Women in the Thai Judiciary

doi:10.1017/9781009000208.005

4 - Women in the Thai Judiciary

Obstacles and Challenges*

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2021

Sarah Bishop

Edited by

Melissa Crouch

Show author details

Melissa Crouch: Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney

Book contents

Get access

Summary

On 1 October 2018, Ubonrat Luiwikkai became the first woman in Thailand to be appointed to the position of president of the Thai Court of Appeal. The position is the second most senior post within the Thai Courts of Justice hierarchy, and arguably within the Thai career judiciary. The appointment came seventy-eight years after the first Thai woman graduated with a legal degree and fifty-three years after the first Thai woman was admitted as a judge. Hopefully the appointment signals a new era in the opening up of the senior ranks of the Thai judiciary to women. Looking at statistics on women in the judiciary more broadly, however, signs are less promising. This chapter will trace developments which saw courts in Thailand move from prohibiting women from becoming judges to allowing women judges the appointment of Ubonrat. The chapter will look at trends in employment of women in the judiciary in Thailand more broadly, and will consider remaining obstacles to women’s progression in the judiciary.

Keywords

Thailand women judges courts feminisation the judiciary gender and the law

Type: Chapter
Information: Women and the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific , pp. 109 - 148

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009000208.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Boigeol, Anne. 2013. ‘Feminisation of the French “Magistrature”: Gender and Judging in a Feminized Context’. In Gender and Judging, edited by Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, 125–143. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Wotong, Boonyen. 1964. ‘Establishment of Administrative Educational Institutions in Thailand: Case Study of Establishment of the University of Moral and Political Sciences as a Tool for Administration in the Early Democratic Era in Thailand’ [kan chattang sathaban kansueksa nai thang pokkhrong khong prathet thai : bot sueksa chapho korani kan chattang mahawitthayalai wicha thammasat lae kanmueang nai laksana thi pen upakon to kan pokkhrong rabop prachathippatai samai roemton nai prathet thai]. Masters Thesis. Thammasat University.Google Scholar

C.12. 2009. ‘This Is the Administrative Courts (2)’ [thi ni sanpokkhrong (2)], December 11, Thai Rath, www.thairath.co.th/content/52128.Google Scholar

C.12. 2015. ‘The New Group of Supreme Administrative Court Judges’ [tulakan san po.kho. sungsut chut mai]. Thai Rath, November 24, 2015. www.thairath.co.th/content/541332.Google Scholar

Cremation Volume from the Royal Funeral of Khunying Raem Phromobon Bunyaprasop, Mo.Por.Cho., Mo. Wo.Mo., Tor.Jo., at the Crematorium in Front of Isariyaphorn Pavilion Thepsirintharawas Temple, Bangkok, Monday 29 September 2008 [anuson ngan phraratchathan phloeng sop khunying raem phrommobon bunyaprasop mopocho, mowomo, tocho na meru luang na phlapphla itisriyaphon wat thepsirinthrawat krungthepmahanakhon, wan chan thi 29 kanyayon phoso 2551]. 2008. Bangkok: Family of Khunying Raem Phromobon Bunyaprasop.Google Scholar

Hamburg, Cambria G. 2008. ‘Prohibited Spaces: Barriers and Strategies in Women’s NGO Work in Isaan, North-Eastern Thailand’. In Women and Politics in Thailand: Continuity and Change, edited by Iwanaga, Kazuki, 95–124. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar

Iwanaga, Kazuki, ed. 2008. Women and Politics in Thailand: Continuity and Change. NIAS Press.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Renee Knake and Johnson, Hannah Brenner. 2020. Shortlisted: Women in the Shadows of the Supreme Court. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Pornarun, Jittima. 1995. ‘Women’s Rights Movement in Thai Society 1946–1976’ [kan riakrong sitthi satri nai sangkhom thai phoso 2489–2519]. Masters Thesis. Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar

Vichit-Vadakan, Juree. 2008. ‘Women in Politics and Women and Politics: A Socio-Cultural Analysis of the Thai Context’. In Women and Politics in Thailand: Continuity and Change, edited by Iwanaga, Kazuki, 27–53. NIAS Press.Google Scholar

Kay, Fiona and Gorman, Elizabeth. 2008. ‘Women in the Legal Profession’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 4(1): 299–332.Google Scholar

Kenney, Sally J. 2013. ‘Which Judicial Selection Systems Generate the Most Women Judges? Lessons from the United States’. In Gender and Judging, edited by Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, 461–480. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Somanawat, Kitpatchara. 2018. ‘Constructing the Identity of the Thai Judge: Virtue, Status and Power’. Asian Journal of Law and Society 5(1): 91–110.Google Scholar

