Book contents
- Wretched Refuse?
- Cambridge Studies in Economics, Choice, and Society
- Wretched Refuse?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I State of the Debate
- Part II Cross-country Evidence
- Part III Case Studies in Mass Immigration
- 9 United States
- 10 Israel
- 11 Jordan
- Part IV Assessing the New Economic Case for Immigration Restrictions
- Bibliography
- Index
10 - Israel
from Part III - Case Studies in Mass Immigration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 December 2020
- Wretched Refuse?
- Cambridge Studies in Economics, Choice, and Society
- Wretched Refuse?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I State of the Debate
- Part II Cross-country Evidence
- Part III Case Studies in Mass Immigration
- 9 United States
- 10 Israel
- 11 Jordan
- Part IV Assessing the New Economic Case for Immigration Restrictions
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The relaxation of emigration restrictions in the Soviet Union and the state’s subsequent collapse led to a large exogenous shock to Israel’s immigrant flows because Israel allows unrestricted immigration for world-wide Jews. Israel’s population increased by 20 percent in the 1990s due to immigration from the former Soviet Union. These immigrants did not bring social capital that eroded the quality of Israel’s institutional environment. We find that economic institutions improved substantially over the decade. Our synthetic control methodology indicates that it is likely that the institutions' improvement would not have occurred to the same degree without the mass migration. Our case study indicates that immigrant participation in the political process is the main mechanism through which the migration caused institutional change.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Wretched Refuse?The Political Economy of Immigration and Institutions, pp. 223 - 245Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020