Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Snidal, Duncan, “The Concept of Legalization” (2000) 54 International Organization 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alemanno, Alberto and Pech, Laurent, “Thinking Justice Outside the Docket: A Critical Assessment of the Reform of the EU’s Court System” (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Political Science Association, “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties” (1950) 44 American Political Science Review.Google Scholar

Andreas, Holger, “Theoretical Terms in Science,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ankersmit, Frank R., “Representational Democracy: An Aesthetic Approach to Conflict and Compromise” (2002) 8 Common Knowledge 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagehot, Walter, The English Constitution (first published 1867, Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Bagehot, Walter, Physics and Politics: Or Thoughts on the Application of the Principles of Natural Selection and Inheritance to Political Society (first published 1873, Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, Robert and Houghton, John, “Circular Arguments: The Status and Legitimacy of Administrative Rules” (1986) Public Law 239.Google Scholar

Baratta, Roberto, “Notes sur les fonctions et limites des accords interinstitutionnels,” in Tizzano, Antonio (ed.), Verso i 60 anni dai Trattati di Roma: stato e prospettive dell’Unione europea (Giappichelli, 2016).Google Scholar

Baratta, Roberto, “Diritto e prassi evolutiva dell’Eurogruppo” (2015) Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea 493.Google Scholar

Barber, Michael and McCarty, Nolan, “Causes and Consequences of Polarization,” in Mansbridge, Jane and Martin, Cathie Jo (eds.), Negotiating Agreement in Politics: Report of the Task Force on Negotiating Agreement in Politics (American Political Science Association, 2013).Google Scholar

Barón Crespo, Enrique, “El desarrollo de la codecisión como procedimiento legislativo de la UE” (2012) Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassi, Franco, “Circolari amministrative,” in Digesto delle Discipline Pubblicistiche (Utet, 1989).Google Scholar

Bauman, Zigmunt, Europe: An Unfinished Adventure (Polity Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Baume, Sandrine and Novak, Stéphanie, “Compromise and Publicity in Democracy: An Ambiguous Relationship,” in Baume, Sandrine and Novak, Stéphanie (eds.), Compromises in Democracy (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baume, Sandrine and Papadopoulos, Yannis, “Against Compromise in Democracy? A Plea for a Fine-Grained Assessment” (2022) 29 Constellations 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beerbohm, Eric, “The Problem of Clean Hands: Negotiated Compromise in Lawmaking,” in Knight, Jack (ed.), Compromise (New York University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard, “Democracy, Compromise and the Representation Paradox: Coalition Government and Policy Integrity” (2012) 47 Government and Opposition 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellamy, Richard, Kornprobst, Markus and Reh, Christine, “Introduction: Meeting in the Middle” (2012) 47 Government and Opposition 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benz, Arthur, “Lehmbruch Versus Lijphart: Comparing Democratic Governments as Multidimensional Regimes,” in Schneider, Volker and Eberlein, Burkard (eds.), Complex Democracy: Varieties, Crises, and Transformations (Springer, 2015).Google Scholar

Berti, Giorgio, “Stato di diritto informale” (1992) 42 Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico 3.Google Scholar

Bicchieri, Cristina, Muldoon, Ryan and Sontuoso, Alessandro, “Social Norms,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011).Google Scholar

Bickerton, Christopher J., European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bieber, Roland, “Rechtswirkung und gerichtliche Kontrolle des EG-Haushalts. Zugleich Anmerkung zur Entscheidung des EuGH vom 3. Juli 1986, Rs. 34/86 (Rat gegen Europäisches Parlament)” (1986) 101 Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 961.Google Scholar

Bieber, Roland, “Das Gesetzgebungsverfahren der Zusammenarbeit gemäß Art. 149 EWGV” (1989) 22 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1395.Google Scholar

Bieber, Roland, “Artikel 232 (ex-Artikel 199 EGV) [Geschäftsordnung; Verhandlungsniederschriften],” in von der Groeben, Hans, Schwarze, Jürgen and Hatje, Armin (eds.), Europäisches Unionsrecht, 7th ed. (Nomos, 2015).Google Scholar

Blom-Hansen, Jens and Senninger, Roman, “The Commission in EU Policy Preparation” (2021) 59 Journal of Common Market Studies 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobbio, Norberto, “Governo misto,” in Bobbio, Norberto, Matteucci, Nicola and Pasquino, Gianfranco (eds.), Dizionario di politica, 2nd ed. (Utet, 1983).Google Scholar

Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, “Sozialer Bundesstaat und parlamentarische Demokratie: Zum Verhältnis von Parlamentarismus und Föderalismus unter den Bedingungen des Sozialstaats,” in Staat, Nation, Europa: Studien zur Staatslehre, Verfassungstheorie und Rechtsphilosophie (Suhrkamp, 1999).Google Scholar

Boyron, Sophie, “Maastricht and the Codecision Procedure: A Success Story” (1996) 45 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, Kieran St. Clair, “Legal Developments in the European Parliament” (1989) 9 Yearbook of European Law 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandsma, Gijs Jan, “Transparency of EU Informal Trilogues through Public Feedback in the European Parliament: Promise Unfulfilled” (2019) 26 Journal of European Public Policy 1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandsma, Gijs Jan, Dionigi, Maja K., Greenwood, Justin and Roederer-Rynning, Christilla, “Trilogues in Council: Disrupting the Diplomatic Culture?” (2021) 28 Journal of European Public Policy 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandsma, Gijs Jan and Meijer, Albert, “Transparency and Efficiency of Multi-actor Decision-Making Processes: An Empirical Analysis of 244 Decisions in the European Union” (2022) 88 International Review of Administrative Sciences 626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke, “Democracy under Siege: The Decay of Constitutionalization and the Crisis of Public Law and Public Opinion,” in Kjaer, Poul F. and Olsen, Niklas (eds.), Critical Theories of Crisis in Europe: From Weimar to the Euro (Rowman & Littlefield International, 2016).Google Scholar

Bultena, Anita, “Negotiations in the Ordinary Legislative Procedure: The Perspective of the European Parliament,” in Goudappel, Flora A. N. J. and Hirsch Ballin, Ernst M. H. (eds.), Democracy and Rule of Law in the European Union: Essays in Honour of Jaap W. de Zwaan (Asser Press/Springer, 2016).Google Scholar

Burchardt, Dana and Putzer, Max, “Kompetenzgrenzen im deutschen und europäischen Vermittlungsverfahren” (2011) 26 Zeitschrift für Gesetzgebung 68.Google Scholar

