Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5f56664f6-287w5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T19:08:17.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Etho-Cebus Project: Stone-tool use by wild capuchin monkeys

from Part III - Ecology and culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

By
Elisabetta Visalberghi  and
Dorothy Fragaszy
Edited by
Crickette M. Sanz ,
Josep Call  and
Christophe Boesch
Elisabetta Visalberghi
Affiliation:
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
Dorothy Fragaszy
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Georgia
Crickette M. Sanz
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Josep Call
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Christophe Boesch
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Get access

Summary

Tool use, according to St Amant and Horton (2008: 1203), is the “exertion of control over a freely manipulable external object (the tool) with the goal of altering the physical properties of another object, substance, surface or medium (the target, which may be the tool user or another organism), via a dynamic mechanical interaction.” Among wild great apes, only chimpanzees use tools habitually, in many varied formats across their geographical distribution, and for diverse purposes (see McGrew, 1992; Yamakoshi, 2004 for a review; Boesch et al., 2009; and this volume). Tool use is observed much less often in wild Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii), and even more rarely in the other wild great apes (Western gorillas, Gorilla gorilla, and bonobos, Pan paniscus), though in captivity all the great ape species use tools spontaneously in flexible and diverse ways. Among monkeys, very few species use tools in natural settings (Macaca fascicularis: Malaivijitnond et al., 2007; Gumert et al., 2009; Cebuslibidinosus and C. xanthosternos: Canale et al., 2009; for a comprehensive review concerning the genus Cebus, see Ottoni & Izar, 2008), although many species occasionally use tools in captivity (for reviews, see Anderson, 1996; Panger, 2007; Bentley-Condit & Smith, 2010; Shumaker et al., 2011). Among monkeys, the capuchins (species belonging to the newly identified genus Sapajus) excel in all respects (Bentley-Condit & Smith, 2010) and their tool use fully fits St Amant and Horton’s (2008) definition.

Tool-using skills of captive capuchins were reported in Europe in the sixteenth century (see Visalberghi & Fragaszy, 2012), long before the first illustration of a Liberian chimpanzee digging for termites appeared in a stamp issued in 1906 (Whiten & McGrew, 2001) or reached the scientific community through the work of Jane Goodall (1964). However, first-hand published reports on tool use by wild capuchins are relatively recent. Fernandes (1991) published the very first account of direct observation of tool use. He observed a wild capuchin (Cebus apella) using a broken oyster shell to strike oysters still attached to the substrate and successfully breaking them open. Boinski (1988) observed a wild male white-faced capuchin (C. capucinus) hitting a snake with a branch obtained from nearby vegetation. These observations each concerned one individual and one event. Habitual tool use (i.e., by several individuals over a period of time) in wild capuchins has been discovered and investigated only in the present millennium.

