Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Plates
- List of Figures
- Notes on Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Disclaimer
- 1 Making Trade Multilateralism Work for All: The Role of WTO Accessions
- PART I WTO Accessions and the New Trade Multilateralism
- PART II Negotiators’ Perspectives on the WTO Accession Process
- PART III Accessions Acquis: Thematic Perspectives and Implementation Challenges
- 13 How Post-TRIPS Negotiations Reframe the ‘Trade-Related Aspects’ of Intellectual Property after TRIPS: The Lessons of WTO Accessions
- 14 Competition Policy in WTO Accessions: Filling in the Blanks in the International Trading System
- 15 Geographical Indications in the Accessions Landscape
- 16 WTO Accession Commitments on Agriculture: Lessons for WTO Rule-Making
- 17 The WTO-Plus Obligations: Dual Class or a Strengthened System?
- 18 Accession Protocols and the Private Sector
- 19 Post-Accession Support Platform
- 20 Conclusion: Trade Multilateralism - Enhancing Flexibility, Preserving the Momentum
- Contributor Biographies
- Index
- References
17 - The WTO-Plus Obligations: Dual Class or a Strengthened System?
from PART III - Accessions Acquis: Thematic Perspectives and Implementation Challenges
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2017
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Plates
- List of Figures
- Notes on Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Disclaimer
- 1 Making Trade Multilateralism Work for All: The Role of WTO Accessions
- PART I WTO Accessions and the New Trade Multilateralism
- PART II Negotiators’ Perspectives on the WTO Accession Process
- PART III Accessions Acquis: Thematic Perspectives and Implementation Challenges
- 13 How Post-TRIPS Negotiations Reframe the ‘Trade-Related Aspects’ of Intellectual Property after TRIPS: The Lessons of WTO Accessions
- 14 Competition Policy in WTO Accessions: Filling in the Blanks in the International Trading System
- 15 Geographical Indications in the Accessions Landscape
- 16 WTO Accession Commitments on Agriculture: Lessons for WTO Rule-Making
- 17 The WTO-Plus Obligations: Dual Class or a Strengthened System?
- 18 Accession Protocols and the Private Sector
- 19 Post-Accession Support Platform
- 20 Conclusion: Trade Multilateralism - Enhancing Flexibility, Preserving the Momentum
- Contributor Biographies
- Index
- References
Summary
Abstract
Obligations in accession protocols that go beyond the multilateral trade agreements are commonly referred to as ‘WTO-plus’ obligations. This chapter reviews the so-called WTO-plus obligations and argues that even though they are perceived to expand the existing obligations under multilateral trade agreements, they in fact do not create two classes of membership within the World Trade Organization (WTO). First, all accession processes are conducted on a case-by-case basis, and thus result in different obligations for each acceding government. Second, the WTO legal system is evolving continuously; therefore, to adopt new rules and advance the legal system, obligations cannot remain the same as in previous accessions. Third, non-discrimination remains one of the fundamental principles of the multilateral trading system. Accessions to WTO follow this principle and hence WTO-plus obligations have been and will continue to be set on a non-discriminatory basis. At the same time, WTO-plus obligations help upgrade the rules-based multilateral trading system. They fill gaps in the WTO rules on anti-dumping, countervailing and safeguard regimes, and they advance WTO rules by promoting plurilateral agreements.
WTO-plus obligations represent specific obligations contained in accession protocols that are perceived to expand the existing obligations under multilateral trade agreements and go beyond the existing requirements (Qin, 2016). The term ‘WTO-plus obligations’ has been widely used in the literature and addressed by trade negotiators. However, the content of such obligations is yet to be specifically and consensually defined by multilateral trade policy negotiators.
Unlike negotiations for accession to other international organizations, negotiations for accession to the WTO are open-ended. Article XII of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO Agreement) does not put any limit on the ‘terms to be agreed’ between acceding governments and WTO members, including obligations the acceding governments shall undertake. All members that joined the WTO through accession, in contrast to those General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) contracting parties which automatically became members of the WTO upon its creation in 1995, negotiated their terms and conditions of membership on a case-by-case basis, using the national legislation of each applicant as the starting point.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Trade Multilateralism in the Twenty-First CenturyBuilding the Upper Floors of the Trading System through WTO Accessions, pp. 357 - 368Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
- 1
- Cited by