“L’abolition des Capitulations et ses conséquences.” Revue générale de droit international public (1914): 487–493.Google Scholar

Adams, Samuel Hopkins. Common Cause: A Novel of the War in America. Boston-New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1919.Google Scholar

Adams, Samuel Hopkins. Invaded America: “Making Over the Alien”. New York: National Americanization Committee, 1918.Google Scholar

Ador, G., Férriére, F. and Schulthess-Rechberg, A. Rapports de MM. G. Ador, Dr F. Ferrière, Dr de Schulthess-Rechberg sur leurs visites à quelques camps des prisonniers en Autriche-Hongrie. Genève: Librairie Georg & C.ie-Librairie Fischbacher, 1915.Google Scholar

Alien Property Custodian, Alien Property Custodian Report. A detailed report by the Alien property custodian of all proceedings had by him under the Trading with the Enemy Act during the calendar year 1918 and to the close of business on February 15, 1919. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1919.Google Scholar

American Society of International Law. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its Ninth Annual Meeting Held at Washington, DC December 28–30, 1915. Washington, DC: Byron S. Adams Printer, 1916.Google Scholar

Anderson, Frank M. and Hershey, Amos S. Handbook for the Diplomatic History of Europe, Asia, and Africa, 1870–1914. Washington, DC: G.P.O., 1918.Google Scholar

Andina, Maria. La mia prigionia in Austria: ottobre 1917–maggio 1918. Como: Cavalleri, 1921.Google Scholar

Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international, X–XII (1885–1894).Google Scholar

Ariga, Nagao. La Chine et la Grande guerre européenne: au point de vue du droit international. Paris: A. Pedone, 1920.Google Scholar

Ariga, Nagao. La guerre russo-japonaise au point de vue continental et le droit international. Paris: A. Pedone, 1908.Google Scholar

Ariga, Nagao. La guerre sino-japonaise au point de vue du droit international. Edited by Fauchille, Paul Paris: A. Pedone, 1896.Google Scholar

Audinet, Eugène Louis André. “Le retrait des naturalisations accordées aux anciens sujets des puissances en guerre avec la France.” Journal du droit international 42 (1915): 129–140.Google Scholar

Ausschuss zur Untersuchung der Erzeugungs- und Absatzbedingungen der deutschen Wirtschaft. Die deutsche Zahlungsbilanz: Verhandlungen und Berichte des Unterausschusses für allgemeine Wirtschaftsstruktur (I. Unterausschuss) 6. Arbeitsgruppe. Berlin: E.S. Mittler & Son, 1930.Google Scholar

Barclay de Mounteney, Thomas J. The Case of a Détenu. London: Georges Earle, 1838.Google Scholar

Barrès, Maurice. Contre les étrangers. Étude pour la protection des ouvriers français. Paris: Grande imprimerie parisienne, 1893.Google Scholar

Behandlung der feindlichen Zivilpersonen in den kriegführenden Staaten bei Ausbruch des Krieges, Die (Berlin: Ernst Siegfried Mittler und Sohn, 1918).Google Scholar

Beneš, Edvard. My War Memoirs. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1928.Google Scholar

Bentwich, Norman. “International Law as Applied by England during the War.” The American Journal of International Law 9, no. 3 (1915): 642–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, Charles. Le séquestre de la propriété privée en temps de guerre. Enquête de droit international. Vol. 3, Paris: Marcel Giard, 1927–1933.Google Scholar

Bitter, F. W. and Zelle, A. No More War on Foreign Investments. A Kellogg Pact for Private Property. Philadelphia: Dorrance & Co., Inc., 1933.Google Scholar

Blanchod, Fréd and Thormeyer, F. La Croix-Rouge aux camps de prisonniers. Rapports des délégués du Comité international de la Croix-Rouge sur leurs visites aux camps de prisonniers de guerre aux Indes et en Birmanie pendant les mois de février, mars et avril 1917. Genève: Atar, 1918.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, J. C. Le droit international codifié. Paris: Guillaumin et cie, 1870.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, J. C., De Parieu, E., Asser, T. M. C. and Rolin-Jaequemyns, G. “Les lois de la guerre. Appel de l’Institut aux belligérants et à la presse.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 9 (1877): 133–138.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, J. C., De Parieu, E., Asser, T. M. C. and Rolin-Jaequemyns, G. “Völkerrechtliche Betrachtungen über den französisch-deutschen Krieg, 1870–71.” Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Rechtspflege des Deutschen Reichs I (1871): 270–340.Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin M. “Basic Elements of Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad.” The American Journal of International Law 7, no. 3 (1913): 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borchard, Edwin M. “Confiscation of Enemy Private Property.” The Yale Law Journal 28, no. 5 (1919): 478–481.Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin M. The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad. New York: The Banks Law Publishing Co., 1919.Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin M. “Enemy Private Property.” The American Journal of International Law 18, no. 2 (1924): 523–532.Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin M. “Introduction,” in Gathings, James A.. International Law and American Treatment of Alien Enemy Property, Washington, DC: American Council on Public Affairs, 1940: V–XIV.Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin M. “Opinions of the Mixed Claims Commission, United States and Germany (Part II).” The American Journal of International Law 20, no. 1 (1926): 69–80.Google Scholar

Bordwell, Percy. The Law of War between Belligerents: A History and Commentary. Chicago: Callaghan & co., 1908.Google Scholar

Britain. British Foreign and State Papers, London, Foreign Office, vols. 83 (1890–1891), 85 (1892–1893), 99 (1905–1906), 101 (1907–1908), 103 (1909–1910), 105 (1912).Google Scholar

Britain “Correspondence with the United States Ambassador respecting Conditions in the Internment Camp at Ruhleben. Presented to both Houses of Parliament by Command of His Majesty. January 1916.” London: Harrisons and Sons, 1916.Google Scholar

Britain Parliamentary Papers, House of Commons, 1922 [Cmd. 1569] Report made to the Secretary of State for the Home Department by the Certificates of Naturalization (Revocation) Committee in the case of Sir Edgar Speyer, London, 1922.Google Scholar

Britain Parliamentary Returns of Naturalised Aliens 1875–1903; “Summary of the Certificates Registered at the Home Office in each year from 1904 to 1913 Inclusive,” in Parliamentary Papers, House of Commons, Aliens (naturalization). Return showing the names of all aliens to whom certificates of naturalization of re-admission to British nationality have been issued and whose oaths of allegiance have, during the year ended the 31st day of December 1914, been registered at the Home Office, giving the country and place of residence of the person naturalized or re-admitted, and including information as to any aliens who have, during the same period, obtained acts of naturalization from the legislature […] dated 24 April 1914 (London, 1914).Google Scholar

Buzzati, Giulio Cesare, “Note sulla cittadinanza,” Rivista di diritto civile, VIII (1916): 485–506.Google Scholar

Calvo, Carlos. Le droit international théorique et pratique, précédé d’un exposé historique des progrès de la science du droit des gens. Vol. IV, Paris: Guillaumin et Co., 1896. 4. ed.Google Scholar

Capitulations: what they are, and what effect their abolition will have upon the status of British subjects in Turkey, upon their interests, their liberties and upon British trade generally: memorandum submitted on behalf of the non-official British community in Constantinople, The. London: s.n., 1922.Google Scholar

Cauwès, , Albert, , and Chaudun, , Pierre La liquidation des biens ennemis en France d’après les termes des traités de paix. Le tribunal arbitral mixte et les intérêts français en Allemagne et en Autriche. Manuel pratique. Paris: A. Pedone, 1921.Google Scholar

Chronik des deutsch-französischen Krieges. 1870. Aus dem königlich preußischen Staats-Anzeiger, vom 4. Juli bis 6. November 1870. Berlin: Decker, 1870.Google Scholar

Clunet, Edouard. “L’interdiction de commerce avec le sujets ennemis devant le Parlement,” L’Information, January 29 and 30, 1915.Google Scholar

Clunet, Edouard. “La nationalité et la guerre,” Le Temps, August 25, 1917.Google Scholar

Clunet, Edouard. “La personne et les biens des Austro-Allemandes en France,” Le Temps, February 1, 1915.Google Scholar

“Code du prisonnier de guerre, Le. Rapport présenté par le Comité international à la Xme Conférence.” RICR 3, no. 26, 1921: 100–128.Google Scholar

Cohen, Israel. The Ruhleben Prison Camp. A Record of Nineteen Months’ Internment. London: Methuen & Co., 1917.Google Scholar

Cohen-Portheim, Paul. Time Stood Still. My Internment in England 1914–1918. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co. Inc., 1931.Google Scholar

Cooper, Caroline Ethel. Behind the Lines. One Woman’s War 1914–1918. The Letters of Caroline Ethel Cooper. Edited by Denholm, Decie Sidney-London: Collins, 1982.Google Scholar

Coquet, Etienne. “Chronique des faits internationaux. Italie et Turquie.” Revue générale de droit international public XIX (1912): 370–413.Google Scholar

Conférence de la Paix. Recueil des actes de la Conférence. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1922.Google Scholar

Cuthell, Chester. W., “Introduction,” in Bitter, F. W., Zelle, A.. No More War on Foreign Investments. A Kellogg Pact for Private Property, Philadelphia: Dorrance & Co., Inc., 1933: 1–5.Google Scholar

Darut, Joseph-André. De l’expulsion des étrangers. Aix: B. Niel, 1902.Google Scholar

de Lapradelle, Albert Geouffre, ed. La Paix de Versailles. Conférence des préliminaires de paix – Commission économique et financière Vol. VII. Paris: Les Éditions internationales, 1936.Google Scholar

de Roux, Marquis. “Les séquestres et la colonisation allemande en France.” In Répertoire de l’avant-guerre; répertoire professionnel et régional des établissements industriels et commerciaux allemands et autrichiens mis sous séquestre en France pendant la grande guerre (d’après les publications du Journal officiel), edited by Vallet, Maurice. Paris: Nouvelle librairie nationale, 1916.Google Scholar

Despagnet, Frantz. Cours de droit international public. Paris: L. Larose, 1899. 2e éd. complétement revue et mise au courant. ed.Google Scholar

Despagnet, Frantz. La guerre sud-africaine au point de vue du droit international. Paris: A. Pedone, 1902.Google Scholar

Eccard, Frédéric. Biens et intérêts français en Allemagne et en Alsace-Lorraine pendant la guerre. Paris: Payot, 1917.Google Scholar

Economic Conference of the Allies, Text of the Paris Economic Pact, s.l.: s.n., 1916.Google Scholar

Einstein, Lewis. Inside Constantinople: A Diplomatist’s Diary during the Dardanelles Expedition, April-September, 1915. London: J. Murray, 1917.Google Scholar

Ellison, Wallace. Escaped! Adventures in German Captivity. Edinburgh-London: William Blackwood and Sons, 1918.Google Scholar

Fauchille, Paul, ed. La guerre de 1914. Recueil de documents intéressant le droit international. Paris: A. Pedone, 1916–1918.Google Scholar

Fauchille, Paul, Traité de droit international public, Tome II, Guerre et neutralité. Paris: A. Rousseau, 1921.Google Scholar

Ferrière, Frédéric. “Projet d’une Convention internationale réglant la situation des civils tombés à la guerre au pouvoir de l’ennemi.” RICR 5, no. 54 (1923): 560–585.Google Scholar