Bürgin, Alexander, “Intra- and Inter-Institutional Leadership of the European Commission President: An Assessment of Juncker’s Organizational Reforms” (2018) 56 Journal of Common Market Studies 837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calliess, Christian, Die neue Europäische Union nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon (Mohr Siebeck, 2010).Google Scholar

Canetti, Elias, Crowds and Power (Continuum, 1981).Google Scholar

Carrau, Javier Guillem, “Los trílogos en el procedimiento legislativo de la UE: el informal law making en la nueva agenda legislativa europea” (2014) 92–93 Revista de las Cortes Generales 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavalli, Alessandro and Martinelli, Alberto, La società europea (il Mulino, 2015).Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone, “Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy and the Quality of Deliberation” (2004) 12 Journal of Political Philosophy 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamon, Merijn, “Upholding the ‘Community Method’: Limits to the Commission’s Power to Withdraw Legislative Proposals – Council v Commission (C-409/13)” (2015) 40 European Law Review 895.Google Scholar

Charlemagne, “Changing Parliamentary Perspectives,” The Economist, 18 May 2019.Google Scholar

Charlemagne, “Giving Faces to ‘Faceless Eurocrats,’” The Economist, 21 May 2022.Google Scholar

Chisholm, Donald, Coordination without Hierarchy: Informal Structures in Multiorganizational Systems (University of California Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clapp, James E., Thornburg, Elizabeth G., Galanter, Marc and Shapiro, Fred R., Lawtalk: The Unknown Stories behind Familiar Legal Expressions (Yale University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Cooper, Harry, “Where European Democracy Goes to Die,” Politico, 12 July 2016.Google Scholar

Corbett, Richard, Jacobs, Francis and Neville, Darren, The European Parliament, 9th ed. (John Harper, 2016).Google Scholar

Cornewall Lewis, George, A Dialogue on the Best Form of Government (Parker Son and Bourn, 1863).Google Scholar

Costa, Olivier, Dehousse, Renaud and Trakalová, Aneta, “Codecision and ‘Early Agreements’: An Improvement or a Subversion of the Legislative Procedure?” (2011) Notre Europe.Google Scholar

Costello, Rory and Thomson, Robert, “The Distribution of Power among EU Institutions: Who Wins under Codecision and Why?” (2013) 20 Journal of European Public Policy 1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, Paul, “Democracy and Rule-Making within the EC: An Empirical and Normative Assessment” (1997) 3 European Law Journal 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, Paul, “The Eurogroup, Power and Accountability” (2017) 23 European Law Journal 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowe, Richard, “The European Budgetary Galaxy” (2017) 13 European Constitutional Law Review 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre, “The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces” (1993) 30 Common Market Law Review 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre and Leino, Päivi, “In Search of Transparency for EU Law-Making: Trilogues on the Cusp of Dawn” (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czada, Roland, “Demokratietypen, institutionelle Dynamik und Interessenvermittlung: Das Konzept der Verhandlungsdemokratie,” in Lauth, Hans-Joachim (ed.), Vergleichende Regierungslehre: Eine Einführung, 3rd ed. (VS Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A., “Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View,” in Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano (eds.), Democracy’s Edges (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Dani, Marco, “Rehabilitating Social Conflicts in European Public Law” (2012) 18 European Law Journal 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dankert, Pieter, “The Joint Declaration by the Community Institutions of 30 June 1982 on the Community Budgetary Procedure” (1983) 20 Common Market Law Review 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dann, Philipp, “The Political Institutions,” in von Bogdandy, Armin and Bast, Jürgen (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law, 2nd ed. (Hart/C. H. Beck/Nomos, 2011).Google Scholar

Dann, Philipp, “The Council,” in Schütze, Robert and Tridimas, Takis (eds.), Oxford Principles of European Union Law: The European Union Legal Order (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

David, René, “Sources of Law,” in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck)-Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1984).Google Scholar

De Ruiter, Rik and Neuhold, Christine, “Why Is Fast Track the Way to Go? Justifications for Early Agreement in the Co-decision Procedure and Their Effects” (2012) 18 European Law Journal 536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Ruiter, Rik and Neuhold, Christine, “Subsidiarity Watchdogs and the Kennel of Trilogues: When Do They Bark? The Role of National Parliaments in Trilogue Negotiations” (2021) 28 Journal of European Public Policy 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Ruyt, Jean, L’Acte unique européen: commentaire (Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 1987).Google Scholar

Decker, Frank, “Das Scheitern des Spitzenkandidatensystems und andere populäre Irrtümer über die Demokratisierung der Europäischen Union” (2019) 50 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dehousse, Renaud, “Constitutional Reform in the European Community: Are There Alternatives to the Majoritarian Avenue?” (1995) 18 West European Politics 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dell, Edmund, “The Report of the Three Wise Men” (1993) 2 Contemporary European History 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delreux, Tom and Laloux, Thomas, “Concluding Early Agreements in the EU: A Double Principal–Agent Analysis of Trilogue Negotiations” (2018) 56 Journal of Common Market Studies 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desilver, Drew, “The Polarization in Today’s Congress Has Roots That Go Back Decades,” Pew Research Center, 10 March 2022.Google Scholar

Dewost, Jean-Louis and Lepoivre, Marc, “La déclaration commune du Parlement européen, du Conseil et de la Commission relative à différentes mesures visant à assurer un meilleur déroulement de la procédure budgétaire, signée le 30 juin 1982” (1982) 25 Revue du Marché Commun 514.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice, Introduction à la politique (Gallimard, 1964).Google Scholar

Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, “Die Einheitliche Europäische Akte: Die Reform der Organe” (1986) 9 Integration 101.Google Scholar

Elazar, Daniel J., “Federalism and Consociational Regimes” (1985) 15 Publius: The Journal of Federalism 17.Google Scholar

Elazar, Daniel J., Exploring Federalism (University of Alabama Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Farina, Cynthia R., “Congressional Polarization: Terminal Constitutional Dysfunction?” (2015) 115 Columbia Law Review 1689.Google Scholar

Farrel, Henry and Héritier, Adrienne, “The Invisible Transformation of Codecision: Problems of Democratic Legitimacy” (2003) Sieps.Google Scholar

Fehling, Michael, “Informelles Verwaltungshandeln,” in Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang, Schmidt-Aßmann, Eberhard and Voßkuhle, Andreas (eds.), Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts, 2nd ed. (C. H. Beck, 2012).Google Scholar

Forman, John, “The Conciliation Procedure” (1979) 16 Common Market Law Review 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, Nigel G., “The New Conciliation Committee under Article 189b EC” (1994) 19 European Law Review 185.Google Scholar

Frankenberg, Günter, “Critical Comparisons: Re-thinking Comparative Law” (1985) 26 Harvard International Law Journal 411.Google Scholar

