar
40. Kochersberger, K., Wald, Q. and Hyde, K., An experimental and analytical evaluation of the 1911 Wright Bent End Propeller, Paper No. 2000-4122, 18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA, Denver, CO, USA, 14 – 17 August 2000·Google Scholar
41. Hoerner, S.F., Fluid-Dynamic Lift, published by Mrs LISELOTTE A. Hoerner, 1975, (XVI).Google Scholar
42. McCormick, B., Aerodynamics, Aeronautics and Flight Mechanics, 2nd Ed, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1994, p 527.Google Scholar
43. Nelson, R.C., Flight Stability and Automatic Control, 2nd Ed, McGraw Hill, Boston, MA, USA, 1998, p 182.Google Scholar
44. Heeg, J., Analytical and experimental investigation of flutter suppression by Piezoelectric Actuation, NASA. Technical Paper 3241, Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA, 1993.Google Scholar
45. Heeg, J., Miller, J.M. and Doggett, R.V. JR., Attenuation of empennage buffet response through active control of damping. using piezoelectric material, NASA Technical Memorandum 107736, Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA, 1993.Google Scholar