Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:36:54.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of boundary-layers bleeding on unstart/restart characteristics of hypersonic inlets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

J. Chang ,
D. Yu ,
W. Bao ,
Y. Fan  and
Y. Shen
J. Chang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang, China
D. Yu
Affiliation:
[email protected], Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang, China
W. Bao
Affiliation:
[email protected], Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang, China
Y. Fan
Affiliation:
[email protected], Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang, China
Y. Shen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A series of mixed-compression hypersonic inlets at different bleeding rates were simulated at different freestream conditions in this paper. The unstart/restart characteristics of hypersonic inlets were analysed and the reasons why the unstart/restart phenomenon is in existence is presented. The unstart/restart characteristics of hypersonic inlets at different bleeding rates were given. The effects of boundary-layer bleeding on the performance parameter (mass-captured coefficient, total-pressure recovery coefficient), starting and restarting Mach number of hypersonic inlets were discussed. In conclusion, boundary-layer bleeding can improve the performance parameter of hypersonic inlets, and can reduce the starting and restarting Mach number, and can broad the operation range of the hypersonic inlet.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 113 , Issue 1143 , May 2009 , pp. 319 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Campbell, D.H., F-12 series aircraft propulsion system performance and development, J Aircr, 11, (11), 1974, pp 670–676.Google Scholar
2. Seddon, J. and Goldsmith, E.L., Intake Aerodynamics, 1989, AIAA Educational Series, pp 149–168, AIAA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
3. Adams, J.C., Martindale, W.R. and Varner, M.O., One-dimensional unsteady modeling of supersonic inlet unstart/restart, January 1984, AIAA Paper 1984-0439.Google Scholar
4. Mayer, D. and Paynter, G.C., Prediction of supersonic inlet unstart caused by freestream disturbances, AIAA J, 1995, 33, (2), pp 266–275.Google Scholar
5. Neaves, M.D., Mcrae, D.S. and Edwards, J.R., High-speed inlet unstart calculations using an implicit solution adaptive mesh algorithm, January 2001, AIAA Paper 2001-0825.Google Scholar
6. Benson, R.A. and Mcrae, D.S., Numerical simulations of the unstart phenomenon in supersonic inlet/diffuser, June 1993, AIAA Paper 1993-2239.Google Scholar
7. Van Wie, D.M. and Kwok, F.T., Starting characteristics of supersonic inlets, July 1996, AIAA Paper 1996-2914.Google Scholar
8. Zha, G.C., Knight, D. and Smith, D., Numerical investigations of high speed civil transport inlet unstart transient at angle-of-attack, J Aircr, 1998, 35, (6), AIAA, pp 851–856.Google Scholar
9. Cox, C., Lewis, C. and Pap, R., Prediction of unstart phenomena in hypersonic aircraft, April 1995, AIAA Paper 1995-6018.Google Scholar
10. Schmitz, D.M. and Bissinger, N.C., Design and testing of fixedgeometry hypersonic intakes, April 1998, AIAA Paper 1998-1529.Google Scholar
11. Reinhartz, B.U. and Herrmann, C.D., Aerodynamic performance analysis of a hypersonic inlet isolator using computation and experiment, J Propul and Power, 2003, 19, (5), pp 868–875.Google Scholar
12. Emani, S. and Trexler, C.A., Experimental investigation of inlet combustor isolators for a dual-mode scramjet at a Mach number of 4, May 1995, NASA Technical Paper 3502.Google Scholar
13. Yu, D., Chang, J., Bao, W. and Xie, Z., Optimal classifications criterions of hypersonic inlet start/unstart, J Propul and Power, 2007, 23, (2), pp 310–316.Google Scholar
14. Chang, J., Yu, D., Bao, W., Fan, Y. and Shen, Y., Operation pattern classification of hypersonic inlets, Acta Astronautica, Accepted for publication.Google Scholar
15. Chang, J., Yu, D., Bao, W. and Qu, L., Dimensionless analysis of the unstart boundary for 2D mixed hypersonic inlets, Aeronaut J, 2008, 112, (1135), pp 547–555.Google Scholar
16. Chang, J., Yu, D., Bao, W., Xie, Z. and Fan, Y., A CFD assessment of classifications for hypersonic inlet start/unstart phenomena, Aeronaut J, 2009, Accepted for publication.Google Scholar
17. Tan, H. and Guo, R., Experimental study of the unstable–unstarted condition of a hypersonic inlet at Mach 6, J Propul and Power, 2007, 23, (4), pp 783–788.Google Scholar
18. Tan, H., Sun, S. and Yin, Z., Oscillatory flows of rectangular hypersonic inlet unstart caused by downstream mass-flow choking, J Propul and Power, 2009, 25, (1), pp 138–147.Google Scholar
19. Wagner, J.L. and Valdivia, A., An experimental investigation of supersonic inlet unstart, June 2007, AIAA Paper 2007-4352.Google Scholar
20. Cui, T., Yu, D., Chang, J. and Bao, W., Topological geometry interpretation of hypersonic inlet start/unstart-catastrophe, hysteresis and bifurcation, J Aircr, 2008, 45, (4), pp 1464–1468.Google Scholar
21. Reinartz., B.U. and Herrmann, C.D., Aerodynamic performance analysis of a hypersonic inlet isolator using computation and experiment, J Propulsion and Power, 2003, 19, (5), pp 868–875.Google Scholar
22. Herrmann, C. D. and Kosvhel, W. W. Experimental investigation of the internal compression of a hypersonic intake, AIAA Paper 2002-4130.Google Scholar
23. Morris, M.J., Experimental Investigation of normal shock/turbulent boundary layer interactions with and without mass removal, AIAA J, 1992, 30, (2), pp 359–366.Google Scholar
24. Delery, J.M., Shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction and its control, Prog in Aerospace Sciences, 1985, 22, pp 209–280.Google Scholar
25. Smith, A.N., Control of normal shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction using streamwise grooves, 2002, AIAA Paper 2002-0978.Google Scholar
26. Hafenrichter, E.S. and Lee, Y., Experiments on normal shock/boundary layer interaction control using aeroelastic mesoflaps, 2001, AIAA Paper 2001-0156.Google Scholar
27. Mitani, T., Sakuranaka, N., Tomioka, S. and Kobayashi, K., Boundary-layer control in Mach 4 and Mach 6 scramjet engines, J Propul and Power, 2005, 21, (4), pp 636–641.Google Scholar
28. Shih, T., Rimlinger, M. J. and Chyu, W. J.. Three dimensional shockwave/boundary-layer interactions with bleed, AIAA J, 1993, 31, (10), pp 1819–1826.Google Scholar
29. Harloff, G.J. and Smith, G.E., Supersonic inlet boundary layer bleed flow, AIAA J, 1996, 34, (4), pp 778–785.Google Scholar
30. Kouchi, T., Mitani, T. and Masuya, G., Numerical simulations in scramjet combustion with boundary-layer bleeding, J Propul and Power, 2005, 21, (4), pp 642–649.Google Scholar