Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:54:02.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Escaping the Gender Trap: Young Women's Transition into Nontraditional Occupations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2009

By
Marlis Buchmann  and
Irene Kriesi
Edited by
Ingrid Schoon  and
Rainer K. Silbereisen
Ingrid Schoon
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London
Rainer K. Silbereisen
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Despite the fact that women have gained much in terms of educational attainment in recent decades in Switzerland, their occupational opportunities still lag far behind those of men. A major factor that accounts for the inequalities between the sexes in the Swiss labor market is occupational sex-segregation (Buchmann & Kriesi, 2008; Charles, 2005a; Charles & Grusky, 2004). The unequal distribution of men and women between occupations is to a large degree responsible for women's lower pay, lower upward-mobility chances, and fewer opportunities for continuous training and tertiary-level further education (Buchmann, Sacchi, Lamprecht, & Stamm, 2007). Occupational sex-segregation has been revealed as a highly stable phenomenon (Buchmann & Kriesi, 2008 Charles, 2005a; Gottschall, 1995). Women continue to choose from a narrow range of occupations and crowd into a few female-dominated occupations characterized by inferior rewards and prospects (Brown, Eisenberg, & Sawilowsky, 1997).

This raises the question of how young women manage to avoid the “gender trap” at the time when they are selecting educational programs and making career choices. In particular, we need to better understand what supports women in choosing non-female-typed occupations (i.e., the incumbents of which are either predominantly men or equally men and women). Typical examples are journalists, photographers, legal professionals, and medical doctors, to name just a few. In contrast, the incumbents of female-typed occupations are predominantly women (e.g., office clerks, primary school teachers, nurses, and sales workers).

Type
Chapter
Information
Transitions from School to Work
Globalization, Individualization, and Patterns of Diversity
 , pp. 193 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Social-learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Boylard, M. (2005). Gender differences in the occupational choices of high-achieving college students. Stony Brook: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Brown, M. T., Eisenberg, A. I., & Sawilowsky, S. S. (1997). Traditionality and the discriminating effect of expectations of occupational success and occupational values for women within math-oriented fields. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 418–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, B. K., Zvonkovic, A. M., & Reynolds, P. (2006). Parenting in relation to child and adolescent vocational development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchmann, M., & Fend, H. (2004). Context and competence: Swiss longitudinal survey of children and youth research proposal. Bern: Swiss National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Buchmann, M., & Kriesi, I. (2008). Feminisierung der Arbeitswelt. In Larcher, S. & Grubenmann, B. (Eds.), Tagesstrukturen (pp. 51–64), Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
Buchmann, M., & Sacchi, S. (1998). The transition from school to work in Switzerland: Do characteristics of the educational system and class barriers matter? In Shavit, Y. & Müller, W. (Eds.), From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations (pp. 407–442). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Buchmann, M., Sacchi, S., Lamprecht, M., & Stamm, H. (2007). Tertiary education expansion and social inequality in Switzerland. In Shavit, Y., Arum, R., Gamoran, A., & Menahem, G. (Eds.), Stratification in higher education: A comparative study (pp. 321–348). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, M. (2005a). Entwicklung der beruflichen Segregation nach Geschlecht und nach Staatsangehörigkeit in der Schweiz, 1970–2000. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik.Google Scholar
Charles, M. (2005b). National skill regimes, postindustrialism, and sex segregation. Social Politics, 12, 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M., & Buchmann, M. (1994). Assessing micro-level explanations of occupational sex segregation: Human-capital development and labour market opportunities in Switzerland. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 20, 595–620.Google Scholar
Charles, M., & Grusky, D. B. (2004). Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career-choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correll, S. J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryler, H. (1998). Parental role models, gender and educational choice. British Journal of Sociology, 49, 375–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women's achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Alder, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In Eisenberg, N. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Volume III (pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Epstein, C. (1988). Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender, and the social order. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fend, H., Berger, F., & Grob, U. (2008). Lebensverläufe und Lebensbewältigung von der späten Kindheit ins Erwachsenalter. 1527 “Lebensgeschichten.” Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Glass, J. (1990). The impact of occupational sex segregation on working conditions. Social Forces, 68, 779–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S., & Lapan, R. T. (1997). Assessing gender-based circumscription of occupational aspirations. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschall, K. (1995). Geschlechterverhältnis und Arbeitsmarktsegregation. In Becker-Schmidt, R. & Knapp, G. (Eds.), Das Geschlechterverhältnis als Gegenstand der Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 125–162). Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verlag.Google Scholar
Heinz, W. R. (1984). Der Übergang von der Schule in den Beruf als Selbstsozialisation. Bremen: Universität Bremen.Google Scholar
Heinz, W. R., Kelle, U., & Witzel, A. (1998). Vocational training and career development in Germany: Results from a longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, W., Neuenschwander, M. P., & Wannack, E. (2006). Berufswahlprozess. Wie sich Jugendliche auf ihren Beruf vorbereiten. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. A. (1989). Revolving doors: Sex segregation and women's careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ji, P. Y., Lapan, R. T., & Tate, K. (2004). Vocational interests and career efficacy expectations in relation to occupational sex-typing beliefs for eighth grade students. Journal of Career Development, 31, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, H. (1991). Doing gender: Geschlecht als Statuszuweisung im Berufsbildungssystem. In Brock, D., Hantsche, B., Kühnlein, G., Meulemann, H., & Schober, K. (Eds.), Übergänge in den Beruf. Zwischenbilanz zum Forschungsstand, (pp. 136–169). München: DJI Verlag Deutsches Jugendinstitut.Google Scholar
Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mau, W. C. J., Domnick, M., & Ellsworth, R. (1995). Characteristics of students who aspire to science and engineering or homemaking occupations. The Career Development Quarterly, 43, 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, H. M., & Kalin, R. (1994). Congruence between self-image and occupational stereotypes in students entering gender-dominated occupations. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science-Revue, 26, 142–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe-Kleberg, U. (1987). Frauenberufe – Zur Segmentierung der Berufswelt. Bielefeld: B. Kleine Verlag.Google Scholar
Scharmann, T. (1965). Jugend in Arbeit und Beruf. München: Juventa.Google Scholar
Schnabel, K. U., Alfeld, C., Eccles, J. S., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2002). Parental influence on students' educational choices in the United States and Germany: Different ramification – same effect? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 178–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoon, I., & Parsons, S. (2002). Teenage aspirations for future careers and occupational outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 262–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solga, H., & Konietzka, D. (2000). Das Berufsprinzip des deutschen Arbeitsmarktes: Ein geschlechtsneutraler Allokationsmechanismus? Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 26, 111–147.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, J., & Barling, J. (1996). Influence of maternal gender-role beliefs and role satisfaction on daughters' vocational interests. Sex Roles, 34, 637–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 282–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vondracek, F. W., Lerner, R. M., & Schulenberg, J. E. (1986). Career development: A life-span developmental approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. H. (1998). Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 CFT 20. Braunschweig: Westermann.Google Scholar
Wiegfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Q., Valiente, C., & Eisenberg, N. (2003). Empathy and its measurement. In Lopez, S. J. & Snyder, C. R. (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 269–284). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×