Element contents
Series: Elements in the Problems of God
The Trinity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 December 2024
Summary
The doctrine of the Trinity, proclaimed by Christians through the Nicene-Constantinople creed, is foundational to traditional Christian belief and worship of God. But is this doctrine logically coherent? How can there be three divine persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit), each is God, and yet there is only one God? This is a fundamental question for philosophers, but theologians have additional questions. This Element addresses philosophical and theological issues concerning the Trinity: Hermeneutical and Logical problems, Personal Pronouns, Monarchy, Equality, the Greek vs. Latin filioque debate, Real Relations, Unity of Action, Self-Knowledge in the Trinity, and Simplicity. Based on my recent rediscovery of the sixth ecumenical council's (Constantinople III) clarifications of Trinitarian doctrine, this Element introduces Conciliar Trinitarianism and shows how it responds to the issues, including a resolution to the fundamental logical question. It also compares Conciliar Trinitarianism with Miaphysite, neo-Sabellian, Social, and other models of the Trinity.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in the Problems of GodOnline ISBN: 9781009293105Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 16 January 2025
References
Abramowski, Luise and Goodman, Alan E. (1972). A Nestorian Collection of Christological Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter (2020). Yahya Ibn ‘Adi against Al-Kindi on the Trinity. Journal of Eastern Christian Studies 72.3–4: 241–271.Google Scholar
Anatoloios, Khaled (2011). Retrieving Nicaea: The Development and Meaning of Trinitarian Doctrine. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1945). Basic Writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas. Pegis, Anton, trans., New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1975). Summa Contra Gentiles IV: Salvation. O’neill, Charles J., trans., South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Athanasius (2011). Letters to Serapion on the Holy Spirit. In Works on the Spirit. DelCogliano, Mark, Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew, and Ayres, Lewis, eds. and trans., Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press: 53–137.Google Scholar
Ayres, Lewis (2004). Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, Karl (2004). Church Dogmatics I.1: The Doctrine of the Word of God. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Basil the Great (1989). The Treatise De Spiritu Sancto, the Nine Homilies of the Hexaemeron and the Letters of Saint Basil the Great. Blomfield Jackson, trans., Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Basil the Great (2011). On the Holy Spirit. Stephen Hildebrand, trans., Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar
Batilo, Xavier (2018). La Distinction gennetos/agennetos dans le Contra Eunomium I. In Gregory of Nyssa: Contra Eunomium I: An English Translation with Supporting Studies, Brugarolas, Miguel, ed., Leiden: Brill: 538–556.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, David (2004). Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branson, Beau (2022). One God, the Father: The Neglected Doctrine of the Monarchy of the Father, and Its Implications for the Analytic Debate about the Trinity. Theologica 6.2: 6–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey (2004). The Trinity. In The Cambridge Companion to Peter Abelard. Brower, J. and Guilfoy, K., eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 223–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey (2008). Making Sense of Divine Simplicity. Faith and Philosophy 25.1: 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey and Rea, Michael (2005). Material Constitution and the Trinity. Faith and Philosophy 22: 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coakley, Sarah (2002). What Does Chalcedon Solve and What Does It Not? Some Reflections on the Status and Meaning of the Chalcedonian “Definition”. In The Incarnation: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Incarnation of the Son of God. Davis, Stephen T., Kendall SJ, Daniel, and O’Collins SJ, Gerald, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, William Lane (2005). Does the Problem of Material Constitution Illuminate the Doctrine of the Trinity? Faith and Philosophy 22.1: 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, William Lane (2009). Toward a Tenable Social Trinitarianism. In Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity. McCall, Thomas and Rea, Michael, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Richard (2004). Scotus’s Parisian Teaching on Divine Simplicity. In Duns Scot a Paris: Actes du colloque de Paris, 2–4 septembre 2002. Boulnois, Olivier, Karger, Elizabeth, Solère, Jean-Luc, and Sondag, Gérard, eds., Textes et Etudes du Moyen Age, 26. Leiden: Brepols: 519–562.Google Scholar
