Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:08:45.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Eleven - Emergence, transmission and evolution of an uncommon enemy: Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease

from Part II - Understanding between-host processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2019

Kenneth Wilson
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Andy Fenton
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Dan Tompkins
Affiliation:
Predator Free 2050 Ltd
Get access

Summary

Since its emergence, devil facial tumour disease (DFTD) has spread throughout most of the geographic range of the Tasmanian devil, causing >90% local population decline, >80% overall decline and cascading effects on the ecosystem. We developed a decision tree to guide research and management of this cancer. The devil–DFTD system gives an opportunity to study a wildlife disease in all stages of existence across the entire geographic range of a natural host. Despite predictions of extinction, devils persist. State–space models show that individuals with higher fitness (the larger, more dominant individuals responsible for most of the biting) are more likely to become infected themselves. Individual-based models in which demographic parameters depend on the size of the tumours carried by individual hosts show that DFTD epidemics operate on a much slower timescale than those of viral or bacterial diseases. Following an initial epidemic peak, the consequences for a general epidemic may be coexistence, even in the absence of evolutionary changes in either host or pathogen. Multiple lines of evidence show that Tasmanian devils are evolving in response to DFTD. Conservation efforts are now shifting from managing for extinction to managing for persistence.

Type
Chapter
Information
Wildlife Disease Ecology
Linking Theory to Data and Application
, pp. 321 - 341
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altizer, S., Nunn, C.L., Thrall, P.H., et al. (2003) Social organization and parasite risk in mammals: integrating theory and empirical studies. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 34, 517547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R.M., Fraser, C., Ghani, A.C., et al. (2004). Epidemiology, transmission dynamics and control of SARS: the 2002–2003 epidemic. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 359, 10911105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R.M. & May, R.M. (1979) Population biology of infectious diseases. Part I. Nature, 280, 361367.Google Scholar
AusVet. (2005) Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease response. Technical Workshop: 29–31 August 2005. Hobart (Tasmania): Department of Primary Industries, Water, and Environment.Google Scholar
Beeton, N. (2011) Population and disease modelling in the Tasmanian devil. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
Beeton, N. & McCallum, H. (2011) Models predict that culling is not a feasible strategy to prevent extinction of Tasmanian devils from facial tumour disease. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 13151323.Google Scholar
Brown, G.K., Tovar, C., Cooray, A.A., et al. (2016) Mitogen-activated Tasmanian devil blood mononuclear cells kill devil facial tumour disease cells. Immunology and Cell Biology, 94, 673679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruniche-Olsen, A., Jones, M.E., Austin, J.J., Burridge, C.P. & Holland, B.R. (2014) Extensive population decline in the Tasmanian devil predates European settlement and Devil Facial Tumor Disease. Biology Letters, 10, 20140619.Google Scholar
Burgman, M.A. (2005) Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, T. (2012) Integral projections models, their construction and use in posing hypotheses in ecology. Oikos, 121, 13371350.Google Scholar
Daszak, P., Cunningham, A.A. & Hyatt, A.D. (2000) Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife – threats to biodiversity and human health. Science, 287, 443449.Google Scholar
De Castro, F. & Bolker, B. (2005) Mechanisms of disease-induced extinction. Ecology Letters, 8, 117126.Google Scholar
Dewar, E. (2013) Understanding behaviour, stress and disease in Tasmanian devils: implications for selective adaptations. Honours thesis, University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
Doherty, T.S., Dickman, C.R., Johnson, C.N., et al. (2017) Impacts and management of feral cats Felis catus in Australia. Mammal Review, 47(2), 8397. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12080Google Scholar
Donnelly, C.A., Ghani, A.C., Leung, G.M., et al. (2003) Epidemiological determinants of spread of causal agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. The Lancet, 361, 17611766.Google Scholar
Easterling, M.R., Ellner, S.P. & Dixon, P.M. (2000) Size-specific sensitivity: applying a new structured population model. Ecology, 81, 694708.Google Scholar
