Acton, E. K. and Potts, C., 2014. That straight talk: Sarah Palin and the sociolinguistics of demonstratives. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18 (1), 3–31.Google Scholar

Adams, K. L., 1992. Accruing power on debate floors. In Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B., eds., Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 1–10.Google Scholar

Adams, K. L., 1999. Deliberate dispute and the construction of oppositional stance. Pragmatics, 9 (2), 231–248.Google Scholar

Adams, K. L., 2015. Governors debating: The role of situational, discourse and transportable identities. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217–250.Google Scholar

Adcock, C., 2010. The politician, the wife, the citizen, and her newspaper. Feminist Media Studies, 10 (2), 135–159.Google Scholar

Adelswärd, V., 1989. Laughter and dialogue: The social significance of laughter in institutional discourse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 12 (2), 107–136.Google Scholar

Agha, A., 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication, 23 (3), 231–273.Google Scholar

Agha, A., 2007. Language and Social Relations: Structure, Use and Social Significance. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ahmed, S., 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Ahrens, K., ed., 2009. Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ahrens, P., Celis, K., Childs, S., Engeli, I., Evans, E., and Mügge, L., 2018. Editorial: Politics and gender: Rocking political science and creating new horizons. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1 (1–2), 3–16.Google Scholar

Alexander, M., 2016. The metaphorical understanding of power and authority. In Anderson, W., Bramwell, E. and Hough, C., eds., Mapping English Metaphor through Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 191–207.Google Scholar

Allen, P. and Childs, S., 2018. The grit in the oyster? Women’s parliamentary organizations and the substantive representation of women. Political Studies. doi:10.1177/0032321718793080.Google Scholar

Alter, C., 2016. Trump faced his toughest opponent: Megyn Kelly. Time Magazine. http://time.com/4247405/donald-trump-megyn-kelly-debate-opponent/ [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar

Angouri, J., 2011. ‘We are in a masculine profession…’: Constructing gender identities in a consortium of two multinational engineering companies. Gender and Language, 5 (2), 373–403.Google Scholar

Angouri, J., 2018a. Culture, Discourse, and the Workplace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Angouri, J., 2018b. Quantitative, qualitative, mixed or holistic research? Combining methods in linguistic research. In Litosseliti, L., ed., Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury, 35–55.Google Scholar

Anitha, S. and Gill, A., 2009. The illusion of protection? An analysis of forced marriage legislation and policy in the UK. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31 (3), 257–269.Google Scholar

Appleby, R., 2015. Julia Gillard: A murderous rage. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 149–168.Google Scholar

Archer, D., 2015. Slurs, insults, (backhanded) compliments and other strategic facework moves. Language Sciences, 52, 82–97.Google Scholar

Archer, D., 2018. Negotiating difference in political contexts: An exploration of Hansard. Language Sciences, 68 (July), 22–41.Google Scholar

Asenbaum, H., 2019a. Making a difference: Toward a feminist democratic theory in the digital age. Politics & Gender, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18001010 [accessed 25 June 2019].Google Scholar

Asenbaum, H., 2019b. Subject to Change: Anonymity and Democracy in the Digital Age. London: University of Westminster.Google Scholar

Ashley, J., 2004. Bullied, patronised and abused – women MPs reveal the truth about life inside Westminster. The Guardian, 7 December. www.theguardian.com/politics/2004/dec/07/uk.gender [accessed 25 June 2018].Google Scholar

Asterhan, C. S. C., 2018. Exploring enablers and inhibitors of productive peer argumentation: The role of individual achievement goals and of gender. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54 (July), 66–78.Google Scholar

Aston, H., 2012. Gillard’s father died of shame: Alan Jones. The Age. www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/gillards-father-died-of-shame-alan-jones-20120929-26soa.html [accessed 24 October 2018].Google Scholar

Atanga, L. L., 2010. Gender, Discourse and Power in the Cameroonian Parliament. Oxford: African Books Collective.Google Scholar

Atchison, A. L., 2018. Towards the good profession: Improving the status of women in political science. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1 (1–2), 279–298.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. M., 1984. Our Masters’ Voices: Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J., 1999. Jefferson’s transcript notation. In Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N., eds., The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge, 158–166.Google Scholar

Azari, J., 2015. Questions of authenticity are really questions about race, class, and democracy. Vox. www.vox.com/mischiefs-of-faction/2015/10/1/9431367/authenticity-race-gender-democracy [accessed 7 November 2018].Google Scholar

Bäck, H., Debus, M., and Müller, J., 2014. Who takes the parliamentary floor? The role of gender in speech-making in the Swedish Riksdag. Political Research Quarterly, 67 (3), 504–518.Google Scholar

Badham, V., 2013. Who will win my bogan vote? The Guardian, 27 May 2013. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/27/bogan-test-abbott-gillard [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar

Ball, M., 2016. What kind of a man is Donald Trump? The Atlantic, 8 October 2016. www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trump-and-the-women/503402/ [accessed 10 October 2018].Google Scholar

Banwart, M. C. and McKinney, M. S., 2005. A gendered influence in campaign debates? Analysis of mixed-gender United States Senate and gubernatorial debates. Communication Studies, 56 (4), 353–373.Google Scholar

Barrueco, J., 2016. The real reason people question if Hillary Clinton is human. Cosmopolitan. www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a6963161/hillary-clinton-unlikable-human-robotic/ [accessed 7 November 2018].Google Scholar

Bates, S. R., Kerr, P., Byrne, C., and Stanley, L., 2014. Questions to the Prime Minister: A comparative study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron. Parliamentary Affairs, 67 (2), 253–280.Google Scholar

Baxter, J., 1999. Teaching girls to speak out: An investigation of the extent to which gender is a pertinent discourse for describing and assessing girls’ and boys’ speech in public contexts. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Reading.Google Scholar

Baxter, J., 2006. Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Baxter, J., 2010. The Language of Female Leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan and Springer.Google Scholar

Baxter, J., 2017. Freeing women political leaders from their gender stereotypes. In Ilie, C. and Schnurr, S., eds., Challenging Leadership Stereotypes through Discourse. Singapore: Springer, 173–194.Google Scholar

Baxter, J., 2018. Women Leaders and Gender Stereotyping in the UK Press: A Poststructuralist Approach. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

BBC, 2015. BBC Two – Inside the commons. www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0522z48 [accessed 25 June 2018].Google Scholar

BBC News, 2018. MPs condemn ‘vile’ abuse of Theresa May. BBC News Website. www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-45938754 [accessed 22 October 2018].Google Scholar

Beal, F. M., 2008. Double Jeopardy: To be black and female. Meridians, 8 (2), 166–176.Google Scholar

Beard, M., 2017. Women and Power: A Manifesto. London: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Beattie, G., 2016. How Donald Trump bullies with his body language. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/how-donald-trump-bullies-with-his-body-language-66468 [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar

Beckwith, K., 2007. Numbers and newness: The descriptive and substantive representation of women. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 40 (1), 27–49.Google Scholar

Beinart, P., 2019. There’s a reason many voters have negative views of Warren – But the press won’t tell you why. The Atlantic, 2 January. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/01/elizabeth-warren-unpopular-it-depends-who-you-ask/579247/ [accessed 28 January 2019].Google Scholar

Bejarano, C. E., 2013. The Latina Advantage: Gender, Race, and Political Success. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Bennister, M., 2016. The oratory of Hillary Clinton. In Crines, A. and Moon, D., eds., Democratic Orators from JFK to Barack Obama. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 239–260.Google Scholar

Bergvall, V., 1999. Towards a comprehensive theory of language and gender. Language in Society, 28 (2), 273–293.Google Scholar

Bicquelet, A., Weale, A., and Judith, B., 2012. In a different parliamentary voice? Politics & Gender, 8 (1), 83–121.Google Scholar

Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Leech, G., 2002. Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Billig, M., 2000. Towards a critique of the critical. Discourse & Society, 11 (3), 291–292.Google Scholar

Bird, K., 2005. Gendering parliamentary questions. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 7 (3), 353–370.Google Scholar

Bird, S., 1996. Welcome to the men’s club: Homosociality and the maintenance of hegemonic masculinity. Gender and Society, 10 (2), 120–132.Google Scholar

Biressi, A. and Nunn, H., 2017. Transforming the politics of gender and voice: Strategies of expertise and experience. In Sabido, R. S., ed., Representing Communities: Discourse and Contexts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 35–53.Google Scholar

Bjarnegård, A. P. E., 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bjarnegård, E. and Murray, R., 2018a. Critical perspectives on men and masculinities in politics: Introduction. Politics & Gender, 14 (2), 264–265.Google Scholar