Ferrière, F., Micheli, H., and de Watteville, K. Rapport de MM. F. Ferrière, H. Micheli et K. de Watteville sur leur voyage à Vienne, à Budapest et à Sofia et leurs visites à quelques camps de prisonniers en Bulgarie. Avril-mai 1917. Genève: Librairie Georg & C.ie-Librairie Fischbacher, 1917.Google Scholar

Fiore, Pasquale. International Law Codified and its Legal Sanction, or, The Legal Organization of the Society of States. New York: Baker, Voorhis and Co., 1918.Google Scholar

Fiore, Pasquale. Trattato di diritto internazionale. 3 vols. Torino: Unione tipografico-editrice, 1879. 2. ed.Google Scholar

Fite, Emerson D. “Germany’s Losses in America.” Current History. A Monthly Magazine of The New York Times XIII, no. 2 (1921): 266–272.Google Scholar

Flournoy, Richard Wilson, and Hudson, Manley Ottmer. A Collection of Nationality Laws of Various Countries as Contained in Constitutions, Statutes and Treaties. New York: Oxford University Press, 1929.Google Scholar

France. Ministère de la justice. Compte général de l’administration de la justice civile et commerciale pendant l’année 1919 […] France-Algérie-Tunisie. Paris: s.n., 1924.Google Scholar

France. Ministère de la justice. Ministère de finance. Services national des statistiques – Direction de la statistique générale – Études démographiques n° 3, Les naturalisations en France (1870–1940). Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1942.Google Scholar

Frantz, Ernest. Strasbourg 1870: le journal du siège d’après le journal inédit d’Ernest Frantz, 15 juillet-28 septembre. Nancy: Place Stanislas, 2011.Google Scholar

Frost, Stanley. Germany’s New War Against America. New York: E. P. Dutton and company, 1919.Google Scholar

Gaulis, Georges. “Lettres de Turquie.” Journal des Débats, no. 29 Mai (1912).Google Scholar

Georgiadès, P. A. Rapport-Mémoire de Me P.A. Gorgiadès. Avocat helléne à Constantinople au sujet de son internement par les autorités allemandes d’occupation en Roumanie et de la situation, en général, des internés dans les camps de concentration en Bulgarie et dans celui de Holzminden en Allemagne. Mars 1917-Novembre 1918. Paris: Imprimerie Librairie Lahure, 1919.Google Scholar

Gerard, James W. My Four Years in Germany. New York: George H. Doran Company, 1917.Google Scholar

Gerlach, Hellmut von. Die grosse Zeit der Lüge. Charlottenburg: Verlag der Weltbünne, 1926.Google Scholar

German Prisoners in Great Britain. Bolton and London: Tillotson & son ltd. printers, 1916.Google Scholar

Germany. Auswärtiges Amt. Ausnahmegesetze gegen deutsche Privatrechte in England, Frankreich und Russland. Berlin: Auswärtiges Amt, 1915.Google Scholar

Germany. Auswärtiges Amt. Bericht des Reichskommissars zur Erörterung von Gewalttätigkeiten gegen deutsche Zivilpersonen in Feindesland über seine Tätigkeit bis zum 1. Januar 1916.Google Scholar

Germany. Auswärtiges Amt. Denkschrift über die von der k.k. Regierung aus Anlaß des Krieges getroffenen Maßnahmen. Vol. 1–4, Wien: Wien: Hof- u. Staatsdr., 1915–1917.Google Scholar

Germany. Auswärtiges Amt. Die Gefangenen-Misshandlungen in Entente-Ländern: Noten der Deutschen Regierung an die Neutralen Staaten. Berlin: Heymann, 1918.Google Scholar

Gidel, Gilbert, and Barrault, H. E. Le Traité de Paix avec l’Allemagne du 28 Juin 1919 et les intérêts privés. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1921.Google Scholar

Giolitti, Giovanni. Memorie della mia vita. Con uno studio di Olindo Malagodi. Vol. 2, Milano: Treves, 1922.Google Scholar

Hall, William Edward. A Treatise on International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924.Google Scholar

Hammond, Joseph W. “Mr. William Cope’s Petition, 1804.” Dublin Historical Record 6, no. 1 (1943): 25–38.Google Scholar

Hauriou, Maurice. Notes d’arrêts sur décisions du Conseil d’état et du Tribunal des conflits publiées au Recueil Sirey de 1892 à 1928. Réunies et classées par André Hauriou. Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1929.Google Scholar

Hauser, Henri. Les méthodes allemandes d’expansion économique. Paris: A. Colin, 1916.Google Scholar

Heffter, August Wilhelm. Le droit international de l’Europe. Edited by Geffcken, F. Heinrich. Berlin: H.W. Müller, 1883. 4th ed.Google Scholar

Heilborn, Paul. “Deutsche-französische Krieg.” In Wörterbuch des Völkerrechts und der Diplomatie, edited by Strupp, Karl and Hatschek, Julius. Berlin und Leipzig: W. de Gruyter & co., 1924.Google Scholar

Hendrick, Burton J. The Life and Letters of Walter H. Page. Vol. III, Garden City-New York: Doubleday, Page & Company, 1926.Google Scholar

Henry, A. “Les séquestres des biens austro-allemandes.” Revue de droit international privé et de droit pénal international XII (1915–1916): 457–490.Google Scholar

Hershey, Amos S. The Essentials of International Public Law. New York: The Macmillan company, 1912.Google Scholar

Hershey, Amos S. The International Law and Diplomacy of the Russo-Japanese War. New York: Macmillan, 1906.Google Scholar

Heuberg 1914–1917. Leben und Treiben der Kriegsgefangenen. Esslingen a. N.: J. F. Schreiber, 1917.Google Scholar

Hull, William I. The Two Hague Conferences and Their Contributions to International Law. Boston: Ginn & Company, 1908.Google Scholar

Humbert, Gustav. Konstantinopel-London-Smyrna. Skizzen aus dem Leben eines kaiserlich deutschen Auslands-Beamten. Charlottenburg: “Hochschule u. Ausland,” 1927.Google Scholar

International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars, Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1914.Google Scholar

International Labour Office, Studies and Reports (Series O) No. 3, Migration Laws and Treaties Geneva: 1928-1929, vols. I–III.Google Scholar

International Labour Office. Studies and Reports. Series O (Migration), No. 6, World Statistics of Aliens. A Comparative Study of Census Returns 1910–1920–1930, Geneva: P.S. King & Son Ltd., 1936.Google Scholar

International Law Association. Draft convention for the protection of civilian populations in time of war submitted by C.G. Dehn to the Amsterdam committee. n.p.: 1937.Google Scholar

International Law Association. Report of the Thirty-Third Conference held at […] Stockholm, September 8th to 13th 1924. London: Sweet & Maxwell Ltd, 1925.Google Scholar

International Law Association. Transactions of the International Law Association, 1873–1924, compiled by Wyndham A. Bewes. London: Sweet & Maxwell ltd., 1925.Google Scholar

Italy. Ministero degli affari esteri, I documenti diplomatici italiani, quarta serie: 1908–1914, vol. VII–VIII (30 marzo 1911–1918 ottobre 1912), Roma: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, 1985.Google Scholar

Italy. Ministero di agricoltura, industria e commercio, Direzione generale della statistica e del lavoro, Ufficio del censimento, Censimento della popolazione del Regno d’Italia al 10 giugno 1911, vol. 1–7, Rome: Tip. Nazionale G. Bertero, 1914–1916.Google Scholar

Italy. Relazione della Commissione d’assistenza agli italiani espulsi dalla Turchia: nominata con R. Decreto del 23 Maggio 1912, Roma: Tipografia nazionale Bertero, 1917.Google Scholar

Italy. Relazioni della Reale commissione d’inchiesta sulle violazioni del diritto delle genti commesse dal nemico, vol. III. Trattamento dei prigionieri di guerra e degli internati civili. Milano-Roma: Casa Editrice d’arte Bestetti & Tuminelli, 1919.Google Scholar

Jahrbuch für die amtliche Statistik des preussischen Staates, III Jahrgang, vol. II/3, 1867/69, Berlin: Verlag des Königlichen Statistischen Bureaus, 1869.Google Scholar

Jsay, Hermann. Die privaten Rechte und Interessen im Friedensvertrag. Berlin: F. Vahlen, 1923.Google Scholar

Kahl, Friedrich. Die Pariser Wirtschaftskonferenz vom 14. bis 17. Juni 1916 und die ihr voraufgegangenen gemeinsamen Beratungen der Ententestaaten über den Wirtschaftskrieg gegen die Mittelmächte. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 1917.Google Scholar

Kawakami, K. K. [Kiyoshi “Karl”], “China’s Treatment of Enemy Aliens,” Current History (New York), 7:1:2 (1917: Nov.): 358–359.Google Scholar

Kent, James. Commentaries on American Law. Vol. I, New York: O. Halsted, 1826.Google Scholar

Kern, J. Conrad. Politische Erinnerungen, 1833 bis 1883. Frauenfeld: Huber, 1887.Google Scholar

Klingen, Ernst. Der Treuhänder für das feindliche Vermögen in England, den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika und Deutschland. Krefeld: J. Greven, 1920.Google Scholar

Konstantinović, Kosta. Le traitement des prisonniers en Bulgarie. Récit de ma captivité. Courbevoie: La Cootypographie, 1919.Google Scholar

Krafft, Gustave. En Autriche-Hongrie. Les camps de prisonniers et d’internés civils. Lausanne: F. Rouge & cie, 1915.Google Scholar

Kuncz, Aladár. Black Monastery. New York: Harcourt Brace and company, 1934.Google Scholar

Kuneralp, Sinan, ed. Ottoman Diplomatic Documents on the Origins of World War One, V, The Turco-Italian War (First Part), İstanbul: The Isis Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Kuneralp, Sinan, and Tokay, Gül, eds. Ottoman Diplomatic Documents on “the Eastern Question.” X, The Balkan Crisis 1875–1878, Part four, The Turco-Russian War, Istanbul: Isis Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Thomas J. War and Neutrality in the Far East. London: Macmillan, 1904.Google Scholar

Laws of War on Land, The, Oxford, September 9, 1880.Google Scholar

Levi, Leone. International Law with Materials for a Code of International Law. New York: D. Appleton, 1888.Google Scholar

[Lockington] The case of alien enemies, considered and decided upon a writ of habeas corpus, allowed on the petition of Charles Lockington, an alien enemy, by the Hon. William Tilghman, chief justice of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the 22d day of November, 1813, reported by Richard Bache, Esq., Philadelphia: Printed by John Binns, 1813).Google Scholar

Lucas, Charles Prestwood. The Empire at War. Vol. V, London, New York [etc.]: H. Milford-Oxford University Press, 1926.Google Scholar

Maine, Henry Sumner. International Law: A Series of Lectures Delivered before the University of Cambridge, 1887. London: J. Murray, 1888.Google Scholar

Malnoury, Louis. Les dénaturalisations d’anciens sujets d’Allemagne, Autriche-Hongrie et Turquie. Publications du Bulletin des tribunaux de commerce et des conseils de prud’hommes. Paris: G. Roustan, 1915.Google Scholar

Mancini, Pasquale Stanislao. Della nazionalità come fondamento del dritto delle genti: prelezione al corso di dritto internazionale e marittimo. Torino: Tipografia Eredi Botta, 1851.Google Scholar