Ebert, D. & Bull, J.J. (2003) Challenging the trade-off model for the evolution of virulence: is virulence management feasible? Trends in Microbiology, 11, 1520.Google Scholar
Epstein, B., Jones, M., Hamede, R., et al. (2016) Rapid evolutionary response to a transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils. Nature Communications, 7, 12684.Google Scholar
Frankham, R. (2008) Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Molecular Ecology, 17, 325333.Google Scholar
Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., Eldridge, M.D.B., et al. (2011) Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conservation Biology, 25, 465475.Google Scholar
Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., Ralls, K., et al. (2017) Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galvani, A.P. & May, R.M. (2005) Dimensions of superspreading. Nature, 438, 293.Google Scholar
Hamede, R., Bashford, J., Jones, M. & McCallum, H. (2012) Simulating devil facial tumour disease outbreaks across empirically derived contact networks. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 447456.Google Scholar
Hamede, R.K., Bashford, J., McCallum, H. & Jones, M. (2009) Contact networks in a wild Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) population: using social network analysis to reveal seasonal variability in social behaviour and its implications for transmission of devil facial tumour disease. Ecology Letters, 12, 11471157.Google Scholar
Hamede, R.K., Beeton, N.J., Carver, S. & Jones, M.E. (2017) Untangling the model muddle: empirical tumour growth in Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 6217.Google Scholar
Hamede, R.K., McCallum, H. & Jones, M. (2008) Seasonal, demographic and density-related patterns of contact between Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii): implications for transmission of devil facial tumour disease. Austral Ecology, 33, 614614.Google Scholar
Hamede, R.K., McCallum, H. & Jones, M. (2013) Biting injuries and transmission of Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease. Journal of Animal Ecology, 82, 182190.Google Scholar
Hamede, R.K., Pearse, A.M., Swift, K., Barmuta, L.A., Murchison, E.P. & Jones, M.E. (2015) Transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils: localized lineage replacement and host population response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 282, 20151468.Google Scholar
Hawkins, C.E., Baars, C., Hesterman, H., et al. (2006) Emerging disease and population decline of an island endemic, the Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii. Biological Conservation, 131, 307324.Google Scholar
Hawkins, C.E., McCallum, H., Mooney, N., Jones, M. & Holdsworth, M. (2009) Sarcophilus harrisii. IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2009. 1.Google Scholar
Hollings, T., Jones, M., Mooney, N. & McCallum, H. (2014) Trophic cascades following the disease-induced decline of an apex predator, the Tasmanian devil. Conservation Biology, 28, 3675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollings, T., Jones, M., Mooney, N. & McCallum, H. (2016) Disease-induced decline of an apex predator drives invasive dominated states and threatens biodiversity. Ecology, 97, 394405.Google Scholar
Hollings, T., McCallum, H., Kreger, K., Mooney, N. & Jones, M. (2015) Relaxation of risk-sensitive behaviour of prey following disease-induced decline of an apex predator, the Tasmanian devil. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 282, 20150124.Google Scholar
Huxtable, S.J., Lee, D.V., Wise, P. & Save the Tasmanian Devil Program. (2015) Metapopulation management of an extreme disease scenario. In: Armstrong, D.P., Hayward, M.W., Moro, D. & Seddon, B.P. (eds.), Advances in Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Jones, M.E. (2003) Convergence in ecomorphology and guild structure among marsupial and placental carnivores. In: Jones, M.E., Dickman, C.R. & Archer, M. (eds.), Predators With Pouches: The Biology of Carnivorous Marsupials. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Jones, M.E., Cockburn, A., Hamede, R., et al. (2008) Life-history change in disease-ravaged Tasmanian devil populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 10,02310,027.Google Scholar
Jones, M.E., Jarman, P.J., Lees, C.M., et al. (2007) Conservation management of Tasmanian devils in the context of an emerging, extinction-threatening disease: devil facial tumor disease. EcoHealth, 4, 326337.Google Scholar
Jones, M.E., Paetkau, D., Geffen, E.L.I. & Moritz, C. (2004) Genetic diversity and population structure of Tasmanian devils, the largest marsupial carnivore. Molecular Ecology, 13, 21972209.Google Scholar
Karu, N., Wilson, R., Hamede, R., et al. (2016) Discovery of biomarkers for Tasmanian devil cancer (DFTD) by metabolic profiling of serum. Journal of Proteome Research, 15, 38273840.Google Scholar
