Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-28T13:20:22.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fifteen - Patriarchs, Caliphs, Monks, Scribes, and the Byzantinization of Jerusalem’s Liturgy

from III - Languages, Confessions, Empire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2024

Elizabeth S. Bolman
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Scott Fitzgerald Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
Jack Tannous
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

From the perspective of Constantinople, Jerusalem was part of the Byzantine periphery. Even so, its Chalcedonian Orthodox liturgy influenced Constantinople because Jerusalem was the setting of biblical events. In Jerusalem, liturgy was intrinsically connected to movement in processions and holy places, creating a distinctive Eucharistic liturgy, local calendar, and particular lectionary. After the Christological controversies and the Arab conquest, this liturgy proved a unifying factor, grounding the identity of Jerusalem’s Church. Nevertheless, Jerusalem’s liturgy eventually underwent a process of “Byzantinization,” abandoning local practices and adopting Constantinople’s liturgy. Ironically, however, this only occurred once Jerusalem was beyond the borders of the Byzantine Empire. Despite the absence of imperial policy to propagate the Byzantine Rite abroad, the reconquest of Antioch facilitated liturgical Byzantinization by disseminating liturgical manuscripts from Constantinople to Antioch and then Jerusalem. The liturgical rites these books contained were, however, received and adopted in Jerusalem only gradually. Thus, the destruction of holy sites after the Arab conquest only explains the historical circumstances in which liturgical Byzantinization occurred. Fundamentally, liturgical Byzantinization occurred because local Greek, Georgian, Syrian, and Arab scribes working near Jerusalem and faithful to Constantinople selected which liturgical texts were recopied and preserved, and which were abandoned. Throughout this process, these scribes acted as guardians of the liturgical tradition of Jerusalem, and increasingly peripheral in the eyes of Byzantium.

Type
Chapter
Information
Worlds of Byzantium
Religion, Culture, and Empire in the Medieval Near East
, pp. 468 - 501
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreou, Georgios. Il Praxapostolos bizantino: edizione del codice Mosca GIM Vlad. 21 (Savva 4). Jerusalemer Theologisches Forum 46. Münster: Aschendorff, 2023.Google Scholar
al-Anṭākī, Yaḥyā. Cronache dell’Egitto fatimide e dell’impero Bizantino (937–1033). Ed. and trans. Pirone, Bartolomeo. Patrimonio Culturale Arabo Cristiano 3. Milan: Jaca Book, 1998.Google Scholar
al-Anṭākī, Yaḥyā History I. Ed. and trans. Kratchkovsky, Ignaty and Vasiliev, Aleksandr. Histoire de Yahya-ibn-Sa‘īd d’Antioche, continuateur de Sa‘īd-ibn-Bitriq. PO 18.1. Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1924.Google Scholar
al-Anṭākī, Yaḥyā History II. Ed. and trans. Kratchkovsky, Ignaty and Vasiliev, Aleksandr. Histoire de Yahya-ibn-Sa‘īd d’Antioche, continuateur de Sa‘īd-ibn-Bitriq. Fascicule II. PO 23.3. Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1932.Google Scholar
Arranz, Miguel. “Les grandes étapes de la liturgie byzantine: Palestine—Byzance—Russie. Essai d’aperçu historique.Liturgie de l’Église particulière et liturgie de l’église universelle. Bibliotheca “Ephemerides Liturgicae” Subsidia, pp. 743–72. Rome: Edizioni Liturgiche, 1976.Google Scholar
Assemani, Stephanus Evodius, and Assemani, Joseph Simonius. Bibliothecæ apostolicæ vaticanæ codicum manuscriptorum catalogus: in tres partes distributus in quarum prima orientales in altera graeci in tertia latini italici alorumque europaeorum idiomatum codices. 3 vols. [1758]. Paris: Librairie Orientale et Américaine, 1926.Google Scholar
