Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:14:42.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 70 - Paradoxical Embolisms and Strokes

from Section 7 - Non-Inflammatory Disorders of the Arterial Wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2018

By
David E. Thaler  and
Steven C. Cramer
Edited by
Louis Caplan  and
José Biller
Louis Caplan
Affiliation:
Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
José Biller
Affiliation:
Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Uncommon Causes of Stroke , pp. 565 - 574
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H., Bendixen, B., Kappelle, L., et al., 1993. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke, 24, 35–41.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, K., Jayam, V. K., Meyer, M. A., Nayak, A. K., and Nathan, S. 2002. Thrombus-in-transit and paradoxical embolism. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 15, 1021–2.Google Scholar
Albers, G., Amarenco, P., Easton, J., Sacco, R., and Teal, P. 2001. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke. Chest, 119, S300–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alsheikh-Ali, A., Thaler, D., and Kent, D. 2009. Patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke: incidental or pathogenic? Stroke, 40, 2349–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Au, V., Walsh, G., and Fon, G. 2001. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography with pelvic venography in the evaluation of thrombo-embolic disease. Australas Radiol, 45, 141–5.Google Scholar
Ay, H., Buonanno, F., Abraham, S., Kistler, J., and Koroshetz, W. 1998. An electrocardiographic criterion for diagnosis of patent foramen ovale associated with ischemic stroke. Stroke, 29, 1393–7.Google Scholar
Bendixen, B., Posner, J., and Lango, R. 2001. Stroke in young adults and children. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 1, 54–66.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, D. and Bergentz, S. E. 1990. Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. World J Surg, 14, 679–87.Google Scholar
Berthet, K., Lavergne, T., Cohen, A., et al. 2000. Significant association of atrial vulnerability with atrial septal abnormalities in young patients with ischemic stroke of unknown cause. Stroke, 31, 398–403.Google Scholar
Cabanes, L., Mas, J., Cohen, A., et al. 1993. Atrial septal aneurysm and patent foramen ovale as risk factors for CS in patients less than 55 years of age. A study using transesophageal echocardiography. Stroke, 24, 1865–73.Google Scholar
Cakmak, S., Nighoghossian, N., Desestret, V., et al. 2005. Pulmonary embolism: An unusual complication of cerebral venous thrombosis. Neurology, 65, 1136–7.Google Scholar
Calabro, R., La Spina, P., Serra, S., et al. 2009. Prevalence of prothrombotic polymorphisms in a selected cohort of cryptogenic and noncryptogenic ischemic stroke patients. Neurol India, 57, 636–7.Google Scholar
Carroll, J., Saver, J., Thaler, D., et al. 2013. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med, 368, 1092–1100.Google Scholar
Chant, H. and McCollum, C. 2001. Stroke in young adults: The role of paradoxical embolism. Thromb Haemost, 85, 22–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaturvedi, S. 1998. Coagulation abnormalities in adults with CS and patent foramen ovale. J Neurol Sci, 160, 158–60.Google Scholar
Cohnheim, J. 1877. Thrombose und Embolie, Vorlesungen über Allgemeine Pathologie; ein Handbuch für Aertze und Studierende. Berlin: Hirschwald.Google Scholar
Corrin, B. 1964. Paradoxical embolism. Br Heart J, 26, 549–53.Google Scholar
Cramer, S., Rordorf, G., Kaufman, J., et al. 1998. Clinically occult pelvic-vein thrombosis in CS. Lancet, 351, 1927–8.Google Scholar
Cramer, S., Maki, J., Waitches, G., et al. 2003. Paradoxical emboli from calf and pelvic veins in CS. J Neuroimaging, 13, 218–23.Google Scholar
Cramer, S., Rordorf, G., Maki, J., et al. 2004. Increased pelvic vein thrombi in CS: results of the Paradoxical Emboli from Large Veins in Ischemic Stroke (PELVIS) study. Stroke, 35, 46–50.Google Scholar
Dahabreh, I. and Kent, D. 2011. Index event bias as an explanation for the paradoxes of recurrence risk research. JAMA, 305, 822–3.Google Scholar
