Book contents
- Throwing the Party
- Cambridge Studies on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
- Throwing the Party
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Foundations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Supreme Court’s Approach to Political Parties
- 3 The Association versus the Individual
- Part II Party Primaries
- Part III The Party, the Court, and Campaign Finance Law
- Part IV Passé Equal Protection and a Way Forward
- Index
2 - The Supreme Court’s Approach to Political Parties
from Part I - Foundations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 June 2022
- Throwing the Party
- Cambridge Studies on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
- Throwing the Party
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Foundations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Supreme Court’s Approach to Political Parties
- 3 The Association versus the Individual
- Part II Party Primaries
- Part III The Party, the Court, and Campaign Finance Law
- Part IV Passé Equal Protection and a Way Forward
- Index
Summary
The Supreme Court has struggled mightily to determine how political parties should be treated from a constitutional perspective, but it initially took the position that they were private entities beyond the control of the federal government. In the 1921 case of Newberry v. United States, a Senate candidate seeking his party’s nomination had exceeded the amount of primary campaign spending allowed under federal law.1 Art. I, §4 of the Constitution gives the federal government authority to “make or alter such Regulations” with regard to the “Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections” for members of Congress.2 However, when confronted with the question in Newberry of whether such power extends to the regulation of party primaries, the Supreme Court said no.3
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Throwing the PartyHow the Supreme Court Puts Political Party Organizations Ahead of Voters, pp. 17 - 31Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022