Auzépy, Marie-France. “De la Palestine à Constantinople (VIIIe–IXe siècles): Étienne le Sabaïte et Jean Damascène.Travaux et mémoires 12 (1994): 183218. = English translation: “From Palestine to Constantinople (Eighth–Ninth Centuries): Stephen the Sabaite and John of Damascus.” In Languages and Cultures of Eastern Christianity: Greek, edited by Johnson, Scott Fitzgerald, pp. 399442. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Baldovin, John F. The Urban Character of Christian Worship: The Origins, Development, and Meaning of Stational Liturgy. Orientalia Christiana Analecta 228. Rome: Pontifical Oriental Institute, 1987.Google Scholar
Balsamon, Theodore. Canones Sanctorum Patrum qui in Trullo Imperialis Palatii Constantinopoli convenerunt, PG 137:621B.Google Scholar
Baumstark, Anton. Comparative Liturgy. Edited by Botte, Bernard. Translated by Cross, F. L.. Westminster, MD: Newman Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Bertonière, Gabriel. The Historical Development of the Easter Vigil and Related Services in the Greek Church. OCA 193. Rome: Pontifical Oriental Institute, 1972.Google Scholar
Bieberstein, Klaus. “Der Gesandtenaustausch zwischen Karl dem Grossen und Hārūn ar-Rašīd und seine Bedeutung für die Kirchen Jerusalems.Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins 109 (1993): 151–73.Google Scholar
al-Bīrūnī, Abou Rīḥān. Melkite Calendar. Ed. and trans. Griveau, Robert, Les fêtes des Melchites. PO 10.4, 293312 [726]. Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1915.Google Scholar
Blancs, Laurent. “Autour de quelques textes chrétiens concernant les premiers temps de la conquête musulmane.” In Byzance et ses périphéries: Hommage à Alain Ducellier, edited by Doumerc, Bernard and Picard, Christophe, pp. 4155. Toulouse: CNRS; Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail, 2004.Google Scholar
Booth, Phil. Crisis of Empire: Doctrine and Dissent at the End of Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, Paul F., and Johnson, Maxwell E.. The Origins of Feasts, Fasts and Seasons in Early Christianity. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Brakmann, Heinzgerd. “Ein jerusalemer Anaphora-Zitat in den Acta Anastasii Persae (BHG 84),” Analecta Bollandiana 113 (1995), 115–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brightman, F. E., ed. Liturgies Eastern and Western Being the Texts Original or Translated of the Principal Liturgies of the Church. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1896.Google Scholar
Brock, Sebastian P.Dionysios bar Ṣalibi.Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage, edited by Brock, Sebastian, Kiraz, George, Van Rompay, Lucas, Butts, Aaron, pp. 126–7. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchinger, Harald. “Das Jerusalemer Sanctorale: Zu Stand und Aufgaben der Forschung.” In A Cloud of Witnesses: The Cult of Saints in Past and Present, edited by Barnard, Marcel, Post, P. G. J., and Rose, Els, pp. 97128. Leuven: Peeters, 2005.Google Scholar
Buchinger, HaraldOn the Origin and Development of the Liturgical Year: Tendencies, Results, and Desiderata of Heortological Research.Studia Liturgica 40 (2010): 1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Averil. Byzantine Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, AverilEnforcing Orthodoxy in Byzantium.” In Discipline and Diversity, edited by Cooper, Kate and Gregory, Jeremy, pp. 124. Rochester: Ecclesiastical History Society; Boydell Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil, and Hoyland, Robert, eds. Doctrine and Debate in the East Christian World, 300–1500. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011.Google Scholar
Canard, Marius. “La destruction de l’église de la Résurrection par le Calife Ḥākim et l’histoire de la descente du feu sacré.Byzantion 35 (1965): 1643.Google Scholar
Charon, Cyrille (Korolevsky, Cyril). “Le rite byzantin et la liturgie chrysostomienne dans les patriarcats melkites (Alexandrie, Antioche, Jérusalem).” In ΧΡΥΣΟΣΤΟΜΙΚΑ: Studi e ricerche intorno a S. Giovanni Crisostomo, pp. 473718. Rome: Libreria Pustet, 1908.Google Scholar
