Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 September 2020
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Work of PoliticsMaking a Democratic Welfare State, pp. 181 - 195Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Adair-Toteff, Christopher. “Max Weber’s Charisma.” Journal of Classical Sociology 5, no. 2 (2005): 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair-Toteff, Christopher. “Max Weber’s Charismatic Prophets.” History of the Human Sciences 27, no. 1 (2014): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlberg, Jenny, Roman, Christine, and Duncan, Simon. “Actualizing the ‘Democratic Family’? Swedish Policy Rhetoric versus Family Practices.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 15, no. 1 (2008): 79–100.Google Scholar
Allen, Amy. The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Allen, Amy. The Politics of Ourselves: Power, Autonomy, and Gender in Contemporary Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Allen, Amy. “Psychoanalysis and the Methodology of Critique.” Constellations 23, no. 2 (2016): 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation).” Translated by Brewster, Ben. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays 85–126. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin. Bold Relief: Institutional Politics and the Origins of Modern American Social Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. “Thomas Paine’s ‘Agrarian Justice’ and the Origins of Social Insurance.” In Ten Neglected Classics of Philosophy, edited by Schliesser, Eric, 55–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109, no. 2 (1999): 287–337.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. “The Great Tradition I. Law and Power.” Social Research 74, no. 3 (2007): 713–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. “On Hannah Arendt.” In Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World, edited by Hill, Melvyn A. 301–309. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. “Karl Marx and the Tradition of Political Thought: The Broken Thread of Tradition. Draft,” in The Modern Challenge to Tradition: Fragmente eines Buchs, edited by Hahn, Barbara and McFarland, James, 245–255. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. “Thoughts on Politics and Revolution.” In Crisis of the Republic, 199–235. New York: Harvest, 1972.Google Scholar
Arnold, Samuel, and Harris, John R. “What Is Arbitrary Power?” Journal of Political Power 10, no. 1 (2017): 55–70.Google Scholar
Ayaß, Wolfgang. “Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterbewegung Und Sozialversicherung Bis Zur Jahrundertwende.” In Sozialstaat Deutschland: Geschichte Und Gegenwart, edited by Becker, Ulrich, Hockerts, Hans Günter, and Tenfelde, Klaus, 17–45. Bonn: J. H. W. Dietz, 2010.Google Scholar
Azmanova, Albena. Capitalism on Edge: How Fighting Precarity Can Achieve Radical Change without Crisis or Utopia. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Peter. The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bhambra, Gurminder K. and John, Holmwood. “Colonialism, Post-Colonialism, and the Liberal Welfare State.” New Political Economy 23, no. 5 (2018): 574–587.Google Scholar
Beck, Hermann. “Working-Class Politics at the Crossroads of Conservatism, Liberalism, and Socialism.” In Between Reform and Revolution: German Socialism and Communism from 1840 to 1990, edited by Barclay, David E. and Weitz, Eric D., 63–88. New York: Berghahn Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. “Normativity in Neo-Kantianism: Its Rise and Fall.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17, no. 1 (2009): 9–27.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. Critique, Norm and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1996.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Eduard. “The Socialist Concept of Democracy.” In Eduard Bernstein on Social Democracy and International Politics: Essays and Other Writings, edited by Ostrowski, Marius S., 45–57. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. M. “Love and Law: Hegel’s Critique of Morality.” Social Research 70, no. 2 (2003): 393–432.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. M. Recovering Ethical Life: Jürgen Habermas and the Future of Critical Theory. New York: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard. “Rethinking the Social and the Political.” In Philosophical Profiles: Essays in a Pragmatic Mode, 238–259. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackbourn, David, and Eley, Geoff. The Peculiarities of German History: Bourgeois Society and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang. “Lorenz Von Stein As Theorist of the Movement of State and Society towards the Welfare State.” Translated by Underwood, J. A.. In State, Society and Liberty: Studies in Political Theory and Constitutional Law, 115–146. New York: Berg, 1991.Google Scholar
Boedeker, Edgar C. “Individual and Community in Early Heidegger: Situating Das Man, the Man-Self, and Self-Ownership in Dasein’s Ontological Structure.” Inquiry 44, no. 1 (2001): 63–99.Google Scholar