de Belder, M., Tourikis, L., Leech, G., and Camm, A. 1992. Risk of patent foramen ovale for thromboembolic events in all age groups. Am J Cardiol, 69, 1316–20.Google Scholar
De Castro, S., Cartoni, D., Fiorelli, M., et al. 2000. Morphological and functional characteristics of patent foramen ovale and their embolic implications. Stroke, 31, 2407–13.Google Scholar
Di Tullio, M., Sacco, R., Gopal, A., Mohr, J., and Homma, S. 1992. Patent foramen ovale as a risk factor for CS. Ann Intern Med, 117, 461–5.Google Scholar
Di Tullio, M., Jin, Z., Russo, C., et al. 2013. Patent foramen ovale, subclinical cerebrovascular disease, and ischemic stroke in a population-based cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 62, 35–41.Google Scholar
Dodge, S. M., Hassell, K., Anderson, C. A., et al. 2004. Antiphospholipid antibodies are common in patients referred for percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 61, 123–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Droste, D., Lakemeier, S., Wichter, T., et al. 2002. Optimizing the technique of contrast transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the detection of right-to-left shunts. Stroke, 33, 2211–6.Google Scholar
Dubourg, O., Rigaud, M., and Bardet, J. 1984. Contrast echocardiographic visualization of cough-induced right-to-left shunt through a patent foramen ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol, 4, 587–94.Google Scholar
Fedullo, P. F. and Tapson, V. F. 2003. Clinical practice. The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med, 349, 1247–56.Google Scholar
Foster, P. P., Boriek, A. M., Butler, B. D., Gernhardt, M. L., and Bove, A. A. 2003. Patent foramen ovale and paradoxical systemic embolism: A bibliographic review. Aviat Space Environ Med, 74, B1–64.Google Scholar
Foulkes, M., Wolf, P., Price, T., et al., 1988. The Stroke Data Bank: Design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke, 19, 547–54.Google Scholar
Fraser, D., Moody, A., Morgan, P., Martel, A., and Davidson, I. 2002. Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: A prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med, 136, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D., Moody, A., Davidson, I., Martel, A., and Morgan, P. 2003. Deep venous thrombosis: Diagnosis by using venous enhanced subtracted peak arterial MR venography versus conventional venography. Radiology, 226, 812–20.Google Scholar
Furlan, A., Reisman, M., Massaro, J., et al. 2012. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med, 366, 991–9.Google Scholar
Gautier, J., Durr, A., Koussa, S., Lasault, G., and Grosgogeat, T. 1991. Paradoxical cerebral embolism with a patent foramen ovale. Cerebrovasc Dis, 1, 193–202.Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, S., Chronopoulos, A., Dervisis, K., and Arvanitis, D. 2001. Paradoxical embolism. An old but, paradoxically, under-estimated problem. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 42, 675–7.Google Scholar
Gin, K., Huckell, V., and Pollick, C. 1993. Femoral vein delivery of contrast medium enhances transthoracic echocardiographic detection of patent foramen ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol, 22, 1994–2000.Google Scholar
Greer, D. and Buonanno, F. 2001. Cerebral infarction in conjunction with patent foramen ovale and May–Thurner syndrome. J Neuroimaging, 11, 432–4.Google Scholar
Ha, J., Shin, M., Kang, S., et al. 2001. Enhanced detection of right-to-left shunt through patent foramen ovale by transthoracic contrast echocardiography using harmonic imaging. Am J Cardiol, 87, 669–71, A11.Google Scholar
Haeusler, K., Herm, J., Hoppe, B., et al. 2012. Thrombophilia screening in young patients with cryptogenic stroke. Prevalence of gene polymorphisms compared to healthy blood donors and impact on secondary stroke prevention. Hamostaseologie 32, 147–152.Google Scholar
Hagen, P., Scholz, D., and Edwards, W. 1984. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: An autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc, 59, 17–20.Google Scholar
Hamann, G., Schatzer-Klotz, D., Frohlig, G., et al. 1998. Femoral injection of echo contrast medium may increase the sensitivity of testing for a patent foramen ovale. Neurology, 50, 1423–8.Google Scholar
