Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-8cg97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-19T11:15:47.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 27 - Selection of Patients for Carotid Intervention

from Section 5 - Secondary Prevention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2018

Gary K. K. Lau ,
Sarah T. Pendlebury  and
Peter M. Rothwell
Gary K. K. Lau
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Sarah T. Pendlebury
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Peter M. Rothwell
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
Diagnosis, Investigation and Treatment
 , pp. 399 - 418
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ascher, E, Markevich, N, Hingorani, A et al. (2002). Pseudo-occlusions of the internal carotid artery: A rationale for treatment on the basis of a modified duplex scan protocol. Journal of Vascular Surgery 35:340–350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, HJM, Taylor, DW, Eliasziw, M for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1998). Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine 339:1415–1425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benade, MM, Warlow, CP (2002). Cost of identifying patients for carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 33:435–439Google Scholar
Bermann, SS, Devine, JJ, Erdos, LS et al. (1995). Distinguishing carotid artery pseudo-occlusion with colour-flow Doppler. Stroke 26:434–438Google Scholar
Blaser, T, Hofmann, K, Buerger, T et al. (2002). Risk of stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and vessel occlusion before endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. Stroke 33:1057–1062Google Scholar
Boiten, J, Rothwell, PM, Slattery, J for the European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1996). Lacunar stroke in the European Carotid Surgery Trial: Risk factors, distribution of carotid stenosis, effect of surgery and type of recurrent stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 6:281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, R, Narayan, S, Rothwell, PM et al. (2002). Clinical and radiological risk factors for operative stroke and death in the European Carotid Surgery Trial. European Journal of Vascular Endovascular Surgery 23:108–116Google Scholar
Bond, R, Rerkasem, K, Rothwell, PM (2003). A systematic review of the risks of carotid endarterectomy in relation to the clinical indication and the timing of surgery. Stroke 34:2290–2301Google Scholar
Bond, R, Rerkasem, K, Cuffe, R et al. (2005). A systematic review of the associations between age and sex and the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy. Cerebrovascular Diseases 20:69–77Google Scholar
Eckstein, H, Schumacher, H, Klemm, K et al. (1999). Emergency carotid endarterectomy. Cerebrovascular Diseases 9:270–281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eliasziw, M, Streifler, JY, Fox, AJ for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (1994). Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke 25:304–308Google Scholar
European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1998). Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: Final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 351:1379–1387Google Scholar
Fairhead, JF, Rothwell, PM (2005). The need for urgency in identification and treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis is already established. Cerebrovascular Diseases 19:355–358Google Scholar
Ferguson, GG, Eliasziw, M, Barr, HWK for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Collaborators (1999). The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: Surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke 30:1751–1758Google Scholar
Goldstein, LB, McCrory, DC, Landsman, PB et al. (1994). Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for carotid endarterectomy in patients with ipsilateral symptoms. Stroke 25:1116–1121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golledge, J, Cuming, R, Beattie, DK et al. (1996). Influence of patient-related variables on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Vascular Surgery 24:120–126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, RM, McNamara, J (1987). Optimal resources for carotid endarterectomy. Surgery 102:743–748Google Scholar
Inzitari, D, Eliasziw, M, Gates, P for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Group (2000). The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine 342:1693–1700Google Scholar
Johnston, DC, Goldstein, LB (2001). Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: Non-invasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Neurology 56: 1009–1015Google Scholar
Kucey, DS, Bowyer, B, Iron, K et al. (1998). Determinants of outcome after carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Vascular Surgery 28:1051–1058Google Scholar
Lovett, JK, Coull, A, Rothwell, PM on behalf of the Oxford Vascular Study (2004). Early risk of recurrent stroke by aetiological subtype: Implications for stroke prevention. Neurology 62:569–574Google Scholar
MacKinnon, AD, Aaslid, R, Markus, HS (2005). Ambulatory transcranial Doppler cerebral embolic signal detection in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 36:1726–1730Google Scholar
Markus, HS, MacKinnon, A (2005). Asymptomatic embolization detected by Doppler ultrasound predicts stroke risk in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 36:971–975Google Scholar
Mayberg, MR, Wilson, E, Yatsu, F for the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group (1991). Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischaemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Journal of the American Medical Association 266:3289–3294Google Scholar
McCrory, DC, Goldstein, LB, Samsa, GP et al. (1993). Predicting complications of carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 24:1285–1291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mead, GE, Lewis, SC, Wardlaw, JM, Dennis, MS, Warlow, CP (2000). Severe ipsilateral carotid stenosis in lacunar ischaemic stroke: Innocent bystanders? Journal of Neurology 249:266–271Google Scholar
