Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Historical Preface
- General Outline
- Part I Volume Preserving Homeomorphisms of the Cube
- 1 Introduction to Parts I and II (Compact Manifolds)
- 2 Measure Preserving Homeomorphisms
- 3 Discrete Approximations
- 4 Transitive Homeomorphisms of In and Rn
- 5 Fixed Points and Area Preservation
- 6 Measure Preserving Lusin Theorem
- 7 Ergodic Homeomorphisms
- 8 Uniform Approximation in G[In, λ] and Generic Properties in M[In, λ]
- Part II Measure Preserving Homeomorphisms of a Compact Manifold
- Part III Measure Preserving Homeomorphisms of a Noncompact Manifold
- Appendix 1 Multiple Rokhlin Towers and Conjugacy Approximation
- Appendix 2 Homeomorphic Measures
- Bibliography
- Index
7 - Ergodic Homeomorphisms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 August 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Historical Preface
- General Outline
- Part I Volume Preserving Homeomorphisms of the Cube
- 1 Introduction to Parts I and II (Compact Manifolds)
- 2 Measure Preserving Homeomorphisms
- 3 Discrete Approximations
- 4 Transitive Homeomorphisms of In and Rn
- 5 Fixed Points and Area Preservation
- 6 Measure Preserving Lusin Theorem
- 7 Ergodic Homeomorphisms
- 8 Uniform Approximation in G[In, λ] and Generic Properties in M[In, λ]
- Part II Measure Preserving Homeomorphisms of a Compact Manifold
- Part III Measure Preserving Homeomorphisms of a Noncompact Manifold
- Appendix 1 Multiple Rokhlin Towers and Conjugacy Approximation
- Appendix 2 Homeomorphic Measures
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Introduction
The Lusin Theorem (or rather its consequence Corollary 6.3) in the previous chapter provides us with a method of constructing volume preserving homeomorphisms with desired measure theoretic properties. This method reduces the problem to approximating a volume preserving homeomorphism uniformly by a volume preserving automorphism (not necessarily continuous) with the desired measure theoretic property. In the next chapter we will give a very general application of this method, but here we use it simply to demonstrate the existence (and typicality) of ergodic homeomorphisms of the cube. (We recall that an automorphism of a finite measure space is said to be ergodic if its only invariant sets are of measure zero or full measure.) Again, this is an optional chapter, in that a stronger result (Theorem 8.2) will be proved independently in the next chapter.
However, the proof we present here, that ergodicity is typical among volume preserving homeomorphisms of the cube, is a very clear illustration of the method of approximation by discontinuous automorphisms. Given Corollary 6.3 of the previous chapter, we are required only to approximate an arbitrary homeomorphism in M[In, λ] by an ergodic (generally discontinuous) automorphism in G[In, λ], in the uniform topology.
Theorem 7.1The ergodic homeomorphisms form a dense Gδ subset of the volume preserving homeomorphisms of In, in the uniform topology.
Proof Let G[In, λ] denote the space of all volume (λ) preserving bimeasurable bijections of the unit cube, endowed with the weak topology.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Typical Dynamics of Volume Preserving Homeomorphisms , pp. 48 - 52Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2001