Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:34:44.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genealogical constructions and asymptotics for continuous-time Markov and continuous-state branching processes

Part of: Markov processes Limit theorems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2019

Thomas G. Kurtz
Thomas G. Kurtz*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin‒Madison
*
Departments of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Wisconsin‒Madison, 480 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706-1388, USA. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Genealogical constructions of population processes provide models which simultaneously record the forward-in-time evolution of the population size (and distribution of locations and types for models that include them) and the backward-in-time genealogies of the individuals in the population at each time t. A genealogical construction for continuous-time Markov branching processes from Kurtz and Rodrigues (2011) is described and exploited to give the normalized limit in the supercritical case. A Seneta‒Heyde norming is identified as a solution of an ordinary differential equation. The analogous results are given for continuous-state branching processes, including proofs of the normalized limits of Grey (1974) in both the supercritical and critical/subcritical cases.

Keywords

Genealogical constructionMarkov branching processsupercritical limitSeneta‒Heyde normingcontinuous-state branching process

MSC classification

Primary: 60J80: Branching processes (Galton-Watson, birth-and-death, etc.)
Secondary: 60F15: Strong theorems 60J25: Continuous-time Markov processes on general state spaces
Type
Original Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 50 , Issue A: Branching and Applied Probability , December 2018 , pp. 197 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2018 

References

[1]Athreya, K. B. and Ney, P. E. (1972).Branching Processes.Springer,New York.Google Scholar
[2]Bertoin, J. and Le Gall, J.-F. (2006).Stochastic flows associated to coalescent processes. III. Limit theorems.Illinois J. Math. 50,147–181.Google Scholar
[3]Cohn, H. (1982).Norming constants for the finite supercritical Bellman‒Harris process.Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 61,189–205.Google Scholar
[4]Doney, R. A. (1972).A limit theorem for a class of supercritical branching processes.J. Appl. Prob. 9,707–724.Google Scholar
[5]Etheridge, A. M. and Kurtz, T. G. (2018).Genealogical constructions of population models. To appear in Ann. Prob.Google Scholar
[6]Ethier, S. N. and Kurtz, T. G. (1986).Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence.John Wiley,New York.Google Scholar
[7]Grey, D. R. (1974).Asymptotic behaviour of continuous time, continuous state-space branching processes.J. Appl. Prob. 11,669–677.Google Scholar
[8]Harris, T. E. (1951).Some mathematical models for branching processes. In Proc. 2nd Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob., 1950,University of California Press,Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 305–328.Google Scholar
[9]Heyde, C. C. (1970).Extension of a result of Seneta for the super-critical Galton‒Watson process.Ann. Math. Statist. 41,739–742.Google Scholar
[10]Jiřina, M. (1958).Stochastic branching processes with continuous state space.Czechoslovak Math. J. 8,292–313.Google Scholar
[11]Kesten, H. and Stigum, B. P. (1966).A limit theorem for multidimensional Galton‒Watson processes.Ann. Math. Statist. 37,1211–1223.Google Scholar
[12]Kurtz, T. G. (1998).Martingale problems for conditional distributions of Markov processes.Electron. J. Prob. 3, 29pp.Google Scholar
[13]Kurtz, T. G. and Nappo, G. (2011).The filtered martingale problem. In The Oxford Handbook of Nonlinear Filtering,Oxford University Press, pp. 129–165.Google Scholar
[14]Kurtz, T. G. and Rodrigues, E. R. (2011).Poisson representations of branching Markov and measure-valued branching processes.Ann. Prob. 39,939–984.Google Scholar
[15]Lamperti, J. (1967).Continuous state branching processes.Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73,382–386.Google Scholar
[16]Levinson, N. (1959).Limiting theorems for Galton‒Watson branching process.Illinois J. Math. 3,554–565.Google Scholar
[17]Rogers, L. C. G. and Pitman, J. W. (1981).Markov functions.Ann. Prob. 9,573–582.Google Scholar
[18]Schilling, R. L.,Song, R. and Vondraček, Z. (2012).Bernstein Functions: Theory and Applications (De Gruyter Stud. Math. 37),2nd edn.Walter de Gruyter,Berlin.Google Scholar
[19]Seneta, E. (1968).On recent theorems concerning the supercritical Galton‒Watson process.Ann. Math. Statist. 39,2098–2102.Google Scholar