Bjarnegård, E. and Murray, R., 2018b. Revisiting forms of representation by critically examining men. Politics & Gender, 14 (2), 265–270.Google Scholar

Blair, T., 2011. A Journey. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar

Blaxill, L. and Beelen, K., 2016. A feminized language of democracy? The representation of women at Westminster since 1945. Twentieth Century British History, 27 (3), 412–449.Google Scholar

Bock, J., Byrd-Craven, J., and Burkley, M., 2017. The role of sexism in voting in the 2016 presidential election. Personality and Individual Differences, 119 (December), 189–193.Google Scholar

Bongiorno, F., 2012. What we talk about when we talk about bogans. Inside Story. https://insidestory.org.au/what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-bogans/ [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar

Bortoluzzi, M. and Semino, E., 2016. Face attack in Italian politics. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 4 (2), 178–201.Google Scholar

Boryczka, J. M., 2018. WANTED: Hillary Clinton, suspect citizen. Politics & Gender, 14 (1), 121–127.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P., 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Boxer, D., Jones, L. M., and Cortés-Conde, F., 2017. Cracking the concrete ceiling in male-dominated societies: A tale of three ‘Presidentas’. In Ilie, C. and Schnurr, S., eds., Challenging Leadership Stereotypes through Discourse. Singapore: Springer, 195–219.Google Scholar

Boyd, M. S., 2012. Reframing the American dream: Conceptual metaphor and personal pronouns in the 2008 US presidential debates. In Cap, P. and Okulska, U., eds., Analyzing Genres in Political Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 297–320.Google Scholar

Boyle, K., 2019. What’s in a name? Theorising the inter-relationships of gender and violence. Feminist Theory, 20 (1), 19–36.Google Scholar

Bradley-Geist, J. C., Rivera, I., and Geringer, S. D., 2015. The collateral damage of ambient sexism: Observing sexism impacts bystander self-esteem and career aspirations. Sex Roles, 73 (1), 29–42.Google Scholar

Brescoll, V. L., 2011. Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56 (4), 622–641.Google Scholar

Brescoll, V. L., 2016. Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 415–428.Google Scholar

Brewis, J., 2001. ‘Telling it like it is?’ Gender, language and organizational theory. In Westwood, R. and Linstead, S., eds., The Language of Organization. London: Sage, 283–309.Google Scholar

Brown, A., 2000. Designing the Scottish parliament. Parliamentary Affairs, 53 (3), 542–556.Google Scholar

Brown, A., 2005. Women and the new Scottish parliament: Making a difference? (Research Summary) ESRC End of Award Report. R000223281 Swindon: ESRC.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S., 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Browning, B. C., Wright, P. E., and Fowler, A. R., eds., 2018. House of Representatives Practice. 7th ed. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/Practice7 [accessed 15 October 2018].Google Scholar

Bull, P., 2013. The role of adversarial discourse in political opposition: Prime Minister’s questions and the British phone-hacking scandal. Language and Dialogue, 3 (2), 254–272.Google Scholar

Bull, P., 2016. Theresa May has a very special technique for avoiding questions. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/theresa-may-has-a-very-special-technique-for-avoiding-questions-67424 [accessed 24 September 2018].Google Scholar

Bull, A. and Allen, K., 2018. Introduction: Sociological interrogations of the turn to character. Sociological Research Online, 23 (2), 392–398.Google Scholar

Bull, P. and Mayer, K., 1988. Interruptions in political interviews: A study of Margaret Thatcher and Neil Kinnock. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7 (1), 35–46.Google Scholar

Bull, P. and Strawson, W., 2019. Can’t answer? won’t answer? An analysis of equivocal responses by Theresa May in Prime Minister’s questions. Parliamentary Affairs, Online First. http://academic.oup.com/pa/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pa/gsz003/5307955 [accessed 12 February 2019].Google Scholar

Bull, P. and Waddle, M., 2019. Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7 (1), 56–78.Google Scholar

Bull, P. and Wells, P., 2012. Adversarial discourse in Prime Minister’s questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31 (1), 30–48.Google Scholar

Burnett, D., 2011. PM must de-bogan to get attention. Sunshine Coast Daily, 19 July. www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/news/pm-must-de-bogan-her-accent-to-get-us-listening/909174/ [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar

Butler, J., 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., 1990. The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., 1992. ‘Not gender difference but the difference gender makes’ – Explanation in research on sex and language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 94 (1), 13–26.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., 1996. The language-gender interface: Challenging co-optation. In Bergvall, V. and Bing, J. M., eds., Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice. New York: Longman, 31–55.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., 1997a. Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Johnson, S. and Meinhof, U. H., eds., Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell, 47–64.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., 1997b. Theoretical debates in feminist linguistics: Questions of sex and gender. In Wodak, R., ed., Gender and Discourse. London: Sage, 21–37.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., 2000. Good to Talk? Living and Working in a Communication Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., 2003. Gender and language ideologies. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., eds., The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, 447–467.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., 2006. On Language and Sexual Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., 2007. The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., 2016. On banter, bonding and Donald Trump. Language: A feminist guide. https://debuk.wordpress.com/2016/10/09/on-banter-bonding-and-donald-trump/ [accessed 11 November 2018].Google Scholar

Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B., and Richardson, K., 1992. Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cameron, D., McAlinden, F., and O’Leary, K., 1988. Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In Coates, J. and Cameron, D., eds., Women in Their Speech Communities. Harlow: Longman, 74–93.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. and Shaw, S., 2016. Gender, Power and Political Speech: Women and Language in the 2015 UK General Election. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. and Shaw, S., 2020. Constructing women’s “different voice”: Gendered Mediation in the 2015 UK General Election. Journal of Language and Politics, 19 (1), 143–159.Google Scholar

Campbell, A., 2011. The Alastair Campbell Diaries. Vol. 2: Power to the People 1997–99. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Campbell, J., 2012. Warning women: Don’t read this. The Sydney Morning Herald, 14 October.Google Scholar

Campbell, K. K., 1989. Man Cannot Speak for Her: A Critical Study of Early Feminist Rhetoric. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Campbell, K. K., 1998. The discursive performance of femininity: Hating Hillary. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 1 (1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Carlin, D. B. and Winfrey, K. L., 2009. Have you come a long way, baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and sexism in 2008 campaign coverage. Communication Studies, 60 (4), 326–343.Google Scholar

Carter, A., Croft, A., Lukas, D., and Sandstrom, G., 2018. Women’s visibility in academic seminars: Women ask fewer questions than men. PLOS ONE, 13 (9), e0202743. http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10985 [accessed 3 January 2019].Google Scholar

Catalano, A., 2009. Women acting for women: An analysis of gender and debate participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007. Politics & Gender, 5 (1), 45–68.Google Scholar

Celis, K. and Childs, S., 2018. Conservatism and women’s political representation. Politics & Gender, 14 (1), 5–26.Google Scholar

Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., and Krook, M. L., 2008. Rethinking women’s substantive representation. Representation, 44 (2), 99–110.Google Scholar

Celis, K. and Erzeel, S., 2015. Beyond the usual suspects: Non-Left, male and non-feminist MPs and the substantive representation of women. Government and Opposition, 50 (1), 45–64.Google Scholar

Celis, K., Erzeel, S., Mügge, L., and Damstra, A., 2014. Quotas and intersectionality: Ethnicity and gender in candidate selection. International Political Science Review, 35 (1), 41–54.Google Scholar

Celis, K. and Lovenduski, J., 2018. Power struggles: Gender equality in political representation. European Journal of Politics and Gender. 1 (1–2), 131–147.Google Scholar

Chaney, P., 2004. The post-devolution equality agenda: The case of the Welsh assembly’s statutory duty to promote equality of opportunity. Policy and Politics, 32 (1), 63–77.Google Scholar

Chappell, L., 2006. Comparing political institutions: Revealing the gendered ‘logic of appropriateness’. Politics & Gender, 2 (2), 223–235.Google Scholar

Chappell, L. and Waylen, G., 2013. Gender and the hidden life of institutions. Public Administration, 91 (3), 599–615.Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J., 2009. Metaphor and gender in British parliamentary debates. In Ahrens, K., ed., Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 139–165.Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J., 2014. Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J., 2017. Competition metaphors and ideology: Life as a race. In Wodak, R. and Forchtner, B., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. Oxford: Routledge, 202–217.Google Scholar

Childs, S., 2000. The new labour women MPs in the 1997 British parliament: Issues of recruitment and representation. Women’s History Review, 9 (1), 55–73.Google Scholar

Childs, S., 2004. New Labour’s Women MPs: Women Representing Women. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Childs, S., 2016. The good parliament. University of Bristol/ESRC. www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/news/2016/july/20%20Jul%20Prof%20Sarah%20Childs%20The%20Good%20Parliament%20report.pdf [accessed 23 July 2018].Google Scholar