Fromage, Diane, “How to Ensure That National Parliaments (Truly) ‘Contribute Actively to the Good Functioning of (Tomorrow’s) EU’?” (2020) 26 European Law Journal 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frowein, Jochen Abr., “Die rechtliche Bedeutung des Verfassungsprinzips der parlamentarischen Demokratie für den europäischen Integrationsprozeß” (1983) 18 Europarecht 301.Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen Abr., “Erinnerungen an die ‘Groupe Vedel,’” in Becker, Ulrich, Hatje, Armin, Potacs, Michael, and Wunderlich, Nina (eds.), Verfassung und Verwaltung in Europa: Festschrift für Jürgen Schwarze zum 70. Geburtstag (Nomos, 2014).Google Scholar

Fumurescu, Alin, Compromise: A Political and Philosophical History (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallie, W. B., “Essentially Contested Concepts” (1955) 56 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galligan, Denis J., Law in Modern Society (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Garman, Julie and Hilditch, Louise, “Behind the Scenes: An Examination of the Importance of the Informal Processes at Work in Conciliation” (1998) 5 Journal of European Public Policy 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giannini, Massimo Severo, “Circolare,” in Enciclopedia del Diritto (Giuffrè, 1960).Google Scholar

Giersdorf, Fabian, Der informelle Trilog: Das Schattengesetzgebungsverfahren der Europäischen Union (Duncker & Humblot, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom and Stephanopoulos, Nicholas, “The Concepts of Law” (2017) 84 University of Chicago Law Review 147.Google Scholar

Gómez-Leal Pérez, María, “El procedimiento legislativo ordinario en la práctica: los acuerdos en primera lectura” (2015) Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwald Smith, Rachel, On Compromise: Art, Politics, and the Fate of an American Ideal (Graywolf Press, 2021).Google Scholar

Greenwood, Justin and Roederer-Rynning, Christilla, “Taming Trilogues: The EU’s Law-Making Process in a Comparative Perspective,” in Costa, Olivier (ed.), The European Parliament in Times of EU Crisis: Dynamics and Transformations (Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).Google Scholar

Grunden, Timo, “Informelle Machtarchitekturen im parlamentarischen Regierungssystem – Zur Analyse der Entstehung, Funktion und Veränderung informeller Institutionen,” in Bröchler, Stephan and Grunden, Timo (eds.), Informelle Politik: Konzepte, Akteure und Prozesse (Springer, 2014).Google Scholar

Guiot, François-Vivien, “La ‘Commission politique’, une ‘commission impossible’? Construction d’un paradoxe” (2021) 57 Cahiers de droit européen 419.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis, The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It (Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, “The Postnational Constellation and the Future of Democracy,” in The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (MIT Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Zur Verfassung Europas: Ein Essay, 5th ed. (Suhrkamp, 2014).Google Scholar

Häge, Frank M. and Naurin, Daniel, “The Effect of Codecision on Council Decision-Making: Informalization, Politicization and Power” (2013) 20 Journal of European Public Policy 953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han, Byung-Chul, The Transparency Society (Stanford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanke, Christian, “Informale Regeln als Substrat des parlamentarischen Verhandlungssystems. Zur Begründung einer zentralen Kategorie der Parlamentarismusforschung” (1994) 25 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 410.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Martin, Vertrauen: Die unsichtbare Macht (S. Fischer, 2020).Google Scholar

Hatch, Marie Jo, Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Hatje, Armin and Schwarze, Jürgen, “Der Zusammenhalt der Europäischen Union” (2019) 54 Europarecht 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona and Wallace, Helen, The Council of Ministers, 2nd ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, Hermann, Staatslehre (A. W. Sijthoff’s Uitgeversmij N.V., 1934).Google Scholar

Heller, Hermann, “The Nature and Structure of the State” (1996) 18 Cardozo Law Review 1139.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes toward American Political Institutions (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hillebrandt, Maarten and Leino-Sandberg, Päivi, “Administrative and Judicial Oversight of Trilogues” (2021) 28 Journal of European Public Policy 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horst, Patrick, “Das Management der dritten Großen Koalition in Deutschland 2013 bis 2015: unangefochtene Dominanz der drei Parteivorsitzenden” (2015) 46 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, Katrin and Shackleton, Michael, “Codecision: A Practitioner’s View from Inside the Parliament” (2013) 20 Journal of European Public Policy 1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hueglin, Thomas O. and Fenna, Alan, Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry, 2nd ed. (University of Toronto Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Hurrelmann, Achim, “Democracy beyond the State: Insights from the European Union” (2014) 129 Political Science Quarterly 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Innerarity, Daniel, Democracy in Europe: A Political Philosophy of the EU (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Innerarity, Daniel, Una teoría de la democracia compleja: Gobernar en el siglo XXI, 3rd ed. (Galaxia Gutenberg, 2020).Google Scholar

Isensee, Josef, “Verfassungsrecht als ‘politisches Recht,’” in Isensee, Josef and Kirchhof, Paul (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts, 3rd ed. (C. F. Müller, 2014).Google Scholar

Sir Jacobs, Francis, “Comparative Law and European Union Law,” in Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Jacqué, Jean-Paul, “La pratique des institutions communautaires et le développement de la structure institutionnelle communautaire,” in Bieber, Roland and Ress, Georg (eds.), Die Dynamik des Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrechts / The Dynamics of EC-Law: Die Auslegung des Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrechts im Lichte nachfolgender Praxis der Mitgliedstaaten und der EG-Organe (Nomos, 1987).Google Scholar

Jacqué, Jean-Paul, “Une vision réaliste de la procédure de codécision,” in De Walsche, Aline and Levi, Laure (eds.), Mélanges en hommage à Georges Vandersanden: promenades au sein du droit européen (Bruylant, 2008).Google Scholar

Jacqué, Jean-Paul, “Lost in Transition: The European Commission between Intergovernmentalism and Integration,” in Ritleng, Dominique (ed.), Independence and Legitimacy in the Institutional System of the European Union (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

JHR and LB, “Editorial: Spitzenkandidaten and the European Union’s System of Government” (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaiser, Robert G., Act of Congress: How America’s Essential Institution Works, and How It Doesn’t (Vintage, 2014).Google Scholar

Kardasheva, Raya, “Package Deals in EU Legislative Politics” (2013) 57 American Journal of Political Science 858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, Hans Gustav, Das “Junge Europa”: 1834–1836 (Max Niehans Verlag, 1938).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie (J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1929).Google Scholar