Bonnell, Andrew G. “Oligarchy in Miniature? Robert Michels and the Marburg Branch of the German Social Democratic Party.” German History 29, no. 1 (2011): 23–35.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Breen, Keith. Under Weber’s Shadow: Modernity, Subjectivity, and Politics in Habermas, Arendt and Macintyre. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Brenner, Neil. “Foucault’s New Functionalism.” Theory and Society 23, no. 5 (1994): 679–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruenig, Matt. “A Simple Fix for Our Massive Inequality Problem.” New York Times, November 30, 2017.Google Scholar
Bruun, Hans Henrik, and Whimster, Sam. “Introduction.” In Max Weber: Collected Methodological Writings, edited by Bruun, Hans Henrik and Whimster, Sam, xi–xxviii. New York: Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter, eds. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea Louise. “Policy Makes Mass Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15 (2012): 333–351.Google Scholar
Carlson, Allan C. The Swedish Experiment in Family Policy: The Myrdals and the Interwar Population Crisis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1990.Google Scholar
Cazenave, Noel A. Impossible Democracy: The Unlikely Success of the War on Poverty Community Action Programs. Albany: State University New York Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Celikates, Robin. “Recognition, System Justification and Reconstructive Critique.” In Reconnaissance: Identité Et Intégration Sociale, edited by Lazzeri, Christian and Nour, Soraya, 85–99. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest, 2009.Google Scholar
Ciaffa, Jay A. Max Weber and the Problems of Value-Free Social Science: A Critical Examination of the “Werturteilsstreit”. Cranbury: Associated University Presses, 1998.Google Scholar
Cicerchia, Lillian. “Structural Domination in the Labor Market.” European Journal of Political Theory, online first.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L., and Arato, Andrew. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Crew, David F. “The Pathologies of Modernity: Detlev Peukert on Germany’s Twentieth Century.” Social History 17, no. 2 (1992): 319–328.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. “Privatised Keynesianism: An Unacknowledged Policy Regime.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 11, no. 3 (2009): 382–399.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, Barbara. The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Edward Ross. “Biopolitics, Fascism, Democracy: Some Reflections on Our Discourse about ‘Modernity.’” Central European History 37, no. 01 (2004): 1–48.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Edward Ross. “Not So Scary after All? Reform in Imperial and Weimar Germany.” Central European History 43, no. 01 (2010): 149–172.Google Scholar
Donzelot, Jacques. “The Promotion of the Social.” Economy and Society 17, no. 3 (1988): 395–427.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Earles, Kimberly. “The Gendered Effects of the Reregulation of the Swedish Welfare State.” Socialism and Democracy 18, no. 1 (January 01, 2004): 107–134.Google Scholar
Eghigian, Greg. Making Security Social: Disability, Insurance, and the Birth of the Social Entitlement State in Germany. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ellingsaeter, Anne Lise. “Scandinavian Transformations: Labour Markets, Politics and Gender Divisions.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 21, no. 3 (2000): 335–359.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Estévez-Abe, Margarita. “Gender Bias in Skills and Social Policies: The Varieties of Capitalism Perspective on Sex Segregation.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 12, no. 2 (June 20, 2005): 180–215.Google Scholar
Eydal, Guðný Björk, and Tine, Rostgaard. “Gender Equality Revisited – Changes in Nordic Childcare Policies in the 2000s.” Social Policy & Administration 45, no. 2 (2011): 161–179.Google Scholar
Farin, Ingo. “Early Heidegger’s Concept of History in Light of the Neo-Kantians.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 3, no. 4 (2009): 355–384.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stephen M. “An Interpretation of Max Weber’s Theory of Law: Metaphysics, Economics, and the Iron Cage of Constitutional Law.” Law & Social Inquiry 16, no. 2 (1991): 205–248.Google Scholar
Florin, Christina, and Nilsson, Bengt. “‘Something in the Nature of a Bloodless Revolution …’: How Gender Relations Became Gender Equality Policy in Sweden in the Nineteen-Sixties and Seventies.” In State Policy and Gender System in the Two German States and Sweden 1945–1989, edited by Torstendahl, Rolf. Opuscula Historica Upsaliensia. Uppsala: Distribution, Dept. of History, Uppsala Universitet, 1999.Google Scholar
Flynn, Bernard. “The Places of the Work of Art in Arendt’s Philosophy.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 17, no. 3 (1991): 217–228.Google Scholar
Forrester, Katrina. In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer. “A Kantian Republican Conception of Justice As Nondomination.” In Republican Democracy: Liberty, Law, and Democracy, edited by Niederberger, Andreas and Schink, Philipp, 154–169. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer. “Noumenal Power.” Journal of Political Philosophy 23, no. 2 (2015): 111–127.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer. The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. Translated by Flynn, Jeffrey. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage, 1977.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1977–1978. Translated by Burchell, Graham. New York: Picador, 2007.Google Scholar
Frangeur, Renée. “Social Democrats and the Women Question in Sweden: A History of Contradiction.” In Women and Socialism, Socialism and Women: Europe between the Two World Wars, edited by Gruber, Helmut and Graves, Pamela, 425–449. New York: Berghahn Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. “After the Family Wage: A Postindustrial Thought Experiment.” In Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition, 41–68. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. “Legitimation Crisis? On the Political Contradictions of Financialized Capitalism.” Critical Historical Studies 2, no. 2 (2015): 157–189.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. “A Triple Movement? Parsing the Politics of Crisis after Polanyi.” New Left Review 81, May–June (2013): 119–132.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. “What’s Critical about Critical Theory? The Case of Habermas and Gender.” In Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory, 113–143. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “Mourning and Melancholia.” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, edited by James Strachley 243–258. London: Vintage, 2001.Google Scholar
Gines, Kathryn T. Hannah Arendt and the Negro Question. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Getachew, Adom. Worldmaking After Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Chad Alan. Citizens and Paupers: Relief, Rights, and Race, from the Freedmen’s Bureau to Workfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Goldman, Harvey. Politics, Death, and the Devil: Self and Power in Max Weber and Thomas Mann. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Alyosha. Poverty in Common: The Politics of Community Action during the American Century. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gooding-Williams, Robert. In the Shadow of Du Bois: Afro-Modern Political Thought in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Alex. From Slavery to the Cooperative Commonwealth: Labor and Republican Liberty in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “A Reply.” In Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s The Theory of Communicative Action, edited by Honneth, Axel and Joas, Hans, 24–264. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Further Reflections on the Public Sphere.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Calhoun, Craig, 421–462. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Historical Materialism and the Development of Normative Structures.” Translated by McCarthy, Thomas. In Communication and the Evolution of Society, 95–129. Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Knowledge and Human Interests. Translated by Shapiro, Jeremy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Labor and Interaction: Remarks on Hegel’s Jena Philosophy of Mind.” In Theory and Practice 142–169. Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Legitimation Crisis. Translated by McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon, 1975.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.” Translated by Lenhardt, Christian and Nicholson, Shierry Weber. In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, 116–194. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Natural Law and Revolution.” In Theory and Practice, 82–120. Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “A Post-Script to Knowledge and Human Interests.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 3 (1973): 157–189.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Theory and Practice. Translated by Viertel, John. Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by McCarthy, Thomas. Vol. 2, Boston: Beacon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by McCarthy, Thomas. Vol. 1, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Toward a Reconstruction of Historical Materialism.” Translated by McCarthy, Thomas. In Communication and the Evolution of Society, 130–177. Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. “Varieties of Capitalist Interests and Capitalist Power: A Response to Swenson.” Studies in American Political Development 18, no. 2 (2004): 186–195.Google Scholar
Haley, Peter. “Rudolph Sohm on Charisma.” The Journal of Religion 60, no. 2 (1980): 185–197.Google Scholar
Haugaard, Mark. “Rethinking the Four Dimensions of Power: Domination and Empowerment.” Journal of Political Power 5, no. 1 (2012): 33–54.Google Scholar
Heath, Joseph. “Three Normative Models of the Welfare State.” Public Reason 3, no. 2 (2011): 13–44.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. “The Spirit of Christianity and Its Fate.” Translated by Knox, T. M.. In Early Theological Writings, 182–301. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1962.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Towards the Definition of Philosophy. Translated by Sadler, Ted. London and New Brunswick, NJ: The Athlone Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hennock, E. P. The Origin of the Welfare State in England and Germany, 1850–1914: Social Policies Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hentilä, Seppo. “The Origins of the Folkhem Ideology in Swedish Social Democracy.” Scandinavian Journal of History 3, no. 1–4 (1978): 323–345.Google Scholar