DelCogliano, Mark (2010). Basil of Caesarea’s Anti-Eunomian Theory of Names: Christian Theology and Late-Antique Philosophy in the Fourth Century Trinitarian Controversy. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzinger, Henricus, ed. (1965). Enchiridion Symbolorum: Definitionum et Declarationum De Rebus Fidei et Morum, Editio XXXIII. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Didymus the Blind (2011). On the Holy Spirit. In Works on the Spirit. DelCogliano, Mark, Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew, and Ayres, Lewis, eds. and trans., Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press: 143–227.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John (1956). Ordinatio. Liber Primus. Distinctiones 4–10. Volume 4. Balić, Carolo, Bodewig, Martino, Buselic, Stanislao, et al., eds., Vatican: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.Google Scholar
Ebeid, Bishara (2021). Metaphysics of Trinity in Graeco-Syriac Miaphysitism: A Study and Analysis of the Trinitarian Florilegium in MS British Library Add. 14532. Studia Graeco-Arabica 11.1: 83–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebied, Rifaat Y., Van Roey, Albert, and Wickham, Lionel R. (1981). Peter of Callinicum: Anti-Tritheist Dossier. Leuven: Department Oriëntalistiek.Google Scholar
Emery, Giles OP (2007). The Trinitarian Theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas. Francesca Aran Murphy, trans., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erismann, Christopher (2010). Non Est Natura Sine Persona: The Issue of Uninstantiated Universals from Late Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. In Methods and Methodologies: Aristotelian Logic East and West: 500–1500. Cameron, Margaret and Marenbon, John, eds., Leiden: Brill: 75–92.Google Scholar
de Vitoria, Francisco (1991). The Political Writings of Francisco de Vitoria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Russell L. (2007). The Voluntary Emanation of the Holy Spirit: Views of Natural Necessity and Voluntary Freedom at the Turn of the Thirteenth Century. In Trinitarian Theology in the Medieval West. Karkkainen, Pekka, ed., Finland: Luther-Agricola-Society: 124–148.Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L. (2010). Medieval Trinitarian Thought from Aquinas to Ockham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzus (2002). On God and Christ: The Five Theological Orations and Two Letters to Cledonius. Frederick Williams and Lionel Wickham, trans., Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzus (2003). Select Orations. Vinson, Martha, trans., Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa (1954). The Lord’s Prayer, the Beatitudes. Graef, Hilda C., trans., New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa (1986). Concerning We Should Think of Saying that There Are Not Three Gods to Ablabius. In The Trinitarian Controversy. William G. Rusch, trans., Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press: 149–161.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa (2019). Catechetical Discourse. Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar
Gregory Palamas (2022). The Apodictic Treatises on the Procession of the Holy Spirit. Tagarades: Uncut Mountain Press.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Alois (1975a). “Piscatorie” – “Aristotelice”. Zur Bedeutung der “Formel” in den seit Chalkedon getrennten Kirchen. In Mit Ihm und in Ihm. Christologische Forschungen und Perspektiven. Freiburg: Herder: 283–300.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Alois (1975b). Christ in Christian Tradition: Volume One: From the Apostolic Age to Chalcedon (451). John Bowden, trans., Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Alois (1986). Christ in Christian Tradition: Volume Two, Part One: From Chalcedon to Justinian I. Pauline Allen and John Cawte, trans., Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Alois and Hainthaler, Theresia (1995). Christ in Christian Tradition: Volume 2, Part 2: The Church of Constantinople in the Sixth Century. Pauline Allen and John Cawte, trans., Louisville, KY: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Alois (1996). Christ in Christian Tradition: Volume 2, Part 4: The Church of Alexandria with Nubia and Ethiopia after 451. O. C. Dean, trans., Louisville, KY: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Alois (2013). Christ in Christian Tradition: Volume 2, Part 3: The Churches of Jerusalem and Antioch from 451 to 600. Marianne Ehrhardt, trans., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Nonna Verna (2011). The Trinity and Feminism. In The Oxford Handbook of the Trinity. Gilles Emery, OP, and Levering, Matthew, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasker, William (2013). Metaphysics and the Tri-Personal God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasker, William (2018). Can a Latin Trinity Be Social? Response to Scott M. Williams. Faith and Philosophy 35.3: 356–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasker, William (2021a). Is the Latin Social Trinity Defensible? A Rejoinder to Scott M. Williams. Faith and Philosophy 38.4: 505–513.Google Scholar