Mancini, Pasquale Stanislao. Diritto internazionale. Prelezioni con un saggio sul Machiavelli. Napoli: G. Marghieri, 1873.Google Scholar

Manson, E., Ilbert, Courtenay, Bedwell, C. E. A., and Nicolle, E. T. “British Isles.” Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation 16 (1916): 1–34.Google Scholar

Mantoux, Paul. The Deliberations of the Council of Four (March 24–June 28, 1919). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Martens, Fedor Fedorovich. Traité de droit international. 3 vols. Paris: Chevalier-Marescq et cie., 1883–1887.Google Scholar

Maunoury, Henry. Police de guerre (1914–1919). Paris: Éditions de la Nouvelle revue critique, 1937.Google Scholar

Mc Nair, A.D. Essays and Lectures Upon Some Legal Effects of the War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1920.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Daniel J. The Prisoner of War in Germany. The Care and Treatment of the Prisoner of War with a History of the Development of the Principle of Neutral Inspection and Control. New York: Moffat Yard, 1918.Google Scholar

Moore, John Bassett. A Digest of International Law. Vol. 4, Washington: Govt. print. off., 1906.Google Scholar

Moore, John Bassett. International Law and Some Current Illusions: and Other Essays. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1924.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Henry. Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Page, 1918.Google Scholar

Morin, Edgar. Vidal and His Family: From Salonica to Paris. The Story of a Sephardic Family in the Twentieth Century. Brighton-Portland: Sussex Academic Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Mott, Thomas Bentley. Myron T. Herrick, Friend of France, an Autobiographical Biography. Garden City: Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc., 1929.Google Scholar

Mullins, Claud. “Private Enemy Property.” Transactions of the Grotius Society 8 (1922): 89–106.Google Scholar

Naville, Ed., Van Berchem, V., de Marval, C., and Eugster, A. Comité International de la Croix Rouge, Documents publiés à l’occasion de la guerre de 1914 1915 – Rapports de MM. Ed. Naville & V. Van Berghem, Dr C. De Marval – A. Eugster sur les visites aux camps de prisonniers en Angleterre, France et Allemagne […] – Mars 1915 Genève-Paris: Librairie Georg & C.ie-Librairie Fischbacher, 1915.Google Scholar

Oakes, Augustus Henry, and Mowat, R. B. The Great European Treaties of the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1930.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa F. L. International Law: A Treatise. London: Longmans & Co., 1905.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa F. L. International Law. A Treatise. London: Longmans, 1920–1921.Google Scholar

Palmieri, Daniel, ed. Les Procès-Verbaux de l’Agence internationale des Prisonniers de Guerre (AIPG). Genève: Comité internationale de la Croix-Rouge, 2014.Google Scholar

Pettitt, D. H., Ilbert, Courtenay, Bedwell, C. E. A., Kneale, Llewellyn, and Nicolle, E. T. “British Isles.” Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation 17 (1917): 1–30.Google Scholar

Phillimore, George Grenville “Trading with the Enemy.” Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation 15, no. 1 (1915): 17–37.Google Scholar

Phillimore, Robert. Commentaries upon International Law. 4 vols. Philadelphia: T. & J.W. Johnson, 1854.Google Scholar

Phillipson, Coleman. International Law and the Great War. London: T.F. Unwin Ltd, 1916.Google Scholar

Phillipson, Coleman. Termination of War and Treaties of Peace. New York: Dutton, 1916.Google Scholar

Pillet, Antoine. Le droit de la guerre. Conférences faites aux officiers de la garnison de Grenoble pendant l’année 1891–1892. Paris: A. Rousseau, 1892.Google Scholar

Pinoche, André. “Le séquestre et la liquidation des biens des sujets ennemis en France et en Allemagne.” Thèse, Nancy, 1920.Google Scholar

Politis, Nicolas. “Chronique des faits internationaux. Grèce et Turquie.” Revue générale de droit international public IV (1897): 504–533.Google Scholar

Posse-Brázdová, Amelie. Sardinian Sideshow. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., inc, 1933.Google Scholar

Powell, Joseph, and Gribble, Francis. The History of Ruhleben. A Record of British Organisation in a Prison Camp in Germany. London: W. Colins Sons & Company, 1919.Google Scholar

“Recent Trends in Denaturalization in the United States and Abroad.” Columbia Law Review 44, no. 5 (1944): 736–751.Google Scholar

Recueil des arrêts du Conseil d’État statuant au contentieux, des décisions du Tribunal des conflits et de la Cour des comptes Edited by Adrien Panhard Vol. 86, 2e série, Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1916.Google Scholar

Recueil des arrêts du Conseil d’État statuant au contentieux, des décisions du Tribunal des conflits et de la Cour des comptes Edited by Adrien Panhard, vol. 87, 2e série, Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1917.Google Scholar

Reinharz, Jehuda. Dokumente zur Geschichte des deutschen Zionismus 1882–1933. Tübingen: Mohr, 1981.Google Scholar

Reulos, Alexandre. “Les séquestres et la gestion des biens des sujets ennemis en France.” Journal du Droit International (Journal de Clunet) 44 (1917): 24–48.Google Scholar

Rivier, Alphonse. Principes du droit des gens. Paris: A. Rousseau, 1896.Google Scholar

Rocker, Rudolf. Hinter Stacheldraht und Gitter: Erinnerungen aus der englischen Kriegsgefangenschaft. Berlin: Der Syndikalist, 1925.Google Scholar

Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “La guerre actuelle dans ses rapports avec le droit international.” Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 2 (1870): 643–718.Google Scholar

Root, Elihu. “The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad.” The American Journal of International Law 4, no. 3 (1910): 517–528.Google Scholar

Roxburgh, R. F. “German Property in the War and the Peace.” Law Quarterly Review 37, no. 1 (1921): 46–62.Google Scholar

Rubin, Seymour J. ““Inviolability” of Enemy Private Property.” Law and Contemporary Problems 11, no. 1 (1945): 166–182.Google Scholar

Saillard, Auguste. 1914–1915. Le séquestre des biens des allemands et des austro-hongrois. Paris: Berger-Levrault, 1915.Google Scholar

Schneider, Gustav. Pariser Briefe. Leipzig: Wigand, 1872.Google Scholar

Signorel, Jean. Le statut des sujets ennemis. Le droit français pendant la guerre. Paris: Berger-Levrault, 1916.Google Scholar

Simonson, Paul Frederick. Private Property and Rights in Enemy Countries, and Private Rights against Enemy Nationals and Governments under the Peace Treaties with Germany, Austria, Hungary, Bulgaria, and Turkey. London: E. Wilson, 1921.Google Scholar

Spiropulos, Jean. Ausweisung und Internierung feindlicher Staatsangehöriger. Leipzig: Roßberg’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1922.Google Scholar

Steinbeck, John, East of Eden [1952], in Novels 1942–1952. New York: The Library of America, 2001.Google Scholar

Sturt, Charles. The Real State of France, in the Years 1809–10: with an Account of the Treatment of the Prisoners of War, and Persons Otherwise Detained in France. London: J. Ridgway, 1810. 6th ed.Google Scholar

Switzerland. Documents Diplomatiques Suisses, https://dodis.ch/search?lang=fr.Google Scholar

Takahashi, Sakuyé. Cases on International Law during the Chino-Japanese War. With A Preface by Professor T.E. Holland D.L.C. and an Introduction by Professor J. Westlake Q.C., LL.D. Cambridge: University Press, 1899.Google Scholar

Takahashi, Sakuyé. International Law Applied to the Russo-Japanese War, with the Decisions of the Japanese Prize Courts. London: Stevens and Sons, 1908.Google Scholar

Temperley, H. W. V., ed. A History of the Peace Conference of Paris, vol. V. Economic Reconstruction and Protection of Minorities. London: Henry Frowde and Hodder & Stoughton, 1921.Google Scholar

Thaller, Edmond. Esquisse de réforme de la législation des étrangers, particulièrement dans les rapports franco-allemands, individus et sociétés. Paris: Rousseau et cie, 1917.Google Scholar

Thiesing, Theo H. “Dual Allegiance in the German Law of Nationality and American Citizenship.” The Yale Law Journal 27, no. 4 (1918): 479–508.Google Scholar

Thiesing, Theo H. Trading with the Enemy: an article upon the measures adopted by Germany in retaliation for those promulgated by other nations. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1917.Google Scholar

Thormeyer, F., and Ferrière, F. Rapports de MM F. Thormeyer et Dr. F. Ferrière sur leur visites aux camps des prisonniers en Russie. Octobre 1915 à Février 1916. Genève: Librairie Georg & C.ie, 1916.Google Scholar

Twiss, Travers. The Law of Nations Considered as Independent Political Communities. Vol. 2, On The Rights and Duties of Nations in Time of War. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1884. 2nd ed.Google Scholar

The Treaties of Peace 1919–1923, Vol. II (New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1924).Google Scholar

Tribunaux arbitraux mixtes, and Office français des biens et intérêts privés. Recueil des décisions des tribunaux arbitraux mixtes, institués par les traités de paix. Vol. 1–10, Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1922–1930.Google Scholar

United States of America. United States Tariff Commission, Handbook of Commercial Treaties. Digests of Commercial Treaties, Conventions, and Other Agreements of Commercial Interest between All Nations, Washington, DC: U.S. Goverment Printing Office, 1922.Google Scholar

United States of America. United States Tariff Commission, [FRUS 1870] United States Department of State. Executive documents printed by order of the House of Representatives. 1870–71, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1870–1871.Google Scholar

United States of America. United States Tariff Commission, [FRUS 1887–1888] Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, For the Year 1887, Transmitted to Congress, With a Message of the President, June 26, 1888, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1888.Google Scholar

United States of America. United States Tariff Commission, [FRUS 1914 WWI] Papers relating to the foreign relations of the United States, 1914. Supplement, The World War, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1914Google Scholar

United States of America. United States Tariff Commission, [FRUS 1917, WWI/S1] Papers relating to the foreign relations of the United States, 1917. Supplement 1, The World War, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1917.Google Scholar

United States of America. United States Tariff Commission, [FRUS 1917, WWI/S2] Papers relating to the foreign relations of the United States, 1917. Supplement 2, The World War, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1917.Google Scholar

United States of America. United States Tariff Commission, [FRUS 1918, WWI/S1] Papers relating to the foreign relations of the United States, 1918. Supplement 1, The World War, Volume I, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1918.Google Scholar

United States of America. United States Tariff Commission, [FRUS 1918, WWI/S2] Papers relating to the foreign relations of the United States, 1918. Supplement 2, The World War, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1918.Google Scholar

Valéry, Jules. “De la condition en France des ressortissants des puissances ennemies.” Revue générale de droit international public 23 (1916): 349–394.Google Scholar

Valéry, Jules. “World War and Its Effect on Future Private International Law.” [In English]. Harvard Law Review 31 (May 1918): 980–1010.Google Scholar

Valfrey, Jules Joseph. Histoire du Traité de Francfort et de la libération du territoire français. Paris: Amyot, 1874.Google Scholar

Vattel, Emer de. The Law of Nations: or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns. London: G. G. and J. Robinson Paternoster-Row, 1797.Google Scholar

V. L. B. “The Policy and Practice of the United States in the Treatment of Enemy Private Property.” Virginia Law Review 34, no. 8 (1948): 928–943.Google Scholar

von Martens, Georg Friedrich. Summary of the Law of Nations, Founded on the Treaties and Customs of the Modern Nations of Europe; with a List of the Principal Treaties, Concluded since the Year 1748 down to the Present Time, Indicating the Works in Which They are to be Found. Philadelphia: Thomas Bradford, 1795.Google Scholar