Hart, R., Diener, H., Coutts, S., et al. 2014. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: The case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol, 13, 429–38.Google Scholar
Hausmann, D., Mugge, A., Becht, I., and Daniel, W. 1992. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography and association with cerebral and peripheral embolic events. Am J Cardiol, 70, 668–72.Google Scholar
Hausmann, D., Mugge, A., and Daniel, W. 1995. Identification of patent foramen ovale permitting paradoxic embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol, 26, 1030–8.Google Scholar
Havig, O. 1977a. Deep vein thrombosis. Acta Chir Scand, 478, S4–11.Google Scholar
Havig, O. 1977b. Source of pulmonary emboli. Acta Chir Scand, 478, S42–7.Google Scholar
Hirsh, J. and Hoak, J. 1996. Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A statement for healthcare professionals. Council on Thrombosis (in consultation with the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American Heart Association. Circulation, 93, 2212–45.Google Scholar
Homma, S., Di Tullio, M., Sacco, R., et al. 1994. Characteristics of patent foramen ovale associated with CS. A biplane transesophageal echocardiographic study. Stroke, 25, 582–6.Google Scholar
Homma, S., Sacco, R., Di Tullio, M., et al. 2002. Effect of medical treatment in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale: patent foramen ovale in the CS Study. Circulation, 105, 2625–31.Google Scholar
Horowitz, P. E. 2002. Fat embolism. Anaesthesia, 57, 830–1.Google Scholar
Jacobs, B., Boden-Albala, B., Lin, I., and Sacco, R. 2002. Stroke in the young in the northern Manhattan stroke study. Stroke, 33, 2789–93.Google Scholar
Jeanrenaud, X., Bogousslavsky, J., Payot, M., Regli, F., and Kappenberger, L. 1990. Patent foramen ovale and cerebral infarct in young patients. Schweiz Med Wochenschr, 120, 823–9.Google Scholar
Job, F., Ringelstein, E., Grafen, Y., et al. 1994. Comparison of transcranial contrast Doppler sonography and transesophageal contrast echocardiography for the detection of patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients. Am J Cardiol, 74, 381–4.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. 1951. Paradoxical emboli. J Clin Pathol, 4, 316–32.Google Scholar
Jones, E., Calafiore, P., Donnan, G., and Tonkin, A. 1994. Evidence that patent foramen ovale is not a risk factor for cerebral ischemia in the elderly. Am J Cardiol, 74, 596–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearon, C. and Hirsh, J. 1994. Factors influencing the reported sensitivity and specificity of impedance plethysmography for proximal deep vein thrombosis. Thrombosis Haemost, 72, 652–8.Google Scholar
Kearon, C., Akl, E., Comerota, A., et al. 2012. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th edn: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest, 141(2 Suppl): e419S-494S.Google Scholar
Kelly, J., Rudd, A., Lewis, R., and Hunt, B. 2001. Venous thromboembolism after acute stroke. Stroke, 32, 262–7.Google Scholar
Kent, D., Ruthazer, R., Weimer, C., et al. 2013. An index to identify stroke-related vs incidental patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology, 81, 619–25.Google Scholar
Kent, D., Dahabreh, I., Ruthazer, R., et al. 2015. Anticoagulant vs. antiplatelet therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: An individual participant data meta-analysis. Eur Heart J, 36, 2381–9.Google Scholar
Kent, D. M., Dahabreh, I. J., Ruthazer, R., et al. 2016. Device closure of patent foramen ovale after stroke: Pooled analysis of completed randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol, 67, 907–17.Google Scholar
Kerut, E., Norfleet, W., Plotnick, G., and Giles, T. 2001. Patent foramen ovale: A review of associated conditions and the impact of physiological size. J Am Coll Cardiol, 38, 613–23.Google Scholar
Kiernan, T., Yan, B., Cubeddu, R., et al. 2009. May–Thurner syndrome in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: An important clinical association. Stroke, 40, 1502–4.Google Scholar
Kitsios, G., Dahabreh, I., Abu, D., et al. 2012. Patent foramen ovale closure and medical treatments for secondary stroke prevention: A systematic review of observational and randomized evidence. Stroke, 43, 422–31.Google Scholar
