Abdulghani, J. M., Iraq & Iran: The Years of Crisis (Croom Helm, 1984).Google Scholar

Achen, Christopher H., and Snidal, Duncan, ‘Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies’, 41 World P.143–69 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acheson, Dean, Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department (Norton, 1969).Google Scholar

Akehurst, Michael, ‘The Hierarchy of Sources of International Law’, 47 Brit. YBIL273–85 (1974–5).Google Scholar

Akehurst, Michael,‘Custom as a Source of International Law’, 47 Brit. YBIL1–53 (1976).Google Scholar

Alexandrov, Stanimir A., Self-Defense Against the Use of Force in International Law (Kluwer Law International, 1996).Google Scholar

Allain, Jean and Jones, John R. W. D., ‘A Patchwork of Norms: A Commentary on the 1996 Draft Code of Crimes Against Peace and Security of Mankind’, 8 Eur. JIL100–17 (1997).Google Scholar

Amer, Ramses, ‘The United Nations’ Reactions to Foreign Military Interventions’, 31 J. Peace Res.425–44 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amin, S. H., ‘The Iran-Iraq Conflict: Legal Implications’, 31 Int. & Comp. LQ167–88 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ando, Nisukeet al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar

Anonymous, ‘Future Petroleum Provinces are Many in Gulf of Mexico-Caribbean Area’, 78 Oil & Gas J.216–26 (20 Oct. 1980).

Asrat, Belatchew, Prohibition of Force Under the UN Charter: A Study of Art. 2(4) (Iustus, 1991).Google Scholar

Athanasopoulos, Haralambos, Nuclear Disarmament in International Law (McFarland & Company, 2000).Google Scholar

Atwood, Susan J., ‘From Just War to Just Intervention’, 19 New Eng. J. Pub. Pol.55–75 (2003–4).Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law in Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, 1984).Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert and Keohane, Robert O., ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’, 38 World P.226–54 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azar, Edward E., Jureidini, Paul and McLaurin, Ronald, ‘Protracted Social Conflict: Theory and Practice in the Middle East’, 8 J. Pal. Stud.41–60 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Sydney D., ‘Nonmilitary Areas in UN Practice’, 74 Am. JIL499–524 (1980).Google Scholar

Barker, J. Craig, International Law and International Relations (Continuum, 2000).Google Scholar

Bauer, Ekkehard, ‘Ultimatum’, in Schlochauer, Hans-Jürgen (ed.), Wörterbuch des Völkerrechts 467–8 (2nd edn, De Gruyter, 1962).Google Scholar

Baxter, R. R., ‘Multilateral Treaties as Evidence of Customary International Law’, 41 Brit. YBIL275–300 (1965–6).Google Scholar

Beck, Robert J., ‘Munich's Lessons Reconsidered’, 14 Int. Sec.161–91 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bederman, David J., ‘Collective Security, Demilitarization and “Pariah” States’, 13 Eur. JIL121–38 (2002).Google Scholar

Bell, Christine, ‘Peace Agreements: Their Nature and Legal Status’, 100 Am. JIL373–412 (2006).Google Scholar

Bennett, Michael, ‘The People's Republic of China and the Use of International Law in the Spratly Islands Dispute’, 28 Stan. JIL425–50 (1992).Google Scholar

Bentwich, Norman and Martin, Andrew, A Commentary on the Charter of the United Nations (2nd edn, Routledge and Paul, 1951).Google Scholar

Bernhardt, Rudolf, ‘Interpretation in International Law’, 2 Enc. Pub. IL1416–26 (1995).Google Scholar

Beverage, Fiona, ‘The Lockerbie Affair’, 41 Int. & Comp. LQ907–20 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, William W. Jr., ‘The Corfu Channel Case (Merits)’, 43 Am. JIL558–89 (1949).Google Scholar

Blechman, Barry M. and Tamara Cofman Wittes, ‘The Threat and Use of Force in American Foreign Policy Since 1989’, in Stern, Paul C. (ed.), International Conflict Resolution after the Cold War 90–122 (National Academy Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Blix, Hans, Disarming Iraq (Pantheon Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Boczek, B. A., ‘Peace-time Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zone of Third Countries’, 19 Ocean Dev. & IL455–68 (1988).Google Scholar

Boczek, B. A.,‘Peaceful Purposes Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’, 20 Ocean Dev. & IL359–89 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodansky, Daniel, ‘Non Liquet and the Incompleteness of International Law’, in Chazournes, Laurence Boisson and Sands, Philippe (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons 153–70 (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Booth, Ken, Law, Force, and Diplomacy at Sea (Allen & Unwin, 1985).Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin, ‘The Dumbarton Oaks Conference’, 39 Am. JIL97–100 (1945).Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael, ‘Consequences of the Prohibition of the Use of Force: Comments on Arts. 49 and 70 of the ILC's Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties’, 27 ZaöRV507–19 (1967).Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael,‘Friedenssicherung und Kriegsrecht’, in Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf (ed.), Völkerrecht 589–667 (3rd edn, Walter de Gruyter, 2004).Google Scholar

Bourquin, Maurice, ‘Le Problème de La Sécurité Internationale’, 49 Rec. des Cours, vol. III, 473–542 (1934).Google Scholar

Bowett, Derek W., Self-Defence in International Law (Praeger, 1958).Google Scholar

Bowett, Derek W.,‘International Incidents: New Genre or New Delusion?’, 12 Yale JIL386–95 (1987).Google Scholar

Bracken, Paul, ‘Mobilization in the Nuclear Age’, 3 Int. Sec.74–93 (1978–9).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brecher, Michael, ‘State Behavior in International Crises: A Model’, 23 J. Conf. Resol.446–80 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brecher, Michael and Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, A Study of Crisis (University of Michigan Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breidlid, Anders, Brogger, Fredrik Chr.et al., American Culture: An Anthology of Civilization Texts (Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard (ed.), The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order (Harcourt, 1946).Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard, ‘Implications for Military Policy’, in Brodie, Bernard (ed.), The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order 70–110 (Harcourt, 1946).Google Scholar

Brosche, Harmut, Zwang Beim Abschluss Völkerrechtlicher Verträge (Duncker & Humblot, 1974).Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, International Law and the Use of Force by States (Clarendon Press, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burroughs, John, The (Il)legality of Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons: A Guide to the Historic Opinion of the International Court of Justice (Lit, 1997).Google Scholar

Butler, Nicholas Murray, Across the Busy Years: Recollections and Reflections, 2 vols. (Scribner, 1939–40).Google Scholar

Butterton, Glenn R., ‘Signals, Threats, and Deterrence: Alive and Well in the Taiwan Strait’, 47 Cath. ULR51 (1997).Google Scholar

Buzzini, Gionata Piero, ‘Les Comportements Passifs des États et leur Incidence sur la Réglementation de l'Emploi de la Force en Droit International Général’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo and Palchetti, Paolo (eds.), Customary International Law on the Use of Force: A Methodological Approach 79–117 (Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).Google Scholar

Byers, Michael, ‘Response, Taking the Law Out of International Law: A Critique of the “Iterative” Perspective’, 28 Harv. ILJ201–5 (1997).Google Scholar

Byers, Michael,Custom, Power and the Power of Rules; International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byers, Michael,‘Terrorism, the Use of Force and International Law after 11 September’, 51 Int. & Comp. LQ401–14 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byers, Michael,‘The Shifting Foundations of International Law: A Decade of Forceful Measures against Iraq’, 13 Eur. JIL21–41 (2002).Google Scholar

Byers, Michael,book review, ‘Recourse To Force: State Action Against Threats And Armed Attacks’, 97 Am. JIL721–5 (2003).Google Scholar

Cahin, Gérard, La Coutume Internationale et les Organisations Internationales: L'incidence de la Dimension Institutionelle sur le Processus Coutumier (Editions A. Pedone, 2001).Google Scholar

Calvocoressi, Peter, World Politics 1945–2000 (8th edn, Pearson Education, 2001).Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, Enzo and Paolo, Palchetti (eds.), Customary International Law on the Use of Force: A Methodological Approach (Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).Google Scholar

Carter, Ashton B. and Perry, William J., Preventive Defense: A New Security Strategy for America (Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, Self-determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio,‘Ex Iniuria Ius Oritur: Are We Moving towards International Legitimation of Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community?’, 10 Eur. JIL23–30 (1999).Google Scholar

Catley, Robert and Keliat, Makmur, Spratlys: The Dispute in the South China Sea (Ashgate, 1997).Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I. and Prescott, J. R. V., ‘Resolving Cross-Strait Relations Between China and Taiwan’, 94 Am. JIL453–77 (2000).Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram, The Cuban Missile Crisis: International Law and the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Chemillier-Gendreau, Monique, Sovereignty Over the Paracel and Spratly Islands (Kluwer Law International, 2000).Google Scholar

