Book contents
- Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities?
- ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory
- Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: The Need for a Robust and Consistent Theory of International Punishment
- 2 The Practical Importance of Theories of Punishment in International Criminal Law
- Part I Setting the Framework: Criminological, Historical and Domestic Perspectives
- Part II Rationales for Punishment in International Criminal Law: Theoretical Perspectives
- Part III Consequences for the Practice of the International Criminal Court
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
Select Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 February 2020
Book contents
- Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities?
- ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory
- Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: The Need for a Robust and Consistent Theory of International Punishment
- 2 The Practical Importance of Theories of Punishment in International Criminal Law
- Part I Setting the Framework: Criminological, Historical and Domestic Perspectives
- Part II Rationales for Punishment in International Criminal Law: Theoretical Perspectives
- Part III Consequences for the Practice of the International Criminal Court
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities?Purposes of Punishment in International Criminal Law, pp. 387 - 390Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Select Bibliography
Akhavan, Payam ‘Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amann, Diane Marie ‘Group Mentality, Expressivism, and Genocide’ (2002)2 International Criminal Law Review 93–143.Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai ‘Punishment without a Sovereign? The Ius Puniendi Issue of International Criminal Law’ (2013) 33 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 293–315.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: Viking Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Damaska, Mirjan R. ‘What Is the Point of International Criminal Justice’ (2008) 83 Chicago-Kent Law Review 329–365.Google Scholar
D’Ascoli, Silvia Sentencing in International Criminal Law: The UN Ad Hoc Tribunals and Future Perspectives for the ICC (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar
deGuzman, Margaret M. ‘Choosing to Prosecute: Expressive Selection at the International Criminal Court’ (2012) 33 Michigan Journal of International Law 265–320.Google Scholar
deGuzman, Margret M. ‘Harsh Justice for International Crimes?’ (2014) 39 Yale Journal of International Law 1–35.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark A. Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drumbl, Mark A. ‘Victims Who Victimise’ (2016) 4 London Journal of International Law 217–246.Google Scholar
Duff, Anthony Punishment, Communication, and Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Duff, Anthony ‘Process, not Punishment: The Importance of Criminal Trials for Transitional and Transnational Justice’ (2014) University of Minnesota Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 14–03.Google Scholar
Epik, Aziz Die Strafzumessung bei Taten nach dem Völkerstrafgesetzbuch (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Fletcher, George The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierhake, Katrin Begründung des Völkerstrafrechts auf der Grundlage der Kantischen Rechtslehre (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golash, Deirdre ‘The Justification of Punishment in the International Context’ in May, Larry and Hoskins, Zachary (eds.), International Criminal Law and Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010) 201–223Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Alexander K.A. ‘International Criminal Law for Retributivists’ (2014) 35 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 969–1044.Google Scholar
Günther, Klaus ‘Crime and Punishment as Communication’ in Simester, A.P., Du Bois-Pedain, Antje and Neumann, Ulfrid (eds.), Liberal Criminal Theory, Essays for Andrew von Hirsch (Oxford: Hart, 2014) 123–139.Google Scholar
Haque, Adil Ahmad ‘Group Violence and Group Vengeance: Toward a Retributivist Theory of International Criminal Law’ (2005) 9 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 273–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haque, Adil Ahmad ‘Retributivism: The Right and the Good’ (2013) 32 Law and Philosophy 59–82.Google Scholar
Harmon, Mark B. and Gaynor, Fergal, ‘Ordinary Sentences for Extraordinary Crimes’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 683–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrendorf, Stefan ‘How Can Criminology Contribute to an Explanation of International Crimes?’ (2014) 12 Journal of International Criminal Justice 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, Farooq ‘The Theoretical Basis of Punishment in International Criminal Law’ (1983) 15 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 39–60.Google Scholar
Henham, Ralph The Philosophical Foundations of International Sentencing, (2003) 1 Journal of International Criminal Justice 64–85.Google Scholar