Conybeare, Frederick C.Antiochus Strategos: The Capture of Jerusalem by the Persians in 614 ad.English Historical Review 25 (1910): 502–17.Google Scholar
Dagron, Gilbert. “Minorités ethniques et religieuses dans l’Orient byzantin à la fin du Xe et au XIe siècle: l’immigration syrienne.Travaux et mémoires 6 (1976): 177216.Google Scholar
D’Aiuto, Francesco, Morello, Giovanni, and Piazzoni, Ambrogio M., eds. I Vangeli dei Popoli: La Parola e l’immagine del Cristo nelle culture e nella storia. Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 2000.Google Scholar
di Scitopoli, Cirillo. Storie monastiche del deserto di Gerusalemme. Translated by Baldelli, Romano and Mortari, Luciana. Abbazia di Praglia: Edizioni Scritti Monastici, 1990.Google Scholar
Dmitrievskii, Alexei A. Описаніе литургическихъ рукописей, хранящихся въ библіотекахъ православнаго востока, vol. 3: Τυπικά. Petrograd: Типографія В.Ө. Киршбаума, 1917.Google Scholar
Ebied, Rifaat. “Dionysius bar Ṣalībī’s Syriac Polemical Treatises: Prejudice and Polarization Towards Christians, Jews and Muslims.The Harp 20 (2006): 7386.Google Scholar
Failler, Albert, ed. Georges Pachymérès, Relations Historiques. Translated by Laurent, Vitalien. 5 vols. Paris: Société d’édition “Les belles lettres”; Institut français d’études byzantines, 1984–2000.Google Scholar
Fedalto, Giorgio. Hierarchia Ecclesiastica Orientalis. 3 vols. Padua: Edizioni Messagero, 1988.Google Scholar
Felix, Wolfgang. Byzanz und die islamische Welt im früheren 11. Jahrhundert: Geschichte der politischen Beziehungen von 1001 bis 1055. Vienna: Verlag der Östtereichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1981.Google Scholar
Fenwick, John R. K. The Anaphoras of St Basil and St James: An Investigation into Their Common Origin. Rome: Pontifical Oriental Institute, 1992.Google Scholar
Flusin, Bernard. “L’hagiographie palestinienne et la reception du concile du Chalcédoine.ΛΕΙΜΩΝ: Studies Presented to L. Rydén on His Sixty-Fifth Birthday, edited by Rosenqvist, Jan Olaf, pp. 2547. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet, 1996.Google Scholar
Follieri, Enrica. Initia hymnorum ecclesiae Graecae. 5 vols. ST 211–215. Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1960–6.Google Scholar
Frøyshov, Stig S. R. “The Early Development of the Liturgical Eight-Mode System in Jerusalem.St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 51, no. 2–3 (2007): 139–78.Google Scholar
Frøyshov, Stig S. R “L’Horologe ‘géorgien’ du Sinaiticus ibericus 34.” Ph.D. thesis. Université de Paris-Sorbonne; Institut Catholique de Paris; Institut de théologie orthodoxe Saint-Serge, 2004.Google Scholar
Galadza, Daniel. “The Jerusalem Lectionary and the Byzantine Rite.” In Rites and Rituals of the Christian East, edited by Groen, Bert, Galadza, Daniel, Glibetic, Nina, and Radle, Gabriel, pp. 181–99. Leuven: Peeters, 2014.Google Scholar
Galadza, DanielLes grandes étapes de la liturgie byzantine de Miguel Arranz, quarante ans après.” In 60 semaines liturgiques à Saint-Serge: Bilans et perspectives nouvelles, edited by Lossky, André and Sekulovski, Goran, pp. 295310. Münster: Aschendorff, 2016.Google Scholar
Galadza, DanielLiturgical Byzantinization in Jerusalem: Al-Bīrūnī’s Melkite Calendar in Context.Bollettino della Badia greca di Grottaferrata 3rd ser. 7 (2010), 6985.Google Scholar
Galadza, Daniel Liturgy and Byzantinization in Jerusalem. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Galadza, DanielSources for the Study of Liturgy in Post-Byzantine Jerusalem (638–1187 ce).Dumbarton Oaks Papers 67 (2013): 7594.Google Scholar
Galadza, Daniel and Verheyden, Joseph, eds. The Lavra of St. Sabas: Liturgy and Literature in Communities and Contexts. Leuven: Peeters, 2024.Google Scholar
Garitte, Gérard. Le calendrier palestino-géorgien du Sinaiticus 34 (Xe siècle). Brussels: Société des Bollandistes, 1958.Google Scholar
Garitte, GérardLe Menée géorgien de Dumbarton Oaks.Le Muséon 77 (1964): 2964.Google Scholar