Kerr, P. J., Liu, J., Cattadori, I., et al. (2015) Myxoma virus and the leporipoxviruses: an evolutionary paradigm. Viruses, 7, 10201061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreiss, A., Brown, G.K., Tovara, C., Lyons, A.B. & Woods, G.M. (2015). Evidence for induction of humoral and cytotoxic immune responses against devil facial tumor disease cells in Tasmanian devils Sarcophilus harrisii immunized with killed cell preparations. Vaccine, 33, 30163025.Google Scholar
Lachish, S., Jones, M. & McCallum, H. (2007) The impact of disease on the survival and population growth rate of the Tasmanian devil. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 926936.Google Scholar
Lachish, S., McCallum, H. & Jones, M. (2009) Demography, disease and the devil: life-history changes in a disease-affected population of Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii). Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 427436.Google Scholar
Lachish, S., McCallum, H., Mann, D., Pukk, C. & Jones, M.E. (2010) Evaluation of selective culling of infected individuals to control Tasmanian devil facial tumor disease. Conservation Biology, 24, 841851.Google Scholar
Lafferty, K.D. & Kuris, A.M. (2002) Trophic strategies, animal diversity and body size. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 507513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazenby, B. (2009) Habitat identification and hair tube surveys for the Endangered New Holland Mouse in Tasmania with a focus on the St Helens area. www.northeastbioregionalnetwork.org.au/docs/NEBN%20final%20report.pdf (downloaded 08/06/2017): North East Bioregional Network.Google Scholar
Lazenby, B.T., Tobler, M.W., Brown, W.E., et al. (2018) Density trends and demographic signals uncover the long‐term impact of transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55, 13681379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365–2664.13088Google Scholar
Le Roex, N., Berrington, C.M., Hoal, E.G. & Van Helden, P.D. (2015) Selective breeding: the future of TB management in African buffalo? Acta Tropica, 149, 3844.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Smith, J.O., Schreiber, S.J., Kopp, P.E. & Getz, W.M. (2005) Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence. Nature, 438, 355359.Google Scholar
May, R.M. & Anderson, R. M. (1979) Population biology of infectious diseases. Part II. Nature, 280, 455461.Google Scholar
McCallum, H. (2005) Inconclusiveness of chytridiomycosis as the agent in widespread frog declines. Conservation Biology, 19, 14211430.Google Scholar
McCallum, H. & Jones, M. (2006) To lose both would look like carelessness: Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease. PLoS Biology, 4, e3421674.Google Scholar
McCallum, H. & Jones, M. (2010) Sins of omission and sins of commission: St Thomas Aquinas and the devil. Australian Zoologist, 35, 307314.Google Scholar
McCallum, H. & Jones, M. (2012) Infectious cancer in wildlife. In: Aguirre, A., Daszak, P. & Ostfeld, R. (eds.), Conservation Medicine: Applied Cases of Ecological Health (pp. 270283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCallum, H., Jones, M., Hawkins, C., et al. (2009) Transmission dynamics of Tasmanian devil facial tumor disease may lead to disease-induced extinction. Ecology, 90, 33793392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalf, C.J.E., Graham, A.L., Martinez-Bakker, M. & Childs, D.Z. (2016) Opportunities and challenges of Integral Projection Models for modelling host–parasite dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology, 85, 343355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metzger, M.J., Reinisch, C., Sherry, J. & Goff, S.P. (2015) Horizontal transmission of clonal cancer cells causes leukemia in soft-shell clams. Cell, 161, 255263.Google Scholar
Metzger, M.J., Villalba, A., Carballal, M.J., et al. (2016) Widespread transmission of independent cancer lineages within multiple bivalve species. Nature, 534, 705709.Google Scholar
Mooney, N. (2004) The devil’s new hell. Nature Australia, 28, 34.Google Scholar
Murchison, E.P. (2008) Clonally transmissible cancers in dogs and Tasmanian devils. Oncogene, 27, S19S30.Google Scholar
Murchison, E.P., Schulz-Trieglaff, O.B., Ning, Z., et al. (2012) Genome sequencing and analysis of the Tasmanian devil and its transmissible cancer. Cell, 148, 780791.Google Scholar
Murchison, E.P., Wedge, D.C., Alexandrov, L.B., et al. (2014) Transmissable dog cancer genome reveals the origin and history of an ancient cell lineage. Science, 343, 437440.Google Scholar
Murgia, C., Pritchard, J.K., Kim, S.Y., Fassati, A. & Weiss, R.A. (2006) Clonal origin and evolution of a transmissible cancer. Cell, 126, 477487.Google Scholar
Nak, D., Nak, Y., Cangul, I.T. & Tuna, B. (2005) A clinico-pathological study on the effect of vincristine on transmissible venereal tumour in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A, 52, 366370.Google Scholar