Kitsios, G. D., Thaler, D. E., and Kent, D. M. 2013. Potentially large yet uncertain benefits: A meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale closure trials. Stroke, 44, 2640–3.Google Scholar
Klotzsch, C., Janssen, G., and Berlit, P. 1994. Transesophageal echocardiography and contrast-TCD in the detection of a patent foramen ovale. Neurology, 44, 1603–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koessler, M. J. and Pitto, R. P. 2002. Fat embolism and cerebral function in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop, 26, 259–62.Google Scholar
Konstantinides, S., Geibel, A., Kasper, W., et al. 1998. Patent foramen ovale is an important predictor of adverse outcome in patients with major pulmonary embolism. Circulation, 97, 1946–51.Google Scholar
Kunitz, S., Gross, C., Heyman, A., et al., 1984. The pilot Stroke Data Bank: Definition, design, and data. Stroke, 15, 740.Google Scholar
Lamy, C., Giannesini, C., Zuber, M., et al. 2002. Clinical and imaging findings in CS patients with and without patent foramen ovale: The PFO–ASA Study. Atrial septal aneurysm. Stroke, 33, 706–11.Google Scholar
Landi, G., D’Angelo, A., Boccardi, E., et al. 1992. Venous thromboembolism in acute stroke: Prognostic importance of hypercoagulability. Arch Neurol, 49, 279–83.Google Scholar
Lapergue, B., Decroix, J., Evrard, S., et al. 2015. Diagnostic yield of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism by combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale. Eur Neurol, 74, 69–72.Google Scholar
Lechat, P., Mas, J., and Lascault, G. 1988. Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. N Engl J Med, 318, 1148–52.Google Scholar
Leon, L., Giannoukas, A. D., Dodd, D., Chan, P., and Labropoulos, N. 2005. Clinical significance of superficial vein thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 29, 10–7.Google Scholar
Lethen, H., Flachskampf, F., Schneider, R., et al. 1997. Frequency of deep vein thrombosis in patients with patent foramen ovale and ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Am J Cardiol, 80, 1066–9.Google Scholar
Liberman, A., Daruwalla, V., Collins, J., et al. 2014. Diagnostic yield of pelvic magnetic resonance venography in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale. Stroke, 45, 2324–9.Google Scholar
Lip, P. and Lip, G. 2014. Patent foramen ovale and migraine attacks: A systematic review. Am J Med, 127, 411–20.Google Scholar
Lohr, J., James, K., Deshmukh, R., et al. 1995. Karmody Award. Calf vein thrombi are not a benign finding. Am J Surg, 170, 86–90.Google Scholar
Loscalzo, J. 1986. Paradoxical embolism: Clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic options. Am Heart J, 112, 141–5.Google Scholar
Loud, P., Katz, D., Bruce, D., Klippenstein, D., and Grossman, Z. 2001. Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: Detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography. Radiology, 219, 498–502.Google Scholar
Maldjian, P. D., Anis, A., and Saric, M. 2006. Radiological reasoning: Pulmonary embolism – thinking beyond the clots. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 186, S219–23.Google Scholar
Mas, J.-L., Arquizan, C., Lamy, C., et al. 2001. Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. N Engl J Med, 345, 1740–6.Google Scholar
Mas, J. L, Derumeaux, G., Guillon, B., et al. 2017. Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation vs. antiplatelets after stroke. N Engl J Med, 377, 1011–21.Google Scholar
Meier, B., Kalesan, B., Heinrich, M., et al. 2013. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med, 368, 1083–91.Google Scholar
Meissner, I., Khandheria, B. K., Heit, J. A., et al. 2006. Patent foramen ovale: Innocent or guilty? Evidence from a prospective population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 47, 440–5.Google Scholar
Messe, S., Silverman, I., Kizer, J., et al. 2004. Practice parameter: Recurrent stroke with patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysm. Neurology, 62, 1042–50.Google Scholar
Miller, R. L., Das, S., Anandarangam, T., et al. 1997. Relation between patent foramen ovale and perfusion abnormalities in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol, 80, 377–8.Google Scholar