Hinnfors, Jonas. “Stability through Change: Swedish Parties and Family Policies, 1960–1980.” In State Policy and Gender System in the Two German States and Sweden 1945–1989, edited by Torstendahl, Rolf 105–132. Opuscula Historica Upsaliensia. Uppsala: Distribution, Dept. of History, Uppsala Universitet, 1999.Google Scholar
Hinton, Elizabeth. From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: The Making of Mass Incarceration in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hirdman, Yvonne, and Vale, Michel. “Utopia in the Home.” International Journal of Political Economy 22, no. 2 (1992): 5–99.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. Emergency Politics: Paradox, Law, Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. Public Things: Democracy in Disrepair. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. “Toward an Agonistic Feminism: Hannah Arendt and the Politics of Identity.” In Feminist Interpretations of Hannah Arendt, edited by Honig, Bonnie, 135–167. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory. Translated by Baynes, Kenneth. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. Translated by Ganahl, Joseph. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. “The Social Dynamics of Disrespect: On the Location of Critical Theory Today.” In Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory 63–79. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hook, Jennifer. “Gender Inequality in the Welfare State: Sex Segregation in Housework, 1965–2003.” American Journal of Sociology 115, no. 5 (2010): 1480–1523.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor W.. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Translated by Jephcott, Edmund. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2002 [1947].Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Hung, Ho-fung, and Thompson, Daniel. “Money Supply, Class Power, and Inflation: Monetarism Reassessed.” American Sociological Review 81, no. 3 (2016): 447–466.Google Scholar
Irving, Sean. “Hayek’s Neo-Roman Liberalism.” European Journal of Political Theory online first.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. “Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century.” World Politics 61, no. 03 (2009): 438–486.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane, and Rianne, Mahon. “Representing Solidarity: Class, Gender and the Crisis in Social-Democratic Sweden.” New Left Review, no. 201 (1993): 76–100.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jason. “Mothers, Wives, and Workers: Explaining Gendered Dimensions of the Welfare State.” Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 9 (2006): 1109–1132.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas. Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Gunnel. “Social Democratic Women’s Coup in the Swedish Parliament.” Translated by Gustafsson, Jennifer. In Is There a Nordic Feminism? Nordic Feminist Thought on Culture and Society, edited by von der Fehr, Drude, Rosenbeck, Bente and Jónasdóttir, Anna G., 44–68. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Kateb, George. “Wolin As a Critic of Democracy.” In Democracy and Vision: Sheldon Wolin and the Vicissitudes of the Political, edited by Botwinick, Aryeh and Connolly, William E., 39–58. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver. Thinking about Social Policy: The German Tradition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2013.Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore J. The Genesis of Heidegger’s “Being and Time”. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Klein, Steven. “Fictitious Freedom: A Polanyian Critique of the Republican Revival.” American Journal of Political Science 61, no. 4 (2017): 852–863.Google Scholar
Klein, Steven, and Lee, Cheol-Sung. “Towards a Dynamic Theory of Civil Society: The Politics of Forward and Backward Infiltration.” Sociological Theory 37, no. 1 (2019): 62–88.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James T. Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Kohn, Margaret. The Death and Life of the Urban Commonwealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. “Being under the Powers of Others.” In Republicanism and the Future of Democracy, edited by Rousselière, Geneviève and Elizar, Yiftah, 94–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. “Rule over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 42, no. 4 (2014): 287–336.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. “Contentious Institutions: An Augmented Rational-Action Analysis of the Origins and Path Dependency of Welfare State Institutions in the Western Countries.” Rationality and Society 13, no. 2 (2001): 235–283.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. “Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists.” World Politics 58, no. 2 (2006): 167–206.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter, Ferrarini, Tommy, and Englund, Stefan. “Women’s Opportunities under Different Family Policy Constellations: Gender, Class, and Inequality Tradeoffs in Western Countries Re-Examined.” Social Politics 20, no. 1 (2013): 1–40.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter, and Palme, Joakim. “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries.” American Sociological Review 63, no. 5 (1998): 661–687.Google Scholar
