Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T22:36:59.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Seven - The Anti-Impunity Transnational Legal Order for Human Rights

Formation, Institutionalization, Consequences, and the Case of Darfur

from Part III - Transnational Legal Ordering and International Crimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

By
Joachim J. Savelsberg
Edited by
Gregory Shaffer  and
Ely Aaronson
Gregory Shaffer
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Ely Aaronson
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the formation of a new anti-impunity Transnational Legal Order (TLO), its institutionalization, and its consequences. Socio-legal scholarship and recent research on responses to the mass violence unfolding in the Darfur region of Sudan, beginning in 2003, provide insights into strengths and limits of the new anti-impunity TLO. Based on a comparative eight-country study, involving in depth interviews in four social fields (human rights, diplomacy, humanitarian aid, media) and an analysis of 3,387 media reports, I review judicial steps taken on Darfur, conditions supporting them, and their consequences, interpreting them in terms of the transnational legal ordering approach. The case of Darfur shows the anti-impunity TLO at work, displaying it as a force that delegitimizes mass violence. Yet, it also shows impediments to institutionalization in the form of hostile state actors, fields with potentially competing agendas, including diplomacy and humanitarian aid, internal contradictions, and lack of enforcement power. Nation-level forces filter cultural effects of intervention, resulting in diminished concordance between the international and the global realms and across nation states.

Keywords

Anti-impunityjustice cascadeInternational Criminal Court (ICC)mass violencegenocideDarfurcultural consequences of anti-impunity lawsdiplomacyhumanitarian aidglobalization
Type
Chapter
Information
Transnational Legal Ordering of Criminal Justice , pp. 205 - 233
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, , J. C. 2004. “On the Social Construction of Moral Universals: The ‘Holocaust’ from War Crime to Trauma Drama.” Pp. 196–263 in Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, edited by Alexander, J. C. et al. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annan, Kofi. 2004. Speech before the United Nations General Assembly. April 7, 2004.Google Scholar
Bergsmo, Morten, Mark, Klamberg, Kjersti, Lohne and Mahony, Chris, eds., 2020. Power in International Criminal Justice: Towards a Sociology of International Justice. Oslo: TOAEP.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Judicial Field.” The Hastings Law Journal 38: 805–853.Google Scholar
Cohen, Stanley. 2001. States of Denial. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Engle, Karen. 2016. “A Genealogy of the Criminal Turn in Human Rights.” In Anti-impunity and the Human Rights Agenda, edited by Engle, Karen, Miller, Zinaida, and Davis, D. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, and Savelsberg, Joachim J.. 2006. “Introduction: Global Processes, National Institutions, Local Bricolage: Shaping Law in an Era of Globalization.” Law and Social Inquiry 31: 513–519.Google Scholar
Giesen, Bernhard. 2004. Triumph and Trauma. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Golden, Shannon. 2013. After Atrocity: Community Reconstruction in Northern Uganda. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Hagan, John. 2003. Justice in the Balkans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence, and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015a. “Transnational Legal Orders.” In Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence and Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence, and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015b. “Researching Transnational Legal Orders.” In Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence and Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ICID (International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur). 2005. Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. www.un.org/news/dh/sudan/com_inq_darfur.pdf.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran. 2015. Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, and Simmons, Beth A.. 2016. “Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?” International Organization 70(3): 443–475.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret. E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Hunjoon, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2010. “Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries.” International Studies Quarterly 54(4): 939–963.Google Scholar
Levi, Ron, and Hagan, John, with the collaboration of Dezalay, Sara, eds. 2008. Pacifier et Punir, special issues of Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 173 and 174.Google Scholar
Levy, Daniel, and Sznaider, Natan. 2010. Human Rights and Memory: Essays on Human Rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
McElrath, Suzy. 2020. The Global Criminalization of Genocide, 1948–2015. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1918. “The Psychology of Punitive Justice.” American Journal of Sociology 23(5): 577–602.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens. 2006. “Conspiracy in International Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2(1): 341–357.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens. 2014. “The Evolution of the Office of the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court: Insights from Institutional Theory.” In The First Global Prosecutor, edited by Minow, Martha, Whiting, Alex, and True-Frost., Cora Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. 2016. “From Aggression to Atrocity: Rethinking the History of International Criminal Law.” Oxford Handbook of International Criminal Law, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2805952.Google Scholar
Neier, Aryeh. 2012. The International Human Rights Movement: A History. Human Rights and Crimes against Humanity, Book 14. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe, and Selznick, Philip. 1978. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
Pensky, M. 2008. “Amnesty on Trial: Impunity, Accountability, and the Norms of International Law.” Ethics and Global Politics 1(1–2): 1–40.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N. 2005. The Pinochet Effect: Transnational Justice in the Age of Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Rome Statute. 1998. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. http://legal.un.org/icc/statute/99_corr/cstatute.htm.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 1992. “Law That Does Not Fit Society: Sentencing Guidelines as a Neoclassical Reaction to the Dilemmas of Substantivized Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1346–1381.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 1994. “Knowledge, Domination, and Criminal Punishment.” American Journal of Sociology 99(4): 911–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 2015. Representing Mass Violence: Conflicting Responses to Human Rights Violations in Darfur. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 2017. Max Weber’s Formal and Substantive Rationality: Tensions in International Law. Pp. 493–510 in Recht als Kultur? Beiträge zu Max Webers Soziologie des Rechts. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. 2020. “The Representational Power of International Criminal Courts.” In Power in International Criminal Justice: Towards a Sociology of International Justice, edited by Bergsma, Morten and Lohne, Kjersti. Oslo: TOAEP.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. forthcoming. “Media and Transitional Justice.” In The Oxford Handbook of Transitional Justice, edited by Douglas, Lawrence, Hinton, Alexander, and Meierhenrich, Jens. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J., and King, Ryan D.. 2011. American Memories: Atrocities and the Law. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J., and Suzy, McElrath. 2018. “Human Rights and Penal Policy.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia for Criminology and Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J., and Brehm, Holly Nyseth. 2015. “Representing Human Rights Violations in Darfur: Global Justice, National Distinctions.” American Journal of Sociology 121(2): 564–603.Google Scholar
Scheffer, David. 2012. All the Missing Souls: A Personal History of the War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Seekers of Truth and Justice. 2003. The Black Book. n.p.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2016. “Theorizing Transnational Legal Ordering.” Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 12: 231–253.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip. 2008. Punishment and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie. 2004. “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security 28(3): 5–44.Google Scholar
Stryker, Robin. 1989. “Limits on Technocratization of Law.” American Sociological Review 54: 341–358.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. 1976. Law in Modern Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Vilmer, Jean-Baptiste Jeangène. 2015. La Responsabilité de Protéger. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×