Childs, S. and Dahlerup, D., 2018. Increasing women’s descriptive representation in national parliaments: The involvement and impact of gender and politics scholars. European Journal of Politics and Gender. 1 (1–2), 185–204.Google Scholar

Childs, S. and Krook, M. L., 2006. Should feminists give up on critical mass? A contingent yes. Politics & Gender, 2 (4), 522–530.Google Scholar

Childs, S. and Webb, P., 2011. Sex, Gender and the Conservative Party: From Iron Lady to Kitten Heels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Childs, S. and Withey, J., 2004. Women representatives acting for women: Sex and the signing of early day motions in the 1997 British parliament. Political Studies, 52 (3), 552–564.Google Scholar

Chilton, P. A., 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Christie, C., 2003. Politeness and the linguistic construction of gender in parliament: An analysis of transgressions and apology behaviour. Sheffield Hallam Working Papers: Linguistic Politeness and Context. http://extra.shu.ac.uk/wpw/politeness/christie.htm [accessed 27 August 2015].Google Scholar

Cliff, M., 2016. Theresa May and Hillary Clinton wear matching outfits. Mail Online, 13 July. www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3688798/Theresa-wears-yellow-black-ensemble-just-like-Hillary-Clinton.html [accessed 13 February 2019].Google Scholar

Clinton, H. R., 2017. What Happened. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Clune, B., 2013. Playing the ‘gender card’? As if Julia Gillard has a choice. The Guardian, 12 June. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/12/menu-quail-julia-gillard-liberal [accessed 16 October 2018].Google Scholar

CNN, 2016. Full 3rd presidential debate. https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/10/20/trump-clinton-entire-las-vegas-debate-sot.cnn [accessed 12 November 2018].Google Scholar

Coates, J., 1989. Gossip revisited: Language in all-female groups. In Coates, J. and Cameron, D., eds., Women in Their Speech Communities. Harlow: Longman, 94–121.Google Scholar

Coates, J., 1994. The language of the professions: Discourse and career. In Evetts, J., ed., Women and Career: Themes and Issues In Advanced Industrial Societies. London: Routledge, 72–86.Google Scholar

Cockcroft, R., Cockcroft, S., Hamilton, C., and Downing, L. H., 2014. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cole, H., 2017. PM-snooze: Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn bore everyone to tears with another repetitive PMQs squabble on the NHS. 22 February. www.thesun.co.uk/news/2927654/theresa-may-and-jeremy-corbyn-bore-everyone-to-tears-with-another-repetitive-pmqs-squabble-on-the-nhs/ [accessed 21 September 2018].Google Scholar

Collier, C. N. and Raney, T., 2018. Understanding sexism and sexual harassment in politics: A comparison of Westminster parliaments in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 25 (3), 432–455.Google Scholar

Collins, P. H., 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Collins, P. H. and Bilge, S., 2016. Intersectionality. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Commonwealth Parliament, 2018. Infosheet 1 – Questions. Parliament of Australia. www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_1_-_Questions [accessed 15 October 2018].Google Scholar

Connell, R. W., 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Connell, R. W., 1995. Masculinities. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Connell, R. W. and Messerschmidt, J. W., 2005. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19 (6), 829–859.Google Scholar

Copland, F. and Creese, A., 2015. Linguistic Ethnography: Collecting, Analysing and Presenting Data. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Cortès-Conde, F. and Boxer, D., 2015. Breaking the glass and keeping the ceiling: Women presidentas’ discursive practices in Latin America. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 43–66.Google Scholar

Coser, R. L., 1960. Laughter among colleagues. Psychiatry, 23 (1), 81–95.Google Scholar

Costa, R., Balz, D., and Rucker, P., 2016. Donald Trump wanted to put Bill Clinton’s accusers in his family box. Debate officials said no. The Independent, 10 October. www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/presidential-debate-donald-trump-tried-to-get-the-woman-accusing-bill-clinton-of-sex-abuse-sat-in-a7353466.html [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar

Cotter, C., 2011. Women’s place at the Fourth Estate: Constraints on voice, text, and topic. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (10), 2519–2533.Google Scholar

Cotterill, J., 2002. Language in the Legal Process. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Coupland, N., 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cowburn, A., 2018. Speaker John Bercow accused of calling Andrea Leadsom a ‘stupid woman’. Independent, 18 May. www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/john-bercow-andrea-leadsom-stupid-woman-house-of-commons-bullying-accusations-a8357071.html [accessed 29 July 2018].Google Scholar

Cox, L., 2018. The bullying and harassment of house of commons staff: Independent inquiry report. Independent Inquiry Report. www.cloisters.com/images/Bullying-Harassment-HOC-Staff-Oct-2018.pdf [accessed 5 January 2019].Google Scholar

Crace, J., 2016. Theresa struggles to take back control – from her Maybot. The Guardian, 8 November. www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/08/theresa-may-struggles-take-back-control-maybot-india-brexit [accessed 25 September 2018].Google Scholar

Crace, J., 2018. I, Maybot: The Rise and Fall. 2nd ed. London: Guardian Faber Publishing.Google Scholar

Cracknell, R. and Keen, R., 2014. Women in parliament and government – Commons library standard note. UK Parliament. www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/SN01250/women-in-parliament-and-government [accessed 18 March 2015].Google Scholar

Crawford, M., 1995. Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Creedon, P., 2018. Media narratives of gender in the contentious conservative age of Trump. In Gutsche, R. E. Jr., ed., The Trump Presidency, Journalism, and Democracy. New York: Routledge, 156–178.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, K., 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 140, 139–167.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, K., 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43 (6), 1241–1299.Google Scholar

Crewe, E., 2005. Lords of Parliament: Manners, Rituals and Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Crewe, E., 2010. An anthropology of the house of lords: Socialisation, relationships and rituals. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16 (3), 313–324.Google Scholar

Crewe, E., 2014a. Ethnographic research in gendered organizations: The case of the Westminster parliament. Politics & Gender, 10 (4), 673–678.Google Scholar

Crewe, E., 2014b. Westminster parliamentarians: Performing politics. In Rai, S. M. and Johnson, R. E., eds., Democracy in Practice: Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 40–59.Google Scholar

Crewe, E., 2015. The House of Commons: An Anthropology of MPs at Work. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J., 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (3), 349–367.Google Scholar

Cunningham, C. M., Crandall, H. M., and Dare, A. M., eds., 2017. Gender, Communication, and the Leadership Gap. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar

Curry, T. J., 1991. Fraternal bonding in the locker room: A profeminist analysis of talk about competition and women. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8 (2), 119–135.Google Scholar

Curry, T. J., 1998. Beyond the locker room: Campus bars and college athletes. Sociology of Sport Journal, 15 (3), 205–215.Google Scholar

Dahlerup, D., 1988. From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11 (4), 275–298.Google Scholar

Daly, M., 1977. Beyond God the Father: Toward a Philosophy of Women’s Liberation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Davis, K., 2008. Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9 (1), 67–85.Google Scholar

De Smet, H., 2016. How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change, 28 (1), 83–102.Google Scholar

De Swert, K. and Hooghe, M., 2010. When do women get a voice? Explaining the presence of female news sources in Belgian news broadcasts (2003–5). European Journal of Communication, 25 (1), 69–84.Google Scholar

Deacon, D., Downey, J., Smith, D., Stanyer, J., and Wring, D., 2017. A tale of two leaders: News media coverage of the 2017 general election. In Thorsen, E., Jackson, D. and Lilleker, D., eds., UK Election Analysis 2017: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Bournemouth: PSA/Bournemouth University, 40–41.Google Scholar

Deacon, M., 2017. The real reason Tories call Emily Thornberry ‘Lady Nugee’... and it isn’t sexist. The Telegraph, 12 July. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/12/real-reason-tories-call-emily-thornberry-lady-nugee-isnt-sexist/ [accessed 29 June 2018].Google Scholar

DeFrancisco, V. L., 1991. The sounds of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. Discourse and Society, 2 (4), 413–424.Google Scholar

Demmen, J., Jeffries, L., and Walker, B., 2018. Charting the semantics of labour relations in House of Commons debates spanning two hundred years. In Kranert, M. and Horan, G., eds., Doing Politics: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 81–104.Google Scholar

Derks, B., Van Laar, C., and Ellemers, N., 2016. The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 456–469.Google Scholar

Dionne, A. M., 2010. Women, Men and the Representation of Women in the British Parliaments: Magic Numbers? Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Dirks, D., 2016. Progress would be accepting that Trump’s ‘locker room talk’ illustrates ‘rape culture’. New York Times, 13 October. www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/10/13/what-did-donald-trump-reveal-about-progress-for-women/progress-would-be-accepting-that-trumps-locker-room-talk-illustrates-rape-culture [accessed 11 November 2018].Google Scholar