Kersten, Jens, “Art. 77 GG,” in Maunz, Theodor and Dürig, Günter (eds.), Grundgesetz: Kommentar (C. H. Beck, 2012).Google Scholar

Kirchhof, Paul, “Mittel staatlichen Handelns,” in Isensee, Josef and Kirchhof, Paul (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts, 3rd ed. (C. F. Müller, 2007).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Informal Instruments before the European Court of Justice” (1994) 31 Common Market Law Review 997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Institutional Ambivalence by Design: Soft Organizations in International Law” (2001) 70 Nordic Journal of International Law 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kluth, Winfried, “Der Vermittlungsausschuß,” in Isensee, Josef and Kirchhof, Paul (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts, 3rd ed. (C. F. Müller, 2005).Google Scholar

Kommers, Donald P. and Miller, Russell A., The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 3rd ed. (Duke University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Krajewski, Markus and Rösslein, Ulrich, “Art. 15 AEUV [Grundsatz der Offenheit],” in Grabitz, Eberhard, Hilf, Meinhard and Nettesheim, Martin (eds.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union (C. H. Beck, 2013).Google Scholar

Kreppel, Amie, “Typologies and Classifications,” in Martin, Shane, Saalfeld, Thomas and Strøm, Kaare W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Krick, Eva, “The Myth of Effective Veto Power under the Rule of Consensus. Dynamics and Democratic Legitimacy of Collective Decision-Making by ‘Tacit Consent’” (2017) Négociations 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LB and JHR, “Editorial: Talking about European Democracy” (2017) 13 European Constitutional Law Review 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Frances E., “Bicameral Representation,” in Edwards, George C. III, Lee, Frances E. and Schickler, Eric (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Lehmbruch, Gerhard, “Verhandlungsdemokratie, Entscheidungsblockaden und Arenenverflechtung,” in Merkel, Wolfgang and Busch, Andreas (eds.), Demokratie in Ost und West: Für Klaus von Beyme (Suhrkamp, 1999).Google Scholar

Lehmbruch, Gerhard, “Einleitung: Von der Konkurrenzdemokratie zur Verhandlungsdemokratie – zur Entwicklung eines typologischen Konzepts,” in Verhandlungsdemokratie: Beiträge zur vergleichenden Regierungslehre (Westdeutscher Verlag, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmbruch, Gerhard, “Die korporative Verhandlungsdemokratie in Westmitteleuropa,” in Verhandlungsdemokratie: Beiträge zur vergleichenden Regierungslehre (Westdeutscher Verlag, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmbruch, Gerhard, “Proporzdemokratie: Politisches System und politische Kultur in der Schweiz und in Österreich,” in Verhandlungsdemokratie: Beiträge zur vergleichenden Regierungslehre (Westdeutscher Verlag, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehnert, Matthias, “Der Einfluss der Parteipolitik auf das Vermittlungsverfahren: Eine Analyse der Einigungsvorschläge (1949–2005),” in Schöne, Helmar and von Blumenthal, Julia (eds.), Parlamentarismusforschung in Deutschland: Ergebnisse und Perspektiven 40 Jahre nach Erscheinen von Gerhard Loewenbergs Standardwerk zum Deutschen Bundestag (Nomos, 2009).Google Scholar

Leino, Päivi, “The Politics of Efficient Compromise in the Adoption of EU Legal Acts,” in Cremona, Marise and Kilpatrick, Claire (eds.), EU Legal Acts: Challenges and Transformations (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Lenaerts, Koen, “The Principle of Democracy in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice” (2013) 62 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenaerts, Koen, Maselis, Ignace and Gutman, Kathleen, EU Procedural Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven and Ziblatt, Daniel, How Democracies Die (Viking, 2018).Google Scholar

Lewis, Jeffrey, “Council of Ministers and European Council,” in Jones, Erik, Menon, Anand and Weatherill, Stephen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, 2nd ed. (Yale University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Lo Bianco, Santino, “Informal Decision-Making in the EU: Assessing Trialogues in the Light of Deliberative Democracy,” in de Zwaan, Jaap, Lak, Martijn, Makinwa, Abiola and Willems, Piet (eds.), Governance and Security Issues of the European Union: Challenges Ahead (Asser Press/Springer, 2016).Google Scholar

Longley, Lawrence D. and Oleszek, Walter J., Bicameral Politics: Conference Committees in Congress (Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Lord, Christopher, “The Democratic Legitimacy of Codecision” (2013) 20 Journal of European Public Policy 1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plumb, Lord, “Building a Democratic Community: The Role of the European Parliament” (1989) 45 The World Today 112.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin, “The Silences of Constitutions” (2018) 16 International Journal of Constitutional Law 922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, Legitimation durch Verfahren, 9th ed. (Suhrkamp, 2013).Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie, 16th ed. (Suhrkamp, 2015).Google Scholar

Lupo, Nicola, “The Commission’s Power to Withdraw Legislative Proposals and its ‘Parliamentarisation’, between Technical and Political Grounds” (2018) 14 European Constitutional Law Review 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, Suzanne and Gridneff, Ilya, “Europe’s American President: The Paradox of Ursula von der Leyen,” Politico, 6 October 2022.Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, Neil, Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mair, Peter and Thomassen, Jacques, “Political Representation and Government in the European Union” (2010) 17 Journal of European Public Policy 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malhotra, Deepak, Negotiating the Impossible (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2016).Google Scholar

Mancini, G. F., “Democracy and the European Court of Justice,” in Democracy and Constitutionalism in the European Union: Collected Essays (Hart, 2000).Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard, The Principles of Representative Government (Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, Thomas, “Art. 77 [Verfahren bei Gesetzesbeschlüssen],” in Sachs, Michael (ed.), Grundgesetz: Kommentar, 8th ed. (C. H. Beck, 2018).Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J., The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manow, Philip, In the King’s Shadow: The Political Anatomy of Democratic Representation (Polity Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Manow, Philip, (Ent)demokratisierung der Demokratie: Ein Essay (Suhrkamp, 2020).Google Scholar

Manzella, Andrea, “Legislation and Legislative Procedures between the Parliament, the Council and the Commission,” in Amato, Giuliano, Moavero-Milanesi, Enzo, Paquino, Gianfranco, and Reichlin, Lucrezia (eds.), The History of the European Union: Constructing Utopia (Bloomsbury, 2019).Google Scholar

March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P., “Elaborating the ‘New Institutionalism,’” in Binder, Sarah A., Rhodes, R. A. W. and Rockman, Bert A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Margalit, Avishai, On Compromise and Rotten Compromises (Princeton University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Marquand, David, Parliament for Europe (Jonathan Cape, 1979).Google Scholar

