We have seen that Western countries treat speech regulation in far different ways than the United States. For the most part the approaches taken in Europe and Canada are similar to those taken in Israel, South Africa, and other countries. We have yet to explore why the United States is so different from the rest of the world when it comes to protecting speech. To put it another way, we have not yet explored the phenomenon of US free speech (including free press) exceptionalism. Many point to deep-seated cultural differences. I want to explore that, but I will ultimately argue that the differences arise from political, ideological, and interpretive disagreements – disagreements that are historically late-breaking.

Most of the literature on US exceptionalism has emphasized general cultural differences between Europe and the United States. And, of course, the differences between the United States and Europe range far beyond free speech. Consider our constitutional protection of the right to bear arms, our use of the death penalty, our failure to guarantee rights of food, clothing, housing, or medical care (and the degree we fall short in meeting these needs even for children), and the impossibility that an openly atheistic person could be elected to high political office. In assessing these differences, we might suppose that these general differences arise from large cultural distinctions that also affect free speech. Beyond freedom of speech, in terms of differences, as Stephen Gardbaum observes,