Garitte, GérardUn évangéliaire grec–arabe du Xe siècle (cod. Sin. ar. 116).” In Studia Codicologica, edited by Treu, Kurt, pp. 207–25. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar
Gil, Moshe. A History of Palestine, 634–1099. Translated by Broido, Ethel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Gouillard, Jean. “Le synodikon de l’Orthodoxie: Édition et commentaire.Travaux et mémoires 2 (1967): 1316.Google Scholar
Gregory, Timothy E.Melchites.” In The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, vol. 2, p. 1332. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Griffith, Sidney H.The Church of Jerusalem and the ‘Melkites’: The Making of an ‘Arab Orthodox’ Christian Identity in the World of Islam (750–1050 ce).” In Christians and Christianity in the Holy Land: From the Origins to the Latin Kingdoms, edited by Limor, Ora and Stroumsa, Guy G., pp. 175204. Turnhout: Brepols, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, Sidney H.From Aramaic to Arabic: The Languages of the Monasteries of Palestine in the Byzantine and Early Islamic Periods.Dumbarton Oaks Papers 51 (1997): 1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, Sidney H.What Has Constantinople to Do with Jerusalem? Palestine in the Ninth Century: Byzantine Orthodoxy in the World of Islam.” In Byzantium in the Ninth Century: Dead or Alive? Papers from the Thirtieth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Birmingham, March 1996, edited by Brubaker, Leslie, pp. 181–94. Aldershot: Ashgate Variorum, 1998.Google Scholar
Grumel, Venance. Les Regestes des actes du patriarcat de Constantinople. Vol. 1. Les actes des patriarches, fasc. 2–3: Les regestes de 715 à 1206, edited by Darrouzès, Jean. Paris: Institut français d’études byzantines, 1989.Google Scholar
Grumel, VenanceLes Réponses canoniques à Marc d’Alexandrie, leur caractère official, leur double rédaction.Échos d’Orient 38 (1939): 321–33.Google Scholar
Hannick, Christian. “Annexions et reconquêtes byzantines: Peut-on parler d’‘uniatisme’ byzantin?Irénikon 66 (1993): 451–74.Google Scholar
Hannick, Christian, Plank, Peter, Lutzka, Carolina, and Afanas’eva, Tat’jana I, eds. Das Taktikon des Nikon vom Schwarzen Berge: Griechischer Text und kirchenslavische Übersetzung des 14. Jahrhunderts. Freiburg im Breisgau: Weiher Verlag, 2014.Google Scholar
Hawkes-Teeples, Steven, ed. St. Symeon of Thessalonika: The Liturgical Commentaries. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huygens, R. B. C., Mayer, H. E., and Rösch, G., eds. Chronicon Archepiscophi Willelmi Tyrensis. Turnhout: Brepols, 1986.Google Scholar
Jacob, André. “Une lettre de Charles le Chauve au clergé de Ravenne?Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique 67 (1972): 409–22.Google Scholar
Janeras, Sebastià. “Le vendredi avant le Dimanche des Palmes dans la tradition liturgique hagiopolite.Studi sull’Oriente Cristiano 4, no. 1 (2000): 5986.Google Scholar
Janeras, SebastiàLes lectionnaires de l’ancienne liturgie de Jérusalem.Collectanea Christiana Orientalia 2 (2005): 7192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazamias, Alkiviades K. Ἡ Θεία Λειτουργία τοῦ Ἁγίου Ἰακώβου τοῦ Ἀδελφοθέου καὶ τὰ νέα σιναϊτικὰ χειρόγραφα. Thessaloniki: Ἵδρυμα Ὄρους Σινᾶ, 2006.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, Alexander, and Nancy, Patterson-Ševčenko. “Theodosios the Koinobiarches.” In The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, vol. 3, p. 2053. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kekelidze, Korneli. ქართული ჰაგიოგრაფიული ძეგლები, ნაწ. 1, კიმენი (Kʻartʻuli agiograpʻiuli żeglebi, nac. 1, kemini) / Monumenta hagiographica georgica: Pars prima, Keimena, vol. 1, pp. 165–73. Tʻbilisi: Sakʻartʻvelos SSR mecʻnierebatʻa akademiis gamomcʻemloba, 1918– and 1946.Google Scholar
Kekelidze, Korneli. Іерусалимскій Канонарь VІІ вѣка (Грузинская версія). T‘bilisi: Лосаберидзе, 1912.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Ernst. “Byzantine Art in the Period between Justinian and Iconoclasm.” In Berichte zum XI. Internationalen Byzantinisten-Kongress, pp. 150. Munich: Kommission bei C. H. Beck, 1958. Reprinted in Ernst Kitzinger, The Art of Byzantium and the Medieval West: Selected Studies, ed. W. E. Kleinbauer, pp. 157–232. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Krueger, Derek. Liturgical Subjects: Christian Ritual, Biblical Narrative, and the Formation of the Self in Byzantium. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Laurent, Vitalien. “Le rituel de la proscomidie et le métropolite de Crète Élie.Revue des études byzantines 16 (1958): 116–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeb, Helmut. Die Gesänge im Gemeindegottesdienst von Jerusalem (vom 5. bis 8. Jahrhundert). Vienna: Herder, 1970.Google Scholar
Liturgia Ibero-Graeca Sancti Iacobi: Editio – translatio – retroversio – commentarii. Part 1: The Old Georgian Version of the Liturgy of Saint James, edited by Khevsuriani, L., Shanidze, M., Kavtaria, M., and Tseradze, T.. Part 2: La Liturgie de Saint Jacques: Rétroversion grecque et commentaires, edited by Verhelst, S.. Jerusalemer Theologisches Forum 17. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar
Mai, Cardinal Angelo. Novae Partum Bibliothecae, vol. 10, part 2. Edited by Cozza-Luzi., Joseph Rome: Bibliotheca Vaticana, 1905.Google Scholar
Mai, Cardinal Angelo. Spicilegium Romanum, vol. 10: Synodus Constantinopolitana. Rome: Typis Collegii Urbani, 1844.Google Scholar
Mateos, Juan. Le Typicon de la Grande Église: Ms. Sainte-Croix no 40, Xe siècle. 2 vols. Rome: Pontifical Oriental Institute, 1962–3.Google Scholar
Mercier, Basile-Charles, ed. La Liturgie de Saint Jacques: Édition critique du texte grec avec traduction latine. Patrologia Orientalis 26.2. Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1946.Google Scholar
Metreveli, Elene, Čankievi, Caca, and Xevsuriani, Lili. უძველესი იადგარი [Uẓvelesi Iadgari, “The Most Ancient Iadgari”]. T‘bilisi: Metsniereba, 1980.Google Scholar
Mingana, Alphonse. “A Treatise of Barṣalībi against the Melchites.” Woodbrooke Studies: Christian Documents in Syriac, Arabic, and Garshūni, vol. 1, pp. 1763. Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons, 1927.Google Scholar
Nasrallah, Joseph. “La liturgie des Patriarcats melchites de 969 à 1300.Oriens Christianus 71 (1987): 156–81. = English translation: “The Liturgy of the Melkite Patriarchs from 969 to 1300.” In Languages and Cultures of Eastern Christianity: Greek, edited by Scott Fitzgerald Johnson, pp. 507–32. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Nedungatt, George, and Featherstone, Michael, ed. The Council in Trullo Revisited. Rome: Pontifical Oriental Institute, 1995.Google Scholar
Nikiforova, Alexandra. Из истории Минеи в Византии: Гимнографические памятники VIII–XI вв. из собрания монастыря святой Eкатерины на Синае. Moscow: Издательство Православного Свято-Тихоновского Гуманитарного Универcитета, 2012.Google Scholar
Nikolopoulos, Panagiotes G., Damianos, A., Sophronios, A., and Peltikoglou, B., eds. Τὰ νέα εὑρήματα τοῦ Σινᾶ. Athens: Ἵδρυμα Ὄρους Σινᾶ, 1998.Google Scholar
Noble, Samuel, and Treiger, Alexander, eds. The Orthodox Church in the Arab World, 700–1700: An Anthology of Sources. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Ousterhout, Robert. “Rebuilding the Temple: Constantine Monomachus and the Holy Sepulchre.Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 48, no. 1 (March 1989): 6678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outtier, Bernard. “Langue et littérature géorgiennes.” In Christianismes orientaux: Introduction à l’étude des langues et des littératures, edited by Albert, Micheline, Beylot, Robert, Coquin, René-G, Outtier, Bernard, Renoux, Charles, and Guillaumont, Antoine, pp. 263–96. Paris: Cerf, 1993.Google Scholar
