Book contents
- The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
- Reviews
- The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Changing the Status Quo in Nuclear Arms Control Law: The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons 2017
- 2 Adopting the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons 2017: A New Dawn, a New Deal, a New Direction in Nuclear Disarmament Law?
- 3 Humanitarian Nuclear Disarmament: Challenging the Status Quo through New Approaches to Legal Process, Purpose and Provisions
- 4 Legal Congruence with Existing Treaty Obligations: Toward Complementary or Competing Interests?
- 5 Customary International Law, Opinio Juris and State Practice Regarding the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons 2017: Toward Universality?
- 6 Treaty Safeguards, Verification and Implementation: A Simple-Ban Approach and a Need for Oversight
- 7 Nuclear Deterrence Policies and the Prohibition Treaty: Disarmament Considerations
- 8 Nuclear Defense Doctrines: Disarmament and Emerging Humanitarian Concerns
- 9 Competition, Fragmentation and Polarization: A Bifurcated International Legal Infrastructure Regarding the Nuclear Architecture and Regulation?
- 10 Stigmatization-Action and Changing Global Perceptions to Delegitimize and Eliminate Nuclear Weapons
- 11 Toward Neo-Universalism: Toward a New Reality in International Law?
- 12 Obligations Erga Omnes: The Missing Link for Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament Compliance
- 13 The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons within the Nuclear Nonproliferation and Security Architecture in International Law: From Grand Bargain to Grand Challenges with the Right to Nuclear Peace and Freedom from Nuclear Fear: Summaries and Conclusions
- Index
6 - Treaty Safeguards, Verification and Implementation: A Simple-Ban Approach and a Need for Oversight
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2021
- The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
- Reviews
- The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Changing the Status Quo in Nuclear Arms Control Law: The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons 2017
- 2 Adopting the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons 2017: A New Dawn, a New Deal, a New Direction in Nuclear Disarmament Law?
- 3 Humanitarian Nuclear Disarmament: Challenging the Status Quo through New Approaches to Legal Process, Purpose and Provisions
- 4 Legal Congruence with Existing Treaty Obligations: Toward Complementary or Competing Interests?
- 5 Customary International Law, Opinio Juris and State Practice Regarding the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons 2017: Toward Universality?
- 6 Treaty Safeguards, Verification and Implementation: A Simple-Ban Approach and a Need for Oversight
- 7 Nuclear Deterrence Policies and the Prohibition Treaty: Disarmament Considerations
- 8 Nuclear Defense Doctrines: Disarmament and Emerging Humanitarian Concerns
- 9 Competition, Fragmentation and Polarization: A Bifurcated International Legal Infrastructure Regarding the Nuclear Architecture and Regulation?
- 10 Stigmatization-Action and Changing Global Perceptions to Delegitimize and Eliminate Nuclear Weapons
- 11 Toward Neo-Universalism: Toward a New Reality in International Law?
- 12 Obligations Erga Omnes: The Missing Link for Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament Compliance
- 13 The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons within the Nuclear Nonproliferation and Security Architecture in International Law: From Grand Bargain to Grand Challenges with the Right to Nuclear Peace and Freedom from Nuclear Fear: Summaries and Conclusions
- Index
Summary
The success of any arms control treaty generally depends on its ability to achieve its primary objectives and intended outcomes. At the heart of measuring such success are effective compliance criteria and verification mechanisms. This includes the ability to apply metrics to assess tangible outcomes and measurable outputs and benchmarks of achievement, including on-site visits. In relation to nuclear issues, this also means that verification of both the non-diversion of nuclear material from declared peaceful activities (i.e., correctness of conduct), and the absence of undeclared or clandestine nuclear activities in a particular state (i.e., completeness in following treaty terms).
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear WeaponsLegal Challenges for Military Doctrines and Deterrence Policies, pp. 135 - 167Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021