Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Pronunciation Guide
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 On Being Tribal in the Malay World
- 3 Tribal People on the Southern Thai Border: Internal Colonialism, Minorities, and the State
- 4 Developing Indigenous Communities into Sakais: South Thailand and Riau
- 5 Organizing Orang Asli Identity
- 6 Traditional Alliances: Contact between the Semais and the Malay State in Pre-modern Perak
- 7 Forest People, Conservation Boundaries, and the Problem of “Modernity” in Malaysia
- 8 Engaging the Spirits of Modernity: The Temiars
- 9 Against the Kingdom of the Beast: Semai Theology, Pre-Aryan Religion, and the Dynamics of Abjection
- 10 Culture Contact and Semai Cultural Identity
- 11 “We People Belong in the Forest”: Chewong Re-creations of Uniqueness and Separateness
- 12 Singapore's Orang Seletar, Orang Kallang, and Orang Selat: The Last Settlements
- 13 Orang Suku Laut Identity: The Construction of Ethnic Realities
- 14 Tribality and Globalization: The Orang Suku Laut and the “Growth Triangle” in a Contested Environment
- 15 The Orang Petalangan of Riau and their Forest Environment
- 16 Inter-group Relations in North Sumatra
- 17 State Policy, Peasantization and Ethnicity: Changes in the Karo Area of Langkat in Colonial Times
- 18 Visions of the Wilderness on Siberut in a Comparative Southeast Asian Perpective
- 19 Defining Wildness and Wilderness: Minangkabau Images and Actions on Siberut (West Sumatra)
- 20 Gender and Ethnic Identity among the Lahanans of Sarawak
- Index
11 - “We People Belong in the Forest”: Chewong Re-creations of Uniqueness and Separateness
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2017
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Pronunciation Guide
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 On Being Tribal in the Malay World
- 3 Tribal People on the Southern Thai Border: Internal Colonialism, Minorities, and the State
- 4 Developing Indigenous Communities into Sakais: South Thailand and Riau
- 5 Organizing Orang Asli Identity
- 6 Traditional Alliances: Contact between the Semais and the Malay State in Pre-modern Perak
- 7 Forest People, Conservation Boundaries, and the Problem of “Modernity” in Malaysia
- 8 Engaging the Spirits of Modernity: The Temiars
- 9 Against the Kingdom of the Beast: Semai Theology, Pre-Aryan Religion, and the Dynamics of Abjection
- 10 Culture Contact and Semai Cultural Identity
- 11 “We People Belong in the Forest”: Chewong Re-creations of Uniqueness and Separateness
- 12 Singapore's Orang Seletar, Orang Kallang, and Orang Selat: The Last Settlements
- 13 Orang Suku Laut Identity: The Construction of Ethnic Realities
- 14 Tribality and Globalization: The Orang Suku Laut and the “Growth Triangle” in a Contested Environment
- 15 The Orang Petalangan of Riau and their Forest Environment
- 16 Inter-group Relations in North Sumatra
- 17 State Policy, Peasantization and Ethnicity: Changes in the Karo Area of Langkat in Colonial Times
- 18 Visions of the Wilderness on Siberut in a Comparative Southeast Asian Perpective
- 19 Defining Wildness and Wilderness: Minangkabau Images and Actions on Siberut (West Sumatra)
- 20 Gender and Ethnic Identity among the Lahanans of Sarawak
- Index
Summary
Although clear trends towards an ever-increasing involvement in the money economy and the consumer culture were discernible among the Chewong in 1991, they have recently taken a cultural choice to reverse the process and return to their old way of life. Their decisions and actions present a challenge to much contemporary thinking that holds processes of modernization and globalization to be irreversible. At the same time, it could be argued that the Chewong actions may be interpreted as an instance whereby the processes of globalization have resulted in a new self-consciousness about the meaning and value of social life. In this chapter, I shall try to elicit some reasons that may help explain the Chewong choice. This will involve an examination of the deeper meanings of sociality.
As a result of maintaining a relationship with the Chewong over a period of almost twenty years, I have come to revise some earlier interpretations about their understanding of their reality, their environmental orientations, and their cultural values regarding self and others. I shall suggest that concepts about descent and locality are major semantic keys to understanding their exploitation of the forest. I shall further argue that they operate a form of kin- based “ownership” over land areas. This does not correspond easily to Western notions of ownership in the sense that it is not exclusive, not delineated, not individually owned and may not be alienated. I return to this below.
CRITERIA FOR US AND THEM
In cases where social groups place high value on their uniqueness, it is important to examine reasons for such a desire as well as the criteria employed to maintain and re-create a separate identity. My argument as regards the Chewong is that their ontological and epistemological orientations are intrinsically tied to their societal identity. This identity is constituted in relation to two other societal categories with whom they interact: the radical others of Malays and Chinese, and the intermediate others of neighbouring “forest people” (bi? brәte?) groups. The last groups are those designated as Orang Asli by the outside world.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Tribal Communities in the Malay WorldHistorical, Cultural and Social Perspectives, pp. 254 - 272Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 2002