Koven, Seth, and Michel, Sonya, eds. Mothers of a New World: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of the Welfare State. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Koven, Seth, and Michel, Sonya, eds. “Womanly Duties: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States, 1880–1920.” The American Historical Review 95, no. 4 (1990): 1076–1108.Google Scholar
Krippner, Greta R. “Democracy of Credit: Ownership and the Politics of Credit Access in Late Twentieth-Century America.” American Journal of Sociology 123, no. 1 (2017): 1–47.Google Scholar
Lee, Cheol-Sung. When Solidarity Works: Labor-Civic Networks and Welfare States in the Market Reform Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, Turo-Kimmo, and Liukko, Jyri. “Producing Solidarity, Inequality, and Exclusion through Insurance.” Res Publica 21, no. 2 (2015): 155–169.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jane, and Åström, Gertrude. “Equality, Difference, and State Welfare: Labor Market and Family Policies in Sweden.” Feminist Studies 18, no. 1 (1992): 59–87.Google Scholar
Lidtke, Vernon L. The Outlawed Party: Social Democracy in Germany, 1878–1890. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Lindenfeld, David F. The Practical Imagination: The German Sciences of State in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Lindholm, Marika. “Swedish Feminism, 1835–1945: A Conservative Revolution.” Journal of Historical Sociology 4, no. 2 (1991): 121–142.Google Scholar
List, Christian, and Valentini, Laura. “Freedom As Independence.” Ethics 126, no. 4 (2016): 1043–1074.Google Scholar
Lister, Ruth. “A Nordic Nirvana? Gender, Citizenship, and Social Justice in the Nordic Welfare States.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 16, no. 2 (2009): 242–278.Google Scholar
Lizardo, Omar, and Stoltz, Dustin S.. “Max Weber’s Ideal versus Material Interest Distinction Revisited.” European Journal of Social Theory 21, no. 1 (2018): 3–21.Google Scholar
Locke, Jill. “Little Rock’s Social Question: Reading Arendt on School Desegregation and Social Climbing.” Political Theory 41, no. 4 (2013): 533–561.Google Scholar
Lovett, Frank. A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lovett, Frank, and Pettit, Philip. “Neorepublicanism: A Normative and Institutional Research Program.” Annual Review of Political Science 12, no. 1 (2009): 11–29.Google Scholar
Lundell, Torborg. “Ellen Key and Swedish Feminist Views on Motherhood.” Scandinavian Studies 56, no. 4 (1984): 351–369.Google Scholar
Lundqvist, Åsa. Family Policy Paradoxes: Gender Equality and Labor Market Regulation 1930–2010. Bristol: The Policy Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Lyne, Ian. “Rickert and Heidegger: On the Value of Everyday Objects.” Kant-Studien 91, no. 2 (2000): 204–225.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne. “Child Care in Canada and Sweden: Policy and Politics.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 4, no. 3 (1997): 382–418.Google Scholar
Maley, Terry. Democracy and the Political in Max Weber’s Thought. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Mandel, Hadas, and Semyonov, Moshe. “A Welfare State Paradox: State Interventions and Women’s Employment Opportunities in 22 Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 111, no. 6 (2006): 1910–1949.Google Scholar
Manns, Ulla. “Gender and Feminism in Sweden: The Fredrika Bremer Association.” In Women’s Emancipation Movements in the Nineteenth Century: A European Perspective, edited by Paletschek, Sylvia and Pietrow-Ennker, Bianka, 152–164. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Manow, Philip. “Social Insurance and the German Political Economy.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 97, no. 2 (1997): 1–48.Google Scholar
Marasco, Robyn. The Highway of Despair: Critical Theory after Hegel. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Marin, Mara. Connected by Commitment: Oppression and Our Responsibility to Undermine It. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Marin, Mara. “What Domination Can and Cannot Do: Gender Oppression and the Limits of the Notion of Domination.” Unpublished Manuscript, 2018.Google Scholar
Markell, Patchen. “Arendt’s Work: On the Architecture of the Human Condition.” College Literature 38, no. 1 (2011): 15–44.Google Scholar
Markell, Patchen. “The Insufficiency of Non-Domination.” Political Theory 36, no. 1 (2008): 9–36.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. “The Critique of Impure Reason: Foucault and the Frankfurt School.” Political Theory 18, no. 3 (1990): 437–469.Google Scholar
McClure, Kirstie M. “The Social Question, Again.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 28, no. 1 (2008): 85–113.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. Weber, Habermas and Transformations of the European State: Constitutional, Social, and Supranational Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
McDougall, Glen R. “Franz Mehring and the Problems of Liberal Social Reform, in Bismarckian Germany 1884–90: The Origins of Radical Marxism.” Central European History 16, no. 03 (1983): 225–255.Google Scholar