Cheng, Bin, ‘United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: “Instant” Customary Law?’, 5 Ind. JIL23–112 (1965).Google Scholar

Christensen, Thomas C., ‘Threats, Assurances, and the Last Chance for Peace: The Lessons of Mao's Korean War Telegrams’, 17 Int. Sec.122–54 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, Il Yung, Legal Problems Involved In The Corfu Channel Incident (E. Droz, 1959).Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R. and Lowe, A. V., The Law of the Sea (3rd edn, Manchester University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Cima, Ronald C., ‘Vietnam in 1988: The Brink of Renewal’, 29 Asian Surv.64–72 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cimbala, Stephen J., Coercive Military Strategy (Texas A&M University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald H., ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, 3 JL & Econ.1–23 (1960).Google Scholar

Coates, David and Krieger, Joel, Blair's War (Polity, 2004).Google Scholar

Collier, David and Mahoney, James, ‘Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Work’, 49 World P.56–91 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, John and Lowe, Vaughan, The Settlement of Disputes in International Law (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Corton, Olivier, ‘Breach and Evolution of Customary International Law on the Use of Force’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo and Palchetti, Paolo (eds.), Customary International Law on the Use of Force: A Methodological Approach 119–44 (Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).Google Scholar

Corton, Olivier,‘The Controversies Over the Customary Prohibition on the Use of Force’, 16 Eur. JIL803–22 (2005).Google Scholar

Crawford, James, International Law as an Open System: Selected Essays (Cameron May, 2002).Google Scholar

Crawford, James,‘Negotiating Global Security Threats in a World of Nation States: Issues and Problems of Sovereignty’, in James Crawford, International Law as an Open System: Selected Essays 95–121 (Cameron May, 2002).Google Scholar

Crawford, James,The International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Crawford, James,The Creation of States in International Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Crawford, James and Viles, Thomas, ‘International Law on a Given Day’, in Konrad Ginther et al., Völkerrecht Zwischen Normativem Anspruch und Politischer Realität: Festschrift für Karl Zemanek zum 65. Geburtstag 45–68 (Duncker & Humblot, 1994).Google Scholar

D'Amato, Anthony, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Daadler, Ivo H. and O'Hanlon, Michael E., Winning Ugly: NATO's War to Save Kosovo (Brookings Institution Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Dahm, Georg, Völkerrecht, 2 vols. (W. Kohlhammer, 1960).Google Scholar

Dahm, Georg, Delbrück, Jost and Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Völkerrecht, 2 vols. (2nd edn, de Gruyter, 1988).Google Scholar

Danilovic, Vesna, ‘Conceptual and Selection Bias Issues in Deterrence’, 45 J. Conf. Resol.97–125 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chazournes, Laurence Boisson and Sands, Philippe (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

de Gurmendi, Silva A. Fernández, ‘An Insider's View’, in Politi, Mauro and Nesi, Giuseppe (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression 175–88 (Ashgate, 2004).Google Scholar

Jong, H. G., ‘Coercion in the Conclusion of Treaties: A Consideration of Articles 51 and 52 of the Convention on the Law of Treaties’, 15 Neth. YBIL209–47 (1984).Google Scholar

Luca, Anthony R., ‘Soviet-American Politics and the Turkish Straits’, 92 PSQ503–24 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Degenhardt, Henry W., Maritime Affairs – A World Handbook: A Reference Guide to Maritime Organizations, Conventions and Disputes and to the International Politics of the Sea (Longman Group, 1985).Google Scholar

Delbrück, Jost, ‘Proportionality’, 3 Enc. Pub. IL1140–4 (1997).Google Scholar

Delbrück, Jost,‘Article 24’, in Simma, Bruno (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. I, 442–52 (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2002),Google Scholar

Derpa, Rolf M., Das Gewaltverbot der Satzung der Vereinten Nationen und die Anwendung Nichtmilitärischer Gewalt (Athenäum, 1969).Google Scholar

Desjeans, Mary and Clement, Peter, ‘Soviet Policy Toward Central America’, 36 Proc. Acad. PS223–34 (1987).Google Scholar

Despretz, Patrice, ‘Le Droit International et les Menaces d'Intervention de l'OTAN au Kosovo’, Act. Droit Int. (Nov. 1998), http://www.ridi.org/adi.

Diehl, Paul F., A Road Map to War: Territorial Dimensions of International Conflict (Vanderbilt University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Dingemann, Rüdiger, Krisenherde der Welt: Konflikte und Kriege seit 1945 (Westermann, 1996).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity (M. Nijhoff, 1989).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram,War, Aggression and Self-Defence (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorman, Andrew M. and Otte, Thomas G. (eds.), Military Intervention: From Gunboat Diplomacy to Humanitarian Intervention (Dartmouth, 1995).Google Scholar

Drekonja-Kornat, Gerhard, ‘Der Kolumbianisch-Nicaraguanische Streit um den San Andrés-Archipel’, 16 Verf. & R. Übersee (1983).Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C., ‘Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution Among Neighbors in Shasta County’, 38 Stan. LR623–87 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C.,Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes (Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., ‘Nuclear Weapons, International Law and the World Court: A Historic Encounter’, 91 Am. JIL64–75 (1997).Google Scholar

Fearon, James, ‘Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science’, 43 World P.169–95 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearon, James,Threats to Use Force: Costly Signals and Bargaining in International Crises (Berekely, 1992).Google Scholar

Fearon, James,‘Domestic Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes’, 88 Am. PSR577–92 (1994).Google Scholar

Fearon, James,‘Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands Versus Sinking Costs’, 41 J. Conf. Resol.68–90 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feinstein, Lee and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘A Duty to Prevent’, 83 F. Aff.136–51 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferencz, Benjamin B., ‘Defining Aggression: Where it Stands and Where it's Going’, 66 Am. JIL491–508 (1972).Google Scholar

Ferencz, Benjamin B.,Defining International Aggression: The Search for World Peace; A Documentary History and Analysis, 2 vols. (Oceana Publications, 1975).Google Scholar

Ferencz, Benjamin B.,‘Aggression’, 1 Enc. Pub. IL58–65 (1992).Google Scholar

Ferrell, Robert H., Peace in Their Time: The Origins of the Kellog-Briand Pact (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1952).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Sir Gerald, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Treaty Interpretation and Certain Other Treaty Points’, 28 Brit. YBIL1–28 (1951).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Malgosia A., ‘The Corfu Channel Case and the Development of International Law’, in Ando, Nisukeet al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda, vol. I, 119–46 (Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M., ‘Who Killed Article 2(4)? or: Changing Norms Governing the Use of Force by States’, 64 Am. JIL809–37 (1970).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,‘The Stealing of the Sahara’, 70 Am. JIL694–721 (1976).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,‘Of Gnats and Camels: Is there a Double Standard at the United Nations?’, 78 Am. JIL811–33 (1984).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,Nation Against Nation: What Happened to the UN Dream and What the US Can Do About It (Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,‘Legitimacy in the International System’, 82 Am. JIL705–59 (1988).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,‘Lessons of Kosovo’, 93 Am. JIL857–60 (1999).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,‘What Happens Now? The United Nations After Iraq’, 97 Am. JIL607–20 (2003).Google Scholar

Frost, Robert, Mending Wall (Ginn and Company, 1914).Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen A., Das de Facto-Regime im Völkerrecht: Eine Untersuchung zur Rechtstellung ‘Nichtanerkannter Staaten’ und Ähnlicher Gebilde (Heymanns Verlag, 1968).Google Scholar

Gaddis, John Lewis, The Long Peace: Inquiries Into the History of the Cold War (Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Gardam, Judith, Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States (Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardiner, Leslie, The Eagle Spreads His Claws: A History of the Corfu Channel Dispute and of Albania's Relations with the West 1945–1965 (Blackwood, 1966).Google Scholar

Gardner, Richard N., ‘Neither Bush Nor the “Jurisprudes” ’, 97 Am. JIL585–90 (2003).Google Scholar

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘NATO Coercive Military Activities in the Yugoslav Crisis (1992–1999)’, 12 Eur. JIL391–435 (2001).Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara, ‘How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics’, 2 Pol. Analysis131–50 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelpi, Christopher, ‘Crime and Punishment: The Role of Norms in Crisis Bargaining’, 91 Am. PSQ339–60 (1997).Google Scholar

George, Alexander L., Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to War (United States Institute of Peace Press, 1993).Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Simons, William E. (eds.), The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy (2nd edn, Westview Press, 1994).Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Smoke, Richard, Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice (Columbia University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Gerlach, Axel, Begriff und Methoden der Intervention im Völkerrecht (Varia iuris publici, 1967).Google Scholar

