Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Preface
- Part I A quick look at various zeta functions
- Part II Ihara zeta function and the graph theory prime number theorem
- 6 Ihara zeta function of a weighted graph
- 7 Regular graphs, location of poles of the Ihara zeta, functional equations
- 8 Irregular graphs: what is the Riemann hypothesis?
- 9 Discussion of regular Ramanujan graphs
- 10 Graph theory prime number theorem
- Part III Edge and path zeta functions
- Part IV Finite unramified Galois coverings of connected graphs
- Part V Last look at the garden
- References
- Index
7 - Regular graphs, location of poles of the Ihara zeta, functional equations
from Part II - Ihara zeta function and the graph theory prime number theorem
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Preface
- Part I A quick look at various zeta functions
- Part II Ihara zeta function and the graph theory prime number theorem
- 6 Ihara zeta function of a weighted graph
- 7 Regular graphs, location of poles of the Ihara zeta, functional equations
- 8 Irregular graphs: what is the Riemann hypothesis?
- 9 Discussion of regular Ramanujan graphs
- 10 Graph theory prime number theorem
- Part III Edge and path zeta functions
- Part IV Finite unramified Galois coverings of connected graphs
- Part V Last look at the garden
- References
- Index
Summary
Next we want to consider the Ihara zeta function for regular graphs (which are unweighted and which satisfy our usual hypotheses, for the most part). We need some facts from graph theory first. References for the subject include Biggs [15], Bollobas [18], [19], Cvetković, Doob, and Sachs [32].
Definition 7.1 A graph is a bipartite graph iff its set of vertices can be partitioned into two disjoint sets S, T such that no vertex in S is adjacent to any other vertex in S and no vertex in T is adjacent to any other vertex in T.
Exercise 7.1 Show that the cube of Figure 2.8 is an example of a bipartite graph.
Proposition 7.2 (Facts about Spectrum A, when A is the adjacency operator of a connected (q + 1)-regular graph X) Assume that X is a connected (q + 1)-regular graph and that A is its adjacency matrix. Then:
(1) λ ∈ Spectrum A implies that ∣λ∣ ≤ q + 1;
(2) q + 1 ∈ Spectrum A and has multiplicity 1;
(3) −(q + 1) ∈ Spectrum A iff the graph X is bipartite.
Proof of fact (1) Note that q + 1 is clearly an eigenvalue of A corresponding to the constant vector. Suppose that Aυ = λυ, for some column vector υ = t(υ1 … υn) ∈ ℝn, and suppose that the maximum ∣υi∣ occurs at i = a.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Zeta Functions of GraphsA Stroll through the Garden, pp. 47 - 51Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010