Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:42:56.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identification of a MIMO state space model of an F/A-18 aircraft using a subspace method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2018

S. De Jesus-Mota ,
M. Nadeau Beaulieu  and
R. M. Botez
S. De Jesus-Mota
Affiliation:
École de technologie supérieure Department of Automated Production Engineering Laboratory of Research in Active Controls, Aeroservoelasticity and Avionics, Montréal, Québec Canada
M. Nadeau Beaulieu
Affiliation:
École de technologie supérieure Department of Automated Production Engineering Laboratory of Research in Active Controls, Aeroservoelasticity and Avionics, Montréal, Québec Canada
R. M. Botez*
Affiliation:
École de technologie supérieure Department of Automated Production Engineering Laboratory of Research in Active Controls, Aeroservoelasticity and Avionics, Montréal, Québec Canada
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to determine the mathematical relationship (model) between control deflections and structural deflections of the F/A-18 modified aircraft in the active aeroelastic wing technology program. Five sets of signals from flight flutter tests corresponding to the excited sources were measured by NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. These excitation inputs are: differential ailerons, collective ailerons, collective stabilisers, differential stabilisers, and rudders. The signals to be used by the model are of two types: control deflection time histories and corresponding structural deflections on the wing and trailing-edge flaps. We choose to use the subspace identification method based on reconstructing the observability matrix in order to identify the nonlinear multi-input, linear-in-the-states, multi-output system. We identify models (input/output characteristics) by applying this method for a number of sixteen flight conditions for which the Mach number varies from 0·85 to 1·30 and the altitudes vary from 5,000ft to 25,000ft. Very good results are obtained with a fit between the estimated and the measured signals and a correlation coefficient higher than 90%.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 113 , Issue 1141 , March 2009 , pp. 183 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Voracek, D., Pendleton, E., Reichenback, E., Griffin, K. and Welch, L. The active aeroelastic wing phase I Flight Research through January 2003, NASA TM-2003-210741, April 2003.Google Scholar
2.Lee, D., Baldelli, D., Lindsley, N. and Brenner, M. Static aeroelastic and open-loop aeroservoelastic analyses for the F/A-18 AAW Aircraft, AIAA Paper 2007-213548, April 2007.Google Scholar
3.Pendleton, E., Flick, P., Paul, D., Voracek, D., Reichenbach, E. and Griffin, K. The X-53 A summary of the active aeroelastic wing flight research program, AIAA Paper 2007-185548, April 2007.Google Scholar
4.Kehoe, M.W. A historical overview of flight flutter testing, NASA Technical Memorandum 4720, 1995.Google Scholar
5.Ljung, L. System Identification Theory for the User, 2nd (Ed), Prentice Hall, 1999, pp 340–351.Google Scholar
6.Sung Won, K, TsaiH., M. H., M., Sadeghi, M. and Liu, F. Nonlinear impulse methods for aeroelastic simulations, AIAA Paper 2005-4845, June 2005, pp 1–19.Google Scholar
7.Kukreja, S.L. and Brenner, M. Nonlinear aeroelastic system identification with application to experimental data, AIAA J Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2006, 29, (2).Google Scholar
8.Silva, W.A., Vartio, E., Shimko, A., Segundo, EI, Kvaternik, R. G., Eure, K.W. and Scott, R. Development of aeroservoelastic analytical models and gust Load alleviation control laws of a sensorcraft windtunnel model using measured data, AIAA Paper 2006-1935, May 2006.Google Scholar
9.Le Garrec, C., Humbert, M., Bucharles, A. and Vacher, P. In flight aeroelastic model identification and tuning of a flight control system on a large civil aircraft, CEAS International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Madrid, Spain, June 2001.Google Scholar
10.Galvao, R.K.H., Hadjiloucas, S., Becerra, V.M. and Bowen, J.W. Subspace system identification framework for the analysis of multimoded propagation of THz-transient signals, Institute of Physics Publishing, Measurement Science and Technology, 2005, 16, pp 1037–1053.Google Scholar
11.Brenner, M. and Feron, E. Wavelet analysis of F/A-18 aeroelastic and aeroservoelastic flight test data, AIAA paper A97-24112 05-09, April 1997.Google Scholar
12.Luis, S.B., Da Silva, BOSE, Joao, B.K., and Pinto, O.P., Recurrent Neural Networks based implementation of programmable cascaded low pass filter used in stator flux synthesis of vector controlled induction motor drive, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 46, (3), June 1999.Google Scholar
13.Lennart, L. System Identification Toolbox for use with Matlab®, User Guide Version 6, The Mathworks Inc, 2006.Google Scholar
14.Vanovershee, P. and Demoor, B. Subspace Identification of Linear Systems: Theory, Implementation, Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.Google Scholar