Book contents
- Twenty Ways to Assess Personnel
- Twenty Ways to Assess Personnel
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction to Selection and Assessment
- 2 Complex and Sticky Issues in Assessment and Selection
- 3 Traditional and Mainly Discredited Assessment Methods
- 4 Self-Report Tests
- 5 Observer Reports
- 6 Behavioural Tests
- 7 Physiology
- 8 Biography
- 9 Big Data
- 10 The Future of Assessment
- Index
- References
1 - Introduction to Selection and Assessment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2021
Book contents
- Twenty Ways to Assess Personnel
- Twenty Ways to Assess Personnel
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction to Selection and Assessment
- 2 Complex and Sticky Issues in Assessment and Selection
- 3 Traditional and Mainly Discredited Assessment Methods
- 4 Self-Report Tests
- 5 Observer Reports
- 6 Behavioural Tests
- 7 Physiology
- 8 Biography
- 9 Big Data
- 10 The Future of Assessment
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter looks at the background to the whole issue of when, why and how people go about selecting applicants in the workplace. It is at the heart of industrial, organisational, vocational and work psychology. The chapter suggests that there are essentially five ways to assess people in the workplace: what they say about themselves; what others say about them; their behaviour on tests or in particular situations; physical and physiological evidence and their life history The chapter considers, in detail, many attempts over the years to compare and contrast different methods of assessment based on a number of criteria, particularly reliability and validity, but also cost, legal constraints and acceptability to the candidate. The chapter also looks at the research from a practitioner perspective, namely the current practice of assessment and their beliefs about various test methods. The final section looks at changes and developments in the academic and business world with respect to assessing people.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Twenty Ways to Assess PersonnelDifferent Techniques and their Respective Advantages, pp. 1 - 44Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Anderson, N., & Cunningham‐Snell, N. (2000) Personnel selection. In Chmiel, N. (Ed.), Introduction to work and organizational psychology (p. 69–99). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Arnold, J., Silvester, J., Cooper, C. L., Robertson, I. T., & Patterson, F. M. (2005). Work psychology: Understanding human behaviour in the workplace. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Chatman, J. A., Wong, E., & Joyce, C. (2008). When do people make the place? In The people make the place (p. 63–86). New York: LEA.Google Scholar
Cook, M. (2016). Personnel selection: Adding value through people-A changing picture. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, E., & Lievens, F. (2017). Future directions in personality, occupational and medical selection: myths, misunderstandings, measurement, and suggestions. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(2), 387–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnham, A. (2008). HR professionals’ beliefs about, and knowledge of, assessment techniques and psychometric tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(3), 300–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (2018). The great divide: Academic versus practitioner criteria for psychometric test choice. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(5), 498–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnham, A., & Jackson, C. J. (2011). Practitioner reactions to work‐related psychological tests. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 549–565.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Trickey, G., & Hyde, G. (2012). Bright aspects to dark side traits: Dark side traits associated with work success. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(8), 908–913.Google Scholar
Gatewood, R., Feild, H. S., & Barrick, M. (2015). Human resource selection. Nelson Education.Google Scholar
Greiff, S., & Iliescu, D. (2017). A test is much more than just the test itself. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(3), 145–148.Google Scholar
Ihsan, Z., & Furnham, A. (2018). The new technologies in personality assessment: A review. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 70(2), 147–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundgren, H., Poell, R. F., & Kroon, B. (2019). “This is not a test”: How do human resource development professionals use personality tests as tools of their professional practice? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(2), 175–196.Google Scholar
Piotrowski, C. (2019). Current research emphasis in the field of psychological assessment: A panorama of investigatory domain. North American Journal of Psychology, 21(3), 583–599.Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D. (2005). Selection assessment methods. Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) Foundation.Google Scholar
Rotolo, C. T., & Church, A. H. (2015). Big data recommendations for industrial–organizational psychology: Are we in whoville?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(4), 515–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. M., Inceoglu, I., Bartram, D., Golubovich, J., Grand, J., Reeder, M., Derous, E., Nikolaou, l., & Yao, X. (2015). Trends in testing: Highlights of a global survey. In Nikolaou, I. & Oostrom, J. K. (Eds.), Current issues in work and organizational psychology. Employee recruitment, selection, and assessment: Contemporary issues for theory and practice (p. 136–153). Routledge/Taylor & Francis GroupGoogle Scholar
Schaubroeck, J., Ganster, D., & Jones, J. (1998). Organization and occupation influences in the Attraction‐Selection‐Attrition process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 869–891.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1989). Fairness in employment selection. Advances in Selection and Assessment, 10, 134–153.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I. S., & Shaffer, J. A. (2016). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 100 years… Fox School of Business Research Paper.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–453.Google Scholar
Schneider, B., Smith, D. B., Taylor, S., & Fleenor, J. (1998). Personality and organizations: A test of the homogeneity of personality hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sehlapelo, M., & Terre Blanche, M. (1996). Psychometric testing in South Africa: Views from above and below. Psychology in Society, 21(49), 45.Google Scholar
Sosnowska, J., Hofmans, J., & Lievens, F. (2018). Assessing personality dynamics in personnel selection. In Rauthmann, J. F (Ed.), The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (p. 61–87). Elsevier.Google Scholar