We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Towards a Better Assessment of Pain and Suffering Damages for Personal Injuries Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 November 2017
Calculating pain and suffering damages due to personal injury is a difficult task. To achieve the goals of tort law, as those are stipulated both in legal theory and in law and economics scholarship, the method that should be used to perform this calculation should be able to account for the decrease in health and bodily integrity, as well as the duration of the injury suffered, in a predictable and consistent manner, and at the same time allow the judge to incorporate into her decision particular circumstances pertaining to the case at hand which may influence the amount awarded.
The previous chapter illustrated how a measure that is ‘state of the art’ in the domain of health economics, commonly used to inform the allocation of health care budgets and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of medical interventions, meets the requirements above and is thus well suited to provide a systematic basis for assessing pain and suffering damages. The use of QALYs in the calculation of pain and suffering damages allows the overall reduction in quality of life as a result of the diminution in health and bodily integrity as well as the age of the victim and the duration of injury to figure in the amounts awarded. The range of QALY values in turn allows judges to retain their discretion in choosing the correct value within the range that corresponds to the personal conditions and the specific circumstances of the case.
Besides these qualities, the current chapter suggests that using QALYs in the calculation of pain and suffering damages may have an additional advantage. Under the influence of insights from cognitive psychology, behavioral law and economics have proposed that victims (i.e. plaintiff s) as well as judges may make false predictions about the victims’ future subjective well-being. These false predictions are attributed to the psychological phenomena of hedonic adaptation neglect and the focusing illusion which can influence the calculation of pain and suffering damages and lead to awards that do not correctly reflect the loss of enjoyment of life of the victim due to the injury.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.