Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:47:47.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - The Use of Economics in International Trade Disputes: Economic Versus Legal Thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2017

Theresa Carpenter
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva
Marion Jansen
Affiliation:
International Trade Centre, Geneva
Joost Pauwelyn
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Elsig, Manfred and Pollack, Mark A.. 2014. ‘Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: The Politics of Judicial Appointment at the World Trade Organization’, European Journal of International Relations, 20:391415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flett, J. 2015. ‘The Client’s Perspective’, in The Use of Economics in Trade Disputes: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead, Jansen, M., Pauwelyn, J. and Carpenter, T. (eds), Berlin: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friederiszick, H. and Röller, Lars-Hendrik. 2010. Quantification of Harm in Damages Actions for Antitrust Infringements – Insights from German Cartel Cases, mimeo, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1588126.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., Horn, Henrik, and Mavroidis, Petros C.. 2013. ‘Domestic Instruments’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Legal and Economic Principles of World Trade Law, ALI, The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Law, New York City: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205345.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Mavroidis, Petros C.. 2007. ‘Recurring Misunderstandings of Non-Recurring Subsidies’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Case Law, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 381–90.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, P.C.. 2007US – Lamb’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Case Law, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85127.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Weiler, Joseph H. H.. 2003. ‘European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The WTO Case-Law of 2001: The American Law Institute Reports’ Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1440.Google Scholar
Jansen, Marion and Iacovides, Marios. 2015. ‘Economic versus Legal Thinking in International Economic Law: Communication and Interpretation Challenges Related to Economic Evidence’, in Jansen, M., Pauwelyn, J. and Carpenter, T. (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johannesson, Louise, and Mavroidis, Petros C.. 2014. Black Cat, White Cat: The Identity of the WTO Judges. Mimeo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, A. 2004. ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: What Role for Economic Analysis?’, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 4(4): 365371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neven, Damien, and Trachtman, Joel P.. 2013. ‘Philippines-Taxes on Distilled Spirits: Like Products and Market Definition’, World Trade Review, 12: 297326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordström, Håkan. 2005. ‘The WTO Secretariat in a Changing World’, Journal of World Trade, 39: 819853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parisi, F. 2002. ‘Rent-seeking through Litigation: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems Compared’, International Review of Law and Economics 22(2), 193216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. 2013. ‘The Use, Non-use and Abuse of Economics in WTO and Investment Litigation’, in WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration, and Commercial Arbitration, Huerta-Goldman, Jorge A., Romanetti, Antoine and Stirnimann, Franz X. (eds), Deventer: Wolters Kluwer, chapter 6.Google Scholar

References

Australian Competition Tribunal (2014) Application for Authorisation of Acquisition of Macquarie Generation by AGL Energy Limited [2014] ACompT 1.Google Scholar
Australian Federal Court (2003) Australian Gas Light Company (ACN 052 167 405) v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (No. 3) [2003] FCA 1525 (19 December 2003).Google Scholar
Bertrand, Joseph-Louis (1883) ‘Théorie des Richesses: revue de Théories mathématiques de la richesse sociale par Léon Walras et Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses par Augustin Cournot’, Journal des Savants, 67, pp. 499508.Google Scholar
Budzinski, Oliver and Christiansen, Arndt (2007) ‘The Oracle/PeopleSoft Case: Unilateral Effects, Simulation Models and Econometrics in Contemporary Merger Control’, in Legal Issues of Economic Integration, Vo. 34, No.2, pp. 133166.Google Scholar
Budzinski, Oliver and Ruhmer, Isabel (2010) ‘Merger Simulation in Competition Policy: A Survey’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol 6(2), pp. 277319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cournot, Augustin (1838) Recherches Sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses, Paris: Editions L, Hachette.Google Scholar
Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (2010) Horizontal Merger Guidelines.Google Scholar
Economides, Nicholas (1984) ‘The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Revisited’, European Economic Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 345368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2004) Case No COMP/M.5644 – Kraft Foods / Cadbury Notification of 9/11/2009 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 139/2004, Paragraphs 6669.Google Scholar
European Commission (2004) Guidelines on the Assessment of Horizontal Mergers under the Council Regulation on the Control of Concentrations Between Undertakings (2004/C 31/03).Google Scholar
European Commission (2008) Case No COMP/M.4854 – TOMTOM/ TELE ATLAS.Google Scholar
Hausman, Jerry and Leonard, Gregory (2005) ‘Using Merger Simulation Models: Testing the Underlying Assumptions’, International Journal of Industrial Organisation, Vol. 23, pp. 693698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, Harold (1929) ‘Stability in Competition’, Economic Journal, Vol. 39, No. 153, pp. 4157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huschelrath, Kai (2008) ‘Competition Policy: An Integrated Approach’, ZEW Economic Studies, No. 41.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul (1986) (ed.), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul and Smith, Alastair (1994) (eds), Empirical Studies of Strategic Trade Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research and University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, John (1950) ‘Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36(1):4849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevo, Aviv (2000) ‘Mergers with Differentiated Products: The Case of the Ready-to-eat Cereal Industry’, The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, No.3, pp. 395421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2012) ‘Economic Evidence in Merger Analysis’, OECD Competition Policy Roundtables, Document DAF/COMP(2011)23 pp. 3234.Google Scholar
Office of the United States Attorney General (1955) Report of the U.S. Attorney-General’s National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws, March 31.Google Scholar
Reath, Howard (2011) Analysis and Review of J. Padilla, ‘The Impact of Plain Packaging of Cigarettes in the UK: A Simulation Exercise’, Colchester: Landman Economics.Google Scholar
Scherer, Frederic, and Ross, David (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (3rd edn.), Houghton Mifflin Company, UK.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl (2010) ‘The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines: From Hedgehog to Fox in Forty Years’, Antitrust Law Journal, Vol 77, pp. 702757.Google Scholar
Train, Kenneth (2002) Discrete Choice Methods With Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werden, Gregory (2005) ‘Merger Simulation: Potential and Pitfalls’ in van Bergeijk, Peter and Kloosterhuis, Erik (eds), Modelling European Mergers: Theory, Competition Policy and Case Studies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Werden, Gregory and Froeb, Luke (1998) ‘Simulation as an Alternative to Structural Merger Policy in Differentiated Product Industries’ in Coate, Malcolm and Kleit, Andrew (eds), The Economics of the Anti-Trust Process, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Werden, Gregory and Froeb, Luke (2011) ‘Choosing Among Tools for Assessing Unilateral Merger Effects’, Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11–19.Google Scholar
WTO (2004) United States – Subsidies to Upland Cotton, Report of the Panel, WT/DS267/R.Google Scholar
WTO (2011) United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft, Report of the Panel, Document WT/ DS353/ R.Google Scholar
WTO (2012a) United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft, Report of the Appellate Body, Document WT/ DS353/ AB/R.Google Scholar
WTO (2012b) Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Renewable Energy Generation sector and CanadaMeasures Relating to the Feed-in tariff Programme, WT/DS412/R, WT/DS426/R.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×