Ghebali, Victor-Yves, ‘Avaritia et Ambitio dans les Relations Internationales de l'Entre-guerres: la Gestion des Conflits Internationaux par la Société des Nations’, in Porret, Michel (ed.) Guerres et Paix: Mélanges Offerts à Jena-Claude Favez 715–39 (Georg, 2000).Google Scholar

Gill, Terry D., ‘The Law of Armed Attack in the Context of the Nicaragua Case’, 1 Hague YBIL30–58 (1988).Google Scholar

Ginther, Konradet al., Völkerrecht Zwischen Normativem Anspruch und Politischer Realität: Festschrift für Karl Zemanek zum 65. Geburtstag (Duncker & Humblot, 1994).Google Scholar

Gitelson, Susan Aurelia, ‘Major Shifts in Recent Ugandan Foreign Policy’, 76 Afr. Aff.359–80 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennon, Michael J., Limits of Law, Prerogatives of Power: Interventionalism after Kosovo (Palgrave, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennon, Michael J.,‘Why the Security Council Failed’, 82 F. Aff.16–35 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennon, Michael J.,‘How International Rules Die’, 93 Geo. LJ939–91 (2005).Google Scholar

Gochman, Charles S. and Maoz, Zeev, ‘Militarized Interstate Disputes 1812–1976: Procedures, Patterns and Insights’, 28 J. Conf. Resol.585–616 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldblat, Jozef, Arms Control: The New Guide to Negotiations and Agreements (2nd edn, Sage Publications, 2002).Google Scholar

Gonsiorowski, Miroslas, ‘The Legal Meaning of the Pact for the Renunciation of War’, 30 Am. PSR.653–80 (1936).Google Scholar

Goodrich, Leland M., Hambro, Edvard and Simmons, Anne Patricia, Charter of the United Nations: Commentary and Documents (3rd edn, Columbia University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Gordon, Edward, ‘Article 2(4) in Historical Context’, 10 Yale JIL271–8 (1985).Google Scholar

Gray, Christine, ‘Bosnia and Herzegovina: Civil War or Inter-State Conflict? Characterization and Consequences’, 67 Brit. YBIL155–97 (1996).Google Scholar

Gray, Christine,‘The Use and Abuse of the International Court of Justice: Cases Concerning the Use of Force After Nicaragua’, 14 Eur. JIL867–905 (2003).Google Scholar

Gray, Christine,International Law and the Use of Force (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S., Military Strategy (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher, ‘International Law and the United States Air Operation Against Libya’, 89 WVa LR933–60 (1986–7).Google Scholar

Grey, Lord Edward, Twenty-five Years: 1892–1916, 2 vols. (Frederick A. Stokes Company, 1925)Google Scholar

Gross, Leo, ‘The Dispute Between Greece and Turkey Concerning the Continental Shelf in the Aegean’, 71 Am. JIL31–59 (1977).Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, The Law of War and Peace (Clarendon Press (1925) [1625].Google Scholar

Guicherd, Catherine, ‘International Law and the War in Kosovo’, 41 Survival19–34 (1999).Google Scholar

Harbom, Lotta, Högbladh, Stina and Wallensteen, Peter, ‘Armed Conflict and Peace Agreements’, 43 J. Peace Res.617–31 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, D. J., Cases and Material on International Law (6th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2004).Google Scholar

Harvey, Frank P., ‘Practicing Coercion: Revisiting Successes and Failures Using Boolean Logic and Comparative Methods’, 43 J. Conf. Resol.840–71 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hemleben, Sylvester John, Plans for World Peace through Six Centuries (University of Chicago Press, 1943).Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, ‘The Reports of the Death of Article 2(4) Are Greatly Exaggerated’, 65 Am. JIL544–8 (1971).Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis,How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy (2nd edn, Columbia University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Herrmann, Richard K. and Shannon, Vaughn P., ‘Defending International Norms: The Role of Obligation, Material Interest, and Perception in Decision Making’, 55 Int. Org.621–54 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herwig, Holger, Archer, Christianet al., Cassell's World History of Warfare (University of Nebraska Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Herz, John, ‘Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma’, 20 World P.157–80 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herzberg, Rolf Dietrich (ed.), Festschrift für Dietrich Oehler zum 70. Geburtstag (Carl Heymanns, 1985).Google Scholar

Hickey, Dennis V., ‘U.S. Policy and Taiwan's Bid to Rejoin the United Nations’, 37 Asian Surv.1031–43 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, The Development of International Law Through the Political Organs of the United Nations (Oxford University Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn,Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Hilderbrand, Robert C., Dumbarton Oaks: The Origins of the United Nations and the Search for Postwar Security (University of North Carolina Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Hill, Norman, ‘Was there an Ultimatum Before Pearl Harbour?’, 42 Am. JIL355–67 (1948).Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (Penguin Classics (1968) [1651].Google Scholar

Hoog, Günter, ‘Naval Manoeuvres’, 3 Enc. Pub. IL527–8 (1997).Google Scholar

Howard, Michael, ‘The United Nations and International Security’, in Roberts, Adam and Kingsbury, Benedict (eds.), United Nations, Divided World: The UN's Roles in International Relations 31–45 (Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Hoyt, Edwin C., ‘The United States Reaction to the Korean Attack: A Study of the Principles of the United Nations Charter as a Factor in American Policy-Making’, 55 Am. JIL45–76 (1961).Google Scholar

Hsiao, Anne Hsiu-An, ‘Is China's Policy to Use Force Against Taiwan a Violation of the Principle of Non-Use of Force Under International Law?’, 32 New Eng. LR715–42 (1998).Google Scholar

Hudson, G. F., ‘Threats of Force in International Relations’, in Wight, Martin (ed.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics 201–5 (1966).Google Scholar

Huisken, Ron, The Road to War on Iraq (Strategic Defence Studies Centre, 2003).Google Scholar

Hull, Cordell, The Memoirs of Cordell Hull, 2 vols. (Macmillan Co., 1948).Google Scholar

Hume, David, A Treatise upon Human Nature (Prometheus Books (1992) [1739].Google Scholar

Huth, Paul K., Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict (University of Michigan Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huth, Paul and Russett, Bruce, ‘What Makes Deterrence Work? Cases from 1900 to 1980’, 36 World P.496–526 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huth, Paul and Russett, Bruce,‘Deterrence Failure and Crisis Escalation’, 32 Int. Stud. Q.29–45 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Institute for the Study of Conflict, Annual of Power and Conflict 1980–1981 (The Institute, 1981).

Ioannou, Krateros, ‘Propaganda’, 3 Enc. Pub. IL1135–8 (1997).Google Scholar

Ipsen, Knut, ‘Das “Tokyo Trial” im Lichte des Seinerzeit Geltenden Völkerrechts’, in Herzberg, Rolf Dietrich (ed.), Festschrift für Dietrich Oehler zum 70. Geburtstag 505–15 (Carl Heymanns, 1985).Google Scholar

Ipsen, KnutVölkerrecht (5th edn, C. H. Beck, 2004).

Jackson, Robert H., Report of Robert H. Jackson, United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials, London, 1945, Dept State Pub. 3080 (1949).

Jennings, Sir Robert Y., ‘The Caroline and McLeod Cases’, 32 Am. JIL82–99 (1938).Google Scholar

Jennings, Sir Robert Y.,‘What is International Law and How Do We Tell It When We See It?’, 37 Schw. Jb. IR59–88 (1981).Google Scholar

Jentleson, Bruce W., ‘The Reagan Administration and Coercive Diplomacy: Restraining More than Remaking Governments’, 106 PSQ57–82 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert,‘Security Regimes’, 36 Int. Org.357–78 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jian, Chen, China's Road to the Korean War: The Making of the Sino-American Confrontation (Columbia University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Jie, Chen, ‘China's Spratly Policy: With Special Reference to the Philippines and Malaysia’, 34 Asian Surv.893–903 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jiménez de Aréchaga, Eduardo, ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’, 159 Rec. des Cours, vol. I, 1–344 (1978).Google Scholar

Johann, Heribert, Begriff und Bedeutung des Ultimatums im Völkerrecht (Dunker & Humblot, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Daniel M., Bremer, Stuart A. and Singer, J. David, ‘Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns’, 15 Conf. Mgmt & PS163–213 (1996).Google Scholar

Jones, J. Mervyn, ‘The Corfu Channel Case: Merits’, 26 Brit. YBIL447–53 (1949).Google Scholar

Kagan, Donald, On the Origins of War and the Preservation of Peace (Anchor Books, 1995).Google Scholar

Kahn, Hermann, On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios (Penguin Books, 1965).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Zum Ewigen Frieden: Ein Philosophischer Entwurf (Reclam, 1984) [1975].Google Scholar

Karsten, Peter, Howell, Peter D. and Allen, Artes Frances, Military Threats: A Systematic Historical Analysis of the Determinants of Success (Greenwood Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Kaul, B. M., The Untold Story 290–307 (Allied Publishers, 1967).Google Scholar

Kegley, Charles W. Jr and Raymond, Gregory A., ‘Normative Restraints on the Use of Force Short of War’, 23 J. Peace Res.213–27 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, Patrick J., ‘The Twilight of Customary International Law’, 40 Va JIL449–543 (2000).Google Scholar

Kelson, Hans, ‘Collective Security and Collective Self-Defense Under the Charter of the United Nations’, 42 Am. JIL783–96 (1948).Google Scholar

Kennedy, Robert F., Thirteen Days: A Memoir of the Cuban Missile Crisis (W. W. Norton, 1969).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Keylor, William R., The Twentieth Century World: An International History (4th edn, Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Keylor, William R.,A World of Nations (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Khadiagala, Gilbert M., ‘Uganda's Domestic and Regional Security in the 1970s’, 31 J Mod. Afr. Stud.231–55 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. and Verba, Sydney, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Kirgis, Frederic L., Prior Consultation in International Law: A Study of State Practice (University of Virginia Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Kirgis, Frederic L.‘North Korea's Withdrawal from the Nonproliferation Treaty’, ASIL Insights (Jan. 2003), http://www.asil.org/insights/insigh96.htm.