Dodson, D. L., 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dolan, J., Deckman, M. M., and Swers, M. L., 2017. Women and Politics: Paths to Power and Political Influence. Updated 3rd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Donaghue, N., 2015. Who gets played by ‘the gender card’? Australian Feminist Studies, 30 (84), 161–178.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z., 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dovi, S., 2018. Misogyny and transformations. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1 (1–2), 131–147.Google Scholar

Duff, P. A., 2018. Case study research in Applied Linguistics. In Litosseliti, L., ed., Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury, 305–330.Google Scholar

Eades, D., 2000. I don’t think it’s an answer to the question: Silencing Aboriginal witnesses in court. Language in Society, 29 (2), 161–195.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. and Carli, L. L., 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. and Heilman, M. E., 2016. Gender and leadership: Introduction to the special issue. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 349–353.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. and Steffen, V., 1986. Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100 (3), 309–330.Google Scholar

Eakins, B. and Eakins, R. G., 1976. Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue. In Dubois, B. L. and Crouch, I., eds., The Sociology of the Languages of American Women. San Antonio: Trinity University, 53–62.Google Scholar

Eberhardt, L. and Merolla, J. L., 2017. Shaping perceptions of Sarah Palin’s charisma: Presentations of Palin in the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38 (2), 103–127.Google Scholar

Eckert, P., 1998. Gender and sociolinguistic variation. In Coates, J., ed., Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 64–75.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S., 1992a. Communities of Practice: Where language, gender and power all live. In Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B., eds., Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Group. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 88–89.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S., 1992b. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21 (1), 461–488.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S., 2013. Language and Gender. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Edelsky, C., 1981. Who’s got the floor? Language in Society, 10 (3), 383–421.Google Scholar

Edelsky, C. and Adams, K., 1990. Creating inequality: Breaking the rules in debates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9 (3), 171–190.Google Scholar

Edmondson, C. and Lee, J. C., 2019. Meet the new freshmen in congress. New York Times, 3 January. www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/28/us/politics/congress-freshman-class.html [accessed 14 January 2019].Google Scholar

Eggins, S. and Slade, D., 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Elgot, J., 2018. Bercow bullying claims are a witch-hunt, says serjeant at arms. The Guardian, 13 June. www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jun/13/bercow-bullying-claims-are-a-witch-hunt-says-serjeant-at-arms [accessed 29 July 2018].Google Scholar

Elgot, J. and Walker, P., 2018. Jeremy Corbyn to MPs: I did not call Theresa May a ‘stupid woman’. The Guardian, 19 December. www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/dec/19/jeremy-corbyn-accused-of-calling-theresa-may-a-stupid-woman [accessed 30 December 2018].Google Scholar

Enli, G., 2015. Mediated Authenticity: How the Media Constructs Reality. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.Google Scholar

Erskine May, T., 2015. A Treatise upon the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ervin-Tripp, S. and Lampert, M. D., 1992. Gender differences in the construction of humorous talk. In Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B., eds., Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 108–117.Google Scholar

Esposito, E., 2017. The mother’s picong: A discursive approach to gender, identity and political leadership in Trinidad and Tobago. Discourse & Society, 28 (1), 24–41.Google Scholar

Evans, E., 2016. Diversity matters: Intersectionality and women’s representation in the USA and UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 69 (3), 569–585.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N., 1989. Language and Power. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N., 1992. Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3 (2), 193–217.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N., 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N., 2000. New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. and Fairclough, I., 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R., 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In: van Dijk, T. A., ed., Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258–284.Google Scholar

Falk, E., 2010. Women for President: Media Bias in Nine Campaigns. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Falk, E., 2013. Clinton and the playing-the-gender-card metaphor in campaign news. Feminist Media Studies, 13 (2), 192–207.Google Scholar

Fawcett Society, 2015. Views not shoes. Fawcett Society. www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/views-not-shoes [accessed 2 August 2018].Google Scholar

Feld, V., 2000. A new start in Wales: How devolution is making a difference. In Coote, A., ed., New Gender Agenda: Why Women Still Want More. London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 74–80.Google Scholar

Felice, R. D. and Garretson, G., 2018. Politeness at work in the Clinton email Corpus: A first look at the effects of status and gender. Corpus Pragmatics, 2 (3), 1–22.Google Scholar

Feng, W. and Wu, D., 2015. Discourses of female leaders in postcolonial Hong Kong. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 251–274.Google Scholar

Fenton-Smith, B., 2008. Discourse structure and political performance in adversarial parliamentary questioning. Journal of Language and Politics, 7 (1), 97–118.Google Scholar

Fetzer, A. and Weizman, E., 2018. ‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is ...’: The construction of ordinariness through quotations in mediated political discourse. Discourse & Society, 29 (5), 495–513.Google Scholar

Fetzer, A., Weizman, E., and Berlin, L. N., eds., 2015. The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

First Republican Primary Debate, 2016. Cleveland: Fox News Channel: Quicken Loans Arena. https://video.foxnews.com/v/4406746003001/?#sp=show-clips [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar

Fisher, V. and Kinsey, S., 2014. Behind closed doors! Homosocial desire and the academic boys club. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 29 (1), 44–64.Google Scholar

Formato, F., 2014. Language use and gender in the Italian parliament. PhD thesis. Lancaster: Lancaster University. http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/71736/ [accessed 30 April 2018].Google Scholar

Formato, F., 2019. Gender, Discourse and Ideology in Italian. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Foucault, M., 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books Inc.Google Scholar

Fracchiolla, B., 2011. Politeness as a strategy of attack in a gendered political debate – The Royal–Sarkozy debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (10), 2480–2488.Google Scholar

Franceschet, S., 2011. Gendered institutions and women’s substantive representation: Female legislators in Argentina and Chile. In Krook, M. L. and Mackay, F., eds., Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 58–78.Google Scholar

Franklin, M. N. and Norton, P., eds., 1993. Parliamentary Questions. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Freed, A. F., 1996. Language and gender in an experimental setting. In Bergvall, V. and Bing, J. M., eds., Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice. New York: Longman, 55–76.Google Scholar

Freeman, H., 2016. Theresa May, Margaret Thatcher: Spot the difference – and the sexism. The Guardian, 23 July. www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/commentisfree/2016/jul/23/theresa-may-margaret-thatcher-spot-the-difference-uk-politics-hadley-freeman [accessed 8 April 2018].Google Scholar

Frenkel, D., 2011. Drop the Gillard twang: It’s beginning to annoy. The Sydney Morning Herald, 20 April. www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/drop-the-gillard-twang-its-beginning-to-annoy-20110420-1dosf.html [accessed 11 October 2018].Google Scholar

Friedman, A., 2013. Hey ‘ladies’. The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/112188/how-word-lady-has-evolved [accessed 30 September 2018].Google Scholar

Gains, F. and Lowndes, V., 2014. How is institutional formation gendered, and does it make a difference? A new conceptual framework and a case study of police and crime commissioners in England and Wales. Politics & Gender, 10 (4), 524–548.Google Scholar

Gal, S., 1991. Between speech and silence: The problematics of research on language and gender. In di Leonardo, M., ed., Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era. Berkeley: University of California Press, 175–203.Google Scholar

Gal, S., 1995. Language, gender and power: An anthropological review. In Hall, K. and Bucholtz, M., eds., Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. London: Routledge, 170–182.Google Scholar

Gal, S., 2018. Registers in circulation: The social organization of interdiscursivity. Signs and Society, 6 (1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Galea, N. and Gaweda, B., 2018. (De)constructing the masculine blueprint: The institutional and discursive consequences of male political dominance. Politics & Gender, 14 (2), 276–282.Google Scholar

Gardner, B., 2014. From ‘shrill’ housewife to Downing Street: The changing voice of Margaret Thatcher, 25 November. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11251919/From-shrill-housewife-to-Downing-Street-the-changing-voice-of-Margaret-Thatcher.html [accessed 31 July 2018].Google Scholar

Gawne, L., 2011. Accent on politicians’ speech misses the point. The Sydney Morning Herald, 28 November. www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/accent-on-politicians-speech-misses-the-point-20111128-1o360.html [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar

Gershon, S., 2012. When race, gender, and the media intersect: Campaign news coverage of minority congresswomen. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 33 (2), 105–125.Google Scholar

Ghitis, F., 2016. The ‘shrill’ smear against Hillary Clinton. CNN. www.cnn.com/2016/02/08/opinions/hillary-clinton-sexism-ghitis/index.html [accessed 13 November 2018].Google Scholar