Hasker, William (2021b). “Latin” or “Conciliar”, but Still Incoherent: A Rejoinder to Scott M. Williams. Faith and Philosophy 38.4: 540–545.Google Scholar
Hasker, William (2023). In Defense of the Trinitarian Processions. Roczniki Filozoficzne 71.2: 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry of Ghent (1953). Henry of Ghent: Summae Quaestionum Ordinariarum (Reprint of the 1520 edition). St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent (2015). Henry of Ghent’s Summa, Articles 53–55: On the Divine Persons. Roland J. Teske, SJ, trans., Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent (2021). Henrici De Gandavo, Summa (Quaestiones ordinariae) art. LVI-LIX. Wilson, Gordon A., Etzkorn, Girard J., Goehring, Bernd, eds., Leuven: Leuven University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Wesley (2015). Paul and the Trinity: Persons, Relations, and the Pauline Letters. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen R. (2012). Trinitarian Action and Inseparable Operations: Some Historical and Dogmatic Reflections. In Advancing Trinitarian Theology: Explorations in Constructive Dogmatics. Crisp, Oliver and Sanders, Fred, eds., Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan: 60–74.Google Scholar
Hughes, Christopher (1989). On a Complex Theory of a Simple God: An Investigation in Aquinas’ Philosophical Theology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ibn Sina (2007). The Salvation, Metaphysics 2:1–5. In Classical Arabic Philosophy. McGinnis, Jon and Reisman, David C., eds., Indianapolis, IN: Hackett: 211–214.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jonathan (2015). The Ineffable, Inconceivable, and Incomprehensible God: Fundamentality and Apophatic Theology. Oxford Studies of Philosophy of Religion 6: 158–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, R. B. and Wittman, Tyler R. (2022). Biblical Reasoning: Christological and Trinitarian Rules for Exegesis. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Jedwab, Joseph and Keller, John A. (2019). Paraphrase and the Trinity. Faith and Philosophy 36.2: 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John of Damascus (2022). On the Orthodox Faith. Norman Russell, trans., Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar
Koons, Robert and Pickavance, Timothy (2015). Metaphysics: The Fundamentals. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Korta, Kepa and Perry, John (2019). Pragmatics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Spring 2020 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/pragmatics/.Google Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2004a). Anti Social Trinitarianism. In The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trinity. Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, SJ, and O’Collins, Gerald, SJ, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 203–249.Google Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2007). Modes without Modalism. In Persons: Human and Divine. Van Inwagen, Peter and Zimmerman, Dean, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 357–375.Google Scholar
Lombardo, Nicholas E. (2022). The “Monarchy” of God the Father. International Journal of Systematic Theology 24.3: 324–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Can and Shaftoe, Gillian (Forthcoming). Henry of Ghent on the Relational Character of Causal Powers. Journal of the History of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Neuner, J., SJ., and Dupuis, J., SJ (1982). The Christian Faith in the Doctrinal Documents of the Catholic Church: Revised Edition. New York: Alba House.Google Scholar
Maspero, Giulio (2023a). The Cappadocian Reshaping of Metaphysics: Relational Being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maspero, Giulio (2023b). Rethinking the Filioque with the Greek Fathers. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
McCall, Thomas (2010). Which Trinity? Whose Monotheism? Philosophical and Systematic Theologians on the Metaphysics of Trinitarian Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
McCall, Thomas (2012). Trinity Doctrine, Plain and Simple. In Advancing Trinitarian Theology: Explorations in Constructive Dogmatics. Crisp, Oliver and Sanders, Fred, eds., Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan: 42–59.Google Scholar
