Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 February 2025
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Why the Ancient Greeks Matter , pp. 179 - 183Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Alexander, A. 2014. Infinitesimal: How a Dangerous Mathematical Theory Shaped the Modern World. New York.Google Scholar
Bechler, Z. 2012. Newton’s Physics and the Conceptual Structure of the Scientific Revolution. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Bernal, M. 1987. Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization, Volume i: The Fabrication of Ancient Greece 1785–1985. London.Google Scholar
Biagioli, M. 1993. Galileo Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism. Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984/1979. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cassidy, D. C. 1992. Heisenberg, German Science, and the Third Reich. Social Research 59(3): 643–61.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A. F. (ed.) 2017. One Hundred Years of Pressure: Hydrostatics from Stevin to Newton. Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemla, K. 2012. Reading Proofs in Chinese Commentaries: Algebraic Proofs in an Algorithmic Context, in The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions, ed. Chemla, K, 423–86. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Deutscher, G. 2010. Through the Language Glass: Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages. New York.Google Scholar
Eckstein, L. and Schwarz, A. 2018. The Making of Tupaia’s Map: A Story of the Extent and Mastery of Polynesian Navigation, Competing Systems of Wayfinding on James Cook’s Endeavour, and the Invention of an Ingenious Cartographic System. The Journal of Pacific History 54: 1–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fancy, N. 2013. Science and Religion in Mamluk Egypt: Ibn al-Nafis, Pulmonary Transit and Bodily Resurrection. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, S. 1989. Canon Busting: The Basic Issues. An Interview with Stanley Fish. National Forum (Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi) 69: 13–15.Google Scholar
Gingerich, O. 1975. “Crisis” versus Aesthetic in the Copernican Revolution. Vistas in Astronomy 17: 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giusti, E. 2016. Did Someone Say Augustan Totalitarianism? Duncan Kennedy’s “Reflections”, Hannah Arendt’s Origins, and the Continental Divide over Virgil’s Aeneid. Dictynna 13:1–19.Google Scholar
Goodman, D. 1994. The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1989/1962. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hanink, J. 2014. Lycurgan Athens and the Making of Classical Tragedy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanink, J. 2017. The Classical Debt: Greek Antiquity in an Era of Austerity. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, V. D. and Heath, J. 1998. Who Killed Homer? The Demise of Classical Education and the Recovery of Greek Wisdom. New York.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. ed. 1998. Aristophanes: Frogs. Assemblywomen. Wealth. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Høyrup, J. 2012. Mathematical Justification as Non-Conceptualized Practice: The Babylonian Example, in The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions, ed. Chemla, K, 362–83. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. M. 2010. Lucian, Fronto, and the Absence of Contemporary Historiography under the Antonines. American Journal of Philology 131(2): 285–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1987. The Alleged Fallacy of Hippocrates of Chios. Apeiron 20:103–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, F. 2000. The Slaughterhouse of Literature. Modern Language Quarterly 61: 207–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, O. 2007. Philosophy and Monarchy in the Hellenistic World, in Jewish Perspectives on Hellenistic Rulers, ed. Rajak, T et al., 13–28. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (trans.) 1989. The Correspondence of Erasmus: Letters 1252 to 1355. Toronto.Google Scholar
Netz, R.Google Scholar
Netz, R. 2004b. The Works of Archimedes Translated into English, Volume i: The Two Books on the Sphere and the Cylinder. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Norman, L. F. 2011. The Shock of the Ancient: Literature and History in Early Modern France. Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. 1984. Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1987. The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochberg, F. 2004. The Heavenly Writing: Divination, Horoscopy and Astronomy in Mesopotamian Culture. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, H. and Demetriou, K. (eds.) 2018. Brill’s Companion to the Classics, Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rummel, E. 1981. The Use of Greek in Erasmus’ Letters. Humanistica Lovaniensia 30: 55–92.Google Scholar
Saliba, G. 1995. A History of Arabic Astronomy: Planetary Theories during the Golden Age of Islam. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Savalli, I. 1985. Un “Astronomo Caldeo” nella Tessaglia tardo-ellenistica. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 15: 539–58.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2019. Escape from Rome: The Failure of Empire and the Road to Prosperity. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. 2009. The Liberty of the Ancients? Friedrich Schiller and Aesthetic Republicanism. History of Political Thought 30: 286–314.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. 1994. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, B. 1953/1946. The Discovery of the Mind, trans. T. G. Rosenmeyer. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Starr, I. 1978. Omen Texts Concerning Holes in the Liver. Archiv für Orientforschung, 26: 45–55.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. 1994. Who Read Ancient Novels? in The Search for the Ancient Novel, ed. Tatum, J., 405–18. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Taruskin, R. 2005. The Oxford History of Western Music: The Earliest Notations to the Sixteenth Century. Oxford.Google Scholar
Todd, W. M. 1976. The Familiar Letter as a Literary Genre in the Age of Pushkin. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Walker, M. 1989. National Socialism and German Physics. Journal of Contemporary History 24: 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeda, L. 2015. Vergil’s Political Commentary: In the Eclogues, Georgics and Aeneid. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wietzke, J. 2014. Knowledge in Person: The Socio-Literary Self-Fashioning of the Greek Expository Author. Stanford University [unpublished Ph.D.].Google Scholar
Wietzke, J. 2022. Speaking Wit to Power: Reconsidering Royal Patronage through Archimedes’ Sand-Reckoner. Classical Antiquity 41: 129–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirszubski, C. 1954. Cicero’s Cum Dignitate Otium: A Reconsideration. The Journal of Roman Studies 44: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerberg, D. 2016. How to Be a Good Classicist under a Bad Emperor. Online Eidolon article. (https://eidolon.pub/how-to-be-a-good-classicist-under-a-bad-emperor-6b848df6e54a).Google Scholar
Zuckerberg, D. 2018. Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar