Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:42:09.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Demand side: dealignment and realignment of the structural political potentials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Hanspeter Kriesi
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Edgar Grande
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
Romain Lachat
Affiliation:
New York University
Martin Dolezal
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munchen
Simon Bornschier
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Timotheos Frey
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The country chapters have shown how the structure of electoral competition has been affected by globalization in the recent period. In each of the six countries, we found strong evidence for a transformation of the main dimensions of the political space and for patterns of realignment. In the present chapter, we focus on the demand side of electoral competition, analyzing in more detail the formation of a potential for the new integration v. demarcation cleavage. We take here a comparative perspective and consider similarities and differences among countries in the nature of these developments. It must be emphasized that the nature of our data imposes some limitations on the extent to which voters' attitudes can be compared across elections. To be able to perform similar analyses and to rely on comparable categories of issues across space and time, it was necessary to standardize all scales measuring issue-orientations. This implies that differences among groups of voters are always expressed in a relative way. Absolute positions or absolute distances in the political space cannot be compared directly. This is certainly annoying, but it is unavoidable given the lack of survey questions and designs that are directly comparable across several countries and elections. While this problem limits the type of comparisons that can be performed, it leaves enough room to analyze several of the central implications of our theoretical argument.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×