Molloy, J, Markus, HS (1999). Asymptomatic embolization predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 30:1440–1443Google Scholar
Morgenstern, LB, Fox, AJ, Sharpe, BL et al. for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group (1997). The risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in patients with near occlusion of the carotid artery. Neurology 48:911–915Google Scholar
Morris, S, Patel, NV, Dobson, J et al. (2016). Cost-utility analysis of stenting versus endarterectomy in the International Carotid Stenting Study. International Journal of Stroke 11:446–453Google Scholar
Norris, J, Rothwell, PM (2001). Noninvasive carotid imaging to select patients for endarterectomy: Is it really safer than conventional angiography? Neurology 56:990–991Google Scholar
Pell, JP, Slack, R, Dennis, M et al. (2003). Improvements in carotid endarterectomy in Scotland: Results of a national prospective survey. Scottish Medical Journal 49:53–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritz, MB (1997). Timing of carotid endarterectomy after stroke. Stroke 28:2563–2567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rantner, B, Pavelka, M, Posch, L, Schmidauer, C, Fraedrich, G (2005). Carotid endarterectomy after ischemic stroke: Is there a justification for delayed surgery? European Journal of Vascular Endovascular Surgery 30:36–40Google Scholar
Riles, TS, Imparato, AM, Jacobowitz, GR et al. (1994). The cause of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Vascular Surgery 19:206–216Google Scholar
Rodgers, H, Oliver, SE, Dobson, R et al. (2000). A regional collaborative audit of the practice and outcome of carotid endarterectomy in the United Kingdom. Northern Regional Carotid Endarterectomy Audit Group. European Journal of Vascular Endovascular Surgery 19:362–369Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM (2004). ACST: Which subgroups will benefit most from carotid endarterectomy? Lancet 364:1122–1123Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM (2005). Risk modelling to identify patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis most at risk of stroke. Neurology Research 27(Suppl 1):S18–S28Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Gibson, RJ, Slattery, J et al. (1994). Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis: A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. Stroke 25:2435–2439Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Slattery, J, Warlow, CP (1996). A systematic comparison of the risk of stroke and death due to carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis. Stroke 27:266–269Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Slattery, J, Warlow, CP (1997). Clinical and angiographic predictors of stroke and death from carotid endarterectomy: Systematic review. British Medical Journal 315:1571–1577Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Warlow, CP on behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1999a). Interpretation of operative risks of individual surgeons. Lancet 353:1325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothwell, PM, Warlow, CP on behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1999b). Prediction of benefit from carotid endarterectomy in individual patients: A risk modelling study. Lancet 353:2105–2110Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Warlow, CP on behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2000a). Low risk of ischaemic stroke in patients with reduced internal carotid artery lumen diameter distal to severe symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 31:622–630Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Gibson, R, Warlow, CP on behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2000b). Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischaemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 31:615–621Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Pendlebury, ST, Wardlaw, J et al. (2000c). Critical appraisal of the design and reporting of studies of imaging and measurement of carotid stenosis. Stroke 31:1444–1450Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Gutnikov, SA, Warlow, CP for the ECST (2003a). Re-analysis of the final results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial. Stroke 34:514–523Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Gutnikov, SA, Eliasziw, M et al. for the Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaboration (2003b). Pooled analysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 361:107–116Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Eliasziw, M, Gutnikov, SA for the Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists Collaboration (2004a). Effect of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and to the timing of surgery. Lancet 363:915–924Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Gutnikov, SA, Eliasziw, M et al. (2004b). Sex difference in effect of time from symptoms to surgery on benefit from endarterectomy for transient ischaemic attack and non-disabling stroke. Stroke 35:2855–2861Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Mehta, Z, Howard, SC et al. (2005). From subgroups to individuals: General principles and the example of carotid endartectomy. Lancet 365:256–265Google Scholar
Smurawska, LT, Bowyer, B, Rowed, D et al. (1998). Changing practice and costs of carotid endarterectomy in Toronto, Canada. Stroke 29:2014–2017Google Scholar
Sundt, TM, Sandok, BA, Whisnant, JP (1975). Carotid endarterectomy. Complications and preoperative assessment of risk. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 50:301–306Google ScholarPubMed
Terent, A, Marke, LA, Asplund, K et al. (1994). Costs of stroke in Sweden. A national perspective. Stroke 25:2363–2369Google Scholar
Turnbull, RG, Taylor, DC, Hsiang, YN et al. (2000). Assessment of patient waiting times for vascular surgery. Canadian Journal of Surgery 43:105–111Google Scholar
Welsh, S, Mead, G, Chant, H et al. (2004). Early carotid surgery in acute stroke: A multicentre randomized pilot study. Cerebrovascular Disease 18:200–205Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×