Gill, R., 2011. Sexism reloaded, or, it’s time to get angry again! Feminist Media Studies, 11 (1), 61–71.Google Scholar

Gill, R. and Orgad, S., 2018. The amazing bounce-backable woman: Resilience and the psychological turn in neoliberalism. Sociological Research Online, 23 (2), 477–495.Google Scholar

Gillard, J., 2013a. Interview with Julia Gillard. www.nowtolove.com.au/celebrity/celeb-news/julia-gillard-why-shes-knitting-for-the-royal-baby-9786 [accessed 12 June 2018].Google Scholar

Gillard, J., 2013b. Julia Gillard’s resignation speech. http://rescu.com.au/julia-gillards-speech-video-transcript/ [accessed 5 January 2019].Google Scholar

Gillard, J., 2014. My Story. Sydney: Random House.Google Scholar

Gillard, J., and Summers, A., 2013. “Julia Gillard and Anne Summers.” Big Ideas, ABC Radio National. www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/bigideas/Julia-gillard-26-anne-summers/4978214 [accessed 7 February 2020]Google Scholar

Gilligan, C., 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Glaze, B., 2018. How stubborn May stumbled into leadership fight thanks to blunder after blunder. Daily Mirror. www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/how-stubborn-theresa-ploughed-no-13724406 [accessed 15 February 2019].Google Scholar

Gleason, S. A., 2019. Beyond Mere presence: Gender norms in oral arguments at the U.S. supreme court. Political Research Quarterly. doi:10.1177/1065912919847001.Google Scholar

Gobo, G., 2008. Doing Ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Goldstein, D. M. and Hall, K., 2017. Postelection surrealism and nostalgic racism in the hands of Donald Trump. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7 (1), 397–406.Google Scholar

Goetz, A. M., 2003. Women’s political effectiveness: A conceptual framework. In Goetz, A. M. and Hassim, S., eds., No Shortcuts to Power: African Women in Politics and Policy Making. London: Zed Books, 29–80.Google Scholar

Goffman, E., 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Goffman, E., 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, A., 2013. Unfinished business: Sex, freedom and misogyny. Quarterly Essay, 50 (1), 1–79.Google Scholar

Goodsell, C. T., 1988. The architecture of parliaments: Legislative houses and political culture. British Journal of Political Science, 18 (3), 287–302.Google Scholar

Goodwin, M. H., 2006. The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status, and Exclusion. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gordon, K., Gordon, R., and Nabor, A., 2017. The reinforcement of hegemonic masculinity through gender frames during the 2016 election. Global Tides, 11 (8), 1–16.Google Scholar

Goren, L. J., 2018. Authenticity and emotion: Hillary Rodham Clinton’s dual constraints. Politics & Gender, 14 (1), 111–115.Google Scholar

Gorman, T., 1993. The Bastards: Dirty Tricks and the Challenge to Europe. London: Pan.Google Scholar

Govier, T., 1999. The Philosophy of Argument. Newport News: Vale Press.Google Scholar

Graddol, D. and Swann, J., 1989. Gender Voices. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Graham, K., Bernards, S., Abbey, A., Dumas, T. M., and Wells, S., 2017. When women do not want it: Young female Bargoers’ experiences with and responses to sexual harassment in social drinking contexts. Violence Against Women, 23 (12), 1419–1441.Google Scholar

Graham, R., 2019. The users of unparliamentary language in the New Zealand House of Representatives 1890 to 1950: A community of practice perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 149 (August), 14–24.Google Scholar

Grant, J., 2018. A left feminist comment on supporting Hillary Clinton. Politics & Gender, 14 (1), 106–111.Google Scholar

Grebelsky-Lichtman, T. and Katz, R., 2019. When a man debates a woman: Trump vs. Clinton in the first mixed gender presidential debates. Journal of Gender Studies. doi:10.1080/09589236.2019.1566890.Google Scholar

Green, J. and Bloome, D., 1997. Ethnography and ethnographers of and in education: A situated perspective. In Flood, J., Heath, S. and Lapp, D., eds., A Handbook for Literacy Educators. New York: Macmillan, 181–202.Google Scholar

Greene, J. C. and Caracelli, V. J., 2003. Making paradigmatic sense of mixed-method practice. In Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C., eds., Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 91–110.Google Scholar

Grey, J., 1992. Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J., 1987. Philosophy and aggression. Radical Philosophy, 47 (Autumn), 18–20.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. H., 1972. Directions in Sociolinguistics: Ethnography of Communications. New York: Holt McDougal.Google Scholar

Haack, S., 2003. Truth, truths, ‘truth’, and ‘truths’ in the law. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 26 (1), 17–21.Google Scholar

Hall, L. J. and Donaghue, N., 2013. ‘Nice girls don’t carry knives’: Constructions of ambition in media coverage of Australia’s first female prime minister. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52 (4), 631–647.Google Scholar

Hall, R. M. and Sandler, B. R., 1982. The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Washington, DC: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED215628 [accessed 4 July 2018].Google Scholar

Haraldsson, A. and Wängnerud, L., 2019. The effect of media sexism on women’s political ambition: Evidence from a worldwide study. Feminist Media Studies, 19 (4), 525–541.Google Scholar

Harman, H., 2017. A Woman’s Work. London: Allen Lane/Penguin Random House.Google Scholar

Harmer, E., 2017. Online election news can be bloody difficult (for a) woman. In Thorsen, E., Jackson, D., and Lilleker, D., eds., UK Election Analysis 2017: Media Voters and the Campaign. Poole: Bournemouth University, Political Studies Association/Centre for Politics and Media Research, 39.Google Scholar

Harrington, K., Litosseliti, L., Sauntson, H., and Sunderland, J., eds., 2008. Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Harris, S., 1984. Questions as a mode of control in magistrates’ courts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1984 (49), 5–28.Google Scholar

Harris, S., 2001. Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse & Society, 12 (4), 451–472.Google Scholar

Haywood, C., Johansson, T., Hammarén, N., Herz, M., and Ottemo, A., 2018. The Conundrum of Masculinity: Hegemony, Homosociality, Homophobia and Heteronormativity. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hazarika, A. and Hamilton, T., 2018. Punch and Judy Politics: An Insiders’ Guide to Prime Minister’s Questions. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar

Hearn, J., 1992. Men in the Public Eye. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Heilman, M. E., 1983. Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298. https://nyuscholars.nyu.edu/en/publications/sex-bias-in-work-settings-the-lack-of-fit-model.Google Scholar

Heller, M., Pietikäinen, S., and Pujolar, J., 2018. Critical Sociolinguistic Research Methods: Studying Language Issues That Matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hellinger, M., 1990. Kontrastive Feministische Linguistik. Ismaning: Hueber.Google Scholar

Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S., 2004. Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2 (4), 725–740.Google Scholar

Henderson, B., 2016. Donald Trump makes rare apology after video emerges of him making sexually aggressive comments about women. The Telegraph, 7 October. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/07/donald-trump-on-groping-and-kissing-women-when-youre-a-star-they/ [accessed 11 November 2018].Google Scholar

Hewitt, R., 1997. ‘Boxing out’ and ‘taxing’. In Johnson, S. and Meinhof, U. H., eds., Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell, 27–46.Google Scholar

Holland, J. and Wright, K. A., 2017. The double delegitimatisation of Julia Gillard: Gender, the media, and Australian political culture. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 63 (4), 588–602.Google Scholar

Holmes, J., 1992. Women’s talk in public contexts. Discourse and Society, 3 (2), 121–150.Google Scholar

Holmes, J., 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Holmes, J., 2006. Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity Through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Holmes, J., 2017. Leadership and change management: Examining gender, cultural and ‘hero leader’ stereotypes. In Ilie, C. and Schnurr, S., eds., Challenging Leadership Stereotypes through Discourse. Singapore: Springer, 15–43.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. and Marra, M., 2002. Having a laugh at work: How humour contributes to workplace culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (12), 1683–1710.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., 1999. The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society, 28 (2), 173–183.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M., 2003. ‘Feminine’ workplaces: Stereotype and reality. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., eds., The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, 573–600.Google Scholar

Homer, 1980. The Odyssey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hoyt, C. L. and Murphy, S. E., 2016. Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 387–399.Google Scholar

Hughes, R., 1996. English in Speech and Writing: Investigating Language and Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hundleby, C., 2013. Aggression, politeness and abstract adversaries. Informal Logic, 33 (2), 238–262.Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S., 2005. The gender similarity hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60 (6), 581–592.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. H., 1972a. Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. H., eds., Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Blackwell, 35–71.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. H., 1972b. Toward ethnographies of communication: The analysis of communicative events. In Giglioli, P., ed., Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 21–44.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. H., 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Ilie, C., 2010. Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (4), 885–911.Google Scholar

