Lately, Latin Americans might be warming up to transindividual trials to a greater extent than Europeans. At times, they might be exceeding Anglo Americans in this regard, particularly, as documented later, on the so-called societal sort. The discussion will consider Latin America generally yet home in specifically on certain nations there or, precisely, on an illustrative sample of seven substantiation systems: the Mexican, Venezuelan, Colombian, Panamanian, Peruvian, Ecuadorian, and Brazilian. It will now examine (1) the agglomeration of singular, similar, and interrelated entitlements in the vein of federally and civilly adjective Rule 23(b)(3) from the United States together with (2) the conceptualization of them as “homogenous individual” and as benefiting or bonding absentees who have either opted in rather casually or sheerly failed to opt out.