Loos, Tamara. 2006. Subject Siam: Family, Law, and Colonial Modernity in Thailand. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

McCargo, Duncan. 2020. Fighting for Virtue: Justice and Politics in Thailand. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Munger, Frank. 2019. ‘The Evolution of Law, the Legal Profession and Political Authority’. NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3347143. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3347143.Google Scholar

Wailerdsak, Natenapha. 2009. ‘Corporate Women Managers’. In The Changing Face of Management in Thailand, edited by Andrews, Tim and Siengthai, Sununta, 248–268. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2003. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2002’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2545].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2004. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2003’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2546].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2005. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2004’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2547].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2006. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2005’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2548].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2007. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2006’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2549].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2008. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2007’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2550].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2009. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2008’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2551].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2010. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2009’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2552].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2011. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2010’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2553].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2012. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2011’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2554].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2013. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2012’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2555].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2014. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2013’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2556].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2015. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2014’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2557].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2016. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2015’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2558].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2017. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2016’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2559].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2018. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2017’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2560].Google Scholar

Office of the Administrative Courts (OAC). 2019. ‘The Administrative Court Annual Report 2018’ [rai-ngan kan patibatngan khong san pokkhrong lae samnakngan sanpokkhrong pracham pi 2561].Google Scholar

Office of the Civil Service Commission (OCSC). 2011. Government Civilian Workforce 2010 [kamlang khon phak rat nai fai phonlaruean 2553]. Office of the Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Office of the Civil Service Commission (OCSC). 2012. Government Civilian Workforce 2011 [kamlang khon phak rat nai fai phonlaruean 2554]. Office of the Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Office of the Civil Service Commission (OCSC). 2013. Government Civilian Workforce 2012 [kamlang khon phak rat nai fai phonlaruean 2555]. Office of the Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Office of the Civil Service Commission (OCSC). 2014. Government Civilian Workforce 2013 [kamlang khon phak rat nai fai phonlaruean 2556]. Office of the Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Office of the Civil Service Commission (OCSC). 2015. Government Civilian Workforce 2014 [kamlang khon phak rat nai fai phonlaruean 2557]. Office of the Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Office of the Civil Service Commission (OCSC). 2016. Government Civilian Workforce 2015 [kamlang khon phak rat nai fai phonlaruean 2558]. Office of the Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Office of the Civil Service Commission (OCSC). 2017. Government Civilian Workforce 2016 [kamlang khon phak rat nai fai phonlaruean 2559]. Office of the Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Office of the Civil Service Commission (OCSC). 2018. Government Civilian Workforce 2017 [kamlang khon phak rat nai fai phonlaruean 2560]. Office of the Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Office of the Civil Service Commission (OCSC). 2019. Government Civilian Workforce 2018 [kamlang khon phak rat nai fai phonlaruean 2561]. Office of the Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Office of the Courts of Justice (OCJ), ed. 2004. The Role of Women in the Justice Process: Academic Seminar in Honour of Her Majesty Queen Sirikit on the Auspicious Occassion of the Celebration of Her Sixth Cycle on 12 August 2004 [botbat satri nai krabuankan yutitham : kan sammana wichakan chaloemphrakiat somdet phranangchao siri ki phraboromrachininat nueang nai okat phraratchaphithi maha mongkhon chaloemphrachonphansa 6 rop 12 singhakhom 2547]. Bangkok: Office of the Courts of Justice.Google Scholar

Chantharawongphaisan, Oraphan. 2017. ‘Interview Revealing the Life of “Female Judge” Somlak Jadkrabuanpol from “Daughter of Cavalryman” to “Female Referee”’ [samphat poet chiwit ‘phuphiphaksa ying’ somlak chatkrabuanphon chak ‘luksao thahan ma’ su ‘than pao ying’]. online. Matichon. 13 August. www.matichon.co.th/prachachuen/interview/news_627676.Google Scholar

Udomjanya, Praphaphan. 1998. Women on the Executive Path in the Thai Public Service: Judicial Work [phuying bon senthang nakborihan nai rabop ratchakan thai: ngan dan tulakan]. Bangkok: Gender and Development Research Institute.Google Scholar

Bunyaprasop, Raem Phromobon. 1984. ‘A Slice of Memory’ [siao nueng haeng khwam song cham]. In Thammasat 50 Years [thammasat 50 pi], edited by Kasetsiri, Charnvit, 285–298. Bangkok: Thammasat University.Google Scholar