Ilie, C., 2013. Gendering confrontational rhetoric: Discursive disorder in the British and Swedish parliaments. Democratization, 20 (3), 501–521.Google Scholar

Ilie, C., 2015. Follow-ups as multifunctional questioning and answering strategies in Prime Minister’s Questions. In Fetzer, A., Weizman, E. and Berlin, L. N., eds., The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 195–218.Google Scholar

Ilie, C., 2018. Behave yourself, woman! Journal of Language and Politics, 17 (5), 594–616.Google Scholar

Ilie, C. and Schnurr, S., eds., 2017. Challenging Leadership Stereotypes through Discourse: Power, Management and Gender. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Inside the Commons, 2015. Episode 1, lifting the lid, inside the commons – BBC Two. Open University and BBC. www.open.edu/openlearn/tv-radio-events/tv/inside-the-commons?episode=18178#episode-details [accessed on 4 February 2015].Google Scholar

Jacobson, L., 2017. Did Elizabeth Warren break the rules? Plus 5 other questions about Rule 19. PolitiFact. www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/feb/08/did-elizabeth-warren-break-rules-plus-5-other-ques/ [accessed 22 December 2018].Google Scholar

Jacobsen, R. R., 2019. Interruptions and co-construction in the First 2016 Trump–Clinton US presidential debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 148 (July), 71–87.Google Scholar

Jamieson, K. H., 1995. Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jenkins, M. M., 1985. ‘What’s so funny?’ Joking among women. In Bremner, S., Caskey, N. and Moonwomon, B., eds., Proceedings of the First Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 135–151.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., and Reichard, R. J., 2008. The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106 (1), 39–60.Google Scholar

Jones, A. R., 1987. Nets and bridles: Early modern conduct books and sixteenth century women’s lyrics. In Armstrong, N. and Tennenhouse, L., eds., The Ideology of Conduct: Essays on Literature and the History of Sexuality. New York: Methuen, 39–72.Google Scholar

Jones, J. J., 2016. Talk ‘like a man’: The linguistic styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013. Perspectives on Politics, 14 (3), 625–642.Google Scholar

Jones, L. M., 2015. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf: Media’s ‘Ma Ellen’ or the ‘Iron Lady’ of West Africa? Textual discourse and the brand of a leader. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 315–344.Google Scholar

Kammoun, R., 2015. Gender and political discourse in Tunisia. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121–148.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J. and Disch, L. J., 1993. Sexual violence and the reproduction of male power in the locker room: The ‘Lisa Olson incident’. Sociology of Sport Journal, 10 (4), 331–352.Google Scholar

Kanter, R. M., 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Karpowitz, C. F. and Mendelberg, T., 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kathlene, L., 1994. Power and influence in state legislative policy making: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review, 88 (3), 560–576.Google Scholar

Kathlene, L., 1995. Position power versus gender power: Who holds the floor? In Duerst-Lahti, G. and Kelly, R., eds., Gender, Power, Leadership and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 167–193.Google Scholar

Kelly, L., 1988. Surviving Sexual Violence. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Kelly, R., 2018. Independent complaints and grievance scheme. https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8369 [accessed 19 January 2019].Google Scholar

Khazan, O., 2016. What criticisms of Hillary’s voice say about our hidden biases. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/08/hillarys-voice/493565/ [accessed 13 November 2018].Google Scholar

King, M., 2005. A critical assessment of Steenbergen et al’s Discourse Quality Index. Roundhouse: A Journal of Critical Theory and Practice, 1 (1), 1–8.Google Scholar

Kirkup, J., 2008. David Cameron fails to end ‘Punch and Judy’ politics. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/1908155/David-Cameron-fails-to-end-Punch-and-Judy-politics.html [accessed 19 January 2019].Google Scholar

Klofstad, C. A., Anderson, R. C., and Peters, S., 2012. Sounds like a winner: Voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279 (1738), 2698–2704.Google Scholar

Klofstad, C. A., Nowicki, S., and Anderson, R. C., 2016. How voice pitch influences our choice of leaders. American Scientist; Research Triangle Park, 104 (5), 282–287.Google Scholar

Knight, H. M., 1992. Gender interference in transsexuals’ speech. In Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B., eds., Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 312–317.Google Scholar

Koller, V. and Semino, E., 2009. Metaphor, politics and gender: A case study from Germany. In Ahrens, K., ed., Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 9–35.Google Scholar

Kram, K. and Hampton, M. M., 2003. When women lead: The visibility-vulnerability spiral. In Ely, R. J., Foldy, E. G. and Scully, M. A., eds., Reader in Gender, Work and Organization. Oxford: Blackwell, 211–223.Google Scholar

Krook, M. L., 2015. Empowerment versus backlash: Gender quotas and critical mass theory. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3 (1), 184–188.Google Scholar

Krook, M. L., 2017. Violence against women in politics. Journal of Democracy, 28 (1), 74–88.Google Scholar

Krook, M. L., 2018. Westminster too: On sexual harassment in British politics. The Political Quarterly, 89 (1), 65–72.Google Scholar

Krook, M. L. and Mackay, F., 2011. Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kulick, D., 1993. Speaking as a woman: Structure and gender in domestic arguments in a New Guinea village. Cultural Anthropology, 8 (4), 510–541.Google Scholar

Lakoff, R. T., 1990. Talking Power: The Politics of Language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Larson, B. N., 2016. Gender/genre: The lack of gendered register in texts requiring genre knowledge. Written Communication, 33 (4), 360–384.Google Scholar

Lawrence, R. G. and Rose, M., 2010. Hillary Clinton’s Race for the White House: Gender Politics and the Media on the Campaign Trail. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar

Lazar, M. M., 2005. Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Legman, G., 2006. Rationale of the Dirty Joke: An Analysis of Sexual Humor. 2nd ed. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Levon, E., 2015. Integrating intersectionality in language, gender, and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9 (7), 295–308.Google Scholar

Lim, E. T., 2009. Gendered metaphors of women in power: The case of Hillary Clinton as Madonna, unruly woman, bitch and witch. In Ahrens, K., ed., Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 254–269.Google Scholar

Loke, J., Harp, D., and Bachmann, I., 2011. Mothering and governing: How news articulated gender roles in the cases of Governors Jane Swift and Sarah Palin. Journalism Studies, 12 (2), 205–220.Google Scholar

Lovenduski, J., 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Lovenduski, J., 2014a. The institutionalisation of sexism in politics. Political Insight, 5 (2), 16–19.Google Scholar

Lovenduski, J., 2014b. Prime Minister’s questions as political ritual at Westminster. In Rai, S. M. and Johnson, R. E., eds., Democracy in Practice: Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 132–162.Google Scholar

Luff, D., 1999. Dialogue across the divides: ‘Moments of rapport’ and power in feminist research with anti-feminist women. Sociology, 33 (4), 687–703.Google Scholar

Lünenborg, M. and Maier, T., 2015. Governing in the gendered structure of power: The media discourse on Angela Merkel and her power-driven leadership style. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 275–292.Google Scholar

Maas, M. K., McCauley, H. L., Bonomi, A. E., and Leija, S. G., 2018. ‘I was grabbed by my pussy and its #NotOkay’: A Twitter backlash against Donald Trump’s degrading commentary. Violence Against Women, 24 (14), 1739–1750.Google Scholar

Mackay, F., 2004. Gender and political representation in the UK: The state of the ‘discipline’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6 (1), 99–100.Google Scholar

Mackay, F., 2010. Gendering constitutional change and policy outcomes: Substantive representation and domestic violence policy in Scotland. Policy and Politics, 38 (3), 369–388.Google Scholar

Mackay, F., 2014. Nested newness, institutional innovation, and the gendered limits of change. Politics & Gender, 10 (4), 549–571.Google Scholar

Mackay, F. and McAllister, L., 2012. Feminising British politics: Six lessons from devolution in Scotland and Wales. The Political Quarterly, 83 (4), 730–734.Google Scholar

Mackay, F., Myers, F., and Brown, A., 2003. Towards a new politics? Women and constitutional change in Scotland. In Dobrowolsky, A. and Hart, V., eds., Women Making Constitutions: New Politics and Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 84–98.Google Scholar

Mackay, F. and Waylen, G., 2014. Introduction: Gendering ‘new’ institutions. Politics & Gender, 10 (4), 489–494.Google Scholar

Maddox, B., 2019. UK parliament should use renovation to rethink its ways. Financial Times, 6 January. www.ft.com/content/80012468-101a-11e9-b2f2-f4c566a4fc5f [accessed 27 January 2019].Google Scholar