Pearse, A.M. & Swift, K. (2006) Transmission of devil facial-tumour disease – an uncanny similarity in the karyotype of these malignant tumours means that they could be infective. Nature, 439, 549549.Google Scholar
Pearse, A.M., Swift, K., Hodson, P., et al. (2012) Evolution in a transmissible cancer: a study of the chromosomal changes in devil facial tumor (DFT) as it spreads through the wild Tasmanian devil population. Cancer Genetics, 205, 101–112.Google Scholar
Phalen, D.N., Frimberger, A., Pyecroft, S., et al. (2013) Vincristine chemotherapy trials and pharmacokinetics in Tasmanian devils with Tasmanian devil facial tumor disease. PLoS ONE, 8, e65133.Google Scholar
Phalen, D.N., Frimberger, A.E., Peck, S., et al. (2015) Doxorubicin and carboplatin trials in Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) with Tasmanian devil facial tumor disease. The Veterinary Journal, 206, 312316.Google Scholar
Pimm, S.L., Dollar, L. & Bass, O.L. Jr (2006) The genetic rescue of the Florida panther. Animal Conservation, 9, 115122.Google Scholar
Pye, R., Hamede, R., Siddle, H., et al. (2016a) Demonstration of immune responses against devil facial tumour disease in wild Tasmanian devils. Biology Letters, 12, 20160553.Google Scholar
Pye, R.J., Pemberton, D., Tovar, C., et al. (2016b) A second transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 374379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyecroft, S.B., Pearse, A.M., Loh, R., et al. (2007) Towards a case definition for devil facial tumour disease: what is it? EcoHealth, 4, 346351.Google Scholar
Raberg, L., Graham, A.L. & Read, A.F. (2009) Decomposing health: tolerance and resistance to parasites in animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 364, 3749.Google Scholar
Robinson, A.C., Lawson, B., Toms, M.P., et al. (2010) Emerging infectious disease leads to rapid population declines of common British birds. PLoS ONE, 5, e12215.Google Scholar
Roelke-Parker, M.E., Munson, L., Packer, C., et al. (1996) A canine distemper virus epidemic in Serengeti lions (Panthera leo). Nature, 379, 441445.Google Scholar
Rogers, T., Fox, S., Pemberton, D. & Wise, P. (2016) Sympathy for the devil: captive-management style did not influence survival, body-mass change or diet of Tasmanian devils 1 year after wild release. Wildlife Research, 43, 544552.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Aravena, M. (2019). The Tasmanian devil and its transmissible cancer: physiology of the devil-DFTD interaction. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Aravena, M., Jones, M.E., Carver, S., et al. (2018). Sex bias in ability to cope with cancer: Tasmanian devils and facial tumour disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 285, 20182239.Google Scholar
Sakai, A.K., Allendorf, F.W., Holt, J.S., et al. (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 305332.Google Scholar
Scudamore, J.M. & Harris, D.M. (2002) Control of foot and mouth disease: lessons from the experience of the outbreak in Great Britain in 2001. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 21, 699710.Google Scholar
Siddle, H.V., Kreiss, A., Tovar, C., et al. (2013) Reversible epigenetic down-regulation of MHC molecules by devil facial tumour disease illustrates immune escape by a contagious cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 51035108.Google Scholar
Tompkins, D.M., Carver, S., Jones, M.E., Krkosek, M. & Skerratt, L.F. (2015) Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife: a critical perspective. Trends in Parasitology, 31, 149159.Google Scholar
Tovar, C., Obendorf, D., Murchison, E.P., et al. (2011) Tumor-specific diagnostic marker for transmissible facial tumors of Tasmanian devils: immunohistochemistry studies. Veterinary Pathology, 48, 11951203.Google Scholar
Wayne, R.K., Geffen, E., Girman, D.J., et al. (1997) Molecular systematics of the Canidae. Systematic Biology, 46, 622653.Google Scholar
Wells, K., Hamede, R.K., Kerlin, D.H., et al. (2017a) Infection of the fittest: devil facial tumour disease has greatest effect on individuals with highest reproductive output. Ecology Letters, 20, 770778.Google Scholar
Wilber, M.Q., Langwig, K.E., Kilpatrick, A.M., McCallum, H.I. & Briggs, C.J. (2016) Integral Projection Models for host–parasite systems with an application to amphibian chytrid fungus. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 11821194.Google Scholar
Woinarski, J.C., Burbidge, A.A. & Harrison, P.L. (2015) Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 45314540.Google Scholar
Woinarski, J.C.Z., Burbidge, A.A. & Harrison, P.L. (2014) The Action Plan for Australian Mammals 2012. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Woods, G.M., Howson, L.J., Brown, G.K., et al. (2015) Immunology of a transmissible cancer spreading among Tasmanian devils. The Journal of Immunology, 195, 2329.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×