Kittayapong, Rungsaeng. 1990. ‘The Origins of Thailand’s Modern Ministry of Justice and Its Early Development’. PhD. University of Bristol.Google Scholar

Schultz, Ulrike. 2013. ‘“I Was Noticed and I Was Asked …” Women’s Careers in the Judiciary: Results of an Empirical Study for the Ministry of Justice in Northrine-Westfalia, Germany’. In Gender and Judging, edited by Schultz, Ulrike and Shaw, Gisela, 145–166. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Jadkrabuanpol, Somlak. 1989. ‘“Women Judge”’ [‘balang ying’]. Dulpaha 36 (2): 165–185.Google Scholar

Jadkrabuanpol, Somlak. 2017. ‘The Position of Supreme Court President from My Perspective’ [tamnaeng prathan sandika nai mum mong khong khaphachao] Matichon. 4 August. www.matichon.co.th/columnists/news_616455.Google Scholar

2003. ‘Special Interview Prof. Dr. Saowanee Asawaroj Thailand’s First Female Constitutional Court Judge’ [samphat phiset so doro saowani atsawawarot tulakan san ratthathammanun ying khon raek khong prathet thai]. New Law Magazine 1(1): 49–52.Google Scholar

Dangpakdee, Suksun. 1995. ‘Society’s Expectations of Thai Women in the “Nation Building” Period, 1938–1944’ [khwam khatwang khong sangkhom to satri thai nai samai sang chat phoso 2481–2487]. Masters Thesis. Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar

Chaiyarose, Sunee. 2004. ‘Synthesizing Feminism, Democracy and Human Rights: Sunee Chaiyarose’s Self-Portrait’ [kan lom ruam udomkan feminit prachathippatai lae sitthi manutsayachon : sueksa phan prasopkan suni chairot]. Masters Thesis. Thammasat University.Google Scholar

Kachacupt, Supin. 2008. ‘Women’s Equal Rights and Participation in the Thai Bureaucracy’. In Women and Politics in Thailand: Continuity and Change, edited by Iwanaga, Kazuki, 198–236. NIAS Press.Google Scholar

Singkhaloka, Suppatra. 1992a. ‘History of Demanding Women’s Rights from Beginnings to Success’. [prawatti kan roemton khong kan riakrong sitthi satri chonkrathang samret]. In The Sign of Progress Is the Status of Women [khrueangmai haeng khwam rungrueang khue saphap haeng satri], edited by Singkhaloka, Suppatra, 265–272. Bangkok: Ruenkaew Printing.Google Scholar

Singkhaloka, Suppatra. 1992b. ‘History and Work of the Women’s Lawyers Association of Thailand under the Royal Patronage of Her Majesty the Queen’ [prawat lae phonngan khong samakhom bandit satri thang kotmai haeng prathet thai nai phraborom rachinupatham]. In The Sign of Progress Is the Status of Women [khrueangmai haeng khwam rungrueang khue saphap haeng satri], edited by Singkhaloka, Suppatra, 327–343. Bangkok: Ruenkaew Printing.Google Scholar

Khongnirandonsuk, Suprani. 1993. ‘Khunying Suppatra Singkhaloka Godmother of the Chao Phraya River Basin’. Manager Magazine, March. http://info.gotomanager.com/news/details.aspx?id=9550.Google Scholar

Nitimontree, Udomsak. 2007. ‘Experiences of a Judge of 3 Courts’ [prasopkan khong tulakan 3 san]. Administrative Courts Journal 7(1): 15–22.Google Scholar

Siampukdee, Usamard. 2010. ‘Status of Women Profession: Gender Equality of Judicial Occupation in Thailand’. Journal of Ritsumeikan Social Sciences and Humanities 2010(3): 123–144.Google Scholar

Soiphisut, Wasan. 2014. (Un)fun Tales in the Constitutional Court [rueang (mai) sanuk nai san ratthathammanun]. Bangkok: Ton Tham.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

‘Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2517 (1974)’ [ratthathammanun haeng ratcha-anachak thai phoso 2517].Google Scholar

‘Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2540 (1997)’ [ratthathammanun haeng ratcha-anachak thai phoso 2540].Google Scholar

‘Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand (Interim) B.E. 2549 (2006)’ [ratthathammanun haeng ratcha-anachak thai (chabap chuakhrao) phoso 2549].Google Scholar

‘Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2550 (2007)’ [ratthathammanun haeng ratcha-anachak thai phoso 2550].Google Scholar

‘Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560 (2017)’ [ratthathammanun haeng ratcha-anachak thai phoso 2560].Google Scholar

