Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Chapter I Introduction
- Chapter II The Rivalry among Synonyms
- Chapter III The Reflexive Construction
- Chapter IV ‘Impersonal’ Uses of Verbs of Motion
- Chapter V Verbs with Preposed or Postposed Elements
- Chapter VI Verbs of Motion as Auxiliaries
- Chapter VII Present and Past Participles of Verbs of Motion
- Chapter VIII Loan Verbs of Motion
- Chapter IX Conclusion
- Appendix I Examples of Minor Verbs
- Appendix II Manuscript Variants
- Appendix III Formulas, Formulaic Systems, Syntactic Structures, and Variations in Old English Poetry
- Bibliography
- Index of Verbs
Chapter II - The Rivalry among Synonyms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Chapter I Introduction
- Chapter II The Rivalry among Synonyms
- Chapter III The Reflexive Construction
- Chapter IV ‘Impersonal’ Uses of Verbs of Motion
- Chapter V Verbs with Preposed or Postposed Elements
- Chapter VI Verbs of Motion as Auxiliaries
- Chapter VII Present and Past Participles of Verbs of Motion
- Chapter VIII Loan Verbs of Motion
- Chapter IX Conclusion
- Appendix I Examples of Minor Verbs
- Appendix II Manuscript Variants
- Appendix III Formulas, Formulaic Systems, Syntactic Structures, and Variations in Old English Poetry
- Bibliography
- Index of Verbs
Summary
The Rivalry between the Gan-Group and the Faran-group
One of the most influential factors in semantic change is rivalry among synonyms. Owing to the alliterative verse style and the frequent rendering for Latin vocabulary, Old English has abundant supplies of synonyms for alliteration, variation, and repetitive word pairs. Among verbs of motion we find not so many verbs denoting ‘to come’ but many verbs that mean ‘to go’. Verbs of going can be divided into two groups, i.e. the gan-group and the faran-group. The former includes gan, gangan, geonga (Li), gegan, and other prefixed cognates (like ingan and utgan), while the latter contains faran and feran, together with their prefixed cognates (like infaran and oferferan).
This rivalry is a matter of lexical preference. In poetry, gangan, faran, gan, feran, gegan, geferan and gefaran occur in descending order of frequency. If they are rearranged in descending order of alliterating ratio, first comes gegan (which alliterates 18 times out of 23 occurrences, i.e. 78.3%), and then feran (48 out of 74, i.e. 64.9%), gefaran (5 out of 8, i.e. 62.5%), faran (49 out of 110, i.e. 44.5%), gangan (71 out of 178, i.e. 39.9%), geferan (3 out of 10, i.e. 30.0%), and gan (20 out of 99, i.e. 20.2%). Not all the ge-prefixed verbs denote motion, but gegan may mean ‘to conquer’, gefaran ‘to attack’, and geferan ‘to undergo’ at times.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Verbs of Motion in Medieval English , pp. 11 - 31Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2002