Martin, Cathie Jo, “Negotiating Political Agreements,” in Mansbridge, Jane and Martin, Cathie Jo (eds.), Negotiating Agreement in Politics: Report of the Task Force on Negotiating Agreement in Politics (American Political Science Association, 2013).Google Scholar

Martin, Cathie Jo, “Conditions for Successful Negotiation: Lessons from Europe,” in Mansbridge, Jane and Martin, Cathie Jo (eds.), Negotiating Agreement in Politics: Report of the Task Force on Negotiating Agreement in Politics (American Political Science Association, 2013).Google Scholar

Martines, Francesca, “I triloghi alla luce dei principi di democrazia, equilibrio istituzionale, efficienza e trasparenza” (2018) Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 311.Google Scholar

Martínez Iglesias, María José, “The Accidental Democracy: A European Model,” in Garben, Sacha, Govaere, Inge and Nemitz, Paul (eds.), Critical Reflections on Constitutional Democracy in the European Union (Hart, 2019).Google Scholar

Martínez Iglesias, María José, “Better Law-Making and the Interinstitutional (Dis)agreements: Some Comments” (2020) 26 European Law Journal 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maurer, Andreas, “(Co-)Governing after Maastricht: The European Parliament’s Institutional Performance 1994–1999: Lessons for the Implementation of the Treaty of Amsterdam,” POLI 104/rev., October 1999.Google Scholar

McCown, Ada C., The Congressional Conference Committee (Columbia University Press, 1927).Google Scholar

Mead, Rebecca, “In Brexit Britain, the Parliament Choir Is in Purgatory: In a Thirteenth-Century Chapel Deep inside Westminster, a Choral Society Crosses Party Lines,” The New Yorker, 4 November 2019.Google Scholar

“Mechanisms of Secrecy” (2008) 121 Harvard Law Review 1556.Google Scholar

Meinel, Florian, Selbstorganisation des parlamentarischen Regierungssystems: Vergleichende Studien zu einem Verfassungsproblem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Mohr Siebeck, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meinel, Florian, Vertrauensfrage: Zur Krise des heutigen Parlamentarismus (C. H. Beck, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendes, Joana, “Participation and the Role of Law after Lisbon: A Legal View on Article 11 TEU” (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review 1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, Negotiation: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merati-Kashani, Jasmin, “Vermitteln im Vermittlungsausschuss – Mediation in der Bundesgesetzgebung?” (2011) 30 Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht – Extra 1.Google Scholar

Michels, Robert, Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie, 2nd ed. (Alfred Kröner Verlag, 1925).Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart, “Considerations on Representative Government,” in On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and Other Essays (first published 1861, Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Bernhard, Der Koalitionsausschuss: Existenz, Einsatz und Effekte einer informellen Arena des Koalitionsmanagements (Nomos, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Misztal, Barbara A., Informality: Social Theory and Contemporary Practice (Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

Möllers, Christoph, “European Governance: Meaning and Value of a Concept” (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Möllers, Christoph, “Vermittlungsausschuss und Vermittlungsverfahren” (2010) 32 JURA – Juristische Ausbildung 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Möllers, Christoph, Die Möglichkeit der Normen: Über eine Praxis jenseits von Moralität und Kausalität (Suhrkamp, 2015).Google Scholar

Möllers, Christoph, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Morlok, Martin, “Informalisierung und Entparlamentarisierung politischer Entscheidungen als Gefährdungen der Verfassung?” (2003) 62 Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 37.Google Scholar

Mourlon-Druol, Emmanuel, “How Informality Can Play Out in European Integration,” in van Heumen, Lennaert and Roos, Mechthild (eds.), The Informal Construction of Europe (Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar

Müller-Terpitz, Ralf, “Art. 50 GG,” in Maunz, Theodor and Dürig, Günter (eds.), Grundgesetz: Kommentar (C. H. Beck 2017).Google Scholar

Nettesheim, Martin, “Art. 10 EUV [Demokratische Grundsätze],” in Grabitz, Eberhard, Hilf, Meinhard and Nettesheim, Martin (eds.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union (C. H. Beck, 2015).Google Scholar

Nettesheim, Martin, “Art. 13 EUV [Organe der Union],” in Grabitz, Eberhard, Hilf, Meinhard and Nettesheim, Martin (eds.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union (C. H. Beck, 2015).Google Scholar

Neunreither, Karlheinz, “Governance without Opposition: The Case of the European Union” (1998) 33 Government and Opposition 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neustadt, Richard E., Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan (The Free Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Neyer, Jürgen, The Justification of Europe: A Political Theory of Supranational Integration (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicoll, William, “EEC Budgetary Strains and Constraints” (1987) 64 International Affairs 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ninatti, Stefania, “How Do Our Judges Conceive of Democracy? The Democratic Nature of the Community Decision-Making Process under Scrutiny of the European Court of Justice” (2003) Jean Monnet Working Paper.Google Scholar

Nocilla, Damiano, “Autonomia, coordinamento e leale collaborazione tra i due rami di un parlamento bicamerale” (1998) 48 Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico 935.Google Scholar

Nohlen, Dieter, “Parlamentarisierung,” in Nohlen, Dieter and Schultze, Rainer-Olaf (eds.), Lexikon der Politikwissenschaft: Theorien, Methoden, Begriffe (C. H. Beck, 2002).Google Scholar

Norton, Philip, “Power behind the Scenes: The Importance of Informal Space in Legislatures” (2019) 72 Parliamentary Affairs 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Novak, Stéphanie, “The Silence of Ministers: Consensus and Blame Avoidance in the Council of the European Union” (2013) 51 Journal of Common Market Studies 1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Novak, Stéphanie, Rozenberg, Olivier and Bendjaballah, Selma, “Enduring Consensus: Why the EU Legislative Process Stays the Same” (2021) 43 Journal of European Integration 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nugent, Neill and Rhinard, Mark, The European Commission, 2nd ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nugent, Neill and Rhinard, Mark, “Is the European Commission Really in Decline?” (2016) 54 Journal of Common Market Studies 1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nugent, Neill and Rhinard, Mark, “The ‘Political’ Roles of the European Commission” (2019) 41 Journal of European Integration 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Dwyer, Una, “La dynamique historique des relations interinstitutionnelles. Le point de vue d’un praticien sur l’évolution de la procédure de codécision” (2010) Revue du Droit de l’Union Européenne 487.Google Scholar

Oeter, Stefan, “Federalism and Democracy,” in von Bogdandy, Armin and Bast, Jürgen (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law, 2nd ed. (Hart/C. H. Beck/Nomos, 2011).Google Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J., Oleszek, Mark J., Rybicki, Elizabeth and Heniff, Bill Jr., Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 11th ed. (Sage/CQ Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Palermo, Francesco and Kössler, Karl, Comparative Federalism: Constitutional Arrangements and Case Law (Hart, 2017).Google Scholar

