Book contents
- Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities?
- ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory
- Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: The Need for a Robust and Consistent Theory of International Punishment
- 2 The Practical Importance of Theories of Punishment in International Criminal Law
- Part I Setting the Framework: Criminological, Historical and Domestic Perspectives
- Part II Rationales for Punishment in International Criminal Law: Theoretical Perspectives
- 9 ‘Can I Be Brought before the ICC?’
- 10 An Argument for Retributivism in International Criminal Law
- 11 An Expressive Theory of International Punishment for International Crimes
- 12 We’re Exhausting Ourselves, Let’s Get Busy Instead
- 13 Positive General Prevention and the Idea of Civic Courage in International Criminal Law
- 14 The Individual and the International Community
- 15 The Right to Punishment for International Crimes
- Part III Consequences for the Practice of the International Criminal Court
- Select Bibliography
- Index
11 - An Expressive Theory of International Punishment for International Crimes
from Part II - Rationales for Punishment in International Criminal Law: Theoretical Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 February 2020
- Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities?
- ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory
- Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: The Need for a Robust and Consistent Theory of International Punishment
- 2 The Practical Importance of Theories of Punishment in International Criminal Law
- Part I Setting the Framework: Criminological, Historical and Domestic Perspectives
- Part II Rationales for Punishment in International Criminal Law: Theoretical Perspectives
- 9 ‘Can I Be Brought before the ICC?’
- 10 An Argument for Retributivism in International Criminal Law
- 11 An Expressive Theory of International Punishment for International Crimes
- 12 We’re Exhausting Ourselves, Let’s Get Busy Instead
- 13 Positive General Prevention and the Idea of Civic Courage in International Criminal Law
- 14 The Individual and the International Community
- 15 The Right to Punishment for International Crimes
- Part III Consequences for the Practice of the International Criminal Court
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Daniela Demko develops the basic features of a comprehensive expressive theory of punishment for international crimes. She highlights the communicative significance of two functions of international punishment: the trust in norm validity and to assign responsibility. While focusing on the communicative aspects of international punishment, she also shows how retributive and preventive theories and the specific purposes of punishment in international criminal law – the protection of victims and the rejection of a collective guilt thesis – can be integrated into an expressive theory of international punishment. In addition, Demko identifies the protection of the truth, the protection of victims and the rejection of a collective guilt thesis as criminal purposes specific to international criminal law, and integrates them into the statement of content of international punishment.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities?Purposes of Punishment in International Criminal Law, pp. 176 - 195Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
- 1
- Cited by