Page, Gill. Being Byzantine: Greek Identity before the Ottomans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahlitzsch, Johannes. “Griechisch–Syrisch–Arabisch: Zum Verhältnis von Liturgie- und Umgangssprache bei den Melkiten Palästinas im 12. und 13. Jahrhundert.” In Language of Religion – Language of the People: Medieval Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, edited by Richter, Michael, Bremer, Ernst, Jarnut, Jörg, and Wasserstein, David J., pp. 3747. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 2006. = English translation: “Greek–Syriac–Arabic: The Relationship between Liturgical and Colloquial Languages in Melkite Palestine in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries.” In Languages and Cultures of Eastern Christianity: Greek, edited by Scott Fitzgerald Johnson, pp. 495–505. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos-Kerameus, Athanasios. “Τυπικὸν τῆς ἐν Ἱεροσολύμοις ἐκκλησίας.” In Ἀνάλεκτα Ἱεροσολυμητικῆς Σταχυολογίας, vol. 2, pp. 1254. St. Petersburg: Kirschbaum, 1894.Google Scholar
Parenti, Stefano. “The Cathedral Rite of Constantinople: Evolution of a Local Tradition.Orientalia Christiana Periodica 77 (2011): 449–69.Google Scholar
Parenti, Stefano L’anafora di Crisostomo: testo e contesti. Jerusalemer Theologisches Forum 36. Münster: Aschendorff, 2020.Google Scholar
Parenti, StefanoLa ‘vittoria’ nella Chiesa di Costantinopoli della Liturgia di Crisostomo sulla Liturgia di Basilio.” In A Oriente e Occidente di Costantinopoli: Temi e problemi liturgici di ieri e di oggi, edited by Parenti, Stefano, pp. 2747. Monumenta Studia Instrumenta Liturgica 54. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2010. [Originally printed in Acts of the International Congress Comparative Liturgy Fifty Years after Anton Baumstark (1872–1948): Rome, 25–29 September 1998, edited by Robert F. Taft and Gabriele Winkler, pp. 907–28. Orientalia Christiana Analecta 265. Rome: Pontifical Oriental Institute, 2001.]Google Scholar
Patrich, Joseph, ed. The Sabaite Heritage in the Orthodox Church from the Fifth Century to the Present. Leuven: Peeters, 2001.Google Scholar
Peeters, Paul. “La passion de S. Michel le Sabaïte.Analecta Bollandiana 48 (1930): 6598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentkovsky, Aleksei. “Константинопольский и иерусалимский богослужебные уставы.” Журнал Московской Патриархии (April 2001): 70–8.Google Scholar
Prosopographie der mittelbyzantinischen Zeit: 2. Abteilung (867–1025). Edited by Winkelmann, Friedhelm, Lili, Ralph-Johannes, Ludwig, Claudia, Pratsch, Thomas, Zilke, Beate, et al. 8 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Radle, Gabriel. “The Liturgy of St. James in Medieval Damascus: The Dating and Historico-Liturgical Context of Vatican Gr. 2282.Orientalia Christiana Periodica 87 (2021): 341–52.Google Scholar
Renauld, Émile, ed. and trans. Michel Psellos, Chronographie, ou Histoire d’un siècle de Byzance (976–1077). Paris: Société d’édition “Les belles lettres,” 1926.Google Scholar
Renoux, Athanase [Charles], ed. Le Codex Arménien Jérusalem 121, vol. 2: Édition comparée du texte et de deux autres manuscrits. Turnhout: Brepols, 1971.Google Scholar
Sardshweladse, Surab, and Heinz, Fähnrich. Altgeorgisch–Deutsches Wörterbuch. Handbook for Oriental Studies 12. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Schick, Robert. The Christian Communities of Palestine from Byzantine to Islamic Rule: A Historical and Archaeological Study. Princeton: Darwin Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Schönborn, Christoph von. Sophrone de Jérusalem: Vie monastique et confession dogmatique. Paris: Beauchesne, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Eduard, ed. Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum, vol. 3: Collectio Sabbaitica contra acephalos et origeniastas destinata: Insunt acta synodorum Constantinopolitanae et Hierosolymitanae A. 536. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1940.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Eduard Kyrillos von Skythopolis. Texte und Untersuchungen 49, Heft 2. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1939.Google Scholar
Siniscalco, Paolo, ed. Le antiche Chiese orientali: Storia e letteratura. Rome: Città Nuova, 2005.Google Scholar