Vopicka, Charles J. Secrets of the Balkans. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company, 1921.Google Scholar

Washburne, Elihu B. Recollections of a Minister to France, 1869–1877. New York: C. Scribner’s sons, 1887.Google Scholar

Wée, Maurice de, and Houtart, Albert. Le séquestre et la liquidation des biens allemands en Belgique (loi du 17 novembre 1921). Bruxelles: Vve Ferdinand Larcier, 1922.Google Scholar

Weil, Alfred. “Des ambiguités de la dénationalisation allemande.” Journal du Droit International 43, no. (1916): 69–72.Google Scholar

Wheaton, Henry. Elements of International Law. Philadelphia: Carry, Lea & Blanchard, 1836. 8th ed.Google Scholar

Wilson, Woodrow. “Address to a Joint Session of Congress Requesting a Declaration of War Against Germany,” April 2, 1917. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=65366 [last accessed July 14, 2018].Google Scholar

Wilson, ”Fifth Annual Message,” December 4, 1917. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/207599 [last accessed September 4, 2019].Google Scholar

Wilson, “Proclamation 1364—Declaring That a State of War Exists Between the United States and Germany,” April 6, 1917. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/268065 [last accessed September 4, 2019].Google Scholar

Wilson, “Proclamation 1473—Issuance of Passports and Granting of Permits to Depart from and Enter the United States,” August 8, 1918. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/318306 [last accessed September 4, 2019].Google Scholar

Der Wirtschaftskrieg. Sammlung der in den kriegführenden Staaten erlassenen Zahlungs- und Handelsverbote, Verordnungen über die staatliche Aufsicht und Zwangsverwaltung feindlicher Unternehmungen, Maßnahmen auf dem Gebiete des Patent-, Marken-, und Musterrechtes, Konterbandenlisten, Prisengerichtsverfahren. Wien: Verlag der niederösterreichischen Handels- und Gewerbekammer, 1915.Google Scholar

Wood, Eric Fisher. The Note-Book of an Attaché: Seven Months in the War Zone. New York: The Century Company, 1915.Google Scholar

Woodhead, H. G. W., and Bell, H. T. Montague. The China Year Book 1919–1920. London – New York: George Routledge & Son – E.P. Dutton & Co., 1919.Google Scholar

Abbenhuis, Maartje M. The Art of Staying Neutral: The Netherlands in the First World War, 1914–1918. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Abelous, Frédéric. L’évolution de la Turquie dans ses rapports avec les étrangers. Toulouse: Impr. du Sud-Ouest, 1928.Google Scholar

Abraham, Gary A. “Max Weber: Modernist Anti-Pluralism and the Polish Question.” New German Critique, no. 53 (1991): 33–66.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce A. Private Property and the Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio. State of Exception. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Agar, Jon. “Modern Horrors: British Identity and Identity Cards.” In Documenting Individual Identity. The Development of State Practices in the Modern World, edited by Caplan, Jane and Torpey, John. Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2001: 101–120.Google Scholar

Ahmad, Feroz. “Ottoman Perceptions of the Capitulations, 1800–1914.” Journal of Islamic Studies 11, no. 1 (2000): 1–20.Google Scholar

Akçam, Taner. “The Spirit of the Law: Following the Traces of Genocide in the Law of Abandoned Property.” International Criminal Law Review 14, no. 2 (2014): 377–395.Google Scholar

Akçam, Taner, and Kurt, Umit. The Spirit of the Laws. The Plunder of Wealth in the Armenian Genocide. New York-Oxford: Berghahn, 2015.Google Scholar

Aksakal, Mustafa. The Ottoman Road to War in 1914: The Ottoman Empire and the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Albanese, Giulia. “Italianità fascista. Il regime e la trasformazione dei confini della cittadinanza 1922–1938.” Italia Contemporanea, no. 290 (2019): 95–125.Google Scholar

Albert, Bill. South America and the First World War. The Impact of the War on Brazil, Argentina, Peru, and Chile. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Alderman, Geoffrey. “The Anti-Jewish Riots of August 1911 in South Wales.” Welsh History Review = Cylchgrawn Hanes Cymru 6 (1972): 190.Google Scholar

Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, and Klusmeyer, Douglas B. “Plural Nationality: Facing the Future in Migratory World.” In Citizenship Today. Global Perspectives and Practices, edited by Aleinikoff, Thomas Alexander and Klusmeyer, Douglas B., 63–88. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2001.Google Scholar

Alexopoulos, Golfo. “Soviet Citizenship, More or Less: Rights, Emotions, and States of Civic Belonging.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 7, no. 3 (2006): 487–528.Google Scholar

Alger, John Goldworth. Napoleon’s British Visitors and Captives, 1801–1815. London: A. Constable and company ltd., 1904.Google Scholar

Allison, Charles R. Alien Enemies and Property Rights under the Trading with Enemy Act. New York 1921.Google Scholar

Amara, Michaël. Des Belges à l’épreuve de l’exil. Les réfugiés de la Première Guerre Mondiale: France, Grande-Bretagne, Pays-Bas, 1914–1918. Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2014.Google Scholar

Ambrosi, Claudio. Vite internate: Katzenau, 1915–1917. Trento: Fondazione Museo storico del Trentino, 2008.Google Scholar

An-Ski, S. The Enemy at His Pleasure: A Journey through the Jewish Pale of Settlement during World War I. New York: Metropolitan Books-H. Holt and Co., 2003.Google Scholar

Anand, R. P. “Family of “Civilized” States and Japan: A Story of Humiliation, Assimilation, Defiance and Confrontation.” Journal of the History of International Law 5, no. 1 (2003): 1–75.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony. Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Anghie, Tony, and McCormack, Wayne. “The Rights of Aliens: Legal Regimes and Historical Perspectives.” In Migration in the 21st Century: Rights, Outcomes, and Policy, edited by Marie Korinek, Kim and Maloney, Thomas N.. New York: Routledge, 2011: 23–53.Google Scholar

Aprile, Sylvie. Le siècle des exilés. Bannis et proscrits de 1789 à la Commune. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2010.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Jewish Writings. Edited by Kohn, Jerome and Feldman, Ron H.. New York: Schocken Books, 2007.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1958. 2nd, enlarged ed.Google Scholar

Argast, Regula. “An Unholy Alliance: Swiss Citizenship between Local Legal Tradition, Federal Laissez-Faire, and Ethno-National Rejection of Foreigners 1848–1933.” European Review of History 16, no. 4 (2009): 503–521.Google Scholar

Armstrong, John W. Scobell. War and Treaty Legislation. Affecting British Property in Germany and Austria, and Enemy Property in the United Kingdom. London: Hutchinson, 1921.Google Scholar

Aronsfeld, Caesar C. “Enemy Aliens 1914–1918: German-Born Jews in England during the First World War.” Jewish Social Studies XVIII, no. 4 (1956): 275–283.Google Scholar

Auerbach, Sascha. “Negotiating Nationalism: Jewish Conscription and Russian Repatriation in London’s East End, 1916–1918.” Journal of British Studies 46, no. 3 (2007): 594–620.Google Scholar

Aylsworth, Leon E. “The Passing of Alien Suffrage.” The American Political Science Review 25, no. 1 (1931): 114–116.Google Scholar

Bade, Klaus J. Deutsche im Ausland, Fremde in Deutschland: Migration in Geschichte und Gegenwart. München: C.H. Beck, 1992.Google Scholar

Bade, Klaus J. Europa in Bewegung: Migration vom späten 18. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart. München: C. H. Beck, 2000.Google Scholar

Badem, Candan. “‘Forty Years of Black Days’? The Russian Administration of Kars, Ardahan, and Batum, 1878–1918.” In Russian-Ottoman Borderlands: The Eastern Question Reconsidered, edited by Kozelsky, Mara and Frary, Lucien J.. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2014: 221–250.Google Scholar

Baldwin, M. Page. “Subject to Empire: Married Women and the British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act.” Journal of British Studies 40, no. 4 (2001): 522–556.Google Scholar

Banac, Ivo. The National Question in Yugoslavia: Origins, History, Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Banning, Lance. The Sacred Fire of Liberty: James Madison and the Founding of the Federal Republic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Barde, Robert, Carter, Susan B., and Sutch, Richard. “International Migration.” In Historical Statistics of the United States, edited by Carter, Susan B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Barkhof, Sandra. “German Prisoners of War in Japan During the First World War: Letters from the Colonial Frontline.” Journal of War & Culture Studies 10, no. 3 (2017): 253–265.Google Scholar

Barkhof, Sandra. “The New Zealand Occupation of German Samoa during the First World War 1914–18: Enemy Aliens and Internment.” In Internment during the First World War. A Mass Global Phenomenon, edited by Manz, Stefan, Panayi, Panikos and Stibbe, Matthew. Milton Park-New York: Routledge, 2019, 205–226.Google Scholar

Bashford, Alison, and McAdam, Jane. “The Right to Asylum: Britain’s 1905 Aliens Act and the Evolution of Refugee Law.” Law and History Review 32, no. 2 (2014): 309–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bashford, Alison, and Strange, Carolyn. “Asylum–Seekers and National Histories of Detention.” Australian Journal of Politics & History 48, no. 4 (2002): 509–527.Google Scholar

Bassler, Gerhard P. “The Enemy Alien Experience in Newfoundland 1914–1918.” Canadian Ethnic Studies 20 (1988): 42–62.Google Scholar

Bastid-Bruguière, Marianne. “France and the 1915–1916 National Protection Movement.” In Proceedings of Centennial Symposium on Sun Yat-Sen’s Founding of the Kuomintang for Revolution. Taipei: Jin dai Zhongguo chu ban she, 1995.Google Scholar

Bavendamm, Gundula. Spionage und Verrat: Konspirative Kriegserzählungen und französischen Innenpolitik, 1914–1917. Essen: Klartext, 2004.Google Scholar

Bayly, Christopher. “Review Article. Michael Mann and Modern World History,” The Historical Journal, 58, 1 (2015), 331–341.Google Scholar

Beaumont, Joan. Australia’s War, 1914–18. St. Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin, 1995.Google Scholar

Becker, Annette. Oubliés de la grande guerre. Paris: Noêsis, 1998.Google Scholar

Becker, Jean Jacques. 1914, comment les Français sont entrés dans la guerre: contribution à l’étude de l’opinion publique printemps-été 1914. [Paris]: Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques, 1977.Google Scholar

Becker, Peter. “Macht, Gewalt und deren Kontrolle im Ersten Weltkrieg: Theorie und Praxis des Ausnahmezustandes in der Habsburgermonarchie.” In Stadt und Gewalt, edited by Gruber, Elisabeth and Weigl, Andreas, 109–137. Innsbruck-Wien-Bozen: Studien Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar

Beehler, William Henry. The History of the Italian-Turkish War, September 29, 1911, to October 18, 1912. Annapolis: The Advertiser-Republican, 1913.Google Scholar

Behre, Simona. ““Forse che il nero aveva prima di oggi comandato a bianchi?” Gli internati italiani nell’Africa Orientale Tedesca (1915–1916).” Contemporanea. Rivista di storia dell’800 e del ‘900 XX, no. 1 (2017): 87–108.Google Scholar

Bell, David A. The First Total War. Napoleon’s Europe and the Birth of Warfare as We Know It. Boston-New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2007.Google Scholar

Bell, Johannes, ed. Völkerrecht im Weltkrieg Vol. III-2. Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft für Politik und Geschichte, 1927.Google Scholar

Bellezza, Simone Attilio. Tornare in Italia: come i prigionieri trentini in Russia divennero italiani (1914–1920). Bologna: Il Mulino, 2016.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren A. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren A., and Ross, Richard Jeffrey, eds. Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500–1850. New York: New York University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Benton-Cohen, Katherine. Inventing the Immigration Problem: The Dillingham Commission and its Legacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Ben-Ur, Aviva. “Identity Imperative: Ottoman Jews in Wartime and Interwar Britain.” Immigrants & Minorities 33, no. 2 (2015): 165–195.Google Scholar

Beşikçi, Mehmet. “Mobilizing Military Labor in the Age of Total War. Ottoman Conscription before and during the Great War.” In Fighting for a Living, edited by Zürcher, Erik-Jan. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2013: 547–580.Google Scholar

Beşikçi, Mehmet. The Ottoman Mobilization of Manpower in the First World War: Between Voluntarism and Resistance. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Best, Geoffrey. Humanity in Warfare. The Modern History of the International Law of Armed Conflicts. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1980.Google Scholar

Best, Geoffrey. War and Law since 1945. Oxford-New York: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Bevans, Charles I., ed. Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States of America, 1776–1949. Vol. 8, Germany-Iran. Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1971.Google Scholar

Bickers, Robert. “Shanghailanders: The Formation and Identity of the British Settler Community in Shanghai 1843–1937.” Past & Present, no. 159 (1998): 161–211.Google Scholar

Bickers, Robert. “Shanghailanders and Others. British Communities in China, 1843–1957.” In Settlers and Expatriates: Britons Over the Seas, edited by Bickers, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010: 270–301.Google Scholar

Bird, J. C. The Control of Enemy Alien Civilians in Great Britain, 1914–1918. New York: Garland, 1986.Google Scholar

Bjørnlund, Matthias. “The 1914 Cleansing of Aegean Greeks as a Case of Violent Turkification.” Journal of Genocide Research 10, no. 1 (2008): 41–58.Google Scholar

Blanesburgh, Robert Younger. “The Teaching of the Law as to Enemy Nationals and Their British Property During War and After Peace.” Scottish Law Review XXXIX, no. 457(1923): 1–15.Google Scholar

Blévis, Laure. “En marge du décret Crémieux. Les Juifs naturalisés français en Algérie (1865–1919).” Archives Juives 45, no. 2 (2012): 47–67.Google Scholar

Bloch, Marc. “Réflexions d’un historien sur les fausses nouvelles de la guerre.” Revue de Synthèse Historique, no. 33 (1921): 13–35.Google Scholar

Bock, Fabienne. Un parlementarisme de guerre, 1914–1919. Paris: Belin, 2002.Google Scholar

Boemeke, Manfred F. “Woodrow Wilson’s Image of Germany, the War-Guilt Question, and the Treaty of Versailles.” In The Treaty of Versailles: A Reassessment after 75 Years, edited by Boemeke, Manfred F., Feldman, Gerald D. and Glaser, Elisabeth. Washington, DC-Cambridge -New York: German Historical Institute-Cambridge University Press, 1998: 603–614.Google Scholar

Boemeke, Manfred F., Feldman, Gerald D., and Glaser, Elisabeth. The Treaty of Versailles. A Reassessment after 75 Years. Washington, DC-Cambridge-New York: German Historical Institute-Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Bonillo, Marion. “Zigeunerpolitik” im deutschen Kaiserreich 1871–1918. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2001.Google Scholar

Boogert, Maurits H. van den. The Capitulations and the Ottoman Legal System: Qadis, Consuls, and Beraths in the 18th Century. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

Boudreau, Joseph A. “Interning Canada’s Enemy Aliens, 1914–1919.” Canada: An Historical Magazine 2, no. 1 (1974): 15–28.Google Scholar

Bowden, Brett. The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bowles, Edmund A. “Karl Muck and His Compatriots: German Conductors in America during World War I (And How They Coped).” American Music 25, no. 4 (2007): 405–440.Google Scholar

Bradburn, Douglas. “A Clamor in the Public Mind: Opposition to the Alien and Sedition Acts.” The William and Mary Quarterly 65, no. 3 (2008): 565–600.Google Scholar

Brändström, Elsa. Among Prisoners of War in Russia & Siberia. London: Hutchinson, 1929. Berlin, Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft für Politik und Geschichte M.B.H., 1922.Google Scholar

Breckenridge, Keith Derek, and Szreter, Simon. Registration and Recognition: Documenting the Person in World History. Oxford: Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bredbenner, Candice Lewis. A Nationality of Her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Brice, Catherine, ed. Propriété et politique: exil, séquestres, confiscations dans l’Italie du XIXe. Mélanges de l’École française de Rome – Italie et Méditerranée modernes et contemporaines, 2017. Vol. 129-2.Google Scholar

Brown, Robert Craig, and Cook, Ramsay. Canada, 1896–1921: A Nation Transformed. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1974.Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers. “Aftermaths of the Empire and the Unmixing of Peoples: Historical and Comparative Perspectives.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 18, no. 2 (1995): 189–218.Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bunker, Gary L., and Appel, John. ““Shoddy,” Anti-Semitism and the Civil War.” American Jewish History 82 (1994): 43–71.Google Scholar

Burbank, Jane. “An Imperial Rights Regime: Law and Citizenship in the Russian Empire.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian & Eurasian History 7, no. 3 (2006): 397–431.Google Scholar

Burbank, Jane, and Cooper, Frederick. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Burdick, Charles Burton. The Japanese Siege of Tsingtau: World War I in Asia. Hamden: Archon Books, 1976.Google Scholar

Burger, Hannelore. “Passwesen und Staatsbürgerschaft.” In Grenze und Staat: Passwesen, Staatsbürgerschaft, Heimatrecht und Fremdengesetzgebung in der österreichischen Monarchie 1750–1867, edited by Heindl, Waltraud, Saurer, Edith, Burger, Hannelore and Wendlin, Harald. Wien: Böhlau, 2000: 1–172.Google Scholar

Burgess, Greg. Refuge in the Land of Liberty: France and Its Refugees, from the Revolution to the End of Asylum, 1787–1939. Basingstoke-New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar

Cabanes, Bruno. “1919: Aftermath.” In The Cambridge History of the First World War. Vol. I, edited by Winter, J. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014: 172–197.Google Scholar

Cabanes, Bruno. The Great War and the Origins of Humanitarianism, 1918–1924. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Cable, John L. Loss of Citizenship, Denaturalization, the Alien in Wartime. Washington, DC: National Law Book Company, 1943.Google Scholar

Caestecker, Frank. “The Changing Modalities of Regulation in International Migration within Continental Europe.” In Regulation of Migration: International Experiences, edited by Böcker, Anita, Groenendijk, Kees, Havinga, Tetty and Minderhoud, Paul. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis, 1998: 73–98.Google Scholar

Caestecker, Frank. “Stateless of German Origin at the Mercy of the State? The Belgian Case, 1870–1952.” European Review of History (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Caestecker, Frank. “The Transformation of Nineteenth-Century West European Expulsion Policy, 1880–1914.” In Migration Control in the North Atlantic World. The Evolution of State Practices in Europe and the United States from the French Revolution to the Inter-War Period, edited by Fahrmeir, Andreas, Faron, Olivier and Weil, Patrick. New York: Berghahn Books, 2003: 120–138.Google Scholar

Caestecker, Frank, and Moore, Bob. “A Comparative Analysis of Immigration Policies of Liberal States in Western Europe and the Flight from Nazi Germany.” In Refugees from Nazi Germany and the Liberal European States, edited by Caestecker, Frank and Moore, Bob. New York: Berghahn Books, 2010: 193–326.Google Scholar

Caestecker, Frank, and Vrints, Antoon. “The National Mobilization of German Immigrants and their Descendants in Belgium, 1870–1920.” In Germans as Minorities during the First World War: A Global Comparative Perspective, edited by Panayi, Panikos. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014: 123–146.Google Scholar

Çağaptay, Soner. “Citizenship Policies in Interwar Turkey.” Nations and Nationalism 9, no. 4 (2003): 601–619.Google Scholar

Çağaptay, Soner. Islam, Secularism, and Nationalism in Modern Turkey. Who is a Turk? London-New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Caglioti, Daniela L. “Aliens and Internal Enemies: Internment Practices, Economic Exclusion and Property Rights during the First World War. Introduction,” Journal of Modern European History 12, no. 4 (2014): 448–459.Google Scholar

Caglioti, Daniela L. “Enemy Aliens and Colonial Subjects. Confinement and Internment in Italy, 1911–1919.” In Internment during the First World War. A Mass Global Phenomenon, edited by Manz, Stefan, Panayi, Panikos and Stibbe, Matthew. Milton Park-New York: Routledge, 2019: 125–144.Google Scholar

Caglioti, Daniela L. “Germanophobia and Economic Nationalism: Government Policies against Enemy Aliens in Italy during the First World War.” In Germans as Minorities during the First World War: A Global Comparative Perspective, edited by Panayi, Panikos. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014: 147–170.Google Scholar

Caglioti, Daniela L. “La cittadinanza alla prova della Grande guerra: denaturalizzare i cittadini di origine nemica in Francia.” Contemporanea. Rivista di Storia dell’800 e del ‘900 XIX, no. 2 (2016): 303–322.Google Scholar

Caglioti, Daniela L. “Nazionalismo economico e antigermanesimo. La campagna contro i farmaci tedeschi durante la Prima guerra mondiale in Italia.” Contemporanea. Rivista di storia dell’800 e del ‘900 XIII, no. 4 (2010): 681–696.Google Scholar

Caglioti, Daniela L. “Property Rights in Time of War: Sequestration and Liquidation of Enemy Aliens’ Assets in Western Europe during the First World War,” Journal of Modern European History 12, no. 4 (2014), 523–545.Google Scholar

Caglioti, Daniela L. “Subjects, Citizens, and Aliens in a Time of Upheaval: Naturalizing and Denaturalizing in Europe during the First World War.” The Journal of Modern History 89, no. 3 (2017): 495–530.Google Scholar

Caglioti, Daniela L. “Waging War on Civilians: The Expulsion of Aliens in the Franco-Prussian War.” Past & Present 221 (2013): 161–195.Google Scholar

Caglioti, Daniela L. “Why and How Italy Invented an Enemy Aliens Problem in the First World War.” War in History 21, no. 2 (2014): 142–169.Google Scholar

Camiscioli, Elisa. “Intermarriage, Independent Nationality, and the Individual Rights of French Women. The Law of 10 August 1927.” French Politics, Culture & Society (1999): 52–74.Google Scholar

Canning, Kathleen. “Reflections on the Vocabulary of Citizenship in Twentieth-Century Germany.” In Citizenship and National Identity in Twentieth-Century Germany, edited by Eley, Geoff and Palmowski, Jan. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008: 214–232.Google Scholar

Canning, Kathleen. “Sexual Crisis and the Writing of Citizenship: Reflections on States of Exception in Germany, 1914–1920.” In Staats-Gewalt: Ausnahmezustand und Sicherheitsregimes, edited by Algazi, Gadi, Lüdtke, Alf and Wildt, Michael. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2008: 167–213.Google Scholar

Caplan, Jane, and Torpey, John, eds. Documenting Individual Identity. The Development of State Practices in the Modern World. Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Capozzola, Christopher. Uncle Sam Wants You: World War I and the Making of the Modern American Citizen. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph H. Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press., 2000.Google Scholar

Carnahan, Burrus M. Act of Justice: Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation and the Law of War. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2007.Google Scholar

Carruthers, James R. “Great War and Canada’s Enemy Alien Policy.” Queen’s Law Journal 4 (1978): 43–110.Google Scholar

Cassel, Pär Kristoffer. Grounds of Judgment: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Power in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio. “The Martens Clause: Half a Loaf or Simply Pie in the Sky?.” European Journal of International Law 11, no. 1 (2000): 187–216.Google Scholar

Cattaruzza, Marina. L’Italia e il confine orientale: 1866–2006. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2007.Google Scholar

Cavallar, Georg. The Rights of Strangers: Theories of International Hospitality, the Global Community, and Political Justice since Vitoria. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar

Cermelj, Lavo. Life-and-Death Struggle of a National Minority: The Jugoslavs in Italy. Ljubljana: Tiskarna Ljudske pravice, 1936.Google Scholar

Cesarani, David. “Anti-Alienism in England after the First World War.” Immigrants & Minorities 6, no. 1 (1987): 5–29.Google Scholar

Cesarani, David. “An Embattled Minority: The Jews in Britain during the First World War.” In The Politics of Marginality: Race, the Radical Right and Minorities in Twentieth Century Britain, edited by Kushner, Tony and Lunn, Kenneth. London: F. Cass, 1990: 61–81.Google Scholar

Çetinkaya, Doğan. “Atrocity Propaganda and the Nationalization of the Masses in the Ottoman Empire during the Balkan Wars (1912–13).” International Journal of Middle East Studies 46 (2014): 759–778.Google Scholar

Çetinkaya, Doğan. “Illustrated Atrocity: The Stigmatisation of Non-Muslims through Images in the Ottoman Empire during the Balkan Wars.” Journal of Modern European History 12, no. 4 (2014): 460–478.Google Scholar

Çetinkaya, Doğan. The Young Turks and the Boycott Movement: Nationalism, Protest and the Working Classes in the Formation of Modern Turkey. London: I.B. Tauris, 2014.Google Scholar

Chamberlain, Paul. Hell upon Water: Napoleonic Prisoners of War in Britain, 1793–1815. Stroud: Spellmount, 2008.Google Scholar

Chernev, Borislav. Twilight of Empire: The Brest-Litovsk Conference and the Remaking of East-Central Europe, 1917–1918. Toronto-Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Chickering, Roger. The Great War and Urban Life in Germany. Freiburg, 1914–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Chickering, Roger. “Total War. The Use and Abuse of a Concept.” In Anticipating Total War. The German and American Experience, edited by Boemeke, Manfred F., Chickering, Roger and Förster, Stig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 13–28.Google Scholar

Childs, Timothy Winston. Italo-Turkish Diplomacy and the War over Libya, 1911–1912. Leiden; New York: E.J. Brill, 1990.Google Scholar

Chrastil, Rachel. The Siege of Strasbourg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Christensen, Claus Bundgård. “National Identity and Veteran Culture in a Border Region: The Danish Minority in the German Army during the First World War.” War in History 27, no.1 (2018) 57–80.Google Scholar

Clarke, Sidney W. “The Rule of Dora.” Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 1 (1919): 36–41.Google Scholar

Clavin, Patricia. Securing the World Economy: The Reinvention of the League of Nations, 1920–1946. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coats, R. H. “Canada.” In International migrations. Vol. II, Interpretations, edited by Willcox, Walter. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1929–1931: 123–160.Google Scholar

Cohen, Robin. “Shaping the Nation, Excluding the Other: The Deportation of Migrants from Britain.” In Migration, Migration History, History: Old Paradigms and New Perspectives, edited by Lucassen, Jan and Lucassen, Leo. Bern-New York: Peter Lang, 1997: 351–373.Google Scholar

Cohrs, Patrick O. The Unfinished Peace after World War I. America, Britain and the Stabilization of Europe 1919–1932. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Colao, Floriana. ““Hanno perduto il diritto di essere ancora considerati figli d’Italia.” I ‘fuorusciti’ nel Novecento.” Quaderni fiorentini per la storia del pensiero giuridico moderno 38 (2009): 653–699.Google Scholar

Cole, David. Enemy Aliens: Double Standards and Constitutional Freedoms in the War on Terrorism. New York-London: The New Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Compagnon, Olivier. L’adieu à l’Europe: l’Amérique latine et la Grande Guerre: Argentine et Brésil, 1914–1939. L’épreuve de l’histoire. Paris: Fayard, 2013.Google Scholar

Cornwall, Mark. “Austria-Hungary and ‘Yugoslavia’.” In A Companion to World War I., edited by Horne, John. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2010: 371–385.Google Scholar

Cornwall, Mark. “News, Rumour and the Control of Information in Austria-Hungary, 1914–1918.” History 77, no. 249 (1992): 50–64.Google Scholar

Cornwall, Mark. The Undermining of Austria-Hungary: The Battle for Hearts and Minds. New York: Macmillan-St. Martin’s Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Corsini, Umberto. “Die Italiener.” In Die Habsburgermonarchie und der Erste Weltkrieg; 2. Teilbd., Weltkriegsstatistik Österreich-Ungarn 1914–1918, Bevölkerungsbewegung, Kriegstote, Kriegswirtschaft. Die Habsburgermonarchie 1848–1918, edited by Rumpler, Helmut and Wandruszka, Adam. Wien: Ö̈sterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2014: 839–879.Google Scholar

Costa, Pietro. Civitas. Storia della cittadinanza in Europa. Roma: Laterza, 1999–2001.Google Scholar

Cott, Nancy F. “Marriage and Women’s Citizenship in the United States, 1830–1934.” The American Historical Review 103, no. 5 (1998): 1440–1474.Google Scholar

Crampton, R. J. Bulgaria. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Crampton, R. J. Bulgaria 1878–1918: A History. Boulder, New York: East European Monographs distributed by Columbia University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Daniels, Roger. Asian America: Chinese and Japanese in the United States since 1850. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Daniels, Roger. Coming to America: A History of Immigration and Ethnicity in American Life. New York: HarperCollins, 1990.Google Scholar

Davis, Belinda J. Home Fires Burning. Food, Politics, and Everyday Life in World War I Berlin. Chapell Hill-London: The University of North Carolina Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Davison, Roderic H. Essays in Ottoman and Turkish History, 1774–1923: The Impact of the West. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1990.Google Scholar

De Lorentiis, Daniela. “Gli italiani espulsi dall’Impero ottomano. Il fondo “Contenzioso” del Ministero degli Affari Esteri (1911–1913).” In Puglia e Grande Guerra. Tra dimensione adriatica e fronte interno: fonti e ricerche, edited by Altamura, F.. Bari: Besa, 2017.Google Scholar

De Meneses, Filipe Ribeiro. “The Portuguese Empire.” In Empires at war: 1911–1923, edited by Gerwarth, Robert and Manela, Erez. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2014: 179–196.Google Scholar

De Napoli, Olindo. La prova della razza: cultura giuridica e razzismo in Italia negli anni Trenta. Firenze: Le Monnier, 2009.Google Scholar

Deak, John. “Fashioning the Rest: National Ascription in Austria after the First World War.” In Beyond Versailles: Sovereignty, Legitimacy, and the Formation of New Polities After the Great War, edited by Payk, Marcus M. and Pergher, Roberta. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2019: 124–142.Google Scholar

Deak, John. Forging a Multinational State: State Making in Imperial Austria from the Enlightenment to the First World War. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Dean, Martin. “The Development and Implementation of Nazi Denaturalization and Confiscation Policy up to the Eleventh Decree to the Reich Citizenship Law.” Holocaust and Genocide Studies 16, no. 2 (2002): 217–242.Google Scholar

Dean, Martin. Robbing the Jews. The Confiscation of Jewish Property in the Holocaust, 1933–1945. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Dedering, Tilman. “‘Avenge the Lusitania’: The Anti-German Riots in South Africa in 1915.” Immigrants & Minorities 31, no. 3 (2013): 256–288.Google Scholar

Dedering, Tilman. “Compounds, camps, colonialism.” Journal of Namibian Studies 12 (2012): 29–46.Google Scholar

Dehne, Phillip. On the Far Western Front: Britain’s First World War in South America. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Dejung, Christof, and Zangger, Andreas. “British Wartime Protectionism and Swiss Trading Companies in Asia during the First World War.” Past & Present 207, no. 1 (2010): 181–213.Google Scholar

Del Boca, Angelo. Gli Italiani in Libia. Tripoli bel suol d’amore 1860–1922. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 1986.Google Scholar

Deperchin, Annie. “Le juge et les biens allemandes en France pendant la première guerre mondiale.” In La politique et la guerre. Pour comprendre le XXe siècle européen. Hommage à Jean-Jacques Becker, edited by Audoin-Rouzeau, Stéphane, Becker, Annette, Coeuré, Sophie et al. Paris: Vienot-Noesis, 2002: 82–93.Google Scholar

Di Michele, Andrea. L’italianizzazione imperfetta: l’amministrazione pubblica dell’Alto Adige tra Italia liberale e fascismo. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso, 2003.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. Lectures on the Relation between Law & Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century. London-New York: Macmillan & Co., 1905.Google Scholar

Dickinson, Frederick R. “Governments, Parliaments and Parties (Japan).” in 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War, ed. by Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill (Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, 2014-10-08), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15463/ie1418.10434.Google Scholar

Dickinson, Frederick R. War and National Reinvention: Japan in the Great War, 1914–1919. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center, 1999.Google Scholar

Dirck, Brian. “Posterity’s Blush: Civil Liberties, Property Rights, and Property Confiscation in the Confederacy.” Civil War History 48, no. 3 (2002): 237–256.Google Scholar

Dönninghaus, Victor. Die Deutschen in der Moskauer Gesellschaft: Symbiose und Konflikte (1494–1941). München: R. Oldenbourg, 2002.Google Scholar

Douki, Caroline. “Accords franco-italiens: des accommodements d’urgence à l’administration partagée du travail immigré.” In 1914–1918: mains-d’œuvre en guerre, edited by Machu, Laure, Lespinet-Moret, Isabelle and Viet, Vincent. Paris: La documentation française, 2018: 201–225.Google Scholar

Dragostinova, Theodora. “Speaking National: Nationalizing the Greek of Bulgaria, 1900–1939.” Slavic Review 67, no. 1 (2008): 154–181.Google Scholar

Dudden, Alexis. “Japan’s Engagement with International Terms.” In Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations, edited by Liu, Lydia H.. Durham: Duke University Press, 1999: 165–191.Google Scholar

Dudziak, Mary L. War Time. An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Edelstein, Dan. “Enlightenment Rights Talk.” The Journal of Modern History 86, no. 3 (2014): 530–565.Google Scholar

Eksteins, Modris. Rites of Spring: The Great War and the Birth of the Modern Age. Toronto: Lester & Orpen Dennys, 1989.Google Scholar

Eley, Geoff. “Some General Thoughts on Citizenship in Germany.” In Citizenship and National Identity in Twentieth-Century Germany, edited by Eley, Geoff and Palmowski, Jan. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008: 233–246.Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert. The Civilizing Process. Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1939.Google Scholar

Ellis, Howard Sylvester. French and German Investments in China. Honolulu: The Institute of Pacific Relations, 1929.Google Scholar

Elsner, Lothar. “Der Übergang zur Zwangsarbeit für ausländische Arbeiter in der deutschen Landwirtschaft zu Beginn des 1. Weltkrieges.” Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Wilhelm-Pieck-Universität Rostock. Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe 26, no. 3 (1977): 291–298.Google Scholar

Emin, Ahmed. Turkey in the World War. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1930.Google Scholar

Engel, Barbara Alpern. “Not by Bread Alone: Subsistence Riots in Russia during World War I.” Journal of Modern History 69 (1997): 696–721.Google Scholar

Engelstein, Laura. ““A Belgium of Our Own”: The Sack of Russian Kalisz, August 1914.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian & Eurasian History 10, no. 3 (2009): 441–473.Google Scholar

Engelstein, Laura. Russia in Flames: War, Revolution, Civil War, 1914–1921. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Erol, Emre. ““Macedonian Question” in Western Anatolia: The Ousting of the Ottoman Greeks Before World War I.” In World War I and the End of the Ottomans: From the Balkan Wars to the Armenian Genocide, edited by Kieser, Hans-Lukas, Öktem, Kerem and Reinkowski, Maurus. London: I.B. Tauris, 2015: 103–127.Google Scholar

Erol, Emre. The Ottoman Crisis in Western Anatolia: Turkey’s Belle Époque and the Transition to a Modern Nation State. London-New York I.B. Tauris, 2016.Google Scholar

Fabi, Lucio. Trieste 1914–1918: una città in guerra. Trieste: MGS Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Fahrmeir, Andreas. Citizens and Aliens. Foreigners and the Law in Britain and the German States, 1789–1870. New York-Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2000.Google Scholar

Fahrmeir, Andreas. Citizenship: The Rise and Fall of a Modern Concept. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Fahrmeir, Andreas. “Coming to Terms with a Misinterpreted Past? Rethinking the Historical Antecedents of Germany’s 1999 Citizenship Reform.” German Politics and Society 30, no. 1 (2012): 17–38.Google Scholar

Fahrmeir, Andreas. “Passports and the Status of Aliens.” In The Mechanics of Internationalism: Culture, Society, and Politics from the 1840s to the First World War, edited by Geyer, Martin H. and Paulmann, Johannes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 93–120.Google Scholar

Fahrmeir, Andreas, Faron, Olivier, and Weil, Patrick, eds. Migration Control in the North Atlantic World. The Evolution of State Practices in Europe and the United States from the French Revolution to the Inter-War Period. New York-Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2003.Google Scholar

Farcy, Jean-Claude. Les camps de concentration français de la première guerre mondiale (1914–1920). Paris: Anthropos, 1995.Google Scholar

Feis, Herbert. Europe, the World’s Banker, 1870–1914. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1930.Google Scholar

Feldman, David. Englishmen and Jews: Social Relations and Political Culture, 1840–1914. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Feldman, David. “Migrants, Immigrants and Welfare from the Old Poor Law to the Welfare State.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 13 (2003): 79–104.Google Scholar

Feldman, David. “Was the Nineteenth Century Golden Age for Immigrants? The Changing Articulation of National, Local and Voluntary Controls.” In Migration Control in the North Atlantic World. The Evolution of State Practices in Europe and the United States from the French Revolution to the Inter-War Period, edited by Fahrmeir, Andreas, Faron, Olivier and Weil, Patrick. New York-Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2003: 167–177.Google Scholar

Feldman, Gerald D. Army, Industry and Labor in Germany, 1914–1918. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale. “The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 2, no. 2 (2004): 210–239.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall. The Pity of War. London: Allen Lane, 1998.Google Scholar

Ferrara, Antonio, and Pianciola, Niccolò. “The Dark Side of Connectedness: Forced Migrations and Mass Violence Between the Late Tsarist and Ottoman Empires (1853–1920).” Historical Research 92, no. 257 (2019): 608–631.Google Scholar

Ferrara, Antonio, and Pianciola, Niccolò. L’età delle migrazioni forzate. Esodi e deportazioni in Europa, 1853–1953. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2012.Google Scholar

Fimiani, Enzo. “L’unanimità più uno:” plebisciti e potere, una storia europea (secoli XVIII-XX). Firenze: Le Monnier, 2017.Google Scholar

Fink, Carole. Defending the Rights of the Others: The Great Powers, The Jews, and International Minority Protection, 1878–1938. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha. “Rules of War and Wars of Rules: The International Red Cross and the Restraint of State Violence.” In Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875, edited by Boli, John and Thomas, George M.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999: 149–165.Google Scholar

Fischer, Gerhard. Enemy Aliens: Internment and the Homefront Experience in Australia, 1914–1920. Portland: University of Queensland Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Fisher, Alan W. “Emigration of Muslims from the Russian Empire in the Years After the Crimean War.” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 35, no. 3 (1987): 356–371.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Matthew P. Purging the Empire: Mass Expulsions in Germany, 1871–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Flournoy, Richard W. “Observations on the New German Law of Nationality.” The American Journal of International Law 8, no. 3 (1914): 477–486.Google Scholar

Fogarty, Richard. “Between Subjects and Citizens: Algerians, Islam, and French National Identity during the Great War.” In Race and Nation: Ethnic Systems in the Modern World, edited by Spickard, Paul. London: Routledge, 2005: 171–194.Google Scholar

Ford, Nancy Gentile. Americans All! : Foreign-born Soldiers in World War I. College Station: Texas A&M University Press 2009.Google Scholar

Forrest, Alan I., Hagemann, Karen, and Rendall, Jane. Soldiers, Citizens and Civilians: Experiences and Perceptions of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1790–1820. Basingstoke-New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar

Forth, Aidan. Barbed-Wire Imperialism: Britain’s Empire of Camps, 1876–1903. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Forth, Aidan, and Kreienbaum, Jonas “A Shared Malady: Concentration Camps in the British, Spanish, American and German Empires.” Journal of Modern European History 14, no. 2 (2016): 245–267.Google Scholar

Francis, Andrew. “From ‘Proven Worthy Settlers’ to ‘Lawless Hunnish Brutes’: Germans in New Zealand during the Great War.” In Germans as Minorities during the First World War: A Global Comparative Perspective, edited by Panayi, Panikos. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014: 289–309.Google Scholar

Francis, Andrew. ‘To Be Truly British We Must Be Anti-German’: New Zealand, Enemy Aliens, and the Great War Experience, 1914–1919. Oxford-New York: Peter Lang, 2012.Google Scholar

Franklin, William McHenry. Protection of Foreign Interests: A Study in Diplomatic and Consular Practice. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. print. off., 1947.Google Scholar

Freeze, Gregory L. “The Soslovie (Estate) Paradigm and Russian Social History.” The American Historical Review 91, no. 1 (1986): 11–36.Google Scholar

Freitag, Sabine. Exiles from European Revolutions: Refugees in Mid-Victorian England. New York: Berghahn Books, 2003.Google Scholar

French, David. “Spy Fever in Britain, 1900–1915.” The Historical Journal 21, no. 2 (1978): 355–370.Google Scholar

Fruci, Gian Luca. “Il sacramento dell’unità nazionale. Linguaggi, iconografia e pratiche dei plebisciti risorgimentali (1848–1870).” In Storia d’Italia. Annali 22. Il Risorgimento, edited by Banti, Alberto Mario and Ginsborg, Paul. Torino: Einaudi, 2007: 567–605.Google Scholar

Fuller, William C. The Foe Within: Fantasies of Treason and the End of Imperial Russia. Ithaca-London: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Fulwider, Chad R. German Propaganda and U.S. Neutrality in World War I. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Gainer, Bernard. The Alien Invasion: The Origins of the Aliens Act of 1905. London: Heinemann, 1972.Google Scholar

Galántai, József. Hungary in the First World War. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1989.Google Scholar

Gammans, Nelson. “The Responsibility of the Federal Government for Violations of the Rights of Aliens.” The American Journal of International Law 8, no. 1 (1914): 73–80.Google Scholar

Gammerl, Benno. Subjects, Citizens, and Others: Administering Ethnic Heterogeneity in the British and Habsburg Empires, 1867–1918. New York-Oxford: Berghahn, 2018.Google Scholar

Ganschow, Jan. “Kriegsvölkerrecht im Deutsch-Französischen Krieg 1870/71.” In Der Deutsch-Französische Krieg 1870/71: Vorgeschichte, Verlauf, Folgen, edited by Ganschow, Jan, Haselhorst, Olaf and Ohnezeit, Maik. Graz: Ares Verlag, 2009: 283–430.Google Scholar

García Sanz, Carolina. “British Blacklists in Spain during the First World War: The Spanish Case Study as a Belligerent Battlefield.” War in History 21, no. 4 (2014): 496–517.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Paul. “A Wide, Invisible Net: Administrative Deportation in Italy, 1863–1871.” European History Quarterly 48, no. 1 (2018): 5–33.Google Scholar

Garner, James W. International Law and the World War. London-New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1920.Google Scholar

Garner, James W. “Treatment of Enemy Aliens. Measures in Respect to Personal Liberty.” [1rst Article] The American Journal of International Law 12, no. 1 (1918): 27–55.Google Scholar

Garner, James W. “Treatment of Enemy Aliens.” [2nd Article] The American Journal of International Law 12, no. 4 (1918): 744–779.Google Scholar

Garner, James W. “Treatment of Enemy Aliens.” [3rd Article] The American Journal of International Law 13, no. 1 (1919): 22–59.Google Scholar

Gathings, James A. “International Law and American Treatment of Alien Enemy Property.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School, New York University, 1937.Google Scholar

Gathings, James A. International Law and American Treatment of Alien Enemy Property. Washington, DC: American Council on Public Affairs, 1940.Google Scholar

Gatrell, Peter. “Refugees and Forced Migrants during the First World War.” Immigrants & Minorities 26, no. 1/2 (2008): 82–110.Google Scholar

Gatrell, Peter. A Whole Empire Walking: Refugees in Russia during World War One. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Gatrell, Peter, and Zhvanko, Lyubov, eds. Europe on the Move. Refugees in the Era of the Great War. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Gennep, Arnold van. Traité comparatif des nationalités. Tome premier. Les éléments extérieurs de la nationalité. Paris: Payot, 1922.Google Scholar

Gerwarth, Robert. The Vanquished. Why the First World War Failed to End, 1917–1923. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2016.Google Scholar

Gerwarth, Robert, and Manela, Erez, eds. Empires at War: 1911–1923. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Gienow-Hecht, Jessica C. E. “Trumpeting down the Walls of Jericho: The Politics of Art, Music and Emotion in German-American Relations, 1870–1920.” Journal of Social History 36, no. 3 (2003): 585–613.Google Scholar

Gingeras, Ryan. Sorrowful Shores: Violence, Ethnicity, and the End of the Ottoman Empire, 1912–1923. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Ginsburgs, George. “The Soviet Union and the Problem of Refugees and Displaced Persons 1917–1956.” The American Journal of International Law 51, no. 2 (1957): 325–361.Google Scholar

