We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To determine the sound produced by turbulence near an elastic boundary, it is necessary to know the response of the boundary to the turbulence stresses. These stresses not only generate sound but also excite structural vibrations that can store a significant amount of flow energy. The vibrations are ultimately dissipated by frictional forces, but they can contribute substantially to the radiated noise because elastic waves are “scattered” at structural discontinuities, and some of their energy is transformed into sound. Thus, flow-generated sound reaches the far field via two paths: directly from the turbulence sources and indirectly from possibly remote locations where the scattering occurs. The result is that the effective acoustic efficiency of the flow can be very much larger than for a geometrically similar rigid surface, even when only a small fraction of the structural energy is scattered into sound. Typical examples include the cabin noise produced by turbulent flow over an aircraft fuselage and the noise radiated from ship and submarine hulls, from duct flows, piping systems, and turbomachines [26]. Interactions of this kind are discussed in this chapter.
Sources Near an Elastic Plate
The simplest flexible boundary is the homogeneous, nominally flat, thin elastic plate, which supports structural modes in the form of bending waves. The effects of fluid loading are usually important in liquids, where the Mach number M is small, and in this section, it will be assumed that M ≪ 1 and, therefore, that mean flow has a negligible effect on the propagation of sound and plate vibrations.
The sound generated by vorticity in an unbounded fluid is called aerodynamic sound [60, 61]. Most unsteady flows of technological interest are of high Reynolds number and turbulent, and the acoustic radiation is a very small by-product of the motion. The turbulence is usually produced by fluid motion relative to solid boundaries or by the instability of free shear layers separating a high-speed flow (such as a jet) from a stationary environment. In this chapter the influence of boundaries on the production of sound as opposed to the production of vorticity will be ignored. The aerodynamic sound problem then reduces to the study of mechanisms that convert kinetic energy of rotational motions into acoustic waves involving longitudinal vibrations of fluid particles. There are two principal source types in free vortical flows: a quadrupole, whose strength is determined by the unsteady Reynolds stress, and a dipole, which is important when mean mass density variations occur within the source region.
Lighthill's Acoustic Analogy
The theory of aerodynamic sound was developed by Lighthill [60], who reformulated the Navier–Stokes equation into an exact, inhomogeneous wave equation whose source terms are important only within the turbulent (vortical) region. Sound is expected to be such a very small component of the whole motion that, once generated, its back-reaction on the main flow is usually negligible. In a first approximation the motion in the source region may then be determined by neglecting the production and propagation of the sound.
Influence of Rigid Boundaries on the Generation of Aerodynamic Sound
The Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equation (2.2.3) enables aerodynamic sound to be represented as the sum of the sound produced by the aerodynamic sources in unbounded flow together with contributions from monopole and dipole sources distributed on boundaries. For turbulent flow near a fixed rigid surface, the direct sound from the quadrupoles Tij is augmented by radiation from surface dipoles whose strength is the force per unit surface area exerted on the fluid. If the surface is in accelerated motion, there are additional dipoles and quadrupoles, and neighboring surfaces in relative motion also experience “potential flow” interactions that generate sound. At low Mach numbers, M, the acoustic efficiency of the surface dipoles exceeds the efficiency of the volume quadrupoles by a large factor ∼O(1/M2) (Sections 1.8 and 2.1). Thus, the presence of solid surfaces within low Mach number turbulence can lead to substantial increases in aerodynamic sound levels. Many of these interactions are amenable to precise analytical modeling and will occupy much of the discussion in this chapter.
Acoustically Compact Bodies [70]
Consider the production of sound by turbulence near a compact, stationary rigid body. Let the fluid have uniform mean density p0 and sound speed c0, and assume the Mach number is sufficiently small that convection of the sound by the flow may be neglected. This particular situation arises frequently in applications. In particular, M rarely exceeds about 0.01 in water, and sound generation by turbulence is usually negligible except where the flow interacts with a solid boundary [111].
Jets and shear layers are frequently responsible for the generation of intense acoustic tones. Instability of the mean flow over of a wall cavity excites “self-sustained” resonant cavity modes or periodic “hydrodynamic” oscillations, which are maintained by the steady extraction of energy from the flow. Whistles and musical instruments such as the flute and organ pipe are driven by unstable air jets, and shear layer instabilities are responsible for tonal resonances excited in wind tunnels, branched ducting systems, and in exposed openings on ships and aircraft and other high-speed vehicles. These mechanisms are examined in this chapter, starting with very high Reynolds number flows, where a shear layer can be approximated by a vortex sheet. We shall also discuss resonances where thermal processes play a fundamental role, such as in the Rijke tube and pulsed combustor. The problems to be investigated are generally too complicated to be treated analytically with full generality, but much insight can be gained from exact treatments of linearized models and by approximate nonlinear analyses based on simplified, yet plausible representations of the flow.
Linear Theory of Wall Aperture and Cavity Resonances
Stability of Flow Over a Circular Wall Aperture
The sound produced by nominally steady, high Reynolds number flow over an opening in a thin wall is the simplest possible system to treat analytically. Our approach is applicable to all linearly excited systems involving an unstable shear layer, and it is an extension of the method used in Section 5.3.6 to determine the conductivity of a circular aperture in a mean grazing flow.