Skreslet, Stanley H. “The Greeks in Medieval Islamic Egypt: A Melkite Dhimmi Community under the Patriarch of Alexandria (640–1095).” Ph.D. dissertation. Yale University, New Haven, 1988.Google Scholar
Stern, Henri. “Notes sur les mosaïques du Dôme du Rocher et de la Mosquée de Damas à propos d’une livre de Mme. M. G. van Berchem.Cahiers Archéologiques 22 (1972): 201–32.Google Scholar
Taft, Robert F. The Byzantine Rite: A Short History. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Taft, Robert F.Comparative Liturgy Fifty Years after Anton Baumstark (d. 1948): A Reply to Recent Critics.Worship 73 (1999): 521–40.Google Scholar
Taft, Robert F.Mount Athos: A Late Chapter in the History of the Byzantine Rite.Dumbarton Oaks Papers 42 (1988): 179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, Robert F. Through Their Own Eyes: Liturgy as the Byzantines Saw It. Berkeley: InterOrthodox Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Taft, Robert F., and Parenti, Stefano. Il Grande Ingresso: Edizione italiana rivista, ampliata e aggiornata. Grottaferrata: Monastero Esarchico, 2014.Google Scholar
Talbot, Alice-Mary. “Symeon, Archbishop of Thessalonike.” In The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, vol. 3, pp. 1981–2. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Tannous, Jack. “In Search of Monotheletism.Dumbarton Oaks Papers 68 (2014): 2967.Google Scholar
Tarchnischvili, Michael. Geschichte der kirchlichen georgischen Literatur, auf Grund des ersten Bandes der georgischen Literaturgeschichte. Edited by Korneli Kekelidze. Studi e testi 185. Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1955.Google Scholar
Tarchnischvili, Michel, ed. Le grand lectionnaire de l’Église de Jérusalem (Ve–VIIIe siècle). Louvain: Secrétariat du CSCO, 1959–60.Google Scholar
Todt, Klaus-Peter. “Griechisch-Orthodoxe (melkitische) Christen im zentralen und südlichen Syrien: Die Periode von der arabischen Eroberung bis zur Verlegung der Patriarchenresidenz nach Damaskus (635–1365).Le Muséon 119, no. 1–2 (2006): 3388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todt, Klaus-PeterRegion und griechisch-orthodoxes Patriarchat von Antiocheia in mittelbyzantinischer Zeit (969–1084),” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 94 (2001): 239–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todt, Klaus-PeterZwischen Kaiser und ökumenischem Patriarchen: Die Rolle der griechisch-orthodoxen Patriarchen von Antiocheia in den politischen und kirchlichen Auseinandersetzung des 11.–13. Jh. in Byzanz.” In Zwei Sonnen am Goldenen Horn? Kaiserliche und patriarchale Macht im byzantinischen Mittelalter, edited by Grünbart, Michael, Rickelt, Lutz, and Vučetić, Martin Marko, pp. 137–76. Münster: Lit Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar
Treiger, Alexander. “Unpublished Text from the Arab Orthodox Tradition (1): On the Origin of the Term ‘Melkite’ and On the Destruction of the Maryamiyya Cathedral in Damascus.Chronos: Revue d’Histoire de l’Université de Balamand 29 (2014): 737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsougarakis, Dimitris, ed. The Life of Leontios Patriarch of Jerusalem. Leiden: Brill, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velkovska, Elena, and Parenti, Stefano, eds. Eвхологий Барберини гр. 336: Издание текста, предисловие и примечания. Translated by Golovanov, Sergey. Omsk: Golovanov, 2011.Google Scholar
Viscuso, Patrick D. Guide for a Church under Islām: The Sixty-Six Canonical Questions Attributed to Theodōros Balsamōn. A Translation of the Ecumenical Patriarchate’s Twelfth-Century Guidance to the Patriarchate of Alexandria. Brookline, MA: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Voicu, Sever J.Feste di apostoli alla fine di dicembre.Studi sull’Oriente Cristiano 8, no. 2 (2004): 4777.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. W., ed. The Pilgrimage of the Russian Abbot Daniel in the Holy Land, 1106–1107 a.d. London: Palestine Pilgrim’s Text Society, 1895.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×