Madill, C., 2011. Nervous not nasal, misunderstood not misleading – Julia’s just trying too hard. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/nervous-not-nasal-misunderstood-not-misleading-julias-just-trying-too-hard-1301 [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar

Malley, R., 2012. Feeling at home: Inclusion at Westminster and the Scottish Parliament. The Political Quarterly, 83 (4), 714–716.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. J., 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. J., 1999. Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’. The Journal of Politics, 61 (3), 628–657.Google Scholar

Marra, M., Holmes, J., and Kidner, K., 2017. Transitions and interactional competence: Negotiating boundaries through talk. In Doehler, S. P., Bangerter, A., de Weck, G., Filliettaz, L., González-Martínez, E., and Petitjean, C., eds., Interactional Competences in Institutional Settings. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 227–251.Google Scholar

Martin, J., 2014. Politics and Rhetoric: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mavin, S., 2006. Venus envy: Problematizing solidarity behaviour and queen bees. Women in Management Review, 21 (4), 264–276.Google Scholar

Mavin, S., Bryans, P., and Cunningham, R., 2010. Fed‐up with Blair’s babes, Gordon’s gals, Cameron’s cuties, Nick’s nymphets: Challenging gendered media representations of women political leaders. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25 (7), 550–569.Google Scholar

May, T., 2009. Theresa May: My life as a female MP. BBC News, 17 June. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8033607.stm [accessed 13 February 2019].Google Scholar

May, T., 2017a. Theresa May BBC interview with Laura Kuenssberg. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39784170 [accessed 2 June 2018].Google Scholar

May, T., 2017b. Theresa May defends temporary exclusion orders and her record on security. TV. www.itv.com/news/2017-06-06/theresa-may-defends-temporary-exclusion-orders-and-her-record-on-security/ [accessed 15 February 2019].Google Scholar

May, T., 2018a. PM’s vote 100 speech: 6 February 2018. GOV.UK. www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pms-vote-100-speech-6-february-2018 [accessed 13 February 2019].Google Scholar

May, T., 2018b. Theresa May BBC interview with Laura Kuenssberg. TV. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39784170 [accessed 9 October 2018].Google Scholar

May, T., 2018c. Theresa May’s speech to the 2018 conservative party conference. www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/conservative-party/news/98760/read-full-theresa-mays-speech-2018 [accessed 9 October 2018].Google Scholar

McDougall, L., 1998. Westminster Women. London: Vintage.Google Scholar

McElhinny, B., 1998. I Don’t smile much anymore: Affect, gender, and the discourse of Pittsburgh police officers. In Coates, J., ed., Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 309–327.Google Scholar

McElhinny, B., 2003. Theorizing gender in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M., eds., The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, 21–42.Google Scholar

McGlone, M. S. and Pfiester, R. A., 2015. Stereotype threat and the evaluative context of communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34 (2), 111–137.Google Scholar

Mclean, J. and Maalsen, S., 2013. Destroying the joint and dying of shame? A geography of revitalised feminism in social media and beyond. Geographical Research, 51 (3), 243–256.Google Scholar

Medeiros, M., Forest, B., Shah, P., and Juenke, E. G., 2019. Still not there: Continued challenges to women’s political representation. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7 (2), 386–388.Google Scholar

Media Watch ‘Alan Jones’s chaff bag is filling up fast’, 2012. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/alan-joness-chaff-bag-is-filling-up-fast/9973982 [accessed 23 October 2018].Google Scholar

Mellgren, C., Andersson, M., and Ivert, A.-K., 2018. ‘It happens all the time’: Women’s experiences and normalization of sexual harassment in public space. Women & Criminal Justice, 28 (4), 262–281.Google Scholar

Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., and Keller, J., 2018. #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25 (2), 236–246.Google Scholar

Meyjes, T., 2016. Theresa May turned into Margaret Thatcher right before our eyes during first PMQs. Metro. https://metro.co.uk/2016/07/20/theresa-may-turned-into-margaret-thatcher-right-before-our-eyes-during-first-pmqs-6018209/ [accessed 24 September 2018].Google Scholar

Millar, S., Wilson, J., and Boxer, D., 2015. Under fire: Pronominal use and leadership in the discourse of Helle Thorning-Schmidt. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 67–92.Google Scholar

Miller, J., 2016. Polls say Hillary Clinton won the debates – will it matter? CBS News: Face the Nation. www.cbsnews.com/news/polls-hillary-clinton-won-debates-election-2016-donald-trump/ [accessed 10 November 2018].Google Scholar

Mills, S., 1992. Discourse competence: Or how to theorize strong women speakers. Hypatia, 7 (2), 4–17.Google Scholar

Mills, S., 2003. Caught between sexism, anti-sexism and ‘political correctness’: Feminist women’s negotiations with naming practices. Discourse & Society, 14 (1), 87–110.Google Scholar

Mills, S., 2008. Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mills, S. and Mullany, L., 2011. Language, Gender and Feminism: Theory, Methodology and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mitchell, J., 2010. The narcissism of small differences: Scotland and Westminster. Parliamentary Affairs, 63 (1), 98–116.Google Scholar

Mohammed, D., 2018. Argumentation in Prime Minister’s Question Time: Accusation of Inconsistency in Response to Criticism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Moir, 2018. You have to admire Theresa May’s resilience and grit. Daily Mail, 17 November. www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-6399497/JAN-MOIR-admire-Theresa-Mays-resilience-grit-fire.html [accessed 22 February 2019].Google Scholar

Mollin, S., 2007. The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora, 2 (2), 187–210.Google Scholar

Montgomery, M., 2001. The uses of authenticity: ‘Speaking from experience’ in a U.K. election broadcast. The Communication Review, 4 (4), 447–462.Google Scholar

Montgomery, M., 2011. The accountability interview: Politics and change in UK public service broadcasting. In Ekström, M. and Patrona, M., eds., Talking Politics in Broadcast Media: Cross Cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing, Journalism and Accountability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 33–56.Google Scholar

Moore, B., 2019. A new twist in the elusive quest for the origins of the word ‘bogan’ leads to Melbourne’s Xavier College. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/a-new-twist-in-the-elusive-quest-for-the-origins-of-the-word-bogan-leads-to-melbournes-xavier-college-113755 [accessed 27 June 2019]Google Scholar

Mouffe, C., 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar

Moulton, J., 1983. A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In Harding, S. and Hintikka, M. B., eds., Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 149–164.Google Scholar

Mower, S., 2016. Theresa May’s style is more than just her shoes. Daily Mail Online, 1 August. www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3717301/How-dress-like-grown-s-Theresa-s-style-striking-shoes-fashion-expert-SARAH-MOWER-says.html [accessed 19 November 2018].Google Scholar

Mügge, L., Evans, E., and Engeli, I., 2016. Introduction: Gender in European political science education – taking stock and future directions. European Political Science, 15 (3), 281–291.Google Scholar

Mügge, L., Montoya, C., Emejulu, A., and Weldon, S. L., 2018. Intersectionality and the politics of knowledge production. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1 (1–2), 17–36.Google Scholar

Mulkay, M., 1988. On Humor: Its Nature and Its Place in Modern Society. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Mullany, L., 2007. Gendered Discourse in the Professional Workplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mullany, L., 2012. Discourse, gender and professional communication. In Gee, J. P. and Handford, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 509–522.Google Scholar

Murphy, J., 2014. (Im)politeness during Prime Minister’s Questions in the U.K. Parliament. Pragmatics and Society, 5 (1), 76–104.Google Scholar

Murphy, J. and Rek, B., 2018. Candidate gender and the media attention in the 2015 UK general election. Parliamentary Affairs. https://academic.oup.com/pa/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pa/gsy019/4963368 [accessed 31 July 2018].Google Scholar

Murray, R., 2014. Quotas for men: Reframing gender quotas as a means of improving representation for all. American Political Science Review, 108 (3), 520–532.Google Scholar

Murtagh, C., 2008. A transient transition: The cultural and institutional obstacles impeding the Northern Ireland Women’s Coalition in its progression from informal to formal politics. Irish Political Studies, 23 (1), 21–40.Google Scholar

Museum of London. Anti-suffrage postcard sent to Christabel Pankhurst in 1909. https://collections.museumoflondon.org.uk/online/object/289813.html [accessed 30 November 2018].Google Scholar

Nichols, D. and Kolankiewicz, V., 2017. Bogan in the eye of the beholder: The curious case of Rebel Wilson. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/bogan-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder-the-curious-case-of-rebel-wilson-78259 [accessed 27 June 2019].Google Scholar

Nicholson, E., 1996. Secret Society: Inside – and Outside – the Conservative Party. London: Indigo.Google Scholar

