Review process
This journal uses a double-anonymous model of peer review. Neither author nor reviewers know the identity of each other.
Editors' Decisions
The wording of editor’s decisions used by Advances in Archaeological Practice is different than that traditionally used by other journals. Accept, with some level of review is equivalent to Accept with Minor Revisions. Revise and Resubmit for limited review is equivalent to Accept with Major Revisions, Revise and Resubmit for Full Review is similar to Revise and Resubmit, and Reject is Reject.