Henham, Ralph ‘Developing Contextualized Rationales for Sentencing in International Criminal Trials’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 757–778.Google Scholar
Holá, Barbora, Bijleveld, Catrien and Smeulers, Alette, ‘Consistency of International Sentencing – ICTY and ICTR Case Study’ (2012) 9 European Journal of Criminology 539–552.Google Scholar
Holá, Barbora and van Wijk, Joris, ‘Life after Conviction at International Criminal Tribunals – An Empirical Overview’ (2014) 12 Journal of International Criminal Justice 109–132.Google Scholar
Jäger, Herbert Makrokriminalität: Studien zur Kriminologie kollektiver Gewalt (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1989).Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran and Simmons, Beth A. ‘Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?’ (2016) 70 International Organization 443–475.Google Scholar
Karstedt, Susanne ‘Contextualizing Mass Atrocity Crimes: The Dynamics of “Extremely Violent Societies”’ (2012) 9 European Journal of Criminology 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ku, Julian and Nzelibe, Jide, ‘Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities?’ (2006) 84 Washington University Law Review 777–833.Google Scholar
Luban, David ‘Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality, and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law’ in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 575–588.Google Scholar
Malamud-Goti, Jaime ‘Transitional Governments in the Breach: Why Punish State Criminals?’ (1990) 12 Human Rights Quarterly 1–16.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, Pádraig, ‘Suspended Disbelief? The Curious Endurance of the Deterrence Rationale in International Criminal Law’ (2012) 10 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 227–262.Google Scholar
Meernik, James ‘Sentencing Rationales and Judicial Decision Making at the International Tribunals’ (2011) 92 Social Science Quarterly 588–608.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric ‘The Anxieties of International Criminal Justice’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 197–221.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence (Boston: Beacon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Mulgrew, Róisín Towards the Development of the International Penal System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Mulgrew, Róisín and Abels, Denis (eds.), Research Handbook on International Penal System (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016).Google Scholar
Nemitz, Jan C. ‘The Law of Sentencing in International Criminal Law: The Purposes of Sentencing and the Applicable Method for the Determination of the Sentence’ in McDonald, Avril et al. (eds.), Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2001 (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2004) 87–127.Google Scholar
Neubacher, Frank ‘How Can It Happen That Horrendous State Crimes Are Perpetrated? An Overview of Criminological Theories’ (2006) 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice 787–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlin, Jens David ‘Towards a Unique Theory of International Criminal Sentencing’ in Sluiter, Göran and Vasiliev, Sergey (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Towards a Coherent Body of Law (London: Cameron May, 2009) 303–404.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark J. ‘Why Prosecute? Critics of Punishment for Mass Atrocity’ (2000) 22 Human Rights Quarterly 118–147.Google Scholar
Rawls, John A Theory of Justice, revised ed. (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuss, Vasco Zivilcourage als Strafzweck des Völkerstrafrechts. Was bedeutet positive Generalprävention in der globalen Zivilgesellschaft? (Münster: LIT Verlag, 2012).Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. ‘Sentencing by International Tribunals: A Human Rights Approach’ (1997) 7 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 461–517.Google Scholar
Sloane, Robert D. ‘The Expressive Capacity of International Punishment: The Limits of the National Law Analogy and the Potential of International Criminal Law’ (2007) 43 Stanford Journal of International Law 39–93.Google Scholar
Sloane, Robert D ‘Sentencing for the Crime of Crimes: The Evolving “Common Law” of Sentencing of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 713–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeulers, Alette and Haveman, Roelof (eds.), Supranational Criminology: Towards a Criminology of International Crimes (Antwerp: Intersentia Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Tallgren, Immi ‘The Sensibility and Sense of International Criminal Law’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 561–595.Google Scholar
von Hirsch, Andrew and Schorscher, Vivian C., ‘A System of International Criminal Justice for Human Rights Violations: What Is the General Justification for Its Existence?’ in Roberts, Julian V. and Zedner, Lucia (eds.), Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wippman, David ‘Atrocities, Deterrence, and the Limits of International Justice’ (1999) 23 Fordham International Law Journal 473–488.Google Scholar
Wringe, Bill ‘Why Punish War Crimes? Victor’s Justice and Expressive Justifications of Punishment’ (2006) 25 Law and Philosophy 159–191.Google Scholar