Kirgis, Frederic L.‘North Korea's Missile Firings’, ASIL Insights (Jul. 2006), http://www.asil.org/insights/2006/07/insights060724.html.

Klabbers, Jan, ‘International Organizations in the Formation of Customary Law’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo and Palchetti, Paolo (eds.), Customary International Law on the Use of Force: A Methodological Approach 179–95 (Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).Google Scholar

Knight, Jonathan, ‘American Statecraft and the 1946 Black Sea Straits Controversy’, 90 PSQ451–75 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’, 106 Yale LJ2599–659 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohen, Marcelo G., ‘The Notion of “State Survival” in International Law’, in Chazournes, Laurence Boisson and Sands, Philippe (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons 293–314 (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, Ius Contra Bellum: Le Droit International Relatif au Maintien de la Paix (Helbling & Lichtenhahn, 2003).Google Scholar

Kontou, Nany, The Termination and Revision of Treaties in the Light of New Customary Law (Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Korbel, Josef, ‘The Kashmir Dispute After Six Years’, 7 Int. Org.498–510 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia (Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Kritsiotis, Dino, ‘The Legality of the 1993 US Missile Strikes on Iraq and the Right of Self-Defence in International Law’, 45 Int. & Comp. LQ162–77 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunz, Josef L., ‘Legality of the Security Council Resolutions of June 25 and 27, 1950’, 45 Am. JIL137–42 (1951).Google Scholar

Lai, B., ‘The Effects of Different Types of Military Mobilization on the Outcome of International Crises’, 48 J. Conf. Resol.211–29 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, Arthur, ‘The Present Status of Propaganda in International Law’, 31 L. & Cont. Prob.439–51 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauren, Paul Gordon, ‘Coercive Diplomacy and Ultimata: Theory in Practice and History’, in George, Alexander L. and Simons, William E., The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy 23–40 (2nd edn, Westview Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Elihu, ‘River Boundaries: Legal Aspects of the Shatt-al-Arab Frontier’, 9 Int. & Comp. LQ208–36 (1960).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (Archon Books, 1933).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch,‘ “Resort to War” and the Interpretation of the Covenant During the Manchurian Dispute’, 28 Am. JIL43–60 (1934).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch,‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’, 26 Brit. YBIL48–85 (1949).Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard Ned and Stein, Janice Gross, We All Lost the Cold War (Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard Ned and Stein, Janice Gross,‘Deterrence and the Cold War’, 110 PSQ157–81 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Todd L. and Huth, Paul K., ‘Legitimizing Dispute Settlement: International Legal Rulings as Domestic Political Cover’, 100 Am. PSR219–34 (2006).Google Scholar

Leng, Russell J. and Singer, J. David, ‘Militarized Interstate Crises: The BCOW Typology and its Applications’, 32 Int. Stud. Q.155–73 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leng, Russell J. and Wheeler, Hugh G., ‘Influence Strategies, Success, and War’, 23 J. Conf. Resol.655–84 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liévano, Enrique Gaviria (ed.), Nuestro Archipiélago de San Andrés y el Tratado con Nicaragua (Plaza & Janes, 2001).Google Scholar

Lobel, Jules and Ratner, Michael, ‘Bypassing the Security Council: Ambiguous Authorizations to Use Force, Cease-Fires and the Iraqi Inspection Regime’, 93 Am. JIL124–55 (1999).Google Scholar

McCoubrey, Hilaire and White, Nigel D., International Law and Armed Conflict (Dartmouth, 1992).Google Scholar

McDougal, Myers S. and Feliciano, Florentino P., Law and Minimum World Order: The Legal Regulation of International Coercion (Yale University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

MacGibbon, I. C., ‘Some Observations on the Part of Protest in International Law’, 30 Brit. YBIL293–319 (1954).Google Scholar

MacMillan, Margaret, Peacemakers: The Paris Peace Conference and Its Attempt to End War (John Murray, 2003).Google Scholar

Malawer, Stuart S., ‘Imposed Treaties and International Law’, Cal. WILJ 115, 156–8 (1977).Google Scholar

Mandel, Robert, ‘The Effectiveness of Gunboat Diplomacy’, 30 Int. Stud. Q.59–76 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandelstam, M. André, L'Interprétation du Pacte Briand-Kellog par les Gouvernements et les Parlaments des Etats Signataires (Pedone, 1934).Google Scholar

Mayers, David, ‘Containment and the Primacy of Diplomacy: George Kennan's Views, 1947–1948’, 11 Int. Sec.124–62 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisler, Stanley, United Nations: The First Fifty Years (Atlantic Monthly Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Mercer, Jonathan, Reputation and International Politics (Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Milivojevic, Marko, ‘The Spratly and Paracel Island Conflict’, 31 Survival70–7 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, John B., A Digest of International Law as Embodied in Diplomatic Discussions, Treaties and Other International Agreements, 6 vols. (Government Printing Office, 1906).Google Scholar

Morrow, James D., Game Theory for Political Scientists (Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Mueller, John, Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major Wars (Basic Books, 1989).Google Scholar

Mueller, John,‘Changing Attitudes Towards War: The Impact of the First World War’, 21 Brit. JPS1–28 (1991).Google Scholar

Murphy, Sean D., ‘Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law’, 93 Am. JIL470–501, 628–67, 879–912 (1999).Google Scholar

Murphy, Sean D.,‘Efforts to Address Iraqi Compliance’, 96 Am. JIL956–62 (1999).Google Scholar

Murphy, Sean D.,‘Terrorism and the Concept of Armed Attack in Article 51 of the UN Charter’, 43 Harv. ILJ41–51 (2002).Google Scholar

Murphy, Sean D.,‘Use of Military Force to Disarm Iraq’, 97 Am. JIL419–32 (2003).Google Scholar

Myers, Matthew A., ‘Deterrence and the Threat of Force Ban: Does the UN Charter Prohibit Some Military Exercises?’, 162 Mil. LR132–79 (1999).Google Scholar

Nanda, Ved P., and Krieger, David, Nuclear Weapons and the World Court (Transnational, 1998).Google Scholar

Nathan, James A., Soldiers, Statecraft, and History: Coercive Diplomacy and the International Order (Praeger, 2002).Google Scholar

National Secretariate for Information, The Invasion and Occupation of Goa in the World Press (The Secretariate, 1962).

Neff, Stephen C., War and the Law of Nations: A General History (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuhold, Hanspeter, Internationale Konflikte: Verbotene und Erlaubte Mittel ihrer Austragung (Springer Verlag, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nolte, George, Eingreifen auf Einladung: Zur Völkerrechtlichen Zulässigkeit des Einsatzes Fremder Truppen im Internen Konflikt auf Einladung der Regierung (Springer Verlag, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Notter, Harley A. (ed.), Postwar Foreign Policy Preparations 1939–1945 (Department of State Publications, 1949).Google Scholar

Occelli, Maria Benvenuta, ‘ “Sinking” the Caroline: Why the Caroline Doctrine's Restrictions on Self-Defense Should Not be Regarded as Customary International Law’, 4 San Diego ILJ467–90 (2003).Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas G., ‘Law and Lawyers in International Crises’, 29 Int. Org.1035–53 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa, International Law: A Treatise, 2 vols. (1st edn, Longman, 1906).Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa,International Law: A Treatise, 2 vols. (7th edn, Longman, 1952).Google Scholar

OSCE, Kosovo/Kosova, As Seen, as Told: An Analysis of the Human Rights Findings of the OSCE Kosovo Verification Mission (Oct. 1998–Jun. 1999), http://www.osce.org/kosovo/.

Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Otte, Thomas G., ‘Of Congress and Gunboats: Military Intervention in the Nineteenth Century’, in Dorman, Andrew M. and Otte, Thomas G. (eds.), Military Intervention: From Gunboat Diplomacy to Humanitarian Intervention 19–52 (Dartmouth, 1995).Google Scholar

Owen, Art B., Empirical Likelihood (CRC Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., ‘International Law and Naval and Air Operations at Sea’, in Horace B. Robertson, Jr (ed.), The Law of Naval Operations, 64 US Nav. War CIL Stud. 18–37 (1991).

Paulus, Andreas L. and Jörn Müller, ‘Security Council Resolution 1718 on North Korea's Nuclear Test’, ASIL Insights (Nov. 2006), http://www.asil.org/insights/2006/11/insights061103.html.

Perry, William J., ‘Desert Storm and Deterrence’, 70 F. Aff.66–82 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, Walter J., ‘Deterrence and Compellence: A Critical Assessment of Conventional Wisdom’, 30 Int. Stud. Q.269–94 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, Warren and Rimkunas, Richard, ‘The Concept of Crisis in International Politics’, 15 J. Conf. Resol.259–72 (1978).Google Scholar

Politi, Mauro and Nesi, Giuseppe (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression (Ashgate, 2004).Google Scholar

Polybius, The Histories, book 24 (Harvard University Press, 1927) [ca. 150 BC].

Popper, Karl R., Logik der Forschung (7th edn, Mohr, 1982) [1934].Google Scholar

Porret, Michel, (ed.) Guerres et paix: Mélanges offerts à Jena-Claude Favez (Georg, 2000).Google Scholar

Poundstone, William, Prisoner's Dilemma: John von Neumann, Game Theory, and the Puzzle of the Bomb (Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Pritchard, John R. and Sonia M. Zaide (eds.), The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Complete Transcripts of the Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East vol. XX, 49582–4 (1981).

Purdum, Todd S., A Time of Our Choosing: America's War in Iraq (Times Books/Henry Holt, 2003).Google Scholar

Raab, Dominic, ‘ “Armed Attack” After the Oil Platforms Case’, 17 Leid. JIL719–35 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ragazzi, Maurizio, The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Ramazani, Rouhollah K., The Persian Gulf: Iran's Role (University Press of Virginia, 1972).Google Scholar

Randelzhofer, Albrecht, ‘Art. 2(4)’, in Simma, Bruno (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. I, 112–36 (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Randelzhofer, Albrecht,‘Article 51’, in Simma, Bruno (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. I, 788–806 (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Ratner, Steven R., ‘Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello after September 11’, 96 Am. JIL 905–21 (2002).

Ratner, Steven R.,‘The Gulf of Sidra Incident of 1981: A Study of the Lawfulness of Peacetime Aerial Engagements’, 10 Yale JIL59–77 (1984).Google Scholar

Reisman, W. Michael and Willard, Andrew R. (eds.), International Incidents: The Law That Counts in World Politics (Princeton University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ress, Georg, ‘Interpretation’, in Simma, Bruno (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. I, 13–32 (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Richardson, James L., Crisis Diplomacy: The Great Powers Since the Mid-Nineteenth Century (Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rifaat, Ahmed M., International Aggression: A Study of the Legal Concept: Its Development and Definition in International Law (Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1979).Google Scholar

Robel, Richard T., ‘The Aegean Sea Continental Shelf Case’, 18 Harv. JIL649–75 (1977).Google Scholar

Roberts, Adam and Kingsbury, Benedict (eds.), United Nations, Divided World: The UN's Roles in International Relations (Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Robertson Jr, Horace B. (ed.), ‘The Law of Naval Operations’, 64 US Nav. War. CIL Stud. (1991).

Rojahn, Ondolf, ‘Naval Demonstration’, 3 Enc. Pub. IL526–7 (1997).Google Scholar

Rojahn, Ondolf,‘Ultimatum’, 4 Enc. Pub. IL1006–8 (2000).Google Scholar

Rose, S., ‘Naval Activity in the Exclusive Economic Zone: Troubled Waters Ahead’, 21 Ocean Dev. & IL71–103 (1990).Google Scholar

Ross, Robert S., ‘The 1995–96 Taiwan Strait Confrontation: Coercion, Credibility, and the Use of Force’, 25 Int. Sec.87–123 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubinoff, Arthur G., India's Use of Force in Goa (Popular Prakashan, 1971).Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand, Common Sense and Nuclear Warfare (Simon & Schuster, 1959).Google Scholar

Russell, Ruth B. and Muther, Jeannette E., A History of The United Nations Charter: The Role of the United States 1940–1945 (Brookings Institution, 1958).Google Scholar

Sadurska, Romana, ‘Threats of Force’, 82 Am. JIL239–68 (1988).Google Scholar

St John, Ronald Bruce, Libya and the United States: Two Centuries of Strife (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Sample, Susan G., ‘Military Buildups, War, and Realpolitik: A Multivariate Model’, 42 J. Conf. Resol.156–75 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sapiro, Miriam, ‘Iraq: The Shifting Sands of Preemptive Self-Defence’, 97 Am. JIL599–607 (2003).Google Scholar

Sartori, Anne, ‘The Might of the Pen: A Reputational Theory of Communication in International Disputes’, 56 Int. Org.121–49 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saxer, Urs, Kosovo und das Völkerrecht: Ein Konfliktmanagement im Spannungsfeld von Menschenrechten, kollektiver Sicherheit und Unilateralismus (Basler Schriften zur europäischen Integration, 1999).Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Quasi-Judicial Role of the Security Council and the General Assembly’, 58 Am. JIL960–5 (1964).Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar,‘The Twilight Existence of Nonbinding International Agreements’, 71 Am. JIL296–304 (1977).Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar,‘The Invisible College of International Lawyers’, 72 Nw. ULR217–26 (1977–8).Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar,‘The Right of States to Use Armed Force’, 82 Mich. LR1620–46 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, Oscar,‘Entangled Treaty and Custom’, in Dinstein, Yoram (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity 717–38 (M. Nijhoff, 1989).Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar,‘Self-Defense and the Rule of Law’, 83 Am. JIL259–77 (1989).Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar,International Law in Theory and Practice (M. Nijhoff, 1991).Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar,‘United Nations Law’, 88 Am. JIL1–23 (1994).Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C., The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, 1960).Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C.,Arms and Influence (Yale University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Schlochauer, Hans-Jürgen (ed.), Wörterbuch des Völkerrechts (2nd edn, De Gruyter, 1962).Google Scholar

Setear, John K., ‘An Iterative Perspective on Treaties: A Synthesis of International Relations Theory and International Law’, 37 Harv. ILJ139–229 (1996).Google Scholar

Seydi, Süleyman, The Turkish Straits and the Great Powers: From the Montreux Conventions to the Early Cold War 1936–1947 (Isis Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Shaw, Malcolm, International Law (5th edn, Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shawcross, William, Allies: The U.S., Britain, Europe and the War in Iraq (Atlantic Books, 2003).Google Scholar

Shen, Jianming, ‘Sovereignty, Statehood, Self-determination, and the Issue of Taiwan’, 15 Am. UILR1101 (2000).Google Scholar

Shultz, George P., Turmoil and Triumph: My Years as Secretary of State (Maxwell Macmillan, 1993).Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno, ‘NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects’, 10 Eur. JIL1–22 (1999).Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno,(ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, 2 vols. (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd edn, Manchester University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Sirriyeh, Hussein, ‘Development of the Iraq-Iranian Dispute, 1847–1975’, 20 J. Cont. Hist.483–92 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slantchev, Branislav L., ‘Military Coercion in Interstate Crises’, 99 Am. PSR.533–47 (2005).Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Chance to Reshape the U.N.’, Wash. Post (13 Apr. 2003).