McNay, Lois. “The Limits of Justification: Critique, Disclosure and Reflexivity.” European Journal of Political Theory 19, no. 1 (2020): 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medearis, John. Why Democracy Is Oppositional. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Mengelberg, Kaethe. “Lorenz Von Stein, His Life and Work.” Translated by Mengelberg, Kaethe. In The History of the Social Movement in France, 1789–1850, 3–39. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchic Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Translated by Eden, and Paul, Cedar. New York: The Free Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Myers, Ella. Worldly Ethics: Democratic Politics and Care for the World. Durham: Duke University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Alva. Nation and Family: The Swedish Experiment in Democratic Family and Population Policy. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1941.Google Scholar
Nau, Heino Heinrich. “Gustav Schmoller’s Historico-Ethical Political Economy: Ethics, Politics and Economics in the Younger German Historical School, 1860–1917.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 7, no. 4 (2000): 507–531.Google Scholar
Nolan, Mary. Social Democracy and Society: Working-Class Radicalism in Düsseldorf, 1890–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Norval, Aletta J. Aversive Democracy: Inheritance and Originality in the Democratic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Numhauser-Henning, Ann. “The Policy in Gender Equality in Sweden.” Brussels: Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, European Parliament, 2015.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Martin, and Williamson, Thad, eds. Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Olson, Erik J. Civic Republicanism and the Properties of Democracy: A Study of Post-Socialist Political Theory. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Olson, Kevin. “Complexities of Political Discourse: Class, Power, and the Linguistic Turn.” In Justice, Democracy, and the Right to Justification: Rainer Forst in Dialogue, edited by Forst, Rainer, 87–102. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Kevin. Reflexive Democracy: Political Equality and the Welfare State. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.” American Sociological Review 58, no. 3 (1993): 303–328.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. “Gendering the Comparative Analysis of Welfare States: An Unfinished Agenda.” Sociological Theory 27, no. 3 (2009): 317–343.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. “Should Feminists Aim for Gender Symmetry?: Why the Dual-Earner/Dual-Carer Model May Not Be Every Feminist’s Utopia.” In Gender Equality: Transforming Gender Divisions of Labor, edited by Wright, Erik Olin, 129–160. London: Verso, 2009.Google Scholar
Owen, David, and Strong, Tracy B.. “Max Weber’s Calling to Knowledge and Action.” In Max Weber: The Vocation Lectures, edited by Owen, David and Strong, Tracy B., ix–lxii. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
Owens, Patricia. Economics of Force: Counterinsurgency and the Historical Rise of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Palmowski, Jan. Urban Liberalism in Imperial Germany: Frankfurt Am Main, 1866–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Pankoke, Eckart. “‘Personality’ As a Principle of Individual and Institutional Development: Lorenz Von Stein’s Institutional Theory of a ‘Labour-Society.’” In The Theory of the Ethical Economy in the Historical School: Wilhelm Roscher, Lorenz Von Stein, Gustav Schmoller, Wilhelm Dilthey and Contemporary Theory, edited by Koslowski, Peter, 39–51. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
Paster, Thomas. “Business and Welfare State Development: Why Did Employers Accept Social Reforms?” World Politics 65, no. 03 (2013): 416–451.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Cambridge: Polity, 2001.Google Scholar
Peukert, Detlev J. K. “The Genesis of the ‘Final Solution’ from the Spirit of Science.” In Reevaluating the Third Reich, edited by Childers, Thomas and Caplan, Jane, 234–262. New York: Holmes & Meier, 1993.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Translated by Goldhammer, Arthur. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. “Justice: On Relating Private and Public.” Political Theory 9, no. 3 (1981): 327–352.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage, 1977.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty.” The Nation, May 2, 1966.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. “At the End of the Third Road: Swedish Social Democracy in Crisis.” Politics and Society 20, no. 3 (1992): 305–332.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. The Limits of Social Democracy: Investment Politics in Sweden. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. “Radicalization and Retreat in Swedish Social Democracy.” New Left Review 165 (1987): 5–33.Google Scholar
Postone, Moishe. Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Prasad, Monica. The Land of Too Much: American Abundance and the Paradox of Poverty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Quadagno, Jill. The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Qvist, Gunnar. “Policy towards Women and the Women’s Struggle in Sweden.” Scandinavian Journal of History 5, no. 1–4 (1980): 51–74.Google Scholar
Raeff, Marc. “The Well-Ordered Police State and the Development of Modernity in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Europe: An Attempt at a Comparative Approach.” The American Historical Review 80, no. 5 (1975): 1221–1243.Google Scholar
