Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Birth and infancy of a Charter rule: the open framework
- 2 The menu of choice: a guide to interpretation
- 3 Precedents of the international court of justice
- 4 Deciphering post-Charter practice: means and limits
- 5 Open threats to extract concessions
- 6 Demonstrations of force
- 7 Countervailing threats or: threats in self-defence
- 8 Findings and conclusions
- 9 Epilogue: the law in operation
- Annex
- Bibliography
- Index
- CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW
5 - Open threats to extract concessions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Birth and infancy of a Charter rule: the open framework
- 2 The menu of choice: a guide to interpretation
- 3 Precedents of the international court of justice
- 4 Deciphering post-Charter practice: means and limits
- 5 Open threats to extract concessions
- 6 Demonstrations of force
- 7 Countervailing threats or: threats in self-defence
- 8 Findings and conclusions
- 9 Epilogue: the law in operation
- Annex
- Bibliography
- Index
- CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW
Summary
A line drawn into the sand
Open threats to extract concessions, the archetype of nineteenth-century gunboat diplomacy practiced by colonial powers to subjugate new territory to foreign rule and trade, have always had their uses. An anecdote of the Greek historian Polybius illustrates both the antiquity and the essential nature of such threats.
In the summer of 168 BC Antiochus IV Epiphanes, King of Syria, conducted a military campaign against Egypt and Cyprus. The Roman senate, whose legions had just emerged victorious from the Macedonian war against Perseus, dispatched a three-man mission to Alexandria led by Gaius Popilius Laenas as their legate. The senate's decree was that Antiochus should vacate Egypt and Cyprus immediately. Upon meeting Antiochus at the outskirts of Alexandria, Popilius promptly handed him the senate's written demand and, according to Polybius, ‘acted in a manner which was thought to be offensive and exceedingly arrogant’:
He was carrying a stick cut from a vine, and with this he drew a circle round Antiochus and told him he must remain inside this circle until he gave his decision about the contents of the letter. The king was astonished at this authoritative proceeding, but, after a few moments’ hesitation, said he would do all that the Romans demanded. Upon this Popilius and his suite all grasped him by the hand and greeted him warmly.
Although subtly conveyed, there could not have been much doubt in Epiphanes’ mind that Popilius had afforded him a last opportunity to cooperate.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Threat of Force in International Law , pp. 127 - 171Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007