‘Act on Establishment of Administrative Courts and Administrative Court Procedure B.E. 2542 (1999)’ [phraratchabanyat chattang sanpokkhrong lae withi phicharana khadi pokkhrong phoso 2542].Google Scholar

‘Act on Establishment of Juvenile Courts B.E. 2494 (1951)’ [phraratchabanyat chattang sankhadideklaeyaowachon phoso 2494].Google Scholar

‘Act on Principles for Appointment to and Holding of Positions of Senior Judges B.E. 2542 (1999)’ [phraratchabanyat lakken kan taengtang lae kan damrong tamnaeng phu phiphaksa awuso phoso 2542].Google Scholar

‘Act on the Courts of Justice Judicial Service B.E. 2543 (2000)’ [phraratchabanyat rabiap kharatchakan fai tulakan san yutitham 2543].Google Scholar

‘Act on the Judicial Service B.E. 2482 (1939)’ [phraratchabanyat rabiap kharatchakan fai tulakan phoso 2482].Google Scholar

‘Act on the Judicial Service B.E. 2497 (1954)’ [phraratchabanyat rabiap kharatchakan fai tulakan phoso 2497].Google Scholar

‘Act on the Judicial Service B.E. 2521 (1978)’ [phraratchabanyat rabiap kharatchakan fai tulakan phoso 2521].Google Scholar

‘Administrative Court Judicial Commission Regulations on Methods for Selection of Judges of Administrative Courts of First Instance, Heads of Division of Administrative Courts of First Instance, Deputy Chief Justices of Administrative Courts of First Instance and Chief Justices of Administrative Courts of First Instance B.E. 2544 (2001)’ [rabiap ko. sopo. wa duai withikan khatlueak tulakan sanpokkhrong chan ton tulakan huana khana sanpokkhrong chan ton rong athibodi sanpokkhrong chan ton lae athibodi sanpokkhrong chan ton phoso 2544].Google Scholar

‘Administrative Court Judicial Commission Regulations on Methods for Selection of Supreme Administrative Court Judges, Heads of Division of the Supreme Administrative Court, Vice Presidents of the Supreme Administrative Court and President of the Supreme Administrative Court B.E. 2544 (2001)’ [rabiap ko. sopo. wa duai withikan khatlueak tulakan sanpokkhrong sungsut tulakan huana khana sanpokkhrong sungsut rong prathan sanpokkhrong sungsut lae prathan sanpokkhrong sungsut phoso 2544].Google Scholar

‘Administrative Court Judicial Commission Regulations on Moving and Promoting Judges of Administrative Courts of First Instance B.E. 2554 (2011)’ [rabiap ko. sopo. wa duai kan yai lae kan luean tamnaeng khong tulakan nai sanpokkhrong chan ton phoso 2554].Google Scholar

‘Courts of Justice Judicial Commission Regulations on Principles for the Appointment, Promotion, Transfer and Raising of Salary and Position Payments for Judicial Officials B.E. 2554 (2011)’ [rabiap khanakammakan tulakan san yutitham wa duai lakken kan taengtang kan luean tamnaeng kan yokyai taengtang lae kan luean ngoen duean lae ngoen pracham tamnaeng kharatchakan tulakan phoso 2554].Google Scholar

‘Declaration of the Office of the Prime Minister on Appointment of Judges of Administrative Courts of First Instance’ [prakat samnak nayokratthamontri rueang taengtang tulakan nai sanpokkhrong chan ton]. 12 February 2001.Google Scholar

‘Declaration of the Office of the Prime Minister on Appointment of Supreme Administrative Court Judges’ [prakat samnak nayokratthamontri rueang taengtang tulakan nai sanpokkhrong sungsut]. 27 March 2000.Google Scholar

‘Ministerial Regulation Number 4 B.E. 2502 (1959) Issued under the Act on the Judicial Service B.E. 2497 (1954)’ [kotkrasuang chabap thi 4 phoso 2502 ok tam khwam nai phraratchabanyat rabiap kharatchakan fai tulakan 2497].Google Scholar

‘Ministerial Regulation Number 7 B.E. 2518 (1975) Issued under the Act on the Judicial Service B.E. 2497 (1954)’ [kotkrasuang chabap thi 7 phoso 2518 ok tam khwam nai phraratchabanyat rabiap kharatchakan fai tulakan 2497].Google Scholar

‘Report of House of Representatives Meeting, Meeting 10/2497 (1954) (Ordinary Meeting)’ [rai-ngan kan prachum saphaphuthaenratsadon khrang thi 10/2497 (saman)]. 9 September 1954. Ananda Samakhom Throne Hall.Google Scholar