Mosser, Carl (2009). Fully Social Trinitarianism. In Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity. McCall, Thomas and Rea, Michael, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Richard A. (2003). Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics: The Rise and Development of Reformed Orthodoxy, ca. 1520 to ca. 1725 (4 vols.). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Mullins, R. T. (2023). The Trinitarian Processions. Roczniki Filozoficzne 71.2: 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Origen of Alexandria (1992). Treatise on the Passover and Dialogue of Origen with Heraclides and His Fellow Bishops on the Father, the Son, and the Soul. Robert J. Daly, SJ, trans., New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Otto, J. C. T. (1881). Corpus Apologetarum Christianorum Saeculi Secundi. Vol. 5, 3rd edition, Jena: Mauke. http://stephanus.tlg.uci.edu/Iris/Cite?0646:009:19150.Google Scholar
Paasch, J T. (2010). Arius and Athanasius on the Production of God’s Son. Faith and Philosophy 27.4: 382–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paasch, J T. (2012). Divine Production in Late Medieval Trinitarian Theology: Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Meghan D. (2021). Detachment Issues: A Dilemma for Beall’s Contradictory Christology. Journal of Analytic Theology 9: 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadakis, Aristeides (1969). Gregory Palamas at the Council of Blachernae. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 10.4: 333–342.Google Scholar
Pawl, Timothy (2016). In Defense of Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Essay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percival, Henry R. (1988). The Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Undivided Church. In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, 2nd series, volume 14, The Seven Ecumenical Councils. Percival, Henry, ed. and trans., Edinburgh: T&T Clark: 1–671.Google Scholar
Perry, John (1993). What Are Indexicals? In The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philoponus, John (2017). Fragments on the Trinity. In The Cambridge Edition of Early Christian Writings, Volume 1: God. Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew, ed., and Ellen Muehlberger, trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 359–370.Google Scholar
Pierce, Madison N. (2020). Divine Discourse in the Epistle to the Hebrews: The Recontextualization of Spoken Quotations of Scripture. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platti, Emilio (1994). Yahya ibn ‘Adi and His Refutation of Al-Warraq’s Treatise on the Trinity in Relation to His Other Works. In Christian and Arabic Apologetics During the Abbasid Period (750-1258). Samir, Samir Khalil and Nielson, Jorgen S., eds., Leiden: E.J. Brill: 172–191.Google Scholar
Pruss, Alexander R. (2009). Brower and Rea’s Constitutional Account of the Trinity. In Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity. McCall, Thomas and Rea, Michael, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 314–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew (2009). Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedinger, Rudolf, ed. (1990). Concilium Universale Constantinopolitanum Tertium. Series Secunda, Volumen Secundum, pars prima. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Riedinger, Rudolf (1992). Concilium Universale Constantinopolitanum Tertium. Series Secunda, Volumen Secundum, pars secunda. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. N. W. B. ed. and trans. (1899). The Acts and the Decrees of the Synod of Jerusalem. London: Thomas Baker.Google Scholar
Severus of Antioch (2004). Severus of Antioch (The Early Christian Fathers). Pauline Allen and C. T. R. Hayward, trans., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siecienski, Edward (2010). The Filioque: History of a Doctrinal Controversy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijuwade, Joshua (2021). Monarchical Trinitarianism: A Metaphysical Proposal. TheoLogica 5.2: 41–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijuwade, Joshua (2022). Building the Monarchy of the Father. Religious Studies 58.2: 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Brandon, ed. (2023). The Trinity in the Canon: A Biblical, Theological, Historical, and Practical Proposal. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Spencer, Mark K. (2017). The Flexibility of Divine Simplicity: Aquinas, Scotus, and Palamas. International Philosophical Quarterly 57.2: 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, Scott R. (2023). John. In The Trinity in the Canon: A Biblical, Theological, Historical, and Practical Proposal. Smith, Brandon D., ed., Brentwood, TN: B&H Academic: 177–217.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1994). The Christian God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Norman P., SJ, ed. (1990). Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Volumes 1–2. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Tolkien, J. R. R. (1973). The Hobbit, or There and Back Again. Revised. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Tuggy, Dale (2021a). Trinity. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/trinity/.Google Scholar