Modan, B., Sharon, E., and Jelin, N. 1972. Factors contributing to the incorrect diagnosis of pulmonary embolic disease. Chest, 62, 388–93.Google Scholar
Mohr, J. 1988. CS. N Engl J Med, 318, 1197–8.Google Scholar
Mohr, J., Caplan, L., Melski, J., et al. 1978. The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Registry: A prospective registry of patients hospitalized with stroke. Neurology, 28, 754–62.Google Scholar
Mohr, J., Thompson, J., Lazar, R., et al. 2001. A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med, 345, 1444–51.Google Scholar
Ning, M., Lo, E., Ning, P., et al. 2013. The brain’s heart: Therapeutic opportunities for patent foramen ovale (PFO) and neurovascular disease. Pharmacol Ther, 139, 111–123.Google Scholar
Noser, E., Felberg, R., and Alexandrov, A. 2001. Thrombolytic therapy in an adolescent ischemic stroke. J Child Neurol, 16, 286–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obernosterer, A., Aschauer, M., Schnedl, W., and Lipp, R. 2002. Anomalies of the inferior vena cava in patients with iliac venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med, 136, 37–41.Google Scholar
Offelli, P., Zanchetta, M., Pedon, L., et al. 2007. Thrombophilia in young patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO). Thromb Haemost, 98, 906–7.Google Scholar
Osgood, M., Budman, E., Carandang, R., Goddeau, R. P. Jr., and Henninger, N. 2015. Prevalence of pelvic vein pathology in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale undergoing MRV pelvis. Cerebrovasc Dis, 39, 216–223.Google Scholar
Overell, J., Bone, I., and Lees, K. 2000. Interatrial septal abnormalities and stroke: A meta-analysis of case–control studies. Neurology, 55, 1172–9.Google Scholar
Parisi, D. M., Koval, K., and Egol, K. 2002. Fat embolism syndrome. Am J Orthop, 31, 507–12.Google Scholar
Petty, G., Khandheria, B., Chu, C.-P., Sicks, J., and Whisnant, J. 1997. Patent foramen ovale in patients with cerebral infarction. Arch Neurol, 54, 819–22.Google Scholar
Pezzini, A., Del Zotto, E., Magoni, M., et al. 2003. Inherited thrombophilic disorders in young adults with ischemic stroke and patent foramen ovale. Stroke, 34, 28–33.Google Scholar
Philbrick, J. and Becker, D. 1988. Calf deep venous thrombosis. A wolf in sheep’s clothing? Arch Intern Med, 148, 2131–8.Google Scholar
Puls, R., Hosten, N., Bock, J., et al. 1999. Signal-enhanced color Doppler sonography of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs and pelvis. J Ultrasound Med, 18, 185–90.Google Scholar
Ranoux, D., Cohen, A., Cabanes, L., et al. 1993. Patent foramen ovale: Is stroke due to paradoxical embolism? Stroke, 24, 31–4.Google Scholar
Roth, C. and Alli, O. (2015) Role of occlusive devices to prevent thromboembolism among persons with a patent foramen ovale and prior stroke. Curr Treat Options Neurol 17, 337.Google Scholar
Sacco, R., Ellenberg, J., Mohr, J., et al. 1989. Infarcts of undetermined cause: The NINCDS Stroke Data Bank. Ann Neurol, 25, 382–90.Google Scholar
Salem, D. and Thaler, D. 2013. Patent foramen ovale science: Keeping the horse in front of the cart. J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 62, 42–43.Google Scholar
Salzman, E. 1986. Venous thrombosis made easy. N Engl J Med, 314, 847–8.Google Scholar
Saver, J. L., Carroll, J. D., Thaler, D. E., et al. 2017. Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke. N Engl J Med, 377, 1022–32.Google Scholar
Schneider, B., Hofmann, T., Justen, M. H., and Meinertz, T. 1995. Chiari’s network: normal anatomic variant or risk factor for arterial embolic events? J Am Coll Cardiol, 26, 203–10.Google Scholar
Schuchlenz, H., Weihs, W., Horner, S., and Quehenberger, F. 2000. The association between the diameter of a patent foramen ovale and the risk of embolic cerebrovascular events. Am J Med, 109, 456–62.Google Scholar
Schuchlenz, H., Saurer, G., and Weihs, W. 2002a. Patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, and recurrent stroke. N Engl J Med, 346, 1331–2; author reply 1331–2.Google Scholar
Schuchlenz, H., Weihs, W., Beitzke, A., et al. 2002b. Transesophageal echocardiography for quantifying size of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic cerebrovascular events. Stroke, 33, 293–6.Google Scholar