Palmeri, Tara, “The Most Exclusive Dining Club in Brussels: Inside the G5 Where ‘the Best Jokes Are Told’ and Major EU Policies are Pre-cooked,” Politico, 18 June 2015.Google Scholar

Panning, Lara, “Building and Managing the European Commission’s Position for Trilogue Negotiations” (2021) 28 Journal of European Public Policy 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pannes, Anna-Tina, Informalität: Theoretische und empirische Dimensionen informeller Entscheidungsprozesse in Regierungsformationen: Ein Analyseansatz (Springer, 2015).Google Scholar

Pasetti-Bombardella, Francesco, “La controversia fra il Consiglio e il Parlamento europeo sul bilancio generale 1986” (1986) Rivista di diritto europeo 207.Google Scholar

Pasetti-Bombardella, Francesco, “Le Parlement face au Conseil,” in Louis, Jean-Victor and Waelbroeck, Denis (eds.), Le Parlement européen dans l’évolution institutionnelle, 2nd ed. (Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 1989).Google Scholar

Patrin, Maria, Collegiality in the European Commission: Legal Substance and Institutional Practice (Oxford University Press, 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patzelt, Werner J., “Minderheitsregierung? Warum eigentlich nicht!,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 9 December 2019.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A. and Wouters, Jan, “Informal International Lawmaking: An Assessment and Template to Keep It both Effective and Accountable,” in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A. and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennera, Christian and Schoo, Johann, “La Codécision – Dix ans d’application” (2004) 40 Cahiers de droit européen 531.Google Scholar

Persily, Nathaniel, “Stronger Parties as a Solution to Polarization,” in Persily, Nathaniel (ed.), Solutions to Political Polarization in America (Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pescatore, Pierre, “Some Critical Remarks on the ‘Single European Act’” (1987) 24 Common Market Law Review 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, B. Guy, “Coordination in the EU,” in Jones, Erik, Menon, Anand and Weatherill, Stephen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul, Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pircher, Brigitte and Farjam, Mike, “Oppositional Voting in the Council of the EU between 2010 and 2019: Evidence for Differentiated Politicisation” (2021) 22 European Union Politics 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pizzolato, Filippo, “Rappresentenza politica e Unione europea” (2013) 23 Rivista italiana di diritto pubblico comunitario 371.Google Scholar

, P.K., “On Transparency – but Do Not Mention Brexit!” (2019) 44 European Law Review 587.Google Scholar

Ponzano, Paolo, “Il voto nel Consiglio: il compromesso di Ioannina alla luce del Trattato di Lisbona” (2009) Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea 77.Google Scholar

Pozen, David E., “Transparency’s Ideological Drift” (2018) 128 Yale Law Journal 100.Google Scholar

Puetter, Uwe, The European Council and the Council: New Intergovernmentalism and Institutional Change (Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert D., “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games” (1988) 42 International Organization 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert D., Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Anne, “Early Conclusion in Bicameral Bargaining: Evidence from the Co-decision Legislative Procedure of the European Union” (2010) 12 European Union Politics 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rebasti, Emanuele, “The Legal Regime Applicable to the Council Presidency: Competing Conceptual Approaches and Pragmatic Solutions,” in Coman, Ramona and Sierens, Vivien (eds.), EU Council Presidencies in Times of Crises (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024).Google Scholar

Reh, Christine, “European Integration as Compromise: Recognition, Concessions and the Limits of Cooperation” (2012) 47 Government and Opposition 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reh, Christine, “Is Informal Politics Undemocratic? Trilogues, Early Agreements and the Selection Model of Representation” (2014) 21 Journal of European Public Policy 822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reh, Christine, Héritier, Adrienne, Bressanelli, Edoardo and Koop, Christel, “The Informal Politics of Legislation: Explaining Secluded Decision Making in the European Union” (2011) 49 Comparative Political Studies 1112.Google Scholar

Renzsch, Wolfgang, “Deutschland, einig Bundesstaat?,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 9 March 2020.Google Scholar

Rintala, Marvin, “The Two Faces of Compromise” (1969) 22 Western Political Quarterly 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ripoll Servent, Ariadna and Panning, Lara, “Eurosceptics in Trilogue Settings: Interest Formation and Contestation in the European Parliament” (2019) 42 West European Politics 755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritleng, Dominique, “Does the European Court of Justice Take Democracy Seriously? Some Thoughts about the Macro-Financial Assistance Case” (2016) 53 Common Market Law Review 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, Mary T. W., “The Political Implications of the Vedel Report” (1972) 7 Government and Opposition 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roederer-Rynning, Christilla and Greenwood, Justin, “Black Boxes and Open Secrets: Trilogues as ‘Politicised Diplomacy’” (2021) 44 West European Politics 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roger, Charles B., The Origins of Informality: Why the Legal Foundations of Global Governance Are Shifting, and Why It Matters (Oxford University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roger, Léa, Voice(s) in the European Parliament: Deliberation and Negotiation in EP Committees (Nomos, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romano, Santi, “Diritto e corretta costituzionale,” in Scritti minori (Giuffrè, 1950).Google Scholar

Romano, Santi, “Lo Stato moderno e la sua crisi,” in Scritti minori (Giuffrè, 1950).Google Scholar

Romano, Santi, L’ordinamento giuridico, 2nd ed. (Sansoni, 1951).Google Scholar

Romano, Santi, The Legal Order (Routledge, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roos, Mechthild and Neuhold, Christine, “Studying the Informal in European Integration: A Research Guide,” in van Heumen, Lennaert and Roos, Mechthild (eds.), The Informal Construction of Europe (Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar

Roos, Mechthild and van Heumen, Lennaert, “Introduction,” in van Heumen, Lennaert and Roos, Mechthild (eds.), The Informal Construction of Europe (Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre, “The Transformation of Democracy and the Future of Europe,” in Democracy Past and Future (Columbia University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre, Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity (Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Rossi, Lucia Serena, “The Principle of Equality among Member States of the European Union,” in Rossi, Lucia Serena and Casolari, Federico (eds.), The Principle of Equality in EU Law (Springer, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F., “Democratic Respect and Compromise” (2017) 20 Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouméas, Élise, “The Procedural Value of Compromise” (2021) 47 Social Theory and Practice 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rozenberg, Olivier, “The Council of the EU: from the Congress of Ambassadors to a genuine Parliamentary Chamber?,” PE 608.855, January 2019.Google Scholar