Nielson, 2016. First Presidential Debate of 2016 Draws 84 Million Viewers. www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2016/first-presidential-debate-of-2016-draws-84-million-viewers [accessed 8 November 2018].Google Scholar

Norris, P., 1997. Women, Media, and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ochs, E., 1992. Indexing gender. In Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C., eds., Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–359.Google Scholar

Okimoto, T. G. and Brescoll, V. L., 2010. The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36 (7), 923–936.Google Scholar

Parker, A., 2016. Donald Trump says Hillary Clinton doesn’t have ‘a presidential look’. The New York Times, 6 September. www.nytimes.com/2016/09/07/us/politics/donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-doesnt-have-a-presidential-look.html [accessed 8 November 2018].Google Scholar

Parkinson, J. R., 2012. Democracy and Public Space: The Physical Sites of Democratic Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parliament UK, 2010. Equality act 2010. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15 [accessed 27 June 2018].Google Scholar

Parliamentary Report, 2018. Report on an independent complaints and grievance policy. Westminster: Parliament UK. Cross Party Working Group on an Independent Complaints and Grievance Policy. https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CDP-2018-0049 [accessed 27 June 2018].Google Scholar

Pauwels, A., 1998. Women Changing Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Pavlenko, A. and Blackedge, A., 2004. Introduction: New theoretical approaches to the study of negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. In Pavlenko, A. and Blackedge, A., eds., Negotiations of Identity in Multilingual Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1–33.Google Scholar

Peck, J., 2011. When Julia talks, does her gender speak louder? The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/when-julia-talks-does-her-gender-speak-louder-1342 [accessed 25 October 2018].Google Scholar

Penny, L., 2016. A Tory leadership race between two women is not a feminist revolution. New Statesman, 7 July. www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2016/07/tory-leadership-race-between-two-women-not-feminist-revolution [accessed 9 October 2018].Google Scholar

Phillips, A., 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Phillips, J., 2017. Everywoman: One Woman’s Truth about Speaking the Truth. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Pitkin, H. F., 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Pizzini, F., 1991. Communication hierarchies in humour: Gender differences in the obstetrical/gynaecological setting. Discourse & Society, 2 (4), 477–488.Google Scholar

Puwar, N., 1997. Reflections on interviewing women MPs. http://socresonline.org.uk/2/1/4.html [accessed 28 August 2017].Google Scholar

Puwar, N., 2004a. Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Puwar, N., 2004b. Thinking about making a difference. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6 (1), 65–80.Google Scholar

Ramazanoglu, C. and Holland, J., 2002. Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Rampton, B., 2007. Neo-Hymsian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11 (5), 548–607.Google Scholar

Randall, V. and Lovenduski, J., 2004. Gender in contemporary British politics. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 6 (1), 1–2.Google Scholar

Rehn, A., 2010. Abbott’s no means no gaffe. The Daily Telegraph, 3 August 2010. www.dailytelegraph.com.au/abbotts-no-means-no-gaffe/news-story/c61d44cfa2e5f40744cc9fcc6628b375 [accessed 22 October 2018].Google Scholar

Reid Boyd, E. J., 2012. Lady: Still a feminist four letter word? Women and Language, 35 (2), 35–52.Google Scholar

Reid, C., 2014. Rhetoric and parliamentary leadership - Prime Minister’s questions. In Atkins, J., Finlayson, A., Martin, J., and Turnbull, N., eds., Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 45–57.Google Scholar

Reingold, B., 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Reisigl, M., 2010. Rhetoric of political speeches. In Wodak, R. and Koller, V., eds., Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 243–270.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W., 2005. Everyday life in a ministry: Public administration as anthropology. The American Review of Public Administration, 35 (1), 3–25.Google Scholar

Robinson, S. and Kerr, R., 2018. Women leaders in the political field in Scotland: A socio-historical approach to the emergence of leaders. Leadership, 14 (6), 662–686.Google Scholar

Romaniuk, T., 2016. On the relevance of gender in the analysis of discourse: A case study from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential bid in 2007–2008. Discourse & Society, 27 (5), 533–553.Google Scholar

Rooney, P., 2010. Philosophy, adversarial argumentation and embattled reason. Informal Logic, 30 (3), 203–234.Google Scholar

Ross, K., 2017. Gender, Politics, News: A Game of Three Sides. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ross, K. and Carter, C., 2011. Women and news: A long and winding road. Media, Culture & Society, 33 (8), 1148–1165.Google Scholar

Ross, K. and Comrie, M., 2012. The rules of the (leadership) game: Gender, politics and news. Journalism, 13 (8), 969–984.Google Scholar

Rubtcova, M., Butorina, Y., Nakopia, L., Stepanova, E., and Gallina, S., 2018. The analysis of Theresa May and Justin Trudeau’s Twitter accounts media constituent. Rochester: Social Science Research Network. SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 3116711. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3116711 [accessed 4 June 2018].Google Scholar

Rudman, L. A. and Fairchild, R., 2004. Reactions to countersterotypic behaviour: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (2), 157–176.Google Scholar

Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., and Nauts, S., 2012. Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48 (1), 165–179.Google Scholar

Ryan, M. K. and Haslam, S. A., 2005. The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16 (2), 81–90.Google Scholar

Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Stoker, J., and Peters, K., 2016. Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 446–455.Google Scholar

Saalfeld, T., 2011. Parliamentary questions as instruments of substantive representation: Visible minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–10. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17 (3), 271–289.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G., 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696–735.Google Scholar

Sanday, P. R., 2007. Fraternity Gang Rape: Sex, Brotherhood, and Privilege on Campus. 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Savigny, H., 2014. Women, know your limits: Cultural sexism in academia. Gender and Education, 26 (7), 794–809.Google Scholar

Saville-Troike, M., 2003. The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction. 3rd ed. Malden: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar

Savoy, J., 2018. Analysis of the style and the rhetoric of the 2016 US presidential primaries. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 33 (1), 143–159.Google Scholar

Sawer, M., 2013. Misogyny and misrepresentation. Political Science, 65 (1), 105–117.Google Scholar

Sawer, P., 2012. How Maggie Thatcher was remade. 8 January. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/margaret-thatcher/8999746/How-Maggie-Thatcher-was-remade.html [accessed 31 July 2018].Google Scholar

Schreiber, R., 2016. Gender roles, motherhood, and politics: Conservative women’s organizations frame Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 37 (1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Schreiber, R., 2018. Is there a conservative feminism? An empirical account. Politics & Gender, 14 (1), 56–79.Google Scholar

Sclafani, J., 2017. Talking Donald Trump: A Sociolinguistic Study of Style, Metadiscourse, and Political Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sealey, A. and Bates, S., 2016. Prime ministerial self-reported actions in Prime Minister’s Questions 1979–2010: A corpus-assisted analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 104 (October), 18–31.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R., 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Second Presidential Debate, 2016. Washington University in St. Louis. www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000004696519/watch-live-second-presidential-debate.html [accessed 12 November 2018].Google Scholar

Sedgwick, E. K., 1985. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Segal, L., 2006. Men at Bay: The contemporary ‘crisis’ of masculinity. In Whitehead, S., ed., Men and Masculinities: Critical Concepts in Sociology. London: Routledge, 272–281.Google Scholar

Sensales, G. and Areni, A., 2017. Gender biases and linguistic sexism in political communication: A comparison of press news about men and women Italian ministers. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5 (2), 512–536.Google Scholar

Shaw, S., (In Press). Gender, language and elite ethnographies in political institutions. In Angouri, J. and Baxter, J., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shaw, S., 2000. Language, gender and floor apportionment in political debates. Discourse & Society, 11 (3), 401–418.Google Scholar

Shaw, S., 2002. Language and gender in the house of commons. PhD thesis. The Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar

Shaw, S., 2006. Governed by the rules? The female voice in parliamentary debates. In Baxter, J., ed., Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 81–102.Google Scholar

Shaw, S., 2011. ‘I am not an Honourable Lady!’: Gender and language in the National Assembly for Wales. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 8 (3), 275–294.Google Scholar

Shaw, S., 2013. An ethnographic investigation into gender and language in the Northern Ireland Assembly. In Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Vincze, L. and Vinciarelli, A., eds., Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action. Berlin: Springer, 39–53.Google Scholar

Shaw, S., 2018. Off the record: The transcription of parliamentary debates for political discourse analysis. In Kranert, M. and Horan, G., eds., Doing Politics: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 105–126.Google Scholar

Sheldon, A., 2015. ‘Thank you for Heckling me’ Hillary Rodham Clinton’s discursive management of her public persona, her political message and the ‘Iron my shirt’ hecklers in the 2008 presidential election campaign. In Wilson, J. and Boxer, D., eds., Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 195–216.Google Scholar