Rahman, K. Sabeel. Democracy against Domination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rieger, Elmar, and Leibfried, Stephan. Limits to Globalization: Welfare States and the World Economy. Translated by Veghte, Benjamin W.. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Ritter, Gerhard A. Social Welfare in Germany and Britain: Origins and Development. Translated by Traynor, Kim. New York: Learnington Spa, 1986.Google Scholar
Roberts, William Clare. Marx’s Inferno: The Political Theory of Capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Roth, Guenther. The Social Democrats in Imperial Germany. A Study in Working-Class Isolation and National Integration. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Roth, Ralf. “Bürger and Workers: Liberalism and the Labor Movement in Germany, 1848 to 1914.” In Between Reform and Revolution: German Socialism and Communism from 1840 to 1990, edited by Barclay, David E. and Weitz, Eric D., 113–140. New York: Berghahn Books, 1994.Google Scholar
Saar, Martin. “Genealogy and Subjectivity.” European Journal of Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2002): 231–245.Google Scholar
Sachße, Christoph. “Social Mothers: The Bourgeois Women’s Movement and German Welfare-State Formation, 1890–1929.” In Mothers of a New World: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of the Welfare State, edited by Koven, Seth and Michel, Sonya, 136–158. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane. “Gender and the Making of Welfare States: Norway and Sweden.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 8, no. 1 (2001): 113–143.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane, ed. Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane, and Bergqvist, Christina. “The Promise and Pitfalls of Gender Mainstreaming.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 11, no. 2 (2009): 216–234.Google Scholar
Satkunanandan, Shalini. “Bureaucratic Passions.” Law, Culture and the Humanities 15, no. 1 (2019): 14–29.Google Scholar
Satkunanandan, Shalini. Extraordinary Responsibility: Politics Beyond the Moral Calculus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. “Still the Century of Corporatism?.” The Review of Politics 36, no. 01 (1974): 85–131.Google Scholar
Schmoller, Gustav. “Die Sociale Frage Und Der Preußische Staat.” Preußische Jahrbücher XXXIII (1874): 323–342.Google Scholar
Schmoller, Gustav. “Schmoller on Class Conflicts in General.” American Journal of Sociology 20, no. 4 (1915): 504–531.Google Scholar
Schmoller, Gustav, von Halle, Ernst L., and Schutz, Carl L.. “The Idea of Justice in Political Economy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 4 (1894): 1–41.Google Scholar
Schnyder, Gerhard. “Like a Phoenix from the Ashes? Reassessing the Transformation of the Swedish Political Economy since the 1970s.” Journal of European Public Policy 19, no. 8 (2012): 1126–1145.Google Scholar
Schrader, Stuart. “To Secure the Global Great Society: Participation in Pacification.” Humanity: A International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 7, no. 2 (2016): 225–253.Google Scholar
Seeber, Gustav. “Linksliberale Und Sozialdemokratische Kritik an Bismarcks Sozialreform.” In Bismarcks Sozialstaat: Beiträge Zur Geschichte Der Sozialpolitik Und Zur Sozialpolitischen Geschichtsschreibung, edited by Machtan, Lothar, 83–125. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
Sejersted, Francis. The Age of Social Democracy: Norway and Sweden in the Twentieth-Century. Translated by Daly, Richard. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sharon, Assaf. “Domination and the Rule of Law.” Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 2 (2016): 128–155.Google Scholar
Shaw, Tamsin. “The ‘Last Man’ Problem: Nietzsche and Weber on Political Attitudes towards Suffering.” In Nietzsche As Political Philosopher, edited by Stocker, Barry and Knoll, Manuel, 345–380. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.Google Scholar
Shaw, Tamsin. “Max Weber on Democracy: Can the People Have Political Power in Modern States?.” Constellations 15, no. 1 (2008): 33–45.Google Scholar
Smith, Anna Marie. Welfare Reform and Sexual Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Spektorowski, Alberto, and Mizrachi, Elisabet. “Eugenics and the Welfare State in Sweden: The Politics of Social Margins and the Idea of a Productive Society.” Journal of Contemporary History 39, no. 3 (2004): 333–352.Google Scholar
Sperber, Jonathan. “The Social Democratic Electorate in Imperial Germany.” In Between Reform and Revolution: German Socialism and Communism from 1840 to 1990, edited by Barclay, David E. and Weitz, Eric D., 167–194. New York: Berghahn Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Stahl, Titus. “Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique.” Constellations 20, no. 4 (2013): 533–552.Google Scholar
Stein, Lorenz von. The History of the Social Movement in France, 1789–1850. Translated by Mengelberg, Kaethe. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George. Regulating the Social: The Welfare State and Local Politics in Imperial Germany. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven. “Globalization and Taxation: Challenges to the Swedish Welfare State.” Comparative Political Studies 35, no. 7 (2002): 839–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strazzeri, Victor. “Max Weber and German Social Democracy: A Study on the Relationship between the Liberal Bourgeoisie and the Labor Movement in Imperial Germany (1882–1899).” Dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin, 2017.Google Scholar