Tuggy, Dale (2021b). Hasker’s Tri-Personal God vs. New Testament Theology. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13.1: 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twombly, Charles (2015). Perichoresis and Personhood: God, Christ, and Salvation in John of Damascus. Eugene, OR: Pickwick.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, Christina (2019). Medieval Mystics on Persons: What John Locke Didn’t Tell You. In Persons: A History. Lolordo, Antonia, ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter (2009). And Yet They Are Not Three Gods, But One God. In Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity. McCall, Thomas and Rea, Michael, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 216–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter (2011). Relational vs. Constituent Ontologies. Philosophical Perspectives, Metaphysics 25: 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter (2022). Richard Cartwright on Logic and the Trinity. Theologica 6.2: 112–136.Google Scholar
Van Roey, Albert and Allen, Pauline, ed. and trans. (1994). Monophysite Texts of the Sixth Century, Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 56. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Vigorelli, Illaria (2018). The skesis of the Father and of the Son in the Contra Eunomium I. In Gregory of Nyssa: Contra Eunomium I: An English Translation with Supporting Studies, Brugarolas, Miguel, ed., Leiden: Brill: 538–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierenga, Edward (2004). Trinity and Polytheism. Faith and Philosophy 21.3: 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (2010). Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Henry of Ghent, and John Duns Scotus: On the Theology of the Father’s Intellectual Generation of the Word. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 77.1: 38–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (2012). Henry of Ghent on Real Relations and the Trinity: The Case for Numerical Sameness without Identity. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 79.1: 109–148.Google Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (2013). Indexicals and the Trinity: Two Non-social Models. Journal of Analytic Theology 1: 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (2017). Unity of Action in a Latin Social Model of the Trinity. Faith and Philosophy 34.2: 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (2019). Persons in Patristic and Medieval Christian Theology. In Persons: A History. Lolordo, Antonia, ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 52–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (2020a). In Defense of a Latin Social Trinity: A Response to William Hasker. Faith and Philosophy 37.1: 96–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (2020b). Personhood, Ethics, and Disability: A Comparison of Byzantine, Boethian, and Modern Concepts of Personhood. In Disability in Medieval Christian Philosophy and Theology. Williams, Scott M., ed., Oxford: Routledge: 80–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (2021). Gregory of Nyssa, Conciliar Trinitarianism, and the Latin (or Conciliar) Social Trinity: Response to William Hasker. Faith and Philosophy 38.4: 514–539.Google Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (2022a). Discovery of the Sixth Ecumenical Council’s Trinitarian Theology: Historical, Ecclesial, and Theological Implications. Journal of Analytic Theology 10: 332–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (2022b). Why There Wasn’t, and How There Can Be, a Latin Social Trinity. In Claiming God: Essays in Honor of Marilyn McCord Adams. Helmer, Christine and Craigo-Snell, Shannon, eds., Eugene, OR: Pickwick: 153–174.Google Scholar
Williams, Scott M. (Forthcoming-b). Unity of Essence, But Trinity of Persons: Conciliar Trinitarianism and Analytic Theology. Cockayne, Joshua, McKirland, Christa, and Rutledge, Jonathan, eds., Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.Google Scholar
Zachhuber, Johannes (2020). The Rise of Christian Theology and the End of Ancient Metaphysics: Patristic Philosophy from the Cappadocian Fathers to John of Damascus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by