Rudzio, Wolfgang, Das politische System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 9th ed. (Springer, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruffert, Matthias, “Entformalisierung und Entparlamentarisierung politischer Entscheidungen als Gefährdungen der Verfassung?” (2002) 117 Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 1145.Google Scholar

Ruffert, Matthias, “The Many Faces of Rule-Making in the EU,” in Fahey, Elaine (ed.), The Actors of Postnational Rule-Making: Contemporary Challenges of European and International Law (Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Rugge, Giacomo, “Trilogues and Access to Documents: De Capitani v. Parliament” (2019) 56 Common Market Law Review 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rugge, Giacomo, “The Euro Group’s Informality and locus standi before the European Court of Justice: Council v. K. Chrysostomides & Co. and Others” (2021) 81 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 917.Google Scholar

Rybicki, Elizabeth, “Amendments between the Houses: Procedural Options and Effects,” CRS Report R41003, 14 March 2022.Google Scholar

Saalfeld, Thomas, “Germany: Stable Parties, Chancellor Democracy, and the Art of Informal Settlement,” in Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare (eds.), Coalition Governments in Western Europe (Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech, “Legitimacy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule” (2008) 21 Ratio Juris 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandulli, Aldo, Il ruolo del diritto in Europa: L’integrazione europea dalla prospettiva del diritto amministrativo (FrancoAngeli, 2018).Google Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni, “Will Democracy Kill Democracy? Decision-Making by Majorities and by Committees” (1975) 10 Government and Opposition 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffner, Brian F., “Party Polarization,” in Edwards, George C. III, Lee, Frances E. and Schickler, Eric (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W., “The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration” (1988) 66 Public Administration 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W., “Einführung: Zur Theorie von Verhandlungssystemen,” in Benz, Arthur, Scharpf, Fritz W. and Zintl, Reinhard (eds.), Horizontale Politikverflechtung: Zur Theorie von Verhandlungssystemen (Campus Verlag, 1992).Google Scholar

Schmidt, Manfred G., Political Institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Schmidt, Manfred G., Demokratietheorien: Eine Einführung, 6th ed. (Springer, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Vivien A., “Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’” (2013) 61 Political Studies 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Vivien A., “Politicization in the EU: Between National Politics and EU Political Dynamics” (2019) 26 Journal of European Public Policy 1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schoch, Friederich, “Entformalisierung staatlichen Handelns,” in Isensee, Josef and Kirchhof, Paul (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts, 3rd ed. (C. F. Müller, 2005).Google Scholar

Schönberger, Christoph, “Das Parlament: Geschichte einer europäischen Erfindung,” in Morlok, Martin, Schliesky, Ute and Wiefelspütz, Dieter (eds.), Parlamentsrecht: Handbuch (Nomos, 2016).Google Scholar

Schoo, Johann and Görlitz, Niklas, “Artikel 15 AEUV [Grundsatz der Offenheit],” in Schwarze, Jürgen (ed.), EU-Kommentar, 3rd ed. (Nomos, 2012).Google Scholar

Schoo, Johann and Görlitz, Niklas, “Artikel 295 AEUV [Interinstitutionelle Vereinbarungen],” in Schwarze, Jürgen (ed.), EU-Kommentar, 3rd ed. (Nomos, 2012).Google Scholar

Schuett-Wetschky, Eberhard, “Auswanderung der Politik aus den Institutionen: Schwächung der Demokratie? Zur Legitimation der Parteiendemokratie” (2001) 11 Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 3.Google Scholar

Schuett-Wetschky, Eberhard, “Regierung, Parlament oder Parteien: Wer entscheidet, wer beschließt?” (2005) 36 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 489.Google Scholar

Schulze-Fielitz, Helmut, “Der politische Kompromiß als Chance und Gefahr für die Rationalität der Gesetzgebung,” in Grimm, Dieter and Maihofer, Werner (eds.), Gesetzgebungstheorie und Rechtspolitik (Springer, 1988).Google Scholar

Schulze-Fielitz, Helmut, “Das Verhältnis von formaler und informaler Verfassung,” in Görlitz, Alex and Burth, Hans-Peter (eds.), Informale Verfassung (Nomos, 1998).Google Scholar

Schulze-Fielitz, Helmut, “Konstitutionalisierung der Informalität? Nutzen und Grenzen einer Nachführung des Verfassungsrechts an informale Prozesse der Entscheidungsfindung,” in Krüper, Julian, Merten, Heike and Morlok, Martin (eds.), An den Grenzen der Rechtsdogmatik (Mohr Siebeck, 2010).Google Scholar

Schürmann, Thomas, “Plenardebatte,” in Morlok, Martin, Schliesky, Ute and Wiefelspütz, Dieter (eds.), Parlamentsrecht: Handbuch (Nomos, 2016).Google Scholar

Scott, W. Richard, Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities, 4th ed. (Sage, 2014).Google Scholar

Shackleton, Michael, “The Politics of Codecision” (2000) 38 Journal of Common Market Studies 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shlaim, Avi, “The Vedel Report and the Reform of the European Parliament” (1973) 27 Parliamentary Affairs 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siefken, Sven T., “Regierungsbildung ‘wider Willen’ – der mühsame Weg zur Koalition nach der Bundestagswahl 2017” (2018) 49 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmel, Georg, Soziologie (Duncker & Humblot, 1908).Google Scholar

Sipala, Floriana, “La vie démocratique de l’Union,” in Amato, Giuliano, Bribosia, Hervé and De Witte, Bruno (eds.), Genèse et destinée de la Constitution européenne/Genesis and destiny of the European Constitution (Bruylant, 2007).Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S., Roberts, Jason M. and Vander Wielen, Ryan J., The American Congress, 9th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Stacey, Jeffrey, Integrating Europe: Informal Politics and Institutional Change (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Starski, Paulina, “Die ‘Große Koalition’ als Problem des Verfassungsrechts: Recht auf effektive Opposition vs. Gleichheit der Abgeordneten” (2016) 69 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 750.Google Scholar

Stasavage, David, “Open-Door or Closed-Door? Transparency in Domestic and International Bargaining” (2004) 58 International Organization 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steffani, Winfried, Parlamentarische und präsidentielle Demokratie: Strukturelle Aspekte westlicher Demokratien (Springer, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strahan, Randall W., “Party Leadership,” in Edwards, George C. III, Lee, Frances E. and Schickler, Eric (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Stüwe, Klaus, “Der Bundesrat in Zeiten Großer Koalitionen” (2008) Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 24.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., “Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided” (1996) 110 Harvard Law Review 4.Google Scholar