Type
Chapter
Information
Tool Use in Animals
Cognition and Ecology
 , pp. 203 - 222
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams-Curtis, L. E. & Fragaszy, D. M. (1994). Development of manipulation in capuchin monkeys during the first six months. Developmental Psychobiology, 27, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1996). Chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys: comparative cognition. In Russon, A., Bard, K. & Parker, S. (eds.) Reaching into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes (pp. 23–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bentley-Condit, V. K. & Smith, E. O. (2010). Animal tool use: current definition and an updated comprehensive catalog. Behaviour, 174, 185–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. (1981). Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch, H. (1983). Optimisation of nut-cracking with natural hammers by wild chimpanzees. Behaviour, 83, 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch-Achermann, H. (2000). The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boesch, C., Head, J. & Robbins, M. M. (2009). Complex tool sets for honey extraction among chimpanzees in Loango National Park, Gabon. Journal of Human Evolution, 56, 560–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boinski, S. (1988). Use of a club by a wild white-faced capuchin (Cebus capucinus) to attack a venomous snake (Bothrops asper). American Journal of Primatology, 14, 177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. W. (2004). The manual skills and cognition that lie behind hominid tool use. In Russon, A. E. & Begun, D. R. (eds.) The Evolution of Thought: Evolutionary Origins of Great Ape Intelligence (pp. 31–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canale, G. R., Guidorizzi, C. E., Kierulff, M. C. M. & Gatto, C. A. F. R. (2009). First record of tool use by wild populations of the yellow-breasted capuchin monkey (Cebus xanthosternos) and new records for the bearded capuchin (Cebus libidinosus). American Journal of Primatology, 71(5), 366–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, S., Cunha, E., Sousa, C. & Matsuzawa, T. (2008). Chaînes opératoires and resource exploitation strategies in chimpanzee nut-cracking (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Human Evolution, 55, 148–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, S., Biro, D., McGrew, W. & Matsuzawa, T. (2009). Tool-composite reuse in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): archaeologically invisible steps in the technological evolution of early hominins?Animal Cognition, 12, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, I. & McGrew, W. C. (2005). Stone tools and the uniqueness of human culture. Royal Anthropological Institute, 11, 793–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, E. B. M. (1991). Tool use and predation of oysters (Crassostrea rhizophorae) by the tufted capuchin, Cebus apella apella, in brackish water mangrove swamp. Primates, 32, 529–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, R. G, Emidio, R. A. & Jerusalinsky, L. (2010). Three stones for three seeds: natural occurrence of selective tool use by capuchins (Cebus libidinosus) based on an analysis of the weight of stones found at nutting sites. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 270–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, E. A., van Schaik, C. P., Sitompul, A. & Wright, D. N. (2004). Intra and interpopulational differences in orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) activity and diet: implications for the invention of tool use. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 125, 162–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fragaszy, D. M. (1990). Sex and age differences in the organization of behavior in wedge-capped capuchins, Cebus olivaceus. Behavioral Ecology, 1, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M., Izar, P., Visalberghi, E., Ottoni, E. B. & de Oliveira, M. G. (2004a). Wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) use anvils and stone pounding tools. American Journal of Primatology, 64, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fragaszy, D. M., Visalberghi, E. & Fedigan, L. M. (2004b). The Complete Capuchin: The Biology of the Genus Cebus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M., Pickering, T., Liu, Q., et al. (2010). Bearded capuchin monkeys’ and a human’s efficiency at cracking palm nuts with stone tools: field experiments. Animal Behaviour, 79, 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, J. (1964). Tool-using and aimed throwing in a community of free-living chimpanzees. Nature, 201, 1264–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumert, M. D., Kluck, M. & Malaivijitnond, S. (2009). The physical characteristics and usage patterns of stone axe and pounding hammers used by long-tailed macaques in the Andaman Sea region of Thailand. American Journal of Primatology, 71, 594–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslam, M., Hernandez-Aguilar, A., Ling, V., et al. (2009). Primate archaeology. Nature, 460, 339–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inoue-Nakamura, N. & Matsuzawa, T. (1997). Development of stone tool use by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, G. L. (1984). The archaeology of human origins: studies of the lower Pleistocene in East Africa, 1971–1981. Advances in World Archaeology, 3, 1–86.Google Scholar
Key, C. & Ross, C. (1999). Sex differences in energy expenditure in non-human primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 2479–2480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langguth, A. & Alonso, C. (1997). Capuchin monkeys in the Caatinga: tool use and food habits during drought. Neotropical Primates, 5, 77–78.Google Scholar
Leighty, K. A., Byrne, G., Fragaszy, D. M. & Visalberghi, E. (2004). Twinning in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella): rate, survivorship, and weight gain. Folia Primatologica, 75(1), 14–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Q., Simpson, K., Izar, P., et al. (2009). Kinematics and energetics of nut-cracking in wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) in Piauí, Brazil. American Journal of Physical Primatology, 138, 210–220.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, Q., Fragaszy, D., Izar, P., Ottoni, E. & Visalberghi, E. (2011). Wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) place nuts in anvils selectively. Animal Behaviour, 81, 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdorf, E. V., Pusey, A. E. & Eberly, L. (2004). Sex differences in learning in chimpanzees. Nature, 428, 715–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch Alfaro, J., Boubli, J., Olson, L., et al. (2011). Explosive Pleistocene range expansion leads to widespread Amazonian sympatry between robust and gracile capuchin monkeys. Journal of Biogeography, 39(2), 272–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch Alfaro, J., Silva, J.de Sousa, & Rylands, A. (2012). How different are robust and gracile capuchin monkeys? An argument for the use of Sapajus and Cebus. American Journal of Primatology, 74, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaivijitnond, S., Lekprayoon, C., Tandavanittj, N., et al. (2007). Stone-tool usage by Thai long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). American Journal of Primatology, 69, 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannu, M. & Ottoni, E. B. (2009). The enhanced tool-kit of two groups of wild bearded capuchin monkeys in the Caatinga: tool making, associative use, and secondary tools. American Journal of Primatology, 71, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massaro, L., Liu, Q., Visalberghi, E. & Fragaszy, D. (2012). Wild bearded capuchina select hammer tools on the basis of both stone mass and distance from the anvil. Animal Cognition, 15, 1065–1074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsuzawa, T. (2001). Primate foundations of human intelligence: a view of tool use in nonhuman primates and fossil hominids. In Matsuzawa, T. (ed.) Primate Origins of Human Cognition and Behavior (pp. 3–25). Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, W. C. (1992). Chimpanzee Material Culture: Implications for Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercader, J., Panger, M. & Boesch, C. (2002). Excavation of a chimpanzee stone tool site in the African rainforest. Science, 296, 1452–1455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercader, J., Barton, H., Gillespie, J., et al. (2007). 4,300-year-old chimpanzee sites and the origins of percussive stone technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 3043–3048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meulman, E. J. M., Sanz, C. M., Visalberghi, E. & van Schaik, C. P. (2012). The role of terrestriality in promoting primate technology. Evolutionary Anthropology, 21, 58–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, L. (1997). Methods of assessing dietary intake: a case study from wedge-capped capuchins in Venezuela. Neotropical Primates, 5(4), 104–108.Google Scholar
Moura, A. C. A. & Lee, P. C. (2004). Capuchin stone tool use in Caatinga dry forest. Science, 306, 1909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ottoni, E. & Izar, P. (2008). Capuchin monkey tool use: overview and implications. Evolutionary Anthropology, 17, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panger, M. (2007). Tool use and cognition in primates. In Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M. & Bearder, S. K. (eds.) Primates in Perspective (pp. 665–677). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panger, M., Brooks, A., Richmond, B. G. & Wood, B. (2002). Older than the Oldowan? Rethinking the emergence of hominin tool use. Evolutionary Anthropology, 11, 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, R. (1991). Why the Oldowan? Plio-Pleistocene tool making and the transport of resources. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47, 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resende, B. D., Ottoni, E. B. & Fragaszy, D. M. (2008). Ontogeny of manipulative behavior and nut-cracking in young tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a perception-action perspective. Developmental Science, 11, 828–840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, J. G. (1986). Seasonal variation in use of time and space by the wedge-capped capuchin monkey Cebus olivaceus: implications for foraging theory. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 431, 1–60.Google Scholar
Rose, L. M. (1994). Sex differences in diet and foraging behavior in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). International Journal of Primatology, 15, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, K. & Lovejoy, C. O. (2008). The chimpanzee has no clothes: a critical examination of Pan troglodytes in models of human evolution. Current Anthropology, 49, 87–114.Google Scholar
Schrauf, C., Huber, L. & Visalberghi, E. (2008). Do capuchin monkeys use weight to select hammer tools?Animal Cognition, 11, 413–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shumaker, R., Walkup, K. & Beck, B. (2011). Animal Tool Behavior: The Use and Manufacture of Tools by Animals. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Spagnoletti, N. (2009). Tool use in a wild population of Cebus libidinosus in Piauí, Brazil. PhD thesis, University La Sapienza of Rome.
Spagnoletti, N., Izar, P. & Visalberghi, E. (2009). Tool use and terrestriality in wild bearded capuchin monkey (Cebus libidinosus). Folia Primatologica, 80, 142.Google Scholar
Spagnoletti, N., Visalberghi, E., Ottoni, E., Izar, P. & Fragaszy, D. (2011). Stone tool use by adult wild bearded capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus). Journal of Human Evolution, 61, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spagnoletti, N., Visalberghi, E., Verderane, M. P., et al. (2012). Stone tool use in wild bearded capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus): is it a strategy to overcome food scarcity?Animal Behaviour, 83, 1285–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amant, R. & Horton, T. E. (2008). Revisiting the definition of animal tool use. Animal Behavior, 75, 1199–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terborgh, J. (1983). Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Visalberghi, E. & Fragaszy, D. (2012). What is challenging about tool use? The capuchins’ perspective. In Zentall, T. R. & Wasserman, E. A. (eds.) Comparative Cognition: Experimental Explorations of Animal Intelligence (pp. 777–799). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Visalberghi, E., Fragaszy, D., Izar, P. & Ottoni, E. B. (2005). Terrestriality and tool use. Science, 308, 951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visalberghi, E., Fragaszy, D., Ottoni, E., et al. (2007). Characteristics of hammer stones and anvils used by wild bearded capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) to crack open palm nuts. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 132, 426–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visalberghi, E., Haslam, M., Spagnoletti, N. & Fragaszy, D. (submitted). Use of stone hammer tools and anvils by bearded capuchin monkeys over time and space: dynamic construction of an archeological record of tool use. Journal of Archaeological Science.
Visalberghi, E., Sabbatini, G., Spagnoletti, N., et al. (2008). Physical properties of palm fruits processed with tools by wild bearded capuchins (Cebus libidinosus). American Journal of Primatology, 70, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E., Spagnoletti, N., Ramos Da Silva, E., et al. (2009a). Distribution of potential hammers and transport of hammer tools and nuts by wild capuchin monkeys. Primates, 50, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visalberghi, E., Addessi, E., Spagnoletti, N., et al. (2009b). Selection of effective stone tools by wild capuchin monkeys. Current Biology, 19, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waga, I., Dacier, A., Pinha, P. & Tavares, M. (2006). Spontaneous tool use by wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) in the Cerrado. Folia Primatologica, 77, 337–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiten, A. & McGrew, W. C. (2001). Is this the first portrayal of tool use by a chimp?Nature, 409, 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., et al. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399, 682–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, B. W., Wright, K. A., Chalk, J., et al. (2009). Fallback foraging as a way of life: using dietary toughness to compare the fallback signal among capuchins and implications for interpreting morphological variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140, 687–699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wynn, T. & McGrew, W. C. (1989). An ape’s view of the Oldowan. Man, 24, 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamakoshi, G. (2004). Evolution of complex feeding techniques in primates: is this the origin of great ape intelligence? In Russon, A. & Begun, D. R. (eds.) The Evolution of Thought: Evolutionary Origins of Great Ape Intelligence (pp. 140–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×