Sondergaard, L., Kasner, S. E., Rhodes, J. F., et al. 2017. Patent foramen ovale closure or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med, 377, 1033–42.Google Scholar
Spritzer, C., Arata, M., and Freed, K. 2001. Isolated pelvic deep venous thrombosis: Relative frequency as detected with MR imaging. Radiology, 219, 521–5.Google Scholar
Steiner, M., Di Tullio, M., Rundek, T., et al. 1998. Patent foramen ovale size and embolic brain imaging findings among patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke, 29, 944–8.Google Scholar
Stendel, R., Gramm, H., Schroder, K., Lober, C., and Brock, M. 2000. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography as a screening technique for detection of a patent foramen ovale before surgery in the sitting position. Anesthesiology, 93, 971–5.Google Scholar
Stern, J., Abehsera, M., Grenet, D., et al. 2002. Detection of pelvic vein thrombosis by magnetic resonance angiography in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and normal lower limb compression ultrasonography. Chest, 122, 115–21.Google Scholar
Stollberger, C., Slany, J., Schuster, I., et al. 1993. The prevalence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with suspected paradoxical embolism. Ann Intern Med, 119, 461–5.Google Scholar
Tatlisumak, T. and Fisher, M. 1996. Hematologic disorders associated with ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci, 140, 1–11.Google Scholar
Thaler, D., Di Angelantonio, D., Di Tullio, M., et al. 2013a. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Study: Initial description of the completed database. Int J Stroke, 8, 612–9.Google Scholar
Thaler, D., Ruthazer, R., Di Angelantonio, E., et al. 2013b. Neuroimaging findings in cryptogenic stroke patients with and without patent foramen ovale. Stroke, 44, 675–80.Google Scholar
Thaler, D., Ruthazer, R., Weimer, C., et al. 2014a. Recurrent stroke predictors differ in medically treated patients with pathogenic vs. other PFOs. Neurology, 83, 221–6.Google Scholar
Thaler, D., Ruthazer, R., Weimer, C., et al. 2014b. Determinants of antithrombotic choice for patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology, 83, 1954–7.Google Scholar
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. 1995. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med, 333, 1581–7.Google Scholar
The Publications Committee for the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Investigators. 1998. Low molecular weight heparinoid, ORG 10172 (Danaparoid), and outcome after acute ischemic stroke. JAMA, 279, 1265–72.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. and Evans, W. 1930. Paradoxical embolism. Q J Med, 23, 135–52.Google Scholar
Unno, N., Mitsuoka, H., Uchiyama, T., et al. 2002. Superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limbs in patients with varicose veins. Surg Today, 32, 397–401.Google Scholar
Vaidya, V., DeSimone, C., Asirvatham, S., et al. 2014. Implanted endocardial lead characteristics and risk of stroke or transient ischemic attack. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 41, 31–8.Google Scholar
Verlato, F., Zucchetta, P., Prandoni, P., et al. 1999. An unexpectedly high rate of pulmonary embolism in patients with superficial thrombophlebitis of the thigh. J Vasc Surg, 30, 1113–5.Google Scholar
Ward, R., Jones, D., and Haponik, E. 1995. Paradoxical embolism. Chest, 108, 549–58.Google Scholar
Warlow, C., Ogston, D., and Douglas, A. 1976. Deep venous thrombosis of the legs after strokes. Br Med J, 1, 1178–83.Google Scholar
Webster, M., Chancellor, A., Smith, H., et al. 1988. Patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients. Lancet, 2, 11–2.Google Scholar
Wessler, B., Thaler, D., Ruthazer, R., et al. 2014. Transesophageal echocardiography in cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: Analysis of putative high-risk features from the risk of paradoxical embolism database. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 7, 125–31.Google Scholar
Wheeler, H. and Anderson, F. 1995. Diagnostic methods for deep vein thrombosis. Haemostasis, 25, 6–26.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×