Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:30:24.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shape theorems for Poisson hail on a bivariate ground

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2016

François Baccelli*
Affiliation:
University of Texas
Héctor A. Chang-Lara*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Sergey Foss*
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University and Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk
*
* Postal address: Department of Mathematics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Email address: [email protected]
** Postal address: Department of Mathematics, Columbia University, 2990 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA. Email address: [email protected]
*** Postal address: School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK. Email address: [email protected]

Abstract

We consider an extension of the Poisson hail model where the service speed is either 0 or ∞ at each point of the Euclidean space. We use and develop tools pertaining to sub-additive ergodic theory in order to establish shape theorems for the growth of the ice-heap under light tail assumptions on the hailstone characteristics. The asymptotic shape depends on the statistics of the hailstones, the intensity of the underlying Poisson point process, and on the geometrical properties of the zero speed set.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Baccelli, F. and Foss, S. (2011).Poisson hail on a hot ground. In New Frontiers in Applied Probability: A Festschrift for Søren Asmussen (J. Appl. Prob. Spec. Vol.48A),Applied Probability Trust,Sheffield, pp.343366.Google Scholar
[2]Baccelli, F.,Borovkov, A. and Mairesse, J. (2000).Asymptotic results on infinite tandem queueing networks.Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 118,365405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Baccelli, F.,Cohen, G.,Olsder, G. J. and Quadrat, J.-P. (1992).Synchronization and Linearity: An Algebra for Discrete Event Systems.John Wiley,Chichester.Google Scholar
[4]Bhamidi, S.,van der Hofstad, R. and Hooghiemstra, G. (2010).First passage percolation on random graphs with finite mean degrees.Ann. Appl. Prob. 20,19071965.Google Scholar
[5]Cox, J. T.,Gandolfi, A.,Griffin, P. S. and Kesten, H. (1993).Greedy lattice animals. I. Upper bounds.Ann. Appl. Prob. 3,11511169.Google Scholar
[6]Foss, S.,Konstantopoulos, T. and Mountford, T. (2014).Power law condition for stability of Poisson hail. Preprint. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.0911.Google Scholar
[7]Gandolfi, A. and Kesten, H. (1994).Greedy lattice animals. II. Linear growth.Ann. Appl. Prob. 4,76107.Google Scholar
[8]Halsey, T. (2000).Diffusion-limited aggregation: a model for pattern formation.Physics Today 53,3641.Google Scholar
[9]Liggett, T. M. (1985).An improved subadditive ergodic theorem.Ann. Prob. 13,12791285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Seppäläinen, T. (1998).Hydrodynamic scaling, convex duality, and asymptotic shapes of growth models.Markov Process. Relat. Fields 4,126.Google Scholar