Strazzeri, Victor. “Max Weber and the ‘Labour Question’: An Initial Appraisal.” Max Weber Studies 15, no. 1 (2015): 69–100.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. Translated by Camiller, Patrick. London: Verso, 2014.Google Scholar
Sweeney, Dennis. “Liberalism, the Worker and the Limits of Bourgeois Öffentlichkeit in Wilhelmine Germany.” German History 22, no. 1 (2004): 36–75.Google Scholar
Sweeney, Dennis. “Reconsidering the Modernity Paradigm: Reform Movements, the Social, and the State in Wilhelmine Germany.” Social History 31, no. 4 (2006): 405–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, Peter A. “Varieties of Capitalist Interests: Power, Institutions, and the Regulatory Welfare State in the United States and Sweden.” Studies in American Political Development 18, no. 01 (2004): 1–29.Google Scholar
Taylor, Robert S. Exit Left: Markets and Mobility in Republican Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Tennstedt, Florian. Vom Proleten zum Industriearbeiter: Arbeiterbewegung und Sozialpolitik in Deutschland 1800 bis 1914. Cologne: Bund-Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alan. Republic of Equals: Predistribution and Property-Owning Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. “Heidegger and National Socialism.” In A Companion to Heidegger, edited by Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Wrathall, Mark A., 32–48. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. “Heidegger and the Politics of the University.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41, no. 4 (2003): 515–542.Google Scholar
Torstensson, David. “America’s Wars on Poverty and the Building of the Welfare State.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia, American History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse, 1750–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. “Max Weber’s Tragic Modernism and the Study of Law in Society.” Law & Society Review 20, no. 4 (1986): 573–604.Google Scholar
Tsao, Roy T. “Arendt against Athens: Rereading the Human Condition.” Political Theory 30, no. 1 (2002): 97–123.Google Scholar
Victoria Costa, M. “Rawls on Liberty and Domination.” Res Publica 15, no. 4 (2009): 397.Google Scholar
Villa, Dana. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Villa, Dana. “Arendt, Heidegger, and the Tradition.” Social Research 74, no. 4 (2007): 983–1002.Google Scholar
Villa, Dana. “The ‘Autonomy of the Political’ Reconsidered.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 28, no. 1 (2008): 29–45.Google Scholar
Volk, Christian. Arendtian Constitutionalism: Law, Politics and the Order of Freedom. Oxford: Hart, 2015.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark. “Max Weber’s Liberalism for a Nietzschean World.” American Political Science Review 82, no. 1 (1988): 31–50.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Handwritten Note from an Envelope with the Imprint ‘Schickert’s Parc-Hôtel, Nervi,’ Marked ‘Rickerts ‘Werthe’’ (Rickert’s ‘Values’).” In Collected Methodological Writings, edited by Bruun, Hans Henrik and Whimster, Sam 413. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Intervention in the Discussion on ‘the Productivity of the National Economy.’” In Collected Methodological Writings, edited by Bruun, Hans Henrik and Whimster, Sam 358–361. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, 323–362. New York: Oxford University Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “The ‘Objectivity’ of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy.” In Collected Methodological Writings, edited by Bruun, Hans Henrik and Whimster, Sam 100–138. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the “Spirit” of Capitalism and Other Writings. Translated by Baehr, Peter R. and Wells, Gordon C.. New York: Penguin, 2002.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “The Social Psychology of the World Religions.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, 267–301. New York: Oxford University Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. The Vocation Lectures. Translated by Livingstone, Rodney. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2004.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Wirtschaft Und Gesellschaft: Grundriss Der Verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1980.Google Scholar
Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. The German Empire, 1871–1918. Translated by Traynor, Kim. Leamington Spa: Berg, 1985.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L. The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Lindley. Democratic Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. “Democracy and the Welfare State: The Political and Theoretical Connections between Staaträson and Wohlfartsstaaträson.” In The Presence of the Past: Essays on the State and the Constitution, 151–179. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. “Fugitive Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference, edited by Benhabib, Seyla 31–45. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. “Max Weber: Legitimation, Method, and the Politics of Theory.” Political Theory 9, no. 3 (1981): 401–424.Google Scholar
Zerilli, Linda M. G. Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar