School Readiness: Defining the Goal for Universal Preschool

Edward Zigler; Walter S. Gilliam; Stephanie M. Jones

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139167284.003

2 - School Readiness: Defining the Goal for Universal Preschool

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Edward Zigler ,

Walter S. Gilliam and

Stephanie M. Jones

Show author details

Edward Zigler: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Walter S. Gilliam: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Stephanie M. Jones: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The purpose of universal prekindergarten (UPK) is to help all children get ready for the learning opportunities that will be presented when they begin formal schooling. How school readiness is defined has important implications for how UPK should be organized, the types and quality of services that should be provided, and the length and intensity of programming needed to have the best chance of achieving this goal. To paraphrase an old adage, it's impossible to know what direction to head if we don't know where we want to go. The definition of school readiness influences more than policy statements and mandates about curricula, class sizes, teacher training, and other details regarding how UPK is to be delivered. The definition spells out the desired results and therefore gives program designers a master plan for determining whether their efforts are successful.

The immediate goal for any system of universal preschool is of course to increase the school readiness of all students. By implication, the ultimate goal is to increase their chances of succeeding in school and later in life. In this chapter, we discuss why school readiness is so critical for later educational success. We also look at various approaches to dealing with “unready” students, approaches that are shaped by how one defines being ready for school. We examine current debates about what it means to be prepared for school and offer a comprehensive model of school readiness to be used by state policy makers for strategic planning for a universal UPK system.

Type: Chapter
Information: A Vision for Universal Preschool Education , pp. 19 - 36

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167284.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Administration on Children, Youth and Families. (1998). Head Start Program Performance Measures. Second progress report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (Pub. No. ACYF-IM-HS 98-19)

Alexander, K. L., & Entwisle, D. R. (1988). Achievement in the first two years: Patterns and processes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 53 (2, Serial No. 218).CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boyer, E. L. (1991). Ready to learn: A mandate for the nation. Lawrenceville, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (Ed.). (2004). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar

Bryant, E. B., & Walsh, C. (2004). Identifying school readiness indicators to stimulate policy action. Harvard Family Research Project – The Evaluation Exchange, 2, 26.

Cameron, M. B., & Wilson, B. J. (1990). The effects of chronological age, gender and delay of entry on academic achievement and retention: Implications for academic redshirting. Psychology in the Schools, 27, 260–263.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRef Google Scholar

Gilliam, W. S., & Ripple, C. H. (2004). What can be learned from state-funded prekindergarten initiatives? A data-based approach to the Head Start devolution debate. In Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 477–497). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Gilliam, W. S., & Shahar, G. (in press). Prekindergarten expulsion and suspension: Rates and predictors in one state. Infants and Young Children.

Graue, M. E. (1993). Ready for what? Constructing meanings of readiness for kindergarten. Albany: State University Press of New York.Google Scholar

Grendler, G. R. (1984). Transitional classes: A viable alternative for the at-risk child? Psychology in the Schools, 21, 463–470.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRef Google Scholar

Harradine, C. C., & Clifford, R. M. (1996). When are children ready for kindergarten? Views of families, kindergarten teachers, and child care providers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 399 044)

Head Start Bureau. (1995). Charting our progress: Development of the Head Start Program Performance Measures. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Head Start Bureau. (2003). The Head Start path to positive child outcomes: The Head Start child outcomes framework. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Heaviside, S., & Farris, E. (1993). Public school kindergarten teachers' views on children's readiness for school (NCES No. 93-410). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar

Howes, R. B., Calkin, S. D., Anastopoulos, A. D., Keane, S. P., & Shelton, T. L. (2003). Regulatory contributions to children's kindergarten achievement. Early Education and Development, 14, 101–119.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kagan, S. L., Moore, E., & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (1995). Reconsidering children's early development and learning: Toward common views and vocabulary. National Education Goals Panel, Goal 1 Technical Planning Group. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Keenan, K., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2004). Are oppositional defiant and conduct disorder symptoms normative behaviors in preschoolers? A comparison of referred and nonreferred children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 356–358.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Knudson-Lindauer, S. L., & Harris, K. (1989). Priorities for kindergarten curricula: Views of parents and teachers. Journal of Research and Childhood Education, 4(1), 51–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar

Lewitt, E. M., & Baker, L. S. (1995). School readiness. The Future of Children, 5(2), 128–139.CrossRef Google Scholar

Love, J. M., Logue, M. E., Trudeau, J. V., & Thayer, K. (1992). Transitions to kindergarten in American schools. Washington, DC: Office of Policy and Planning, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar

Marcon, R. A. (1999). Differential impact of preschool models on development and early learning of inner-city children: A three-cohort study. Developmental Psychology, 8, 72–79.Google Scholar

National Education Goals Panel. (1999). The National Education Goals report: Building a nation of learners. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

National Governors Association Task Force on School Readiness. (2005). Building the foundation for bright futures: Final report of the NGA Task Force on School Readiness. Washington, DC: National Governors Association. www.nga.org/cda/files/0501TASKFORCEREADINESS.pdf. Accessed January 29, 2005.

Pianta, R. C., & Cox, M. J. (Eds.). (1999). The transition to kindergarten. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Piotrkowski, C. S. (2004). A community-based approach to school readiness in Head Start. In Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 129–142). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Piotrkowski, C. S., Botsko, M., & Matthews, E. (2000). Parents' and teachers' beliefs about children's school readiness in a high-need community. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15, 537–558.CrossRef Google Scholar

Raver, C. C., & Zigler, E. F. (1997). Social competence: An untapped dimension in evaluating Head Start's success. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 363–385.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1992). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar

Salovey, P., & Pizarro, D. A. (2003). The value of emotional intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. & Lautrey, J. (Eds.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives (pp. 263–278). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L. (1988). Synthesis of research on school readiness and kindergarten retention. In Bauch, J. P. (Ed.), Early childhood education in the schools (pp. 88–94). Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar

Shore, R. (1998). Ready schools. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.Google Scholar

West, J., Hauskens, E. G., & Collins, M. (1993). Readiness for kindergarten: Parent and teacher beliefs (NCES No. 93-257). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar

Zigler, E., Balla, D., & Hodapp, R. (1984). On the definition and classification of mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 215–230.Google Scholar PubMed