Tanenhaus, Sam, “The Power of Congress: Before L.B.J., Progressives Saw Bipartisanship as a Blight. What Happened?,” The New Yorker, 12 January 2015.Google Scholar

Taylor, Miles, “Introduction,” in Bagehot, Walter, The English Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Telò, Mario, “Three European Constitutionalisms and Their Respective Legitimacy Requirements: Explaining the longue durée Stability of the EU Polity,” in Lucarelli, Sonia, Cerutti, Furio and Schmidt, Vivien A. (eds.), Debating Political Identity and Legitimacy in the European Union (Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Thirlway, Hugh, “Compromis,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Toope, Stephen J., “Formality and Informality,” in Bodansky, Daniel, Brunnée, Jutta and Hey, Ellen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George, Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (Sage/Princeton University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia, “Representative Democracy and Its Critics,” in Alonso, Sonia, Keane, John and Merkel, Wolfgang (eds.), The Future of Representative Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Urfalino, Philippe, “La décision par consensus apparent. Nature et propriétés” (2007) 45 Revue européenne des sciences sociales 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Middelaar, Luuk, Alarums & Excursions: Improvising Politics on the European Stage (Agenda Publishing, 2019).Google Scholar

Van Parijs, Philippe, “What Makes a Good Compromise?” (2012) 47 Government and Opposition 466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Tatenhove, Jan, Mak, Jeannette and Liefferink, Duncan, “The Inter-play between Formal and Informal Practices” (2006) 7 Perspectives on European Politics and Society 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasilev, George, “The Uneasy Alliance between Consensus and Democracy” (2015) 77 Review of Politics 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vauchez, Antoine, Brokering Europe: Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity (Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vauchez, Antoine, Democratizing Europe (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vermeule, Adrian, Mechanisms of Democracy: Institutional Design Writ Small (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Achenbach, Jelena, Demokratische Gesetzgebung in der Europäischen Union: Theorie und Praxis der dualen Legitimationsstruktur europäischer Hoheitsgewalt (Springer, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Achenbach, Jelena, “Verfassungswandel durch Selbstorganisation: Triloge im europäischen Gesetzgebungsverfahren” (2016) 55 Der Staat 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Achenbach, Jelena, “Transparenz statt Öffentlichkeit und demokratischer Repräsentation: Aktuelle Entwicklungen des Verhandelns in Trilogen im EU-Gesetzgebungsverfahren” (2018) Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 1025.Google Scholar

von Alemann, Florian, Die Handlungsform der interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung: Eine Untersuchung des Interorgansverhältnisses der europäischen Verfassung (Springer, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Beyme, Klaus, Der Gesetzgeber: Der Bundestag als Entscheidungszentrum (Westdeutscher Verlag, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, Gubernative Rechtsetzung: Eine Neubestimmung der Rechtsetzung und des Regierungssystems unter dem Grundgesetz in der Perspektive gemeineuropäischer Dogmatik (Mohr Siebeck, 2000).Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, “Parlamentarismus in Europa: eine Verfalls- oder Erfolgsgeschichte?” (2005) 130 Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 445.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, “Founding Principles,” in von Bogdandy, Armin and Bast, Jürgen (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law, 2nd ed. (Hart/C. H. Beck/Nomos, 2011).Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, “The European Lesson for International Democracy: The Significance of Articles 9–12 EU Treaty for International Organizations” (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, The Emergence of European Society through Public Law: A Hegelian and Anti-Schmittian Approach (Oxford University Press, 2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, Bogdanowicz, Piotr, Canor, Iris, Taborowski, Maciej and Schmidt, Matthias, “Guest Editorial: A Potential Constitutional Moment for the European Rule of Law – The Importance of Red Lines” (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 983.Google Scholar

von Münch, Ingo, “Anmerkungen zur Koalitionsdemokratie und ein Plädoyer für die Beendigung des Lagerdenkens” (2015) 46 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Voßkuhle, Andreas, “Opposition im Europäischen Parlament,” in Becker, Ulrich and others (eds.), Verfassung und Verwaltung in Europa: Festschrift für Jürgen Schwarze zum 70. Geburtstag (Nomos, 2014).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement (Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H., “Parlement européen, integration européenne, démocratie et légitimité,” in Louis, Jean-Victor and Waelbroeck, Denis (eds.), Le Parlement européen dans l’évolution institutionnelle, 2nd ed. (Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 1989).Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H., “European Democracy and Its Critics: Polity and System,” in The Constitution of Europe: “Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?” and Other Essays on European Integration (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H., “In defence of the Status Quo: Europe’s Constitutional Sonderweg,” in Weiler, J. H. H. and Wind, Marlene (eds.), European Constitutionalism Beyond the State (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H., “The Crumbling of European Democracy,” in Graber, Mark A., Levinson, Sanford and Tushnet, Mark (eds.), Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Weinstock, Daniel, “Compromise, Pluralism, and Deliberation” (2017) 20 Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westlake, Martin, “The Community Express Service: The Rapid Passage of Emergency Legislation on German Unification” (1991) 28 Common Market Law Review 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheare, K. C., “Walter Bagehot” (1974) 40 Proceedings of the British Academy 173.Google Scholar

Wieduwilt, Hendrik, “Viele heimliche Gesetzgeber: Für die Flut der Vorschriften sorgt längst nicht mehr nur der Bundestag,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 28 November 2018.Google Scholar

Wille, Emilio, “The Conciliation Procedure and the European Parliament’s Pursuit of Legislation Power” (1984) 49 Il Politico 489.Google Scholar

Willemsen, Roger, Das Hohe Haus: Ein Jahr im Parlament, 6th ed. (Fischer, 2016).Google Scholar

Williamson, David, “Conciliation Procedure in the European Law-Making Process” (2006) 12 Journal of Legislative Studies 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolak, Jennifer, Compromise in an Age of Party Polarization (Oxford University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yardley, Jim, “Has Europe Reached the Breaking Point?,” The New York Times Magazine, 15 December 2015.Google Scholar

Zanetti, Véronique, Spielarten des Kompromisses (Suhrkamp, 2022).Google Scholar

Ziller, Jacques, “Sdoppiamento funzionale e trappola della decisione congiunta nell’Unione europea,” in Colombo, Elisabetta (ed.), Le istituzioni e le idee. Studi indisciplinati offerti a Fabio Rugge per il suo settantesimo compleanno (Giuffrè, 2022).Google Scholar

Ziller, Jacques, Advanced Introduction to European Union Law (Edward Elgar, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zürn, Michael, “Democratic Governance beyond the Nation-State: The EU and Other International Institutions” (2000) 6 European Journal of International Relations 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar