Book contents
- Understanding the Nature–Nurture Debate
- Understanding Life
- Understanding the Nature–Nurture Debate
- Copyright page
- Reviews
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Genesis: Why Do We Care About Nature–Nurture?
- 2 The Worst Legacy of Francis Galton
- 3 Statistical Science and the Invention of Heritability
- 4 Reports of Galton’s Death Are Greatly Exaggerated
- 5 Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis
- 6 Plomin’s Predictions and the Human Genome Project
- 7 GWAS Unchained, GWAS Unwound
- 8 Intelligence
- 9 IQ, Race, and Genetics
- 10 Nature–Nurture and the Possibility of Human Science
- Summary of Common Misunderstandings
- References and Further Reading
- Figure and Quotation Credits
- Index
4 - Reports of Galton’s Death Are Greatly Exaggerated
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 November 2024
- Understanding the Nature–Nurture Debate
- Understanding Life
- Understanding the Nature–Nurture Debate
- Copyright page
- Reviews
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Genesis: Why Do We Care About Nature–Nurture?
- 2 The Worst Legacy of Francis Galton
- 3 Statistical Science and the Invention of Heritability
- 4 Reports of Galton’s Death Are Greatly Exaggerated
- 5 Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis
- 6 Plomin’s Predictions and the Human Genome Project
- 7 GWAS Unchained, GWAS Unwound
- 8 Intelligence
- 9 IQ, Race, and Genetics
- 10 Nature–Nurture and the Possibility of Human Science
- Summary of Common Misunderstandings
- References and Further Reading
- Figure and Quotation Credits
- Index
Summary
The Second World War marked a turning point for what was considered acceptable in genetics and its implications for eugenic and racially motivated social policies. To be sure, the change in attitude was not quick or decisive. Tens of thousands of Americans were sterilized involuntarily after the war. Anti-black racism, antisemitism, and anti-immigrant sentiment, needless to say, persisted for a long while and have not yet been eliminated; interracial marriage was still illegal in much of the country during my lifetime. But – and despite the foot-dragging, I think this needs to be recognized as an advance – it slowly became less and less acceptable to adopt openly eugenic or racist opinions in public or to justify them based on science. Retrograde attitudes about such things persist to this day, but they have mostly been relegated to the fringes of scientific discourse.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Understanding the Nature‒Nurture Debate , pp. 49 - 66Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024