Gironda, Vito Francesco. Die Politik der Staatsbürgerschaft: Italien und Deutschland im Vergleich 1800–1914. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2010.Google Scholar

Gitelman, Zvi Y. Jewish Nationality and Soviet Politics: The Jewish Sections of the CPSU, 1917–1930. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Glaser, Elisabeth. “The Making of the Economic Peace.” In The Treaty of Versailles. A Reassessment after 75 Years, edited by Boemeke, Manfred F., Feldman, Gerald D. and Glaser, Elisabeth. Washington, DC-Cambridge-New York: German Historical Institute – Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Glidden, William Barnes. “Casualties of Caution: Alien Enemies in America, 1917–1919.” PhD Dissertation, Graduate College, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1970.Google Scholar

Glidden, William Barnes. “Internment Camps in America.” Military Affairs 37, no. 4 (1973): 137–141.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Robert Justin. Political Repression in Modern America from 1870 to the Present. Boston: G. K. Hall, 1978.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, Heinz. Die gelbe Gefahr. Geschichte eines Schlagworts. Studien zum imperialistischen Denken. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1962.Google Scholar

Gong, Gerrit W. The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society. Oxford-New York: Clarendon Press-Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Gorman, Daniel. Imperial Citizenship: Empire and the Question of Belonging. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Gosewinkel, Dieter. “Citizenship, Sujecthood, Nationality. Concepts of Belonging in the Age of Modern Nation States.” In European Citizenship: Between National Legacies and Postnational Projects, edited by Eder, Klaus and Giesen, Bernhard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 17–35.Google Scholar

Gosewinkel, Dieter. “The Dominance of Nationality? Nation and Citizenship from the Late Nineteenth Century Onwards: A Comparative European Perspective.” German History 26, no. 1 (2008): 92–108.Google Scholar

Gosewinkel, Dieter. Einbürgern und Ausschliessen: die Nationalisierung der Staatsangehörigkeit vom Deutschen Bund bis zur Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2001.Google Scholar

Gosewinkel, Dieter. “Introduction. Histoire et fonctions de la propriété.” Revue d’Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine 61, no. 1 (2014): 7–25.Google Scholar

Gosewinkel, Dieter. “Naturaliser ou exclure? La nationalité en France et en Allemagne aux XIXe et XXe siècles. Une comparaison historique.” Jus Politicum 12 (2014): 1–21.Google Scholar

Gosewinkel, Dieter. Schutz und Freiheit? Staatsbürgerschaft in Europa im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2016.Google Scholar

Gosewinkel, Dieter. “»Unerwünschte Elemente« – Einwanderung und Einbürgerung der Jude in Deutschland 1848–1933.” Tel Aviver Jahrbuch für deutsche Geschichte XXVII (1998): 71–106.Google Scholar

Gosewinkel, Dieter, Holec, Roman, and Řezník, Miloš. Eigentumsregime und Eigentumskonflikte im 20. Jahrhundert: Deutschland und die Tschechoslowakei im internationalen Kontext. Essen: Klartext, 2018.Google Scholar

Gosewinkel, Dieter, and Meyer, Stefan. “Citizenship, Property Rights and Dispossession in Postwar Poland (1918 and 1945).” European Review of History/Revue europeenne d’histoire 16, no. 4 (2009): 575–595.Google Scholar

Gosewinkel, Dieter, and Spurný, Matēj. “Citoyenneté et expropriation en Tchécoslovaquie au lendemain des deux Guerres mondiales.” Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine 61-1, no. 1 (2014): 26–61.Google Scholar

Gousseff, Catherine. L’exil russe: la fabrique du réfugié apatride, 1920–1939. Paris: CNRS, 2008.Google Scholar

Grabar’, V. Ė. The History of International Law in Russia, 1647–1917: A Bio-Biographical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Grainger, John D. The Amiens Truce: Britain and Bonaparte, 1801–1803. Rochester: Boydell Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Graziosi, Andrea. The Great Soviet Peasant War. Bolsheviks and Peasants, 1917–1933. Harvard papers in Ukrainian studies. Cambridge, MA: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Ukrainian Research Institute, Harvard University, 1996.Google Scholar

Graziosi, Andrea. Guerra e rivoluzione in Europa, 1905–1956. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2001.Google Scholar

Graziosi, Andrea. Histoire de l’URSS. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2010.Google Scholar

Green, Nancy L. “Expatriation, Expatriates, and Expats: The American Transformation of a Concept.” The American Historical Review no. 2 (2009): 307–328.Google Scholar

Green, Nancy L. “The Politics of Exit: Reversing the Immigration Paradigm.” Journal of Modern History 77, no. 2 (2005): 263–289.Google Scholar

Gregory, Adrian. “A Clash of Cultures: The British Press and the Opening of the Great War.” In A Call to Arms. Propaganda, Public Opinion, and Newspapers in the Great War, edited by Troy Paddock, R. E.. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 2004: 15–49.Google Scholar

Gregory, Adrian. The Last Great War: British Society and the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Gregory, Charles Noble, and Dyne, Frederick Van. “The Expulsion of Aliens.” Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting (1907–1917) 5 (1911): 119–150.Google Scholar

Groeneveld, Sabina. “Far Away at Home in Qingdao (1897–1914).” German Studies Review 39, no. 1 (2016): 65–79.Google Scholar

Gross, Oren, and Aoláin, Fionnuala Ní. Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Gullace, Nicoletta. “Friends, Aliens, and Enemies: Fictive Communities and the Lusitania Riots of 1915.” Journal of Social History 40, no. 4 (2005): 345–368.Google Scholar

Gülsüm Polat, Ü. “I. Dünya Savaşı’nın Hong Kong’daki Son Osmanlı Tebaasına Etkileri.” Bilig, no. 69 (2014): 205–220.Google Scholar

Gumz, Jonathan E. The Resurrection and Collapse of Empire in Habsburg Serbia, 1914–1918. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Gürsel, Bahar. “Citizenship and Military Service in Italian-American Relations, 1901–1918.” The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 7, no. 3 (2008): 353–376.Google Scholar

Gutman, David. “Travel Documents, Mobility Control, and the Ottoman State in an Age of Global Migration, 1880–1915.” Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association 3, no. 2 (2016): 347–368.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Edited by De Greiff, Pablo and Cronin, Ciaran. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Halévy, Élie. The Era of Tyrannies. Essays on Socialism and War. New York: New York University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Halévy, Élie. L’ère des tyrannies. Études sur le socialisme et la guerre. Paris: Gallimard, 1938.Google Scholar

Haller, Oswald. “Das Internierungslager Katzenau bei Linz: die Internierung und Konfinierung der italienischsprachigen Zivilbevölkerung des Trentinos zur Zeit des Ersten Weltkrieges.” Dipl. Arb., Universität Wien, 1999.Google Scholar

Hametz, Maura. “Statelessness in Italy: The Post-World War I Citizenship Commission in Trieste.” Contemporanea. Rivista di Storia dell’800 e del ‘900, no. 1 (2019): 79–96.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Daniel W. The Limits of Sovereignty: Property Confiscation in the Union and the Confederacy during the Civil War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hanley, Will. “What Ottoman Nationality Was and Was Not.” Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association 3, no. 2 (2016): 277–298.Google Scholar

Hansen, Randall, and Weil, Patrick, eds. Dual Nationality, Social Rights, and Federal Citizenship in the US and Europe: The Reinvention of Citizenship. New York: Berghahn Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Hardach, Gerd. The First World War, 1914–1918. Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hausman, William J., Hertner, Peter, and Wilkins, Mira. Global Electrification: Multinational Enterprise and International Finance in the History of Light and Power, 1878–2007. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Healy, Maureen. Vienna and the Fall of the Habsburg Empire. Total War and Everyday Life in World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Hell, Stefan. Siam and World War I: An International History. Bangkok: River Books, 2017.Google Scholar

Henderson, Dwight F. Congress, Courts, and Criminals: The Development of Federal Criminal Law, 1801–1829. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Herbert, Ulrich. A History of Foreign Labor in Germany, 1880–1980: Seasonal Workers, Forced Laborers, Guest Workers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Herren, Madeleine. “Governmental Internationalism and the Beginning of a New World Order.” In The Mechanics of Internationalism: Culture, Society, and Politics from the 1840s to the First World War, edited by Geyer, Martin H. and Paulmann, Johannes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 121–144.Google Scholar

Hertner, Peter. “La lotta tra i grandi gruppi.” In Storia dell’industria elettrica. 2. Il potenziamento tecnico e finanziario (1914–1925), edited by De Rosa, Luigi. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 1993: 451–464.Google Scholar

Hickey, Donald R. “The Prager Affair: A Study in Wartime Hysteria.” Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society 62 (1969): 117–134Google Scholar

Hiery, Hermann. The Neglected War: the German South Pacific and the Influence of World War I. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Higham, John. Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860–1925. New Brunswick-London: Rutgers University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Hill, David Jayne. “Dual Citizenship in the German Imperial and State Citizenship Law.” The American Journal of International Law 12, no. 2 (1918): 356–363.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Francine. Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge & the Making of the Soviet Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Hitchins, Keith. Rumania, 1866–1947. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar

Hoare, Marko Attila. The History of Bosnia: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. London-Berkeley: Saqi, 2007.Google Scholar

Hodges, Adam. “‘Enemy Aliens’ and ‘Silk Stocking Girls’: The Class Politics of Internment in the Drive for Urban Order during World War I.” Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era 6, no. 4 (2007): 431–458.Google Scholar

Hoerder, Dirk. Cultures in Contact: World Migrations in the Second Millennium. Durham, NC-London: Duke University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Georg, Goll, Nicole-Melanie, and Lesiak, Philipp. Thalerhof 1914–1936: die Geschichte eines vergessenen Lagers und seiner Opfer. Herne: Schäfer, 2010.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig. “Genealogies of Human Rights.” In Human Rights in the Twentieth Century. A Critical History, edited by Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011: 1–26.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig. “Human Rights and History.” Past & Present, no. 232 (2016): 279–310.Google Scholar

Holborn, Louise W. “The Legal Status of Political Refugees, 1920–1938.” The American Journal of International Law 32, no. 4 (1938): 680–703.Google Scholar

Holmes, Colin. “The German Gypsy Question in Britain, 1904–1906.” In Hosts, Immigrants, and Minorities: Historical Responses to Newcomers in British Society, 1870–1914, edited by Lunn, Kenneth. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1980: 134–159.Google Scholar

Holmes, Colin. John Bull’s Island: Immigration and British Society, 1871–1971. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988.Google Scholar

Holquist, Peter. “Dilemmas of an “Official with Progressive Views” – Baron Boris Nolde.” Baltic Yearbook of International Law 7 (2007): 233–271.Google Scholar

Holquist, Peter. “Dilemmas of a Progressive Administrator Baron Boris Nolde.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian & Eurasian History 7, no. 2 (2006): 241–273.Google Scholar

Holquist, Peter. “The Russian Empire as a “Civilized State”: International Law as Principle and Practice in Imperial Russia, 1874–1878.” Washington, DC: National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEER), 2004.Google Scholar

Horne, John. “Demobilizing the Mind. France and the Legacy of the Great War, 1919–1939.” French History and Civilization. Papers from the George Rudé Seminar 2 (2009): 101–119.Google Scholar

Horne, John, and Kramer, Alan. German Atrocities, 1914: A History of Denial. New Haven-London: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar