Book contents
- Working with Refugee Families
- Working with Refugee Families
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Refugee Family Relationships
- Part II Trauma Care for Refugee Families
- Chapter 7 Mobilizing Resources in Multifamily Groups
- Chapter 8 Working through Trauma and Restoring Security in Refugee Parent-Child Relationships
- Chapter 9 Trauma Narration in Family Therapy with Refugees
- Chapter 10 Exile and Belonging
- Chapter 11 Working with Spirituality in Refugee Care
- Chapter 12 Collaborating with Refugee Families on Dynamics of Intra-family Violence
- Chapter 13 Supporting Refugee Family Reunification in Exile
- Chapter 14 Diagnosis as Advocacy
- Chapter 15 Reflexivity in the Everyday Lives and Work of Refugees and Therapists
- Part III Intersectoral Psychosocial Interventions in Working with Refugee Families
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Chapter 13 - Supporting Refugee Family Reunification in Exile
from Part II - Trauma Care for Refugee Families
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 August 2020
Book contents
- Working with Refugee Families
- Working with Refugee Families
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Refugee Family Relationships
- Part II Trauma Care for Refugee Families
- Chapter 7 Mobilizing Resources in Multifamily Groups
- Chapter 8 Working through Trauma and Restoring Security in Refugee Parent-Child Relationships
- Chapter 9 Trauma Narration in Family Therapy with Refugees
- Chapter 10 Exile and Belonging
- Chapter 11 Working with Spirituality in Refugee Care
- Chapter 12 Collaborating with Refugee Families on Dynamics of Intra-family Violence
- Chapter 13 Supporting Refugee Family Reunification in Exile
- Chapter 14 Diagnosis as Advocacy
- Chapter 15 Reflexivity in the Everyday Lives and Work of Refugees and Therapists
- Part III Intersectoral Psychosocial Interventions in Working with Refugee Families
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Family reunion in exile may be a complex and challenging experience. Refugee families are often reunited in the host countries after having lived through long periods of separation, insecurity and violence. Assisting families in the process of reunification is discussed as an issue of priority, both from a psychological and a human rights point of view. Based on clinical experiences, the authors suggest that accompanying families in this process of transition is meaningful and useful. The chapter argues that work with refugees should be seen through a family lens, and that mental health professionals have the knowledge and background regarding families and systems that enable them to offer good assistance to families in reunification processes. A model for assisting families and dealing with the many challenges involved in the process of reunification is explored and discussed. The need for a more systematized approach is underlined, and research on the effect of conversations to families reunited in exile is called for.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Working with Refugee FamiliesTrauma and Exile in Family Relationships, pp. 212 - 231Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, (1948). (16.3). www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/Google Scholar
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, (1989). (art. 7, 9, 10). www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspxGoogle Scholar
UN High Commissioner for Refugees, (2008). UNHCR Guidelines on Determining the Best Interests of the Child. www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/49103ece2.htmlGoogle Scholar
The Geneva Convention. (1949). Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (art. 24–26). www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/publications/icrc-002–0173.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations. The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance. Adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 20 December 2006; entered into force on 23 December 2010. www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CED/Pages/ConventionCED.aspxGoogle Scholar
European Council Directive 2003/86/EC, (2003). On the Right to Family Reunification. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32003L0086Google Scholar
Reichelt, S. and Sveaass, N., Therapy with refugee families: What is a ‘good’ conversation? Family Process, 33 (1994), 247–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reichelt, S. and Sveaass, N., Creating meaningful conversations with families in exile. Journal of Refugee Studies, 7 (1994), 124–143.Google Scholar
Sveaass, N. and Reichelt, S., Engaging refugee families in therapy: Exploring the benefits of including referring professionals in the first family interviews. Family Process, 40 (2001), 95–114.Google Scholar
Sveaass, N. and Reichelt, S., Refugee families in therapy: From referrals to therapeutic conversations. Journal of Family Therapy, 23 (2001), 119–135.Google Scholar
Bragg, B. and Wong, L. L., ‘Cancelled dreams’: Family reunification and shifting Canadian immigration policy. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 14(1) (2015), 46–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, C., Mekki-Barrada, A. and Moreau, S., Trauma and extended separation from family among Latin American and African refugees in Montreal. Psychiatry, 64(1) (2001), 40–59.Google Scholar
Rousseau, C., Rufagari, M.-C., Bagilishya, D. and Measham, T., Remaking family life: Strategies for re-establishing continuity among Congolese refugees during the family reunification process. Social Science & Medicine, 59 (2004), 1095–1108.Google Scholar
Choummanivong, C., Poole, G. E. and Cooper, A., Refugees’ family reunification and mental health in resettlement. Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, (2014). ISSN: (Print) 1177-083X (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzk20Google Scholar
Sluzki, C. E., Disappeared: Semantic and somatic effects of political repression in a family seeking therapy. Family Process, 29 (1990), 131–143.Google Scholar
Sluzki, C. E., Deception and fear in politically oppressive contexts: Its trickle-down effects on families. Review of Policy Research, 22(5) (2005), 625–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluzki, C. E., Toward a model of family and political victimization: Implications for treatment and recovery. Psychiatry, 56 (1993), 178–187.Google Scholar
Rosenck, R. and Thomson, J., ‘Detoxification’ of Vietnam War trauma: A combined family-individual approach. Family Process, 25 (1987), 559–570.Google Scholar
Lie, B., Sveaass, N. and Eilertsen, D. E., Family, activity and posttraumatic reactions in exile. Community, Work & Family, 7 (2004), 327–351.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, R., Jerusalem, M. and Hahn, A., Unemployment, social support and health complaints: A longitudinal study of stress in East German refugees. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 4 (1994), 31–45.Google Scholar
Solomon, Z. and Waysman, M., From front line to home front: A study of secondary traumatization. Family Process, 31 (1992), 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupinski, J. and Burrows, G., Psychiatric disorders in adolescents and young adults. In Krupinski, J. and Burrows, G., eds., The Price of Freedom: Young Indochinese Refugees in Australia, Rushcutters Bay (Sydney: Pergamon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Beiser, M., Influence of time, ethnicity, and attachment on depression in South Asian refugees. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145 (1988), 183–195.Google Scholar
Montgomery, E., Trauma, exile and mental health in young refugees. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 124 (2011), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorst-Unsworth, C. and Goldenberg, E., Psychological sequelae of torture and organized violence suffered by refugees from Iraq. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172 (1998), 90–94.Google Scholar
Beiser, M., Johnson, P. J. and Turner, R. J., Unemployment, underemployment and depressive affect among Southeast Asian refugees. Psychological Medicine, 23 (1993), 732–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjørn, G. J., Gustafsson, P. A., Sydsjø, G. and Bertero, C., Family therapy sessions with refugee families: A qualitative study. Conflict and Health, 7 (2013), 7.Google Scholar
Sahal, R., (2015), ‘Livet satt på vent’: En studie om enslige flyktninger som har søkt om famliegjenforening (‘Life on hold’: A study of separated minors who have applied for family reunification). Master’s thesis at the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Silove, D., The psychological effects of torture, mass human rights violations, and refugee trauma: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 187 (1999), 200–207.Google Scholar
Sourander, A., Refugee families during asylum seeking. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 57(3) (2010), 203–207. www.tandfonline.com/loi/ipsc20Google Scholar
Gergen, K., The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40 (1985), 266–275.Google Scholar
Anderson, H. and Goolishian, H., Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27 (1988), 371–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, H. and Goolishian, H., The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In McNamee, S. and Gergen, K. J., eds., Therapy as Social Construction (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992), pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
Andersen, T., The reflecting team. Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26 (1987), 415–428.Google Scholar
Hoffman, L., Beyond power and control. Family Systems Medicine, 3 (1985), 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, L., The reflexive stance for family therapy. In McNamee, S. and Gergen, K. J., eds., Therapy as Social Construction (London: Sage, 1992), pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
de Shazer, S., Clues: Investigating Solutions in Brief Therapy (New York: Norton,1988).Google Scholar
White, M. and Epston, D., Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends (New York: Norton, 1990).Google Scholar
Palazzoli, M. S., Boscolo, L, Cecchin, G. and Prata, G., The problem of the referring person. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 6 (1980), 3–9.Google Scholar
Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., Hoffman, L. and Penn, P., Milan Systemic Family Therapy: Conversations in Theory and Practice (New York: Basic Books, 1987).Google Scholar
Imber-Black, E., Families and Larger Systems: A Family Therapist’s Guide through the Labyrinth (New York: Guilford Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Bemak, F., Cross-cultural family therapy with South-East Asian refugees. Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 8 (1989), 22–27.Google Scholar
Gansan, S., Fine, S. and Lin, T. Y., Psychiatric symptoms in refugee families from South East Asia: Therapeutic challenges. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 43 (1989), 218–228.Google Scholar
Arredondo, P., Orjula, A. and Moore, I., Family therapy with Central American war refugee families. Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 8 (1989), 27–35.Google Scholar
De Haene, L., Rober, P., Adriaenssens, P. and Verschueren, K., Voices of dialogue and directivity in family therapy with refugees: Evolving ideas about dialogical refugee care. Family Process, 51 (2012), 391–404.Google Scholar
Flaskas, C., Holding hope and hopelessness: Therapeutic engagements with the balance of hope. Journal of Family Therapy, 29 (2007), 186–202.Google Scholar
NTNU, RVTS and the Department of Psychology, UiO. Familiegjenforening i eksil: Forebygging gjennom familiesamtaler (Family reunification in exile: Prevention through family conversations) (2016). https://samforsk.no/Publikasjoner/2016/Familiegjenforening_web.pdfGoogle Scholar