Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:31:47.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Psychiatrists, Soldiers, and Officers in Italy During the Great War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2009

Mark S. Micale
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Paul Lerner
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

In each of the belligerent countries of the Great War, military trauma, emotional suffering, and daily exposure to violence and death caused mental distress beyond all expectations. Psychiatrists in each country were called on to observe, select, and cure, and were forced to re-examine their views of mental illness in light of the war experiences. Italian psychiatrists, who since 1915 had taken a unified stance in favor of intervention, held positions of authority during the war both within the military and in society as a whole: Augusto Tamburini, president of the psychiatric society, was in charge of the neuropsychiatric service in the army; Leonardo Bianchi, professor of psychiatry in Naples, was minister without portfolio responsible for the coordination of war health services; and Enrico Morselli headed an important section of the Union of Italian Doctors for National Resistance.

The Italian debate on the nature and treatment of war neuroses was directly influenced by the role of psychiatry in national mobilization, by the tendencies that dominated psychiatric thought and practice, and also by the social and political tensions caused by the war. Italy, of course, was the only Western European country to enter the war without mass consensus; indeed, the war, although fought with persistent aggression until the end of 1917, never met with support from the Italian people, who maintained a consistently hostile attitude. Italy's intervention was, in fact, forced on the country by a small political elite that sought economic and territorial expansion and the restoration of domestic authoritarianism.

Type
Chapter
Information
Traumatic Pasts
History, Psychiatry, and Trauma in the Modern Age, 1870–1930
, pp. 222 - 252
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×