Sofaer, Abraham D., ‘International Law and the Use of Force’, 4 The Nat. Interest53–64 (Fall 1988).Google Scholar

Sofaer, Abraham D.,‘On the Necessity of Pre-emption’, 14 Eur. JIL209–26 (2003).Google Scholar

Southall, Aidan, ‘Social Disorganization in Uganda: Before, during, and after Amin’, 18 J. Mod. Afr. Stud.627–56 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanik, Joseph T., El Dorado Canyon: Reagan's Undeclared War With Qaddafi (Naval Institute Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Stein, Janice Gross, ‘Reassurance in International Conflict Management’, 106 PSQ431–51 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, Paul C. (ed.), International Conflict Resolution after the Cold War (National Academy Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Stevenson, David, ‘Militarization and Diplomacy in Europe before 1914’, 22 Int. Sec.125–61 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Subedi, Surya P., Land and Maritime Zones of Peace in International Law (Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Szasz, Paul C., ‘The Security Council Starts Legislating’, 96 Am. JIL901–5 (2002).Google Scholar

Tams, Christian J., Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Alan J. P., The Struggle for Mastery in Europe (2nd edn, Clarendon Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Tschentscher, Axel, The Basic Law (Grundgesetz): The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany (May 23rd, 1949) (Jurisprudentia, 2002).Google Scholar

Tuchman, Barbara W., The Guns of August (Macmillan, 1962).Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard, The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Tulliu, Steve and Schmalberger, Thomas, Coming to Terms with Security: A Lexicon for Arms Control, Disarmament and Confidence-Building (United Nations Publication, 2004).Google Scholar

Ullmann-Margalit, Edna, The Emergence of Norms (Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Vagts, Alfred and Vagts, Detlev, ‘The Balance of Power in International Law: A History of an Idea’, 73 Am. JIL555–80 (1979).Google Scholar

Evera, Stephen, ‘The Cult of the Offensive and the Origins of the First World War’, 9 Int. Sec.58–107 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasquez, John A., The War Puzzle (Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vattel, Emer, Le Droit des Gens ou Principes de la Loi Naturelle, Appliqueé à la Conduite et aux Affaires des Nations et des Souverains (Londres, 1958) [1758].Google Scholar

Vegetius Renatus, Flavius, Epitoma Rei Militari (Clarendon Press, 2004) [390].Google Scholar

Vertzberger, Yaacov Y. I., ‘Foreign Policy Decisionmakers As Practical-Intuitive Historians: Applied History and Its Shortcomings’, 30 Int. Stud. Q.223–47 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Villiger, Mark E., Customary International Law and Treaties: A Manual on the Theory and Practice of the Interrelation of Sources (2nd edn, Kluwer Law International, 1997).Google Scholar

Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf (ed.), Völkerrecht (3rd edn, Walter de Gruyter, 2004).Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik, ‘Outside Options and the Logic of Security Council Action’, 95 Am. PSR.845–58 (2001).Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik,‘The Political Origins of the UN Security Council's Ability to Legitimize the Use of Force’, 59 Int. Org.527–57 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walters, F. P., A History of the League of Nations (Oxford University Press, 1952).Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth, ‘The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better’, 117 Adelphi Papers (1981).

Wedgwood, Ruth, ‘The Enforcement of Security Council Resolution 687: The Threat of Force Against Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction’, 92 Am. JIL724–8 (1998).Google Scholar

Weisburd, A. Mark, Use of Force: The Practice of States Since World War II (Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Weller, Marc, ‘The Rambouillet Conference on Kosovo’, 75 Int. Aff.211–51 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Nigel D. and Cryer, Robert, ‘Unilateral Enforcement of Resolution 687: A Threat Too Far?’, 29 Cal. WJIL243–83 (1999).Google Scholar

Whitton, John B., ‘The United Nations Conference on Freedom of Information and the Movement Against International Propaganda’, 43 Am. JIL73–87 (1949).Google Scholar

Whitton, John B.,‘Hostile International Propaganda and International Law’, 398 Ann. Am. Acad. P&SS14–25 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Widmer, Hans, Der Zwang im Völkerrecht (Robert Noske, 1935).Google Scholar

Wiletts, Peter, The Non-Aligned Movement: The Origins of a Third World Alliance (Nichols Pub. Co., 1978).Google Scholar

Williams, John Fischer, ‘Recent Interpretations of the Briand-Kellog Pact’, 14 Int. Aff.346–68 (1935).Google Scholar

Wilson, Andrew, ‘The Aegean Dispute’, 155 Adelphi Papers (1979).

Winfield, P. H., ‘The History of Intervention in International Law’, 3 Brit. YBIL130–49 (1922–3).Google Scholar

Wolfke, Karol, Custom in Present International Law (2nd edn, Martinus Nyhoff Publishers, 1993).Google Scholar

Wolfram, Karl, Vertrag und Spätere Praxis im Völkerrecht (Springer, 1983).Google Scholar

Woodward, Bob, Plan of Attack (Simon & Schuster, 2004).Google Scholar

Wright, Claudia, ‘Libya And The West: Headlong Into Confrontation?’, 58 Int. Aff.13–41 (1981–2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, Quincy, ‘Opinion of Commission of Jurists on Janina-Corfu Affair’, 18 Am. JIL536–44 (1924).Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy,‘The Outlawry of War’, 19 Am. JIL76–103 (1925).Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy,‘The Stimson Note of January 7, 1932’, 26 Am. JIL342–8 (1932).Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy,‘The Meaning of the Pact of Paris’, 27 Am. JIL39–61 (1933).Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy,‘The Munich Settlement and International Law’, 33 Am. JIL12–32 (1939).Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy,‘The Crime of War Mongering’, 42 Am. JIL128–36 (1948).Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy,The Role of International Law in the Elimination of War (Manchester University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy,‘The Goa Incident’, 56 Am. JIL617–32 (1962).Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy,‘The Cuban Quarantine’, 57 Am. JIL546–65 (1963).Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy,A Study of War (updated and abridged edn, University of Chicago Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Yoo, John, ‘International Law and the War on Iraq’, 97 Am. JIL563–76 (2003).Google Scholar

Young, Oran R., The Politics of Force: Bargaining During International Crises (Princeton University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Zacher, Mark M., ‘The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force’, 55 Int. Org.215–50 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zagare, Franck C. and Kilgour, D. Marc, ‘Deterrence Theory and the Spiral Model Revisited’, 10 J. Theo. P.59–87 (1998), at 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zambelli, Mirko, La Constatation des Situations de l'Article 39 de la Charte des Nations Unies par la Conseil de Sécurité: Le Champ d'Application des Pouvoirs prévus au Chapitre VII de la Charte des Nations Unies (Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 2002).Google Scholar

Zhao, Suisheng (ed.), Across the Taiwan Strait: Mainland China, Taiwan, and the 1995–1996 Crisis (Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Tim, ‘Coercive Diplomacy and Libya’, in George, Alexander L. and Simons, William E. (eds.), The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy 201–28 (Westview Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Abdulghani, J. M., Iraq & Iran: The Years of Crisis (Croom Helm, 1984).Google Scholar

Achen, Christopher H., and Snidal, Duncan, ‘Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies’, 41 World P.143–69 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acheson, Dean, Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department (Norton, 1969).Google Scholar

Akehurst, Michael, ‘The Hierarchy of Sources of International Law’, 47 Brit. YBIL273–85 (1974–5).Google Scholar

Akehurst, Michael,‘Custom as a Source of International Law’, 47 Brit. YBIL1–53 (1976).Google Scholar

Alexandrov, Stanimir A., Self-Defense Against the Use of Force in International Law (Kluwer Law International, 1996).Google Scholar

Allain, Jean and Jones, John R. W. D., ‘A Patchwork of Norms: A Commentary on the 1996 Draft Code of Crimes Against Peace and Security of Mankind’, 8 Eur. JIL100–17 (1997).Google Scholar

Amer, Ramses, ‘The United Nations’ Reactions to Foreign Military Interventions’, 31 J. Peace Res.425–44 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amin, S. H., ‘The Iran-Iraq Conflict: Legal Implications’, 31 Int. & Comp. LQ167–88 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ando, Nisukeet al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar

Anonymous, ‘Future Petroleum Provinces are Many in Gulf of Mexico-Caribbean Area’, 78 Oil & Gas J.216–26 (20 Oct. 1980).

Asrat, Belatchew, Prohibition of Force Under the UN Charter: A Study of Art. 2(4) (Iustus, 1991).Google Scholar

Athanasopoulos, Haralambos, Nuclear Disarmament in International Law (McFarland & Company, 2000).Google Scholar

Atwood, Susan J., ‘From Just War to Just Intervention’, 19 New Eng. J. Pub. Pol.55–75 (2003–4).Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law in Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, 1984).Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert and Keohane, Robert O., ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’, 38 World P.226–54 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azar, Edward E., Jureidini, Paul and McLaurin, Ronald, ‘Protracted Social Conflict: Theory and Practice in the Middle East’, 8 J. Pal. Stud.41–60 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Sydney D., ‘Nonmilitary Areas in UN Practice’, 74 Am. JIL499–524 (1980).Google Scholar

Barker, J. Craig, International Law and International Relations (Continuum, 2000).Google Scholar

Bauer, Ekkehard, ‘Ultimatum’, in Schlochauer, Hans-Jürgen (ed.), Wörterbuch des Völkerrechts 467–8 (2nd edn, De Gruyter, 1962).Google Scholar

Baxter, R. R., ‘Multilateral Treaties as Evidence of Customary International Law’, 41 Brit. YBIL275–300 (1965–6).Google Scholar

Beck, Robert J., ‘Munich's Lessons Reconsidered’, 14 Int. Sec.161–91 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bederman, David J., ‘Collective Security, Demilitarization and “Pariah” States’, 13 Eur. JIL121–38 (2002).Google Scholar

Bell, Christine, ‘Peace Agreements: Their Nature and Legal Status’, 100 Am. JIL373–412 (2006).Google Scholar

Bennett, Michael, ‘The People's Republic of China and the Use of International Law in the Spratly Islands Dispute’, 28 Stan. JIL425–50 (1992).Google Scholar

Bentwich, Norman and Martin, Andrew, A Commentary on the Charter of the United Nations (2nd edn, Routledge and Paul, 1951).Google Scholar

Bernhardt, Rudolf, ‘Interpretation in International Law’, 2 Enc. Pub. IL1416–26 (1995).Google Scholar

Beverage, Fiona, ‘The Lockerbie Affair’, 41 Int. & Comp. LQ907–20 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, William W. Jr., ‘The Corfu Channel Case (Merits)’, 43 Am. JIL558–89 (1949).Google Scholar

Blechman, Barry M. and Tamara Cofman Wittes, ‘The Threat and Use of Force in American Foreign Policy Since 1989’, in Stern, Paul C. (ed.), International Conflict Resolution after the Cold War 90–122 (National Academy Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Blix, Hans, Disarming Iraq (Pantheon Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Boczek, B. A., ‘Peace-time Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zone of Third Countries’, 19 Ocean Dev. & IL455–68 (1988).Google Scholar

Boczek, B. A.,‘Peaceful Purposes Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’, 20 Ocean Dev. & IL359–89 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodansky, Daniel, ‘Non Liquet and the Incompleteness of International Law’, in Chazournes, Laurence Boisson and Sands, Philippe (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons 153–70 (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Booth, Ken, Law, Force, and Diplomacy at Sea (Allen & Unwin, 1985).Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin, ‘The Dumbarton Oaks Conference’, 39 Am. JIL97–100 (1945).Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael, ‘Consequences of the Prohibition of the Use of Force: Comments on Arts. 49 and 70 of the ILC's Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties’, 27 ZaöRV507–19 (1967).Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael,‘Friedenssicherung und Kriegsrecht’, in Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf (ed.), Völkerrecht 589–667 (3rd edn, Walter de Gruyter, 2004).Google Scholar

Bourquin, Maurice, ‘Le Problème de La Sécurité Internationale’, 49 Rec. des Cours, vol. III, 473–542 (1934).Google Scholar

Bowett, Derek W., Self-Defence in International Law (Praeger, 1958).Google Scholar

Bowett, Derek W.,‘International Incidents: New Genre or New Delusion?’, 12 Yale JIL386–95 (1987).Google Scholar

Bracken, Paul, ‘Mobilization in the Nuclear Age’, 3 Int. Sec.74–93 (1978–9).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brecher, Michael, ‘State Behavior in International Crises: A Model’, 23 J. Conf. Resol.446–80 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brecher, Michael and Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, A Study of Crisis (University of Michigan Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breidlid, Anders, Brogger, Fredrik Chr.et al., American Culture: An Anthology of Civilization Texts (Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard (ed.), The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order (Harcourt, 1946).Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard, ‘Implications for Military Policy’, in Brodie, Bernard (ed.), The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order 70–110 (Harcourt, 1946).Google Scholar

Brosche, Harmut, Zwang Beim Abschluss Völkerrechtlicher Verträge (Duncker & Humblot, 1974).Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, International Law and the Use of Force by States (Clarendon Press, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burroughs, John, The (Il)legality of Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons: A Guide to the Historic Opinion of the International Court of Justice (Lit, 1997).Google Scholar

Butler, Nicholas Murray, Across the Busy Years: Recollections and Reflections, 2 vols. (Scribner, 1939–40).Google Scholar

Butterton, Glenn R., ‘Signals, Threats, and Deterrence: Alive and Well in the Taiwan Strait’, 47 Cath. ULR51 (1997).Google Scholar

Buzzini, Gionata Piero, ‘Les Comportements Passifs des États et leur Incidence sur la Réglementation de l'Emploi de la Force en Droit International Général’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo and Palchetti, Paolo (eds.), Customary International Law on the Use of Force: A Methodological Approach 79–117 (Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).Google Scholar

Byers, Michael, ‘Response, Taking the Law Out of International Law: A Critique of the “Iterative” Perspective’, 28 Harv. ILJ201–5 (1997).Google Scholar

Byers, Michael,Custom, Power and the Power of Rules; International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byers, Michael,‘Terrorism, the Use of Force and International Law after 11 September’, 51 Int. & Comp. LQ401–14 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byers, Michael,‘The Shifting Foundations of International Law: A Decade of Forceful Measures against Iraq’, 13 Eur. JIL21–41 (2002).Google Scholar

Byers, Michael,book review, ‘Recourse To Force: State Action Against Threats And Armed Attacks’, 97 Am. JIL721–5 (2003).Google Scholar

Cahin, Gérard, La Coutume Internationale et les Organisations Internationales: L'incidence de la Dimension Institutionelle sur le Processus Coutumier (Editions A. Pedone, 2001).Google Scholar

Calvocoressi, Peter, World Politics 1945–2000 (8th edn, Pearson Education, 2001).Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, Enzo and Paolo, Palchetti (eds.), Customary International Law on the Use of Force: A Methodological Approach (Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).Google Scholar

Carter, Ashton B. and Perry, William J., Preventive Defense: A New Security Strategy for America (Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, Self-determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio,‘Ex Iniuria Ius Oritur: Are We Moving towards International Legitimation of Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community?’, 10 Eur. JIL23–30 (1999).Google Scholar

Catley, Robert and Keliat, Makmur, Spratlys: The Dispute in the South China Sea (Ashgate, 1997).Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I. and Prescott, J. R. V., ‘Resolving Cross-Strait Relations Between China and Taiwan’, 94 Am. JIL453–77 (2000).Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram, The Cuban Missile Crisis: International Law and the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Chemillier-Gendreau, Monique, Sovereignty Over the Paracel and Spratly Islands (Kluwer Law International, 2000).Google Scholar

Cheng, Bin, ‘United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: “Instant” Customary Law?’, 5 Ind. JIL23–112 (1965).Google Scholar

Christensen, Thomas C., ‘Threats, Assurances, and the Last Chance for Peace: The Lessons of Mao's Korean War Telegrams’, 17 Int. Sec.122–54 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, Il Yung, Legal Problems Involved In The Corfu Channel Incident (E. Droz, 1959).Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R. and Lowe, A. V., The Law of the Sea (3rd edn, Manchester University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Cima, Ronald C., ‘Vietnam in 1988: The Brink of Renewal’, 29 Asian Surv.64–72 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cimbala, Stephen J., Coercive Military Strategy (Texas A&M University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald H., ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, 3 JL & Econ.1–23 (1960).Google Scholar

Coates, David and Krieger, Joel, Blair's War (Polity, 2004).Google Scholar

Collier, David and Mahoney, James, ‘Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Work’, 49 World P.56–91 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, John and Lowe, Vaughan, The Settlement of Disputes in International Law (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Corton, Olivier, ‘Breach and Evolution of Customary International Law on the Use of Force’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo and Palchetti, Paolo (eds.), Customary International Law on the Use of Force: A Methodological Approach 119–44 (Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).Google Scholar

Corton, Olivier,‘The Controversies Over the Customary Prohibition on the Use of Force’, 16 Eur. JIL803–22 (2005).Google Scholar

Crawford, James, International Law as an Open System: Selected Essays (Cameron May, 2002).Google Scholar

Crawford, James,‘Negotiating Global Security Threats in a World of Nation States: Issues and Problems of Sovereignty’, in James Crawford, International Law as an Open System: Selected Essays 95–121 (Cameron May, 2002).Google Scholar

Crawford, James,The International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Crawford, James,The Creation of States in International Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Crawford, James and Viles, Thomas, ‘International Law on a Given Day’, in Konrad Ginther et al., Völkerrecht Zwischen Normativem Anspruch und Politischer Realität: Festschrift für Karl Zemanek zum 65. Geburtstag 45–68 (Duncker & Humblot, 1994).Google Scholar

D'Amato, Anthony, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Daadler, Ivo H. and O'Hanlon, Michael E., Winning Ugly: NATO's War to Save Kosovo (Brookings Institution Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Dahm, Georg, Völkerrecht, 2 vols. (W. Kohlhammer, 1960).Google Scholar

Dahm, Georg, Delbrück, Jost and Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Völkerrecht, 2 vols. (2nd edn, de Gruyter, 1988).Google Scholar

Danilovic, Vesna, ‘Conceptual and Selection Bias Issues in Deterrence’, 45 J. Conf. Resol.97–125 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chazournes, Laurence Boisson and Sands, Philippe (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

de Gurmendi, Silva A. Fernández, ‘An Insider's View’, in Politi, Mauro and Nesi, Giuseppe (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression 175–88 (Ashgate, 2004).Google Scholar

Jong, H. G., ‘Coercion in the Conclusion of Treaties: A Consideration of Articles 51 and 52 of the Convention on the Law of Treaties’, 15 Neth. YBIL209–47 (1984).Google Scholar

Luca, Anthony R., ‘Soviet-American Politics and the Turkish Straits’, 92 PSQ503–24 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Degenhardt, Henry W., Maritime Affairs – A World Handbook: A Reference Guide to Maritime Organizations, Conventions and Disputes and to the International Politics of the Sea (Longman Group, 1985).Google Scholar

Delbrück, Jost, ‘Proportionality’, 3 Enc. Pub. IL1140–4 (1997).Google Scholar

Delbrück, Jost,‘Article 24’, in Simma, Bruno (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. I, 442–52 (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2002),Google Scholar

Derpa, Rolf M., Das Gewaltverbot der Satzung der Vereinten Nationen und die Anwendung Nichtmilitärischer Gewalt (Athenäum, 1969).Google Scholar

Desjeans, Mary and Clement, Peter, ‘Soviet Policy Toward Central America’, 36 Proc. Acad. PS223–34 (1987).Google Scholar

Despretz, Patrice, ‘Le Droit International et les Menaces d'Intervention de l'OTAN au Kosovo’, Act. Droit Int. (Nov. 1998), http://www.ridi.org/adi.

Diehl, Paul F., A Road Map to War: Territorial Dimensions of International Conflict (Vanderbilt University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Dingemann, Rüdiger, Krisenherde der Welt: Konflikte und Kriege seit 1945 (Westermann, 1996).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity (M. Nijhoff, 1989).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram,War, Aggression and Self-Defence (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorman, Andrew M. and Otte, Thomas G. (eds.), Military Intervention: From Gunboat Diplomacy to Humanitarian Intervention (Dartmouth, 1995).Google Scholar

Drekonja-Kornat, Gerhard, ‘Der Kolumbianisch-Nicaraguanische Streit um den San Andrés-Archipel’, 16 Verf. & R. Übersee (1983).Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C., ‘Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution Among Neighbors in Shasta County’, 38 Stan. LR623–87 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C.,Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes (Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., ‘Nuclear Weapons, International Law and the World Court: A Historic Encounter’, 91 Am. JIL64–75 (1997).Google Scholar

Fearon, James, ‘Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science’, 43 World P.169–95 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearon, James,Threats to Use Force: Costly Signals and Bargaining in International Crises (Berekely, 1992).Google Scholar

Fearon, James,‘Domestic Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes’, 88 Am. PSR577–92 (1994).Google Scholar

Fearon, James,‘Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands Versus Sinking Costs’, 41 J. Conf. Resol.68–90 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feinstein, Lee and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘A Duty to Prevent’, 83 F. Aff.136–51 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferencz, Benjamin B., ‘Defining Aggression: Where it Stands and Where it's Going’, 66 Am. JIL491–508 (1972).Google Scholar

Ferencz, Benjamin B.,Defining International Aggression: The Search for World Peace; A Documentary History and Analysis, 2 vols. (Oceana Publications, 1975).Google Scholar

Ferencz, Benjamin B.,‘Aggression’, 1 Enc. Pub. IL58–65 (1992).Google Scholar

Ferrell, Robert H., Peace in Their Time: The Origins of the Kellog-Briand Pact (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1952).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Sir Gerald, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Treaty Interpretation and Certain Other Treaty Points’, 28 Brit. YBIL1–28 (1951).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Malgosia A., ‘The Corfu Channel Case and the Development of International Law’, in Ando, Nisukeet al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda, vol. I, 119–46 (Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M., ‘Who Killed Article 2(4)? or: Changing Norms Governing the Use of Force by States’, 64 Am. JIL809–37 (1970).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,‘The Stealing of the Sahara’, 70 Am. JIL694–721 (1976).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,‘Of Gnats and Camels: Is there a Double Standard at the United Nations?’, 78 Am. JIL811–33 (1984).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,Nation Against Nation: What Happened to the UN Dream and What the US Can Do About It (Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,‘Legitimacy in the International System’, 82 Am. JIL705–59 (1988).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,‘Lessons of Kosovo’, 93 Am. JIL857–60 (1999).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.,‘What Happens Now? The United Nations After Iraq’, 97 Am. JIL607–20 (2003).Google Scholar

Frost, Robert, Mending Wall (Ginn and Company, 1914).Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen A., Das de Facto-Regime im Völkerrecht: Eine Untersuchung zur Rechtstellung ‘Nichtanerkannter Staaten’ und Ähnlicher Gebilde (Heymanns Verlag, 1968).Google Scholar

Gaddis, John Lewis, The Long Peace: Inquiries Into the History of the Cold War (Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Gardam, Judith, Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States (Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardiner, Leslie, The Eagle Spreads His Claws: A History of the Corfu Channel Dispute and of Albania's Relations with the West 1945–1965 (Blackwood, 1966).Google Scholar

Gardner, Richard N., ‘Neither Bush Nor the “Jurisprudes” ’, 97 Am. JIL585–90 (2003).Google Scholar

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘NATO Coercive Military Activities in the Yugoslav Crisis (1992–1999)’, 12 Eur. JIL391–435 (2001).Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara, ‘How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics’, 2 Pol. Analysis131–50 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelpi, Christopher, ‘Crime and Punishment: The Role of Norms in Crisis Bargaining’, 91 Am. PSQ339–60 (1997).Google Scholar

George, Alexander L., Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to War (United States Institute of Peace Press, 1993).Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Simons, William E. (eds.), The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy (2nd edn, Westview Press, 1994).Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Smoke, Richard, Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice (Columbia University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Gerlach, Axel, Begriff und Methoden der Intervention im Völkerrecht (Varia iuris publici, 1967).Google Scholar

Ghebali, Victor-Yves, ‘Avaritia et Ambitio dans les Relations Internationales de l'Entre-guerres: la Gestion des Conflits Internationaux par la Société des Nations’, in Porret, Michel (ed.) Guerres et Paix: Mélanges Offerts à Jena-Claude Favez 715–39 (Georg, 2000).Google Scholar

Gill, Terry D., ‘The Law of Armed Attack in the Context of the Nicaragua Case’, 1 Hague YBIL30–58 (1988).Google Scholar

Ginther, Konradet al., Völkerrecht Zwischen Normativem Anspruch und Politischer Realität: Festschrift für Karl Zemanek zum 65. Geburtstag (Duncker & Humblot, 1994).Google Scholar

Gitelson, Susan Aurelia, ‘Major Shifts in Recent Ugandan Foreign Policy’, 76 Afr. Aff.359–80 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennon, Michael J., Limits of Law, Prerogatives of Power: Interventionalism after Kosovo (Palgrave, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennon, Michael J.,‘Why the Security Council Failed’, 82 F. Aff.16–35 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennon, Michael J.,‘How International Rules Die’, 93 Geo. LJ939–91 (2005).Google Scholar

Gochman, Charles S. and Maoz, Zeev, ‘Militarized Interstate Disputes 1812–1976: Procedures, Patterns and Insights’, 28 J. Conf. Resol.585–616 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldblat, Jozef, Arms Control: The New Guide to Negotiations and Agreements (2nd edn, Sage Publications, 2002).Google Scholar

Gonsiorowski, Miroslas, ‘The Legal Meaning of the Pact for the Renunciation of War’, 30 Am. PSR.653–80 (1936).Google Scholar

Goodrich, Leland M., Hambro, Edvard and Simmons, Anne Patricia, Charter of the United Nations: Commentary and Documents (3rd edn, Columbia University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Gordon, Edward, ‘Article 2(4) in Historical Context’, 10 Yale JIL271–8 (1985).Google Scholar

Gray, Christine, ‘Bosnia and Herzegovina: Civil War or Inter-State Conflict? Characterization and Consequences’, 67 Brit. YBIL155–97 (1996).Google Scholar

Gray, Christine,‘The Use and Abuse of the International Court of Justice: Cases Concerning the Use of Force After Nicaragua’, 14 Eur. JIL867–905 (2003).Google Scholar

Gray, Christine,International Law and the Use of Force (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S., Military Strategy (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher, ‘International Law and the United States Air Operation Against Libya’, 89 WVa LR933–60 (1986–7).Google Scholar

Grey, Lord Edward, Twenty-five Years: 1892–1916, 2 vols. (Frederick A. Stokes Company, 1925)Google Scholar

Gross, Leo, ‘The Dispute Between Greece and Turkey Concerning the Continental Shelf in the Aegean’, 71 Am. JIL31–59 (1977).Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, The Law of War and